Status: 0/unconfirmed, in memory pool, broadcast through 5 node(s)
Date: 12-Aug-17 16:30
To: Romano donation addie VftnVwpiUx2jb2vL1MBQYe8s17YYKqQZER
Debit: -1000.00000000 VIA
Transaction fee: -0.00111100 VIA
Net amount: -1000.00111100 VIA
Transaction ID: 91474d87c2929e54607b7acdb513af47a07eeca8b4db55f54d1de978ab36a214
Output index: 0
$1,110 value at time sent, many thanks for all the effort!
https://chainz.cryptoid.info/via/address.dws?VftnVwpiUx2jb2vL1MBQYe8s17YYKqQZER.htmYou're a nice guy
By the way Otoh, I remember you mentioned that you might be able to get Viacoin into the Chinese exchanges, how's that going ?
Ah yes, many thanks for the reminder, it was this post, I can't remember if I asked them about adding VIAcoin back then but will do so now anyway, finger's crossed:
btw, I heard from my BTCC contact yesterday that they'll be adding DASH and some other Alts in a few months, I must ask them to make sure that VIA is on the list.
"Hi Otoh,
I apologize for the late reply. We haven't introduced DASH and the other alts on our exchange, but we're planning to do so over the next months. I'll let you know once we do.
...."
Edit, just checked, I had asked them back then as they'd asked which I'd be able to do some Alt market making on when they listed a few & I've now sent a reminder.
Thanks for the efforts Otoh!
For anyone new to crypto (or "Technical Analysis" guys)
BTCC is a Chinese Exchange
https://www.btcc.comI have to feeling a lot of people don't get this, but getting added to BTCC would be a
huge deal. It will probably gets more attention than the Segwit adoption and activation.
And this is market making
https://youtu.be/Guqs3eOgm6o china alt big market：
bter.com
jubi.com
yunbi.com
yuanbao.com
plus.btcchina.com(aka btcc.com)
btc38.com(fail)
Another chinese exchange with Polo-like volume for some alts is:
https://szzc.com/The chinese usually demand bribery money for listing small coins.
Maybe its time to establish a token-based voting system in VIA where the owners of coins can vote for or against proposals (like in Dash), but rather having their vote weighted by the balance of their accounts,
if the tokens are still there when proposal deadline ends.
(exchange accounts or tokens which are in the property of exchanges should however be denied any voting powers, and for various reasons)
We really should think about introducing a constant, self-sustaining funding mechanism in VIA, by creating a VIA treasury fund.
It could be done by introducing a tax on miners, about say 20%. This way miners would receive 80% and the treasury 20% of the block reward.
If need be, we could extend maximum supply size to 25,000,000 or even 30,000,000 coins (or something in-between), and thereby increasing block reward, so the miners wouldn't get hurt too much.
Indirectly miners would profit too, by price increases related to a well-funded treasury able to fund the forthcoming of the project in many ways.
95% of all the coins suffer badly from lack of funding, because ultimately every third-party implementation or integration costs a lot of money.
But many projects seem not to realize or simply deny it...
Not to mention the urgently needed bribe money to buy away most resistance, wherever encountered.
(me han dicho que eres español, soy "noob")
