Pages:
Author

Topic: [ANN] [VNL] Vanillacoin Beta Pre-Release - page 12. (Read 48245 times)

hero member
Activity: 840
Merit: 500
December 17, 2014, 06:46:57 PM
cpu algo have absolute  fair ?
sr. member
Activity: 350
Merit: 250
December 17, 2014, 11:39:49 AM
OK, the test network is still working as it should. I am fine tuning the difficulty adjustment algorithms through simulation to address some minor issues regarding block generation time.

We will start testing soon. I think most people will be pleased with how fairly I've made solo mining distribution.

I am going to get some rest and let the network continue to run and gather statistics.

Thank you for your support.
we are waiting your good news dev , thanks the hard work
sr. member
Activity: 596
Merit: 251
December 17, 2014, 06:23:46 AM
OK, the test network is still working as it should. I am fine tuning the difficulty adjustment algorithms through simulation to address some minor issues regarding block generation time.

We will start testing soon. I think most people will be pleased with how fairly I've made solo mining distribution.

I am going to get some rest and let the network continue to run and gather statistics.

Thank you for your support.
legendary
Activity: 2703
Merit: 1179
Reflinks und User die solche posten sind Scheisse
December 17, 2014, 04:18:52 AM
Goodmorning all! This is better than reading the morning paper :-)

You're right.
hero member
Activity: 886
Merit: 504
December 17, 2014, 04:14:10 AM
Goodmorning all! This is better than reading the morning paper :-)
hero member
Activity: 636
Merit: 500
December 16, 2014, 07:19:19 PM
I hope the relaunch will go well. The Whirpool Proof-of-Work algorithm is interesting and the  Proof-of-Stake with 0.6% interest rate is enough.
Lets hope he have also fixed the program crashing. I like CPU mining but its hard to make it fair to everybody. I hope people will give him a fair chance to launche the coin. After that it woukld be great to see if he have any ideas how he want to use this coin. 
hero member
Activity: 636
Merit: 500
December 16, 2014, 06:30:39 PM

OMG => An exclamation of shock or surprise, often used repeatedly by stupid people who are shocked and surprised by almost everything and insert it into conversations whenever possible
hero member
Activity: 636
Merit: 500
legendary
Activity: 3164
Merit: 1003
December 16, 2014, 04:26:04 PM
OMG
hero member
Activity: 636
Merit: 500
December 16, 2014, 04:22:55 PM
yes it is always right to ask questions but when presented with factual answers we don't need to keep repeating what amount to accusations of dishonesty.

Open source software development is cool because it allows developers to add on each others work and we keep moving forward.  People take parts of code from all sorts of places to incorporate into their wallets.  

I think people mistake phrases like "engineered from the ground up" to mean "I coded this whole thing from scratch".   Personally I dislike phrases similar to that for that very reason.

Anyway.  I love participating in new coins and I am not concerned at all about being "scammed" because I would not let myself be.  These people aren't asking for your life savings just a little bit of processing power which you are voluntarily giving to them.

I agree with you Digithusiast that I hope John will be trustworthy.
I love participating in new coins too Jookly. Thats why i'm here.  Smiley But when I saw a closed wallet, no confg file to gpu mine to, an algorithm that everyone can mine and more I started thinking. ( I was scammed so many times before sending my hash into the dev pocket ) He has a closed wallet. He had many forks. ok Im patient. But adding all the things that were going on, I started thinking that he could be mining at high hash getting many coin to dump while we have low hash and very little coins with a known algorithm. And that's why I said scam alert, not it's a scam. If anything, he should call this whirl-r or something like that. Saying that he forked it with whirl. Now that would be cool.  Smiley

@tbearhere There must be something damaged in your head. You are shouting scam just because the algo is same. All coins are scams if that is true. Even bitcoin. So your big letters are just making people not to trust you with whatever you are writing. Use that word when its needed and not when you want.

You were just advertising the other thread which is stupid thing to do.
>You are shouting scam< nope scam alert. >Use that word when its needed< I'll use that word when ever I want. >You were just advertising the other thread which is stupid thing to do.< nope just proving that that algorithm already exists.  You remind me of the man walking across the street ready to get hit by a truck, I shout out, lookout theres a truck coming and the man says mind your own business ....................................................bam!!

But there is no truck because the coin is not launched yet. You just wanted to advertise a dying coin that you are a bagholder in. That is awful and disgusting to me. Wait until you have all info and most people are not concerned with your bags. How would you feel if you were a dev and someone like you shows up and started writing scam alert in big red letters. Think about that. There is no coin yet and there is no scam and no truck. Give him a chance to prove himself before you diss him.
legendary
Activity: 3164
Merit: 1003
December 16, 2014, 03:05:42 PM
yes it is always right to ask questions but when presented with factual answers we don't need to keep repeating what amount to accusations of dishonesty.

Open source software development is cool because it allows developers to add on each others work and we keep moving forward.  People take parts of code from all sorts of places to incorporate into their wallets.  

I think people mistake phrases like "engineered from the ground up" to mean "I coded this whole thing from scratch".   Personally I dislike phrases similar to that for that very reason.

Anyway.  I love participating in new coins and I am not concerned at all about being "scammed" because I would not let myself be.  These people aren't asking for your life savings just a little bit of processing power which you are voluntarily giving to them.

I agree with you Digithusiast that I hope John will be trustworthy.
I love participating in new coins too Jookly. Thats why i'm here.  Smiley But when I saw a closed wallet, no confg file to gpu mine to, an algorithm that everyone can mine and more I started thinking. ( I was scammed so many times before sending my hash into the dev pocket ) He has a closed wallet. He had many forks. ok Im patient. But adding all the things that were going on, I started thinking that he could be mining at high hash getting many coin to dump while we have low hash and very little coins with a known algorithm. And that's why I said scam alert, not it's a scam. If anything, he should call this whirl-r or something like that. Saying that he forked it with whirl. Now that would be cool.  Smiley

@tbearhere There must be something damaged in your head. You are shouting scam just because the algo is same. All coins are scams if that is true. Even bitcoin. So your big letters are just making people not to trust you with whatever you are writing. Use that word when its needed and not when you want.

You were just advertising the other thread which is stupid thing to do.
>You are shouting scam< nope scam alert. >Use that word when its needed< I'll use that word when ever I want. >You were just advertising the other thread which is stupid thing to do.< nope just proving that that algorithm already exists.  You remind me of the man walking across the street ready to get hit by a truck, I shout out, lookout theres a truck coming and the man says mind your own business ....................................................bam!!
hero member
Activity: 636
Merit: 500
December 16, 2014, 11:50:16 AM
yes it is always right to ask questions but when presented with factual answers we don't need to keep repeating what amount to accusations of dishonesty.

Open source software development is cool because it allows developers to add on each others work and we keep moving forward.  People take parts of code from all sorts of places to incorporate into their wallets.  

I think people mistake phrases like "engineered from the ground up" to mean "I coded this whole thing from scratch".   Personally I dislike phrases similar to that for that very reason.

Anyway.  I love participating in new coins and I am not concerned at all about being "scammed" because I would not let myself be.  These people aren't asking for your life savings just a little bit of processing power which you are voluntarily giving to them.

I agree with you Digithusiast that I hope John will be trustworthy.
I love participating in new coins too Jookly. Thats why i'm here.  Smiley But when I saw a closed wallet, no confg file to gpu mine to, an algorithm that everyone can mine and more I started thinking. ( I was scammed so many times before sending my hash into the dev pocket ) He has a closed wallet. He had many forks. ok Im patient. But adding all the things that were going on, I started thinking that he could be mining at high hash getting many coin to dump while we have low hash and very little coins with a known algorithm. And that's why I said scam alert, not it's a scam. If anything, he should call this whirl-r or something like that. Saying that he forked it with whirl. Now that would be cool.  Smiley

@tbearhere There must be something damaged in your head. You are shouting scam just because the algo is same. All coins are scams if that is true. Even bitcoin. So your big letters are just making people not to trust you with whatever you are writing. Use that word when its needed and not when you want.

You were just advertising the other thread which is stupid thing to do.
sr. member
Activity: 596
Merit: 251
December 16, 2014, 11:46:00 AM
I have finalized the algorithm that levels the playing field for miners and will make distribution fair.

The consensus driven algorithm will make an ASIC, FPGA or GPU equal to a CPU. It will also make a 64-way multi-core processor like a single CPU. It will make 8 threads (cores) like a single CPU. A core goal of this project was energy efficiency. I have achieved random blind luck mining using only simple technics unrelated to hashing.

I have a test network running that has proven to evenly distribute coins across old laptops, mac mini's and a new macbook pro (12 times the CPU power) using this new algorithm.

I need to get some rest but when I wake I will upload test network binaries and the launch date stands.

Thank you for your support.

You should upload the source so we can try to circumvent it.

After a successful launch I will start committing the *.cpp files to github. You cannot circumvent the consensus unless you can control 51% of the total network hash rate. With this design you can never control 51% of the network hash rate or even a fraction of that from a single peer. When pooled mining is supported even a pool cannot obtain 51% by network consensus.

Good night and thank you for your support.
hero member
Activity: 673
Merit: 500
December 16, 2014, 11:40:55 AM
I have finalized the algorithm that levels the playing field for miners and will make distribution fair.

The consensus driven algorithm will make an ASIC, FPGA or GPU equal to a CPU. It will also make a 64-way multi-core processor like a single CPU. It will make 8 threads (cores) like a single CPU. A core goal of this project was energy efficiency. I have achieved random blind luck mining using only simple technics unrelated to hashing.

I have a test network running that has proven to evenly distribute coins across old laptops, mac mini's and a new macbook pro (12 times the CPU power) using this new algorithm.

I need to get some rest but when I wake I will upload test network binaries and the launch date stands.

Thank you for your support.

You should upload the source so we can try to circumvent it.
legendary
Activity: 1131
Merit: 1007
December 16, 2014, 11:34:38 AM
yes it is always right to ask questions but when presented with factual answers we don't need to keep repeating what amount to accusations of dishonesty.

Open source software development is cool because it allows developers to add on each others work and we keep moving forward.  People take parts of code from all sorts of places to incorporate into their wallets.  

I think people mistake phrases like "engineered from the ground up" to mean "I coded this whole thing from scratch".   Personally I dislike phrases similar to that for that very reason.

Anyway.  I love participating in new coins and I am not concerned at all about being "scammed" because I would not let myself be.  These people aren't asking for your life savings just a little bit of processing power which you are voluntarily giving to them.

I agree with you Digithusiast that I hope John will be trustworthy.
I love participating in new coins too Jookly. Thats why i'm here.  Smiley But when I saw a closed wallet, no confg file to gpu mine to, an algorithm that everyone can mine and more I started thinking. ( I was scammed so many times before sending my hash into the dev pocket ) He has a closed wallet. He had many forks. ok Im patient. But adding all the things that were going on, I started thinking that he could be mining at high hash getting many coin to dump while we have low hash and very little coins with a known algorithm. And that's why I said scam alert, not it's a scam. If anything, he should call this whirl-r or something like that. Saying that he forked it with whirl. Now that would be cool.  Smiley

Ya I do understand your general concerns, and there is no way to say what will happen, I guess we will have to wait and see.  A fair distribution is an ideal that coins strive to achieve and so I think it will be difficult for a group to ever agree on a perfect distribution but who knows maybe this coin will be a step in a positive direction.  Either way I'm going to have some for my collection Smiley
sr. member
Activity: 596
Merit: 251
December 16, 2014, 11:33:54 AM
I have finalized the algorithm that levels the playing field for miners and will make distribution fair.

The consensus driven algorithm will make an ASIC, FPGA or GPU equal to a CPU. It will also make a 64-way multi-core processor like a single CPU. It will make 8 threads (cores) like a single CPU. A core goal of this project was energy efficiency. I have achieved random blind luck mining using only simple technics unrelated to hashing.

I have a test network running that has proven to evenly distribute coins across old laptops, mac mini's and a new macbook pro (12 times the CPU power) using this new algorithm.

I need to get some rest but when I wake I will upload test network binaries and the launch date stands.

Thank you for your support.
legendary
Activity: 3164
Merit: 1003
December 16, 2014, 11:28:16 AM
yes it is always right to ask questions but when presented with factual answers we don't need to keep repeating what amount to accusations of dishonesty.

Open source software development is cool because it allows developers to add on each others work and we keep moving forward.  People take parts of code from all sorts of places to incorporate into their wallets.  

I think people mistake phrases like "engineered from the ground up" to mean "I coded this whole thing from scratch".   Personally I dislike phrases similar to that for that very reason.

Anyway.  I love participating in new coins and I am not concerned at all about being "scammed" because I would not let myself be.  These people aren't asking for your life savings just a little bit of processing power which you are voluntarily giving to them.

I agree with you Digithusiast that I hope John will be trustworthy.
I love participating in new coins too Jookly. Thats why i'm here.  Smiley But when I saw a closed wallet, no confg file to gpu mine to, an algorithm that everyone can mine and more I started thinking. ( I was scammed so many times before sending my hash into the dev pocket ) He has a closed wallet. He had many forks. ok Im patient. But adding all the things that were going on, I started thinking that he could be mining at high hash getting many coin to dump while we have low hash and very little coins with a known algorithm. And that's why I said scam alert, not it's a scam. If anything, he should call this whirl-r or something like that. Saying that he forked it with whirl. Now that would be cool.  Smiley
legendary
Activity: 3164
Merit: 1003
December 16, 2014, 11:01:37 AM
Well, tbearhere is right there are questionmarks about what is said and presented by John.
Maybe he is a bit of a good but sloppy professor. I mean sloppy by having Libcoin as name in the wallet (even having Libcoin in the image in post 1 of this thread),
and running in all these startup problems after 1 year of working on it, is a bit remarkable too,
as also would be forgetting to mention his algo is based on an existing algo and not build from scratch.
As said, I hope John will not let us down and turns out to be trustworthy.

Thank you Digithusiast.
legendary
Activity: 1131
Merit: 1007
December 16, 2014, 10:59:58 AM
yes it is always right to ask questions but when presented with factual answers we don't need to keep repeating what amount to accusations of dishonesty.

Open source software development is cool because it allows developers to add on each others work and we keep moving forward.  People take parts of code from all sorts of places to incorporate into their wallets.  

I think people mistake phrases like "engineered from the ground up" to mean "I coded this whole thing from scratch".   Personally I dislike phrases similar to that for that very reason.

Anyway.  I love participating in new coins and I am not concerned at all about being "scammed" because I would not let myself be.  These people aren't asking for your life savings just a little bit of processing power which you are voluntarily giving to them.

I agree with you Digithusiast that I hope John will be trustworthy.
sr. member
Activity: 294
Merit: 250
December 16, 2014, 10:59:09 AM
I believe, most important thing in this coin was difficulty algo, ie - everyone gets same chances of mining. (I read the white-paper BTW)
Correct me if I'm wrong, but  I think dev meant to make same chances for mining with gpu, i7, i3 or pentium 4...
Implement it in sha256 and asic will be same as cpu for btc mining.

EDIT: about start-up problems - as a programmer I can say that it's nearly impossible to predict all real-life problems, especially if there are 100's of independent participants.
Pages:
Jump to: