Hi Everyone,
I understand there is some frustration regarding development of new features, I'd like to take a moment to explain a bit about that.
We are trying to avoid implementing hastily developed features like other coins, which is why we proceeded carefully in regards to Anon. I'm quite pleased with the plan that is coming together and I believe there will be very big and happy news for all of you this week on that front.
In regards to registering the foundation, I understand that to those with more of a technical background the benefits of this may not be clear, but in my opinion is it key to us breaking out of the altcoin market and gaining actual mainstream acceptance. All of the pieces are now in place, all we need to do is see this through as a community and our recovery will be complete.
I'll also take this opportunity to remind you that this coin belongs to you the community. We aren't like other coins. Responsibility in WhiteCoin's future rests with all of us equally. Given the history of WhiteCoin, the entire point of the foundation is meant to be that if you aren't satisfied with current operations, you have a means to participate in its improvement.
My role has always been to facilitate the transfer of control from the old dev to the community. That means when we deliver things like logo contests, it's at the community's request. We offered this conceptual logo six weeks ago but there was some concern in the community that we were making decisions without giving people a chance to have their say, which is why we did the contest to confirm it.
In two months a great deal of work has been done, and I believe the next two we'll see even more. But that depends upon continued involvement by people liike you.
Best regards,
Chris
I agree things shouldn't be implemented hastily, especially things like anon/whiteout. But my main concern is there are
no updates whatsoever on the technical development of the coin. All the talk is about the foundation and registering it, but not a single word from the development department. We have nothing to build a hype on future features. Who are the developers at this moment, and what are they working on right now?
We have a new logo for what, two weeks now? Shouldn't the wallet be among the first things to be updated with this new and improved design?
I'm still holding on to my WC, but my patience is wearing thin. I don't come here as often as I used to, and my focus has shifted to other coins. I don't want to take my losses and cash out, because I still think this coin has lots of potential.
This is precisely what i was talking about before. If you sit there debating and planning too long, the hype starts to get old and you missed the train. We need to pull full steam ahead on this hype because i believe the anon hype is actually one of the only hypes that is actually going to be based on feature that some people find essential in the coin.
Whiteout needs to have a white paper asap. A sister coin could work out well and be the best solution because i do believe mogonzo in correct about breaking out of the alt market. We need to appeal to mainstream users and those that are not sucked into the circle jerk investing of the alt markets.
However time is of the essence. The issue comes down to funding again. The sister coin should be born with 330M 300 directly claimed by wc owners. 30 Million held by foundation in a transparent public wallet that will over time fund full development of whiteout. Lead devs and lead community managers should be paid % according to successful projects completed.
When i suggested the name whiteout originally i had more a snow blizzard kind of image in mind rather than a bottle of typed correction fluid
but hey let's get whiteout going either way asap. The void idea is also excellent. Let's get mindfox back now whiteout will have some funds to pay him with, can't expect top level developers to work for nothing.
There is no reason not to push full speed ahead with this now before some coin really does pull of a great anon system and the party is over.
