[ANN] (WC) | WhiteCoin | BIG NEWS: Foundation, investors & more ☯ whitecoin.info - page 94.

Kestrel71

sr. member

Activity: 266

Merit: 250

Quote from: surfguy72 on June 20, 2014, 10:57:50 AM

It takes time when dealing with a gov't but, i'm encouraged by the fact they are listening, and seem to want to help us get registered. This will be a first.

Ever heard of emunie? it wont be a 1st at all. Unless you mean a 1st in Canada.

Just to make sure I have the right guy, mindfox is also a dev/helper of crypt coin isn't he?

As for destroying coins, it doesn't work so don't even bother with such a dumb idea guys.

Still people asking for donations and still no action but talk and supposed talk of registration. Where is this 3rd wallet devs were going on about as well?

eddienova

newbie

Activity: 42

Merit: 0

Quote from: rod on June 20, 2014, 04:00:08 AM

Quote from: jonni21 on June 19, 2014, 10:16:16 AM

Quote from: surfguy72 on June 19, 2014, 10:09:53 AM

Quote from: eddienova on June 19, 2014, 09:40:06 AM

Quote from: rod on June 19, 2014, 05:38:35 AM

Hello everyone,

this is my first post ever so be gentle.

Id like you to give you an idea how to turn Whitecoin in special crypto. Idea is to make one additional feature in wallet, you can name it void or something like that. Sender and receiver are agreed by their choice to turn function void in transaction. The void function is to keep crypto till the moment when sender and receiver are agreed to let money out of void when all condition for payment are met. Or you can have option to authorize third party for void payment. This primary idea for additional wallet function and making wallet better. Im sure that this addition will make this crypto a way better and functional then others.

Thank you and donations are welcome.

Brilliant.

So if i'm understanding, its digital escrow. User 1 and User 2 want to do a transaction. User 2 sends user 1 the "void" address for escrow, and until both user 1 and user 2 send signals, the funds remain in "the void."

I love it.

I'd like to add another idea to this feature. So the funds are sitting in escrow and neither user can agree on the services being completed, or, goods recieved, whatever. So user 1 and user 2 then agree to disagree, but then move to picking a 3rd party to act as arbitor. User 1 and user 2 in their wallets select "arbitration" and enter the persons email,id or wallet or something. User 3 (the agreed arbitor of user 1 and user 2) then has control of the funds and can resolve the issue hopefully. It takes both user 1 and user 2 agreeing exactly on the same arbitor for the keys to be released.

I think the Foundation can act as an arbitrator. Another idea is to have a rating system. The more successful deals, the higher the rating.

Dear Whitecoiners,

thank you for your suggestions and donation of 3000 WC.

Reason for sharing idea with this community was our dedication and faith in community itself as a holder and supporter of a coin. Im here from start and I also want to see shining from Whitecoin.

I know how much idea like this worth I hope that you know too. On purpose, I was giving you just a glimpse of idea to see if there will be some effort in fruitful discussions to develop seed idea and hopefully to see that community itself develop this idea to stage that will be implemented and that will be credited to whole community. Also I needed to see is there a cryptovirtue in developing team and that is speed and patience, when you use first and when the other is wisdom.

Its not uncommon in world of science, art or any area of human spirit that many people develop same or similar idea in same time. Thanks to surfguy72 we see that similar idea are in developing stage at our fellowcoiner Blackcoin team. It has brilliant website, the one I would like to see as a image of any serious coin, good support, good developing team and most important that they develop new and practical ideas.

That is what our community should do and we have to look up at fellow Blackcoiners. If they develop their solution I don’t see any reson why we don’t develop ours. From that, on the end, best idea will be overwhelm all coins, future coins and present.

From this point I count on community and WFC to give a hard push to develop coin in a more practical way.

Thank you

If the WCF is the 3rd party arbitor of contested void transactions, perhaps void transactions should have a fee attached to them, like .1% or more (certainly more merchant-friendly than PayPal's 5%), to cover foundation costs of managing arbitration.

vleroybrown

hero member

Activity: 1223

Merit: 506

This is who we are.

What is with the name? Is the impassive on blanco or homes?

blitzkitten

sr. member

Activity: 483

Merit: 250

Quote from: CryptoSEO on June 20, 2014, 05:58:57 PM

Quote from: blitzkitten on June 20, 2014, 04:24:55 PM

So I really can't see how burning or reducing coins in circulation being a positive thing, it seems more likely to me that it would negatively impact the price of the coin..

reason being that say you reduce the amount of coins by 90%, price of coin does jump up 10 fold due to 1/10th supply, nothing is worth anymore but I think people would be more inclined to sell because it appears that 'the price is good, i'll be ahead' pushing prices lower.

potentially it could bring more attention but I see it more likely that it would just create more sell orders and reduce value further.

I think we really need to be promoting the concept of WCF becoming a legitimized enterprise, the credibility that brings is fantastic and fundamentally lack of legitimacy is the Achilles heal of the crypto world. Once legitimized WC becomes more than a speculative trading option and can be seen much more as legal tender.

WC FTW

- The WCF would be an official Foundation in Canada, awaiting some updates from Mogonzo on that. This then can also be used for Escrow Service(s) and so much more... very exciting opportunities here

- I really like the sister coin idea, that way WhiteCoin can stay transparent with WhiteOut (Privacy Coin) being only available through WC...

- Bring real business to WhiteCoin ofc is a priority

- As time permits, Whitecoin.info will have a full facelift for its landing page, we are working hard on this!

Yeah that's it, once Field Marshall Mogonzo has the Foundation sorted, theres a real chance for legitimacy and businesses to get involved.

It's the most professional action i've seen taken on a crypto and I like it

CryptoSEO

full member

Activity: 182

Merit: 100

Quote from: blitzkitten on June 20, 2014, 04:24:55 PM

So I really can't see how burning or reducing coins in circulation being a positive thing, it seems more likely to me that it would negatively impact the price of the coin..

reason being that say you reduce the amount of coins by 90%, price of coin does jump up 10 fold due to 1/10th supply, nothing is worth anymore but I think people would be more inclined to sell because it appears that 'the price is good, i'll be ahead' pushing prices lower.

potentially it could bring more attention but I see it more likely that it would just create more sell orders and reduce value further.

I think we really need to be promoting the concept of WCF becoming a legitimized enterprise, the credibility that brings is fantastic and fundamentally lack of legitimacy is the Achilles heal of the crypto world. Once legitimized WC becomes more than a speculative trading option and can be seen much more as legal tender.

WC FTW

- The WCF would be an official Foundation in Canada, awaiting some updates from Mogonzo on that. This then can also be used for Escrow Service(s) and so much more... very exciting opportunities here

- I really like the sister coin idea, that way WhiteCoin can stay transparent with WhiteOut (Privacy Coin) being only available through WC...

- Bring real business to WhiteCoin ofc is a priority

- As time permits, Whitecoin.info will have a full facelift for its landing page, we are working hard on this!

blitzkitten

sr. member

Activity: 483

Merit: 250

So I really can't see how burning or reducing coins in circulation being a positive thing, it seems more likely to me that it would negatively impact the price of the coin..

reason being that say you reduce the amount of coins by 90%, price of coin does jump up 10 fold due to 1/10th supply, nothing is worth anymore but I think people would be more inclined to sell because it appears that 'the price is good, i'll be ahead' pushing prices lower.

potentially it could bring more attention but I see it more likely that it would just create more sell orders and reduce value further.

I think we really need to be promoting the concept of WCF becoming a legitimized enterprise, the credibility that brings is fantastic and fundamentally lack of legitimacy is the Achilles heal of the crypto world. Once legitimized WC becomes more than a speculative trading option and can be seen much more as legal tender.

WC FTW

surfguy72

hero member

Activity: 672

Merit: 500

Quote from: WhiteCoinJesus on June 20, 2014, 12:06:22 PM

Are you looking for this one ?

http://themeforest.net/item/brooklyn-creative-one-page-multipurpose-theme/6221179

Haha, i think thats the one.

Good Work!

WhiteCoinJesus

member

Activity: 84

Merit: 10

Are you looking for this one ?

http://themeforest.net/item/brooklyn-creative-one-page-multipurpose-theme/6221179

surfguy72

hero member

Activity: 672

Merit: 500

Quote from: RJF on June 20, 2014, 11:29:30 AM

Quote from: piotrek on June 19, 2014, 04:31:42 PM

Here are some ideas that could attract more investors and the reasoning behind it. I'll call it Ownskis Expeto Auctus

Reduction to 3 Million Market Cap (100 to 1 ratio) This will create less coins but increase the value and scarcity which investors like (DRK,CINNI,etc) So if you have 1,000WC right now it would become 10WC. This would also increase the price to reflect that (130sat=13,000sat)
Website facelift The current websites need a major facelift. The WCF foundation index page looks like a clown show, no theme or consistency (very bad) I would recommend using some of the WCF BTC funds to pay for a professional to redo it. It would be money very well spent.
Facebook/Twitter/Reddit Marketing This would also require BTC funds from the WCF bank but would be a nescassary expense to help build up the community. Daily advertising could be bought for a mere $5 a day for each venue. I use social media marketing for my business and it is very successful. I can't stress it enough.
Whiteout Anon feature This is a good idea but should be carefully implemented. Whitecoin took its biggest hits when the block chain forked and/or had security problems. If it can be professionally integrated and tested before release, it could be the holy grail for the community.

Reduction: No to reduction of coins, it only works in special cases. I would think this coin would be widely adopted for its features, not its rarity.

Website: YES, YES, YES to Website "facelift" much needed!!!

Facebook etc: Marketing? Absolutely!!!!!

Whiteout: Agree, absolutely on ALL points in this item...

Regarding the site... I'm actively pushing one of our bounties. We are in need of a good Wordpress template. The layout we are looking for is similar to some of the sites you've seen for sure. Please reach out to your contacts and see if we can find someone. Once we have template... the PR team can run with a new look.

FYI: I tweeted this morning and its already hit about 10,000 followers.

RJF

hero member

Activity: 616

Merit: 500

Online since '89...

Quote from: piotrek on June 19, 2014, 04:31:42 PM

Here are some ideas that could attract more investors and the reasoning behind it. I'll call it Ownskis Expeto Auctus

Reduction to 3 Million Market Cap (100 to 1 ratio) This will create less coins but increase the value and scarcity which investors like (DRK,CINNI,etc) So if you have 1,000WC right now it would become 10WC. This would also increase the price to reflect that (130sat=13,000sat)
Website facelift The current websites need a major facelift. The WCF foundation index page looks like a clown show, no theme or consistency (very bad) I would recommend using some of the WCF BTC funds to pay for a professional to redo it. It would be money very well spent.
Facebook/Twitter/Reddit Marketing This would also require BTC funds from the WCF bank but would be a nescassary expense to help build up the community. Daily advertising could be bought for a mere $5 a day for each venue. I use social media marketing for my business and it is very successful. I can't stress it enough.
Whiteout Anon feature This is a good idea but should be carefully implemented. Whitecoin took its biggest hits when the block chain forked and/or had security problems. If it can be professionally integrated and tested before release, it could be the holy grail for the community.

Reduction: No to reduction of coins, it only works in special cases. I would think this coin would be widely adopted for its features, not its rarity.

Website: YES, YES, YES to Website "facelift" much needed!!!

Facebook etc: Marketing? Absolutely!!!!!

Whiteout: Agree, absolutely on ALL points in this item...

surfguy72

hero member

Activity: 672

Merit: 500

Quote from: tevayo on June 20, 2014, 11:12:04 AM

Quote from: surfguy72 on June 20, 2014, 10:57:50 AM

Quote from: tevayo on June 20, 2014, 10:42:45 AM

Quote from: piotrek on June 19, 2014, 04:31:42 PM

Quote from: Ownski on June 18, 2014, 10:56:27 AM

Here are some ideas that could attract more investors and the reasoning behind it. I'll call it Ownskis Expeto Auctus

Reduction to 3 Million Market Cap (100 to 1 ratio) This will create less coins but increase the value and scarcity which investors like (DRK,CINNI,etc) So if you have 1,000WC right now it would become 10WC. This would also increase the price to reflect that (130sat=13,000sat)
Website facelift The current websites need a major facelift. The WCF foundation index page looks like a clown show, no theme or consistency (very bad) I would recommend using some of the WCF BTC funds to pay for a professional to redo it. It would be money very well spent.
Facebook/Twitter/Reddit Marketing This would also require BTC funds from the WCF bank but would be a nescassary expense to help build up the community. Daily advertising could be bought for a mere $5 a day for each venue. I use social media marketing for my business and it is very successful. I can't stress it enough.
Whiteout Anon feature This is a good idea but should be carefully implemented. Whitecoin took its biggest hits when the block chain forked and/or had security problems. If it can be professionally integrated and tested before release, it could be the holy grail for the community.

First, the only thing keeping me with is I can be WC millionaire. 3M and I am out.
Second, the phase of buy and wait for hype is done. IMO we should consider real steps like registered organization, wc kickstarter, charity funds, payment processor, services etc.

We hold several million WC and I must say that I think exactly what piotrek. So far neither had raised me to sell because I believe in this community, DEVs design and the price is dirt cheap, I understand that I may seem 300,000,000 WCs many anyone and also whenever a currency does that, the market takes it as an attempt to grasp and often fails.
That said without offense, if coins cover is reduced, probably sell.
I think that we should continue as before, try to gradually enter WC is more in society and the price increase will follow.
Greetings.

Currently Mogonzo is working to do just that, register like a real organization. The country of registration will be Canada, which I think is a prime choice. Using his own time and resources, he's working with various departments. It takes time when dealing with a gov't but, i'm encouraged by the fact they are listening, and seem to want to help us get registered. This will be a first.

I agree to all the initiatives that are being taken and I intend to be a long term investor (maybe buy a few million more), I have no hurry.
I just do not approve of (although most is to decide), is the reduction of exchange.
This community has proven to be strong, we must continue as usual and not worry so much about the price.

IMHO I can't see us reducing the number of coins through a ratio change. Some of the other ideas about burning coins, companion coin, etc. theres some good stuff to be found in those ideas. Again IMHO

tevayo

hero member

Activity: 620

Merit: 500

Quote from: surfguy72 on June 20, 2014, 10:57:50 AM

Quote from: tevayo on June 20, 2014, 10:42:45 AM

Quote from: piotrek on June 19, 2014, 04:31:42 PM

Quote from: Ownski on June 18, 2014, 10:56:27 AM

Here are some ideas that could attract more investors and the reasoning behind it. I'll call it Ownskis Expeto Auctus

Reduction to 3 Million Market Cap (100 to 1 ratio) This will create less coins but increase the value and scarcity which investors like (DRK,CINNI,etc) So if you have 1,000WC right now it would become 10WC. This would also increase the price to reflect that (130sat=13,000sat)
Website facelift The current websites need a major facelift. The WCF foundation index page looks like a clown show, no theme or consistency (very bad) I would recommend using some of the WCF BTC funds to pay for a professional to redo it. It would be money very well spent.
Facebook/Twitter/Reddit Marketing This would also require BTC funds from the WCF bank but would be a nescassary expense to help build up the community. Daily advertising could be bought for a mere $5 a day for each venue. I use social media marketing for my business and it is very successful. I can't stress it enough.
Whiteout Anon feature This is a good idea but should be carefully implemented. Whitecoin took its biggest hits when the block chain forked and/or had security problems. If it can be professionally integrated and tested before release, it could be the holy grail for the community.

First, the only thing keeping me with is I can be WC millionaire. 3M and I am out.
Second, the phase of buy and wait for hype is done. IMO we should consider real steps like registered organization, wc kickstarter, charity funds, payment processor, services etc.

We hold several million WC and I must say that I think exactly what piotrek. So far neither had raised me to sell because I believe in this community, DEVs design and the price is dirt cheap, I understand that I may seem 300,000,000 WCs many anyone and also whenever a currency does that, the market takes it as an attempt to grasp and often fails.
That said without offense, if coins cover is reduced, probably sell.
I think that we should continue as before, try to gradually enter WC is more in society and the price increase will follow.
Greetings.

Currently Mogonzo is working to do just that, register like a real organization. The country of registration will be Canada, which I think is a prime choice. Using his own time and resources, he's working with various departments. It takes time when dealing with a gov't but, i'm encouraged by the fact they are listening, and seem to want to help us get registered. This will be a first.

I agree to all the initiatives that are being taken and I intend to be a long term investor (maybe buy a few million more), I have no hurry.
I just do not approve of (although most is to decide), is the reduction of exchange.
This community has proven to be strong, we must continue as usual and not worry so much about the price.

surfguy72

hero member

Activity: 672

Merit: 500

Quote from: tevayo on June 20, 2014, 10:42:45 AM

Quote from: piotrek on June 19, 2014, 04:31:42 PM

Quote from: Ownski on June 18, 2014, 10:56:27 AM

Here are some ideas that could attract more investors and the reasoning behind it. I'll call it Ownskis Expeto Auctus

Reduction to 3 Million Market Cap (100 to 1 ratio) This will create less coins but increase the value and scarcity which investors like (DRK,CINNI,etc) So if you have 1,000WC right now it would become 10WC. This would also increase the price to reflect that (130sat=13,000sat)
Website facelift The current websites need a major facelift. The WCF foundation index page looks like a clown show, no theme or consistency (very bad) I would recommend using some of the WCF BTC funds to pay for a professional to redo it. It would be money very well spent.
Facebook/Twitter/Reddit Marketing This would also require BTC funds from the WCF bank but would be a nescassary expense to help build up the community. Daily advertising could be bought for a mere $5 a day for each venue. I use social media marketing for my business and it is very successful. I can't stress it enough.
Whiteout Anon feature This is a good idea but should be carefully implemented. Whitecoin took its biggest hits when the block chain forked and/or had security problems. If it can be professionally integrated and tested before release, it could be the holy grail for the community.

First, the only thing keeping me with is I can be WC millionaire. 3M and I am out.
Second, the phase of buy and wait for hype is done. IMO we should consider real steps like registered organization, wc kickstarter, charity funds, payment processor, services etc.

We hold several million WC and I must say that I think exactly what piotrek. So far neither had raised me to sell because I believe in this community, DEVs design and the price is dirt cheap, I understand that I may seem 300,000,000 WCs many anyone and also whenever a currency does that, the market takes it as an attempt to grasp and often fails.
That said without offense, if coins cover is reduced, probably sell.
I think that we should continue as before, try to gradually enter WC is more in society and the price increase will follow.
Greetings.

Currently Mogonzo is working to do just that, register like a real organization. The country of registration will be Canada, which I think is a prime choice. Using his own time and resources, he's working with various departments. It takes time when dealing with a gov't but, i'm encouraged by the fact they are listening, and seem to want to help us get registered. This will be a first.

tevayo

hero member

Activity: 620

Merit: 500

Quote from: piotrek on June 19, 2014, 04:31:42 PM

Quote from: Ownski on June 18, 2014, 10:56:27 AM

Here are some ideas that could attract more investors and the reasoning behind it. I'll call it Ownskis Expeto Auctus

Reduction to 3 Million Market Cap (100 to 1 ratio) This will create less coins but increase the value and scarcity which investors like (DRK,CINNI,etc) So if you have 1,000WC right now it would become 10WC. This would also increase the price to reflect that (130sat=13,000sat)
Website facelift The current websites need a major facelift. The WCF foundation index page looks like a clown show, no theme or consistency (very bad) I would recommend using some of the WCF BTC funds to pay for a professional to redo it. It would be money very well spent.
Facebook/Twitter/Reddit Marketing This would also require BTC funds from the WCF bank but would be a nescassary expense to help build up the community. Daily advertising could be bought for a mere $5 a day for each venue. I use social media marketing for my business and it is very successful. I can't stress it enough.
Whiteout Anon feature This is a good idea but should be carefully implemented. Whitecoin took its biggest hits when the block chain forked and/or had security problems. If it can be professionally integrated and tested before release, it could be the holy grail for the community.

First, the only thing keeping me with is I can be WC millionaire. 3M and I am out.
Second, the phase of buy and wait for hype is done. IMO we should consider real steps like registered organization, wc kickstarter, charity funds, payment processor, services etc.

We hold several million WC and I must say that I think exactly what piotrek. So far neither had raised me to sell because I believe in this community, DEVs design and the price is dirt cheap, I understand that I may seem 300,000,000 WCs many anyone and also whenever a currency does that, the market takes it as an attempt to grasp and often fails.
That said without offense, if coins cover is reduced, probably sell.
I think that we should continue as before, try to gradually enter WC is more in society and the price increase will follow.
Greetings.

surfguy72

hero member

Activity: 672

Merit: 500

Hey Guys,

Just got a note that WhiteCoin is now on alcurEX.com a pretty new exchange.

Go on over and check them out. Maybe we can provide them a little volume.

rod

newbie

Activity: 6

Merit: 0

Quote from: jonni21 on June 19, 2014, 10:16:16 AM

Quote from: surfguy72 on June 19, 2014, 10:09:53 AM

Quote from: eddienova on June 19, 2014, 09:40:06 AM

Quote from: rod on June 19, 2014, 05:38:35 AM

Hello everyone,

this is my first post ever so be gentle.

Id like you to give you an idea how to turn Whitecoin in special crypto. Idea is to make one additional feature in wallet, you can name it void or something like that. Sender and receiver are agreed by their choice to turn function void in transaction. The void function is to keep crypto till the moment when sender and receiver are agreed to let money out of void when all condition for payment are met. Or you can have option to authorize third party for void payment. This primary idea for additional wallet function and making wallet better. Im sure that this addition will make this crypto a way better and functional then others.

Thank you and donations are welcome.

Brilliant.

So if i'm understanding, its digital escrow. User 1 and User 2 want to do a transaction. User 2 sends user 1 the "void" address for escrow, and until both user 1 and user 2 send signals, the funds remain in "the void."

I love it.

I'd like to add another idea to this feature. So the funds are sitting in escrow and neither user can agree on the services being completed, or, goods recieved, whatever. So user 1 and user 2 then agree to disagree, but then move to picking a 3rd party to act as arbitor. User 1 and user 2 in their wallets select "arbitration" and enter the persons email,id or wallet or something. User 3 (the agreed arbitor of user 1 and user 2) then has control of the funds and can resolve the issue hopefully. It takes both user 1 and user 2 agreeing exactly on the same arbitor for the keys to be released.

I think the Foundation can act as an arbitrator. Another idea is to have a rating system. The more successful deals, the higher the rating.

Dear Whitecoiners,

thank you for your suggestions and donation of 3000 WC.

Reason for sharing idea with this community was our dedication and faith in community itself as a holder and supporter of a coin. Im here from start and I also want to see shining from Whitecoin.

I know how much idea like this worth I hope that you know too. On purpose, I was giving you just a glimpse of idea to see if there will be some effort in fruitful discussions to develop seed idea and hopefully to see that community itself develop this idea to stage that will be implemented and that will be credited to whole community. Also I needed to see is there a cryptovirtue in developing team and that is speed and patience, when you use first and when the other is wisdom.

Its not uncommon in world of science, art or any area of human spirit that many people develop same or similar idea in same time. Thanks to surfguy72 we see that similar idea are in developing stage at our fellowcoiner Blackcoin team. It has brilliant website, the one I would like to see as a image of any serious coin, good support, good developing team and most important that they develop new and practical ideas.

That is what our community should do and we have to look up at fellow Blackcoiners. If they develop their solution I don’t see any reson why we don’t develop ours. From that, on the end, best idea will be overwhelm all coins, future coins and present.

From this point I count on community and WFC to give a hard push to develop coin in a more practical way.

Thank you

piotrek

member

Activity: 87

Merit: 10

A chat in WC wallet is the worst idea ever.

More code to maintain makes the risk of vulnerabilities bigger.

It is also the information that there is no idea for future other than gadget feeding.

tekke

legendary

Activity: 854

Merit: 1000

Quote from: birddog on June 20, 2014, 12:02:25 AM

The ANN has been updated and refreshed with the new logo and a new look as part of our re-branding efforts.

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.6192676

Next on the re-branding agenda will be a complete overhaul of whitecoin.info (update coming soon)

Cool news, BTW the new logo looks awesome

birddog

member

Activity: 103

Merit: 10

The ANN has been updated and refreshed with the new logo and a new look as part of our re-branding efforts.

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.6192676

Next on the re-branding agenda will be a complete overhaul of whitecoin.info (update coming soon)

birddog

member

Activity: 103

Merit: 10

Quote from: cryptohunter on June 19, 2014, 05:30:39 PM

Is whiteout white paper being worked on as yet?

Whiteout is a feature we are looking into. It has been one of the leading topics of discussion amongst both the core team and the Whitecoin community. The logistics of applying an anonymous or private feature to Whitecoin is something that needs to be taken in a very careful and calculated approach. It is our focus to remain competitive in the fast paced world of crypto and to provide the Whitecoin community the features they ask for. We will be sure to fill in the community once we have further development on the topic.

Topic: [ANN] (WC) | WhiteCoin | BIG NEWS: Foundation, investors & more ☯ whitecoin.info - page 94. (Read 759239 times)