Author

Topic: [ANN] [XMG] MAGI | CPU mining | mPoW | mPoS | [MagiPay] - page 411. (Read 2375972 times)

full member
Activity: 196
Merit: 100
Yeah, 250 per user... Sure guys. Just look at miner list.

Botnets engaged... I only have about 6 servers, along with my home PCs mining, and there's "anonymous" miners with 2x the hashrate. That's either a Botnet or the unauthorized use of a server farm.
Pools should really deal with this. And the Magi Team too. Where is the fair coin distribution then? How can you expect for someone to mine with low power (green) devices when huge botnes are abusing almost every pool? Maybe it's better for Suprnova to stay down for few days. You will see when they make it live again, almost in the same second there will be 500 miners. All botnets, preconfigured to mine on Suprnova.
Magi is trying that for some time
It can only if Pools agree to allow miners with max hashrate. Besides that we all noticed that not all people are reading the Op & last posts here.
In that case they miss the change of mindset.
Most coin need hugh hashrate to gain profit.
With Magi its different. Lower hashrate blockreward is good or will go up. High hashrate blockreward will drop.


They don't care if there is higher or lower profit, they don't use ther own resources. So I think pools must do something, most because of mining with low powered devices, and "green" mining. I know you're trying, but it seems they are always one step ahead.

They don't care. It's all about money. These people would give their own mother syphilis if they knew it'd make them money. 

Hi.
We at TrasMaMod XMG pool take care of this and is very important to have a fair coin.
First the user getting a warning that they are above 300KH/s (that is our MAX allowed speed).
If they dont adjust down within recent time, they will be banned from the pool.
(According to warning/information written on top of our pool).

And there is possible to adjust down if using "m-minerd" with the parameter -e (example -e 60)
Code:
-e, --cpu-efficiency=N       mining efficiency (1-100) (default: 100, i.e, 100)

I applaud your efforts. However, they will just move to another pool that has no limit. It's like trying to kill an elephant with a bb gun.
legendary
Activity: 1019
Merit: 1003
Senior Developer and founder of ViMeAv ICT
Someone to contact Suprnova owner to open his pool?

Better not, it's very bad for the block reward for other miners.
newbie
Activity: 52
Merit: 0
Yeah, 250 per user... Sure guys. Just look at miner list.

Botnets engaged... I only have about 6 servers, along with my home PCs mining, and there's "anonymous" miners with 2x the hashrate. That's either a Botnet or the unauthorized use of a server farm.
Pools should really deal with this. And the Magi Team too. Where is the fair coin distribution then? How can you expect for someone to mine with low power (green) devices when huge botnes are abusing almost every pool? Maybe it's better for Suprnova to stay down for few days. You will see when they make it live again, almost in the same second there will be 500 miners. All botnets, preconfigured to mine on Suprnova.
Magi is trying that for some time
It can only if Pools agree to allow miners with max hashrate. Besides that we all noticed that not all people are reading the Op & last posts here.
In that case they miss the change of mindset.
Most coin need hugh hashrate to gain profit.
With Magi its different. Lower hashrate blockreward is good or will go up. High hashrate blockreward will drop.


They don't care if there is higher or lower profit, they don't use ther own resources. So I think pools must do something, most because of mining with low powered devices, and "green" mining. I know you're trying, but it seems they are always one step ahead.

They don't care. It's all about money. These people would give their own mother syphilis if they knew it'd make them money. 

Hi.
We at TrasMaMod XMG pool take care of this and is very important to have a fair coin.
First the user getting a warning that they are above 300KH/s (that is our MAX allowed speed).
If they dont adjust down within recent time, they will be banned from the pool.
(According to warning/information written on top of our pool).

And there is possible to adjust down if using "m-minerd" with the parameter -e (example -e 60)
Code:
-e, --cpu-efficiency=N       mining efficiency (1-100) (default: 100, i.e, 100)
full member
Activity: 196
Merit: 100
Yeah, 250 per user... Sure guys. Just look at miner list.

Botnets engaged... I only have about 6 servers, along with my home PCs mining, and there's "anonymous" miners with 2x the hashrate. That's either a Botnet or the unauthorized use of a server farm.
Pools should really deal with this. And the Magi Team too. Where is the fair coin distribution then? How can you expect for someone to mine with low power (green) devices when huge botnes are abusing almost every pool? Maybe it's better for Suprnova to stay down for few days. You will see when they make it live again, almost in the same second there will be 500 miners. All botnets, preconfigured to mine on Suprnova.
Magi is trying that for some time
It can only if Pools agree to allow miners with max hashrate. Besides that we all noticed that not all people are reading the Op & last posts here.
In that case they miss the change of mindset.
Most coin need hugh hashrate to gain profit.
With Magi its different. Lower hashrate blockreward is good or will go up. High hashrate blockreward will drop.


They don't care if there is higher or lower profit, they don't use ther own resources. So I think pools must do something, most because of mining with low powered devices, and "green" mining. I know you're trying, but it seems they are always one step ahead.

They don't care. It's all about money. These people would give their own mother syphilis if they knew it'd make them money. 
full member
Activity: 226
Merit: 100
Yeah, 250 per user... Sure guys. Just look at miner list.

Botnets engaged... I only have about 6 servers, along with my home PCs mining, and there's "anonymous" miners with 2x the hashrate. That's either a Botnet or the unauthorized use of a server farm.
Pools should really deal with this. And the Magi Team too. Where is the fair coin distribution then? How can you expect for someone to mine with low power (green) devices when huge botnes are abusing almost every pool? Maybe it's better for Suprnova to stay down for few days. You will see when they make it live again, almost in the same second there will be 500 miners. All botnets, preconfigured to mine on Suprnova.
Magi is trying that for some time
It can only if Pools agree to allow miners with max hashrate. Besides that we all noticed that not all people are reading the Op & last posts here.
In that case they miss the change of mindset.
Most coin need hugh hashrate to gain profit.
With Magi its different. Lower hashrate blockreward is good or will go up. High hashrate blockreward will drop.


They don't care if there is higher or lower profit, they don't use ther own resources. So I think pools must do something, most because of mining with low powered devices, and "green" mining. I know you're trying, but it seems they are always one step ahead.
full member
Activity: 196
Merit: 100
Yeah, 250 per user... Sure guys. Just look at miner list.

Botnets engaged... I only have about 6 servers, along with my home PCs mining, and there's "anonymous" miners with 2x the hashrate. That's either a Botnet or the unauthorized use of a server farm.
Pools should really deal with this. And the Magi Team too. Where is the fair coin distribution then? How can you expect for someone to mine with low power (green) devices when huge botnes are abusing almost every pool? Maybe it's better for Suprnova to stay down for few days. You will see when they make it live again, almost in the same second there will be 500 miners. All botnets, preconfigured to mine on Suprnova.

It's a damn shame, too. But what can be done? How can the masses be controlled? Do the pools put a cap on hashrate? How would the pools find what that cap should be? Other than limiting the amount of connections, I see no other way to do it.
This issue has been around for a long time, with almost every coin.
member
Activity: 119
Merit: 100
great job Joe! Appreciate the timely updates 111Magic!

Amazing community! A+++
Thank you folks!

legendary
Activity: 1750
Merit: 1005
Yeah, 250 per user... Sure guys. Just look at miner list.

Botnets engaged... I only have about 6 servers, along with my home PCs mining, and there's "anonymous" miners with 2x the hashrate. That's either a Botnet or the unauthorized use of a server farm.
Pools should really deal with this. And the Magi Team too. Where is the fair coin distribution then? How can you expect for someone to mine with low power (green) devices when huge botnes are abusing almost every pool? Maybe it's better for Suprnova to stay down for few days. You will see when they make it live again, almost in the same second there will be 500 miners. All botnets, preconfigured to mine on Suprnova.
Magi is trying that for some time
It can only if Pools agree to allow miners with max hashrate. Besides that we all noticed that not all people are reading the Op & last posts here.
In that case they miss the change of mindset.
Most coin need hugh hashrate to gain profit.
With Magi its different. Lower hashrate blockreward is good or will go up. High hashrate blockreward will drop.

full member
Activity: 224
Merit: 100
Is there any news when exchanges will be up again?
Both Yobit and bittrex still maintenance.

I sent message to Bittrex again. Think will be back up in 24 hours. Others i need to contact. If you have time or contact there feel free to send them a message.
I always can use help.

When i mining solo, can i use rpcallowip=192.168.* to permit the access from other host, but the hash of each host is counted separately or the wallet sum all hashrate?

full member
Activity: 226
Merit: 100
Yeah, 250 per user... Sure guys. Just look at miner list.

Botnets engaged... I only have about 6 servers, along with my home PCs mining, and there's "anonymous" miners with 2x the hashrate. That's either a Botnet or the unauthorized use of a server farm.
Pools should really deal with this. And the Magi Team too. Where is the fair coin distribution then? How can you expect for someone to mine with low power (green) devices when huge botnes are abusing almost every pool? Maybe it's better for Suprnova to stay down for few days. You will see when they make it live again, almost in the same second there will be 500 miners. All botnets, preconfigured to mine on Suprnova.
hero member
Activity: 548
Merit: 501
My dekstop wallet won't stake, from debug.log

Code:
ERROR: mempool transaction missing input
ERROR: mempool transaction missing input
ERROR: mempool transaction missing input
ERROR: mempool transaction missing input
ERROR: mempool transaction missing input
ERROR: mempool transaction missing input
ERROR: mempool transaction missing input
ERROR: mempool transaction missing input
ERROR: mempool transaction missing input
ERROR: mempool transaction missing input
ERROR: mempool transaction missing input
ERROR: mempool transaction missing input
ERROR: mempool transaction missing input
ERROR: mempool transaction missing input
ERROR: mempool transaction missing input
ERROR: mempool transaction missing input
ERROR: mempool transaction missing input
ERROR: mempool transaction missing input
ERROR: mempool transaction missing input
ERROR: mempool transaction missing input
ERROR: mempool transaction missing input
ERROR: mempool transaction missing input
ERROR: mempool transaction missing input
ERROR: mempool transaction missing input
ERROR: mempool transaction missing input
Any idea why?
full member
Activity: 196
Merit: 100
Yeah, 250 per user... Sure guys. Just look at miner list.

Botnets engaged... I only have about 6 servers, along with my home PCs mining, and there's "anonymous" miners with 2x the hashrate. That's either a Botnet or the unauthorized use of a server farm.
jr. member
Activity: 49
Merit: 1
With the connect command in magi.conf - I'm only connected to one host, is this the intended method for now?

Yes as joe said connect command forces wallet to connect only given ip.
This is for download ofiical chain.
legendary
Activity: 1484
Merit: 1029
With the connect command in magi.conf - I'm only connected to one host, is this the intended method for now?
full member
Activity: 226
Merit: 100
Someone to contact Suprnova owner to open his pool?
sr. member
Activity: 490
Merit: 256
CryptoID explorer now in synch with current chain
https://chainz.cryptoid.info/xmg/
jr. member
Activity: 49
Merit: 1
Also, I seem to be having issues solo mining. I believe everything is set up correctly in my .conf file, however whenever I try to run m-minerd I'm given this error message: "HTTP request failed: Failed to connect to 127.0.0.1 port 8232: Connection refused"
followed in the next line by:
json_rpc_call request failed, retry after 30 seconds
what do I need to do here to be able to solo mine? Is this something stupid I've missed? Or perhaps a windows issue?
m-minerd .bat looks like so: m-minerd --url http://127.0.0.1:8232/ --user user --pass x -t 6 -e 95

It looks like that either your wallet or daemon is not running, your rpcport is not 8232 in .conf file or you are trying to mine from another computer...?
it could be that! I have my wallet on my NAS currently, will try moving the miner to the NAS/wallet to main machine

still no luck with the solo mining. Tried moving the wallet to the main desktop off of the NAS and still the same issue. .conf looks like so:
rpcuser=rpcuser
rpcpassword=rpcpass

rpcport=8232

rpcallowip=127.0.0.1

listen=0
connect=104.128.225.215

daemon=1
server=1
rpcport=8232
rpcallowip=127.0.0.1
rpcuser=user
rpcpassword=x


In your conf file rpcuser and rpcpass defined 2times please clean your conf file as:

listen=1
connect=104.128.225.215

daemon=1
server=1
rpcport=8232
rpcallowip=127.0.0.1
rpcuser=user
rpcpassword=x
sr. member
Activity: 490
Merit: 256
Any news on PoM pool, namely when it will be up again? I assume it's safe to withdraw now...
full member
Activity: 276
Merit: 100
If connecting from other ip then local host then that ip should be in rcpallowip statement
newbie
Activity: 40
Merit: 0
Isn't listen supposed to be listen=1 if you want it to accept RPC commands?
just tried this and no dice, still the same issue.
Jump to: