Pages:
Author

Topic: [ANN][ANC] Anoncoin (anoncoin.net) | Privacy-centric currency | I2P darknet - page 22. (Read 40664 times)

legendary
Activity: 3136
Merit: 1116
Man, great job wrecking the price Cryptopia Cheesy

I agree they're a decent exchange in general. I like the stand they took on ETH, but I am still shaded the fuck out by EDRcoin. Hopefully they get this sorted shortly and I can grab a few more before price recovers.
hero member
Activity: 714
Merit: 508
URGENT!!

Can everyone please withdraw ANC from Cryptopia before the hardfork, we are running out of time to get the new wallet compiled and don't want coins getting trapped.


Thanks

What? No. I have a few hundred ANC on Cryptopia, and I'm traveling so not in a position to compile a wallet and move them off for at least a week. Get your shit together Cryptopia.


We can setup an offsite precompiled wallet so you can withdraw even after the fork if you just log a support ticket with your ANC address, no coins will be lost or stolen


cryptopia is a great site and it would be a shame if you delisted anoncoin because of this confusion

toolchains is just downloading dependancies like boost and bdb its not getting any extra libs then what other coins such as bitocoin use you can verify the urls yourself
sr. member
Activity: 355
Merit: 250
URGENT!!

Can everyone please withdraw ANC from Cryptopia before the hardfork, we are running out of time to get the new wallet compiled and don't want coins getting trapped.


Thanks

What? No. I have a few hundred ANC on Cryptopia, and I'm traveling so not in a position to compile a wallet and move them off for at least a week. Get your shit together Cryptopia.


We can setup an offsite precompiled wallet so you can withdraw even after the fork if you just log a support ticket with your ANC address, no coins will be lost or stolen
hero member
Activity: 714
Merit: 508
URGENT!!

Can everyone please withdraw ANC from Cryptopia before the hardfork, we are running out of time to get the new wallet compiled and don't want coins getting trapped.


Thanks

What? No. I have a few hundred ANC on Cryptopia, and I'm traveling so not in a position to compile a wallet and move them off for at least a week. Get your shit together Cryptopia.

If an exchange is having issues its best getting out early an often as opposed to getting your coins frozen. It would be better for anoncoin if cryptopia figured it out, but if they dont
its important to move your coins to either your own local wallet or to another exchange (such as exchanged.i2p).

Dont get Vern'd

I appreciate the advice, but I'd rather not be forced to liquidate my coins at a lower price, or open an account elsewhere to move them off. I tried visiting your clearnet site but was getting repeated certificate warnings (ignore first https invalid cert warning and another would pop right up) using chrome on my phone. Guess I should look at btc-38 or btc-e, I think one of them trades ANC.

I really don't see how a hardfork can affect old coins that Cryptopia already has in its wallet. I have been getting a bit suspicious of them since they added that EDRcoin that supposedly does hundreds of BTC volume per day with extremely thin order books and trades nowhere else. Hope I'm not gonna get verngoxed for my 0.15 BTC I have there, but kinda too lazy to do anything about it honestly, plus there's a few coins I like to support that I don't think trade anywhere else.

i2p.rocks is a i2p inproxy run by a well respected i2p dev
the certs are not invalid, they are self-signed, because wildcard * certs are expensive
the site works 100% fine you just have to ignore the PITA cert warnings

the hardfork wont "affect" the coins other then making withdrawals impossible until the client is updated
full member
Activity: 150
Merit: 100
(...)
Ok, so the problem will be the anoncoin.net link, why is it contacting anoncoin.net for libboost?

Our wallet servers are locked down and cannot contact external sites, is this a custom build of libboost?

if this is a custom build can you please direct me to the source code so we can review it? I am not keen to download unreview code onto our wallet server.


Thanks

Sorry I had mistaken... I did build the dependencies using the toolchain (first make) and here is the libraries it download:

Code:
2016-06-27 22:25:18 URL:http://heanet.dl.sourceforge.net/project/boost/boost/1.57.0/boost_1_57_0.tar.bz2 [60821561/60821561] -> "/home/yo/anoncoin/depends/work/download/boost-1_57_0/boost_1_57_0.tar.bz2.temp" [1]
2016-06-27 22:26:36 URL:https://www.openssl.org/source/openssl-1.0.1j.tar.gz [4432964/4432964] -> "/home/yo/anoncoin/depends/work/download/openssl-1.0.1j/openssl-1.0.1j.tar.gz.temp" [1]
2016-06-27 22:27:30 URL:https://fukuchi.org/works/qrencode//qrencode-3.4.3.tar.bz2 [370709/370709] -> "/home/yo/anoncoin/depends/work/download/qrencode-3.4.3/qrencode-3.4.3.tar.bz2.temp" [1]
2016-06-27 22:28:15 URL:http://heanet.dl.sourceforge.net/project/freetype/freetype2/2.5.3/freetype-2.5.3.tar.bz2 [1703842/1703842] -> "/home/yo/anoncoin/depends/work/download/freetype-2.5.3/freetype-2.5.3.tar.bz2.temp" [1]
2016-06-27 22:28:34 URL:http://tenet.dl.sourceforge.net/project/expat/expat/2.1.0/expat-2.1.0.tar.gz [562616/562616] -> "/home/yo/anoncoin/depends/work/download/expat-2.1.0/expat-2.1.0.tar.gz.temp" [1]
2016-06-27 22:28:42 URL:https://dbus.freedesktop.org/releases/dbus/dbus-1.8.6.tar.gz [1861784/1861784] -> "/home/yo/anoncoin/depends/work/download/dbus-1.8.6/dbus-1.8.6.tar.gz.temp" [1]
2016-06-27 22:29:01 URL:https://www.x.org/releases/individual/proto/xproto-7.0.26.tar.bz2 [305321/305321] -> "/home/yo/anoncoin/depends/work/download/xproto-7.0.26/xproto-7.0.26.tar.bz2.temp" [1]
2016-06-27 22:31:02 URL:http://ftp.fau.de/qtproject/archive/qt/4.6/qt-everywhere-opensource-src-4.6.4.tar.gz [160837056/160837056] -> "/home/yo/anoncoin/depends/work/download/qt46-4.6.4/qt-everywhere-opensource-src-4.6.4.tar.gz.temp" [1]
2016-06-27 22:35:02 URL:http://download.oracle.com/berkeley-db/db-4.8.30.NC.tar.gz [22842330/22842330] -> "/home/yo/anoncoin/depends/work/download/bdb-4.8.30/db-4.8.30.NC.tar.gz.temp" [1]
2016-06-27 22:35:23 URL:http://miniupnp.free.fr/files/miniupnpc-1.9.20140701.tar.gz [76735/76735] -> "/home/yo/anoncoin/depends/work/download/miniupnpc-1.9.20140701/miniupnpc-1.9.20140701.tar.gz.temp"


So those are open source public libraries, none are hosted on anoncoin.net (I misread the log).

But yes you have to allow outgoing connections to build the toolchain otherwise it will never work.

Good luck!

CS

legendary
Activity: 3136
Merit: 1116
URGENT!!

Can everyone please withdraw ANC from Cryptopia before the hardfork, we are running out of time to get the new wallet compiled and don't want coins getting trapped.


Thanks

What? No. I have a few hundred ANC on Cryptopia, and I'm traveling so not in a position to compile a wallet and move them off for at least a week. Get your shit together Cryptopia.

If an exchange is having issues its best getting out early an often as opposed to getting your coins frozen. It would be better for anoncoin if cryptopia figured it out, but if they dont
its important to move your coins to either your own local wallet or to another exchange (such as exchanged.i2p).

Dont get Vern'd

I appreciate the advice, but I'd rather not be forced to liquidate my coins at a lower price, or open an account elsewhere to move them off. I tried visiting your clearnet site but was getting repeated certificate warnings (ignore first https invalid cert warning and another would pop right up) using chrome on my phone. Guess I should look at btc-38 or btc-e, I think one of them trades ANC.

I really don't see how a hardfork can affect old coins that Cryptopia already has in its wallet. I have been getting a bit suspicious of them since they added that EDRcoin that supposedly does hundreds of BTC volume per day with extremely thin order books and trades nowhere else. Hope I'm not gonna get verngoxed for my 0.15 BTC I have there, but kinda too lazy to do anything about it honestly, plus there's a few coins I like to support that I don't think trade anywhere else.
hero member
Activity: 714
Merit: 508
URGENT!!

Can everyone please withdraw ANC from Cryptopia before the hardfork, we are running out of time to get the new wallet compiled and don't want coins getting trapped.


Thanks

What? No. I have a few hundred ANC on Cryptopia, and I'm traveling so not in a position to compile a wallet and move them off for at least a week. Get your shit together Cryptopia.

If an exchange is having issues its best getting out early an often as opposed to getting your coins frozen. It would be better for anoncoin if cryptopia figured it out, but if they dont
its important to move your coins to either your own local wallet or to another exchange (such as exchanged.i2p).

Dont get Vern'd
legendary
Activity: 3136
Merit: 1116
URGENT!!

Can everyone please withdraw ANC from Cryptopia before the hardfork, we are running out of time to get the new wallet compiled and don't want coins getting trapped.


Thanks

What? No. I have a few hundred ANC on Cryptopia, and I'm traveling so not in a position to compile a wallet and move them off for at least a week. Get your shit together Cryptopia.
hero member
Activity: 714
Merit: 508
URGENT!!

Can everyone please withdraw ANC from Cryptopia before the hardfork, we are running out of time to get the new wallet compiled and don't want coins getting trapped.


Thanks

Has btc38 announced they are going to upgrade their wallet?

As always ExchangeD.I2P is running the latest anoncoin version and trading flawlessly

You can trade anonymously over i2p or
access exchanged.i2p over the normal internet

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/exchangedi2p-darknet-cryptocurrency-exchange-bitcoin-altcoins-fiat-stocks-1092682

Trade like a pro Smiley
sr. member
Activity: 355
Merit: 250
URGENT!!

Can everyone please withdraw ANC from Cryptopia before the hardfork, we are running out of time to get the new wallet compiled and don't want coins getting trapped.


Thanks
sr. member
Activity: 355
Merit: 250
so cryptopia is still on chain v0.8.5.1-132-g73a4219-beta, did you contact them?

Hi,

we have been unable to compile the new wallet, have spent a week trying, followed all the guides, tried every conceivable Linux version/combination, still never compiles and just returns an error

Code:
 ............
  CXX    libanoncoin_server_a-main.o
main.cpp: In function 'bool LoadBlockIndexDB()':
main.cpp:3109:32: error: 'BlockHashCorrectionMap' has no member named 'reserve'
main.cpp:3177:19: error: 'BlockMap' has no member named 'reserve'
main.cpp: In function 'bool ProcessMessage(CNode*, std::string, CDataStream&)':
main.cpp:4135:18: warning: unused variable 'fFromChanged' [-Wunused-variable]
main.cpp:4659:24: warning: comparison between signed and unsigned integer expressions [-Wsign-compare]
make[2]: *** [libanoncoin_server_a-main.o] Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory `/root/anoncoin/src'
make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/root/anoncoin/src'
make: *** [all-recursive] Error 1


Any ideas?

Hi,

I have never seen this error before. Also there is nothing about the errors at 3109 and 3177 that I can find on the net about bitcoin.

Thus I tried to compile it again in a Mint 17.1 VM, after erasing all data and following https://wiki.anoncoin.net/How_to_build_Anoncoin_from_source#Ubuntu_64_bit_or_Debian_8

Code:
sudo apt-get update
sudo apt-get upgrade
sudo apt-get install g++ git automake
sudo apt-get install autoconf make libtool pkg-config libqt4-network libqtgui4

No problem with those. I did not execute this line: sudo apt-get install libboost-all-dev  git libdb++-dev libssl-dev

Code:
cd
git clone https://github.com/Anoncoin/anoncoin.git
cd anoncoin
./autogen.sh
cd depends
make -j`nproc`

I had an issue here with retrieving the libboost library from anoncoin.net... 404 not found ... had to retry 3 times then it downloaded it correctly.

Code:
dir
cd ..
./configure --prefix=`pwd`/depends/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
make -j`nproc`

No issues, anoncoind, anoncoin-qtc and all others were built correctly.

It seems your issue is occuring at the very early stage of the last make -j`nproc`.

Did you have any problem with the former make? During the build of the toolchain? Maybe the toolchain conflict with your dependencies?


BTW as a reminder, block 555555 is in 9 days so the hardfork will occur very soon, everybody shall update ASAP!

Ok, so the problem will be the anoncoin.net link, why is it contacting anoncoin.net for libboost?

Our wallet servers are locked down and cannot contact external sites, is this a custom build of libboost?

if this is a custom build can you please direct me to the source code so we can review it? I am not keen to download unreview code onto our wallet server.


Thanks
full member
Activity: 150
Merit: 100
so cryptopia is still on chain v0.8.5.1-132-g73a4219-beta, did you contact them?

Hi,

we have been unable to compile the new wallet, have spent a week trying, followed all the guides, tried every conceivable Linux version/combination, still never compiles and just returns an error

Code:
 ............
  CXX    libanoncoin_server_a-main.o
main.cpp: In function 'bool LoadBlockIndexDB()':
main.cpp:3109:32: error: 'BlockHashCorrectionMap' has no member named 'reserve'
main.cpp:3177:19: error: 'BlockMap' has no member named 'reserve'
main.cpp: In function 'bool ProcessMessage(CNode*, std::string, CDataStream&)':
main.cpp:4135:18: warning: unused variable 'fFromChanged' [-Wunused-variable]
main.cpp:4659:24: warning: comparison between signed and unsigned integer expressions [-Wsign-compare]
make[2]: *** [libanoncoin_server_a-main.o] Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory `/root/anoncoin/src'
make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/root/anoncoin/src'
make: *** [all-recursive] Error 1


Any ideas?

Hi,

I have never seen this error before. Also there is nothing about the errors at 3109 and 3177 that I can find on the net about bitcoin.

Thus I tried to compile it again in a Mint 17.1 VM, after erasing all data and following https://wiki.anoncoin.net/How_to_build_Anoncoin_from_source#Ubuntu_64_bit_or_Debian_8

Code:
sudo apt-get update
sudo apt-get upgrade
sudo apt-get install g++ git automake
sudo apt-get install autoconf make libtool pkg-config libqt4-network libqtgui4

No problem with those. I did not execute this line: sudo apt-get install libboost-all-dev  git libdb++-dev libssl-dev

Code:
cd
git clone https://github.com/Anoncoin/anoncoin.git
cd anoncoin
./autogen.sh
cd depends
make -j`nproc`

I had an issue here with retrieving the libboost library from anoncoin.net... 404 not found ... had to retry 3 times then it downloaded it correctly.

Code:
dir
cd ..
./configure --prefix=`pwd`/depends/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
make -j`nproc`

No issues, anoncoind, anoncoin-qtc and all others were built correctly.

It seems your issue is occuring at the very early stage of the last make -j`nproc`.

Did you have any problem with the former make? During the build of the toolchain? Maybe the toolchain conflict with your dependencies?


BTW as a reminder, block 555555 is in 9 days so the hardfork will occur very soon, everybody shall update ASAP!
sr. member
Activity: 355
Merit: 250
so cryptopia is still on chain v0.8.5.1-132-g73a4219-beta, did you contact them?

Hi,

we have been unable to compile the new wallet, have spent a week trying, followed all the guides, tried every conceivable Linux version/combination, still never compiles and just returns an error

Code:
 ............
  CXX    libanoncoin_server_a-main.o
main.cpp: In function 'bool LoadBlockIndexDB()':
main.cpp:3109:32: error: 'BlockHashCorrectionMap' has no member named 'reserve'
main.cpp:3177:19: error: 'BlockMap' has no member named 'reserve'
main.cpp: In function 'bool ProcessMessage(CNode*, std::string, CDataStream&)':
main.cpp:4135:18: warning: unused variable 'fFromChanged' [-Wunused-variable]
main.cpp:4659:24: warning: comparison between signed and unsigned integer expressions [-Wsign-compare]
make[2]: *** [libanoncoin_server_a-main.o] Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory `/root/anoncoin/src'
make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/root/anoncoin/src'
make: *** [all-recursive] Error 1


Any ideas?
full member
Activity: 150
Merit: 100
Crash on launch with the win64 version of anoncoin-qtc.exe. Anyone else?

Edit: Same with the win32 version.
Edit2: Had to delete everything except wallet.dat and rebuild blockchain from scratch. Sad

Yes, you have to empty the data directory but not and rebuild from scratch, with or without bootstrap.dat

Also the old anoncoin.conf is not compatible with the new one, use the anoncoin.conf.sample or anoncoin.conf.txt provided in anoncoin/doc directory.

see https://wiki.anoncoin.net/How_to_setup_your_Anoncoin_wallet#Setting_up_your_client_to_use_I2P_.289.6.11.29
and https://wiki.anoncoin.net/How_to_install_Anoncoin

Thank you, I updated The Guide to install Anoncoin

CS

legendary
Activity: 1270
Merit: 1000
Crash on launch with the win64 version of anoncoin-qtc.exe. Anyone else?

Edit: Same with the win32 version.
Edit2: Had to delete everything except wallet.dat and rebuild blockchain from scratch. Sad
full member
Activity: 150
Merit: 100
so cryptopia is still on chain v0.8.5.1-132-g73a4219-beta, did you contact them?

Thank you for noticing, yes I contacted them again today and they are upgrading now.

The old wallet displayed the difficulty as a number which was a multiple of the minimum difficulty. That is why you cannot directly tell what difficulty relates to the old wallet difficulty for the user, as they are displayed differently, but the difficulty algorithms (Kimoto Gravity Well v2 and GroundRod Retarget PID) understand the difficulty very well, as the proof-of-work required difficulty algorithm did not change between KGW v1 and KGW v2. But after block 555555 with the change of the difficulty algorithm to GroundRod PID, the way the proof-of-work required is calculated will change and this is the reason why this is an hardfork.
In truth the PID Difficulty is a number of 256 bits such as 0x00000000010a2d19999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999, and the PID use this number as it is, but the displayed number by getdifficulty was simplified as shown above.
so will pools have to change something after block 555555? ( will stratum difficulty change etc? )

Normally not, indeed as already stated the difficulty for miners is calculated on the nBits target. So no change has to be made.

A bit more info on the difficulty... You can see the new target by typing "getretargetpid" in the console

Code:

15:57:37

getretargetpid


15:57:37

{
"retargetheight" : 546970,
"allowmintime" : 1466256114,
"retargettime" : 1466258267,
"adjustedtime" : 1466258267,
"prevdiff" : "1c0240e1(231)",
"spacingerror" : "+52.7429(210)",
"rateofchange" : "-14.4158(190)",
"integratorheight" : 546969,
"integrationtime" : 172794,
"integratorblocks" : 974,
"proportionterm" : 89.66285966,
"integratorterm" : 167.94450154,
"derivativeterm" : -0.00000000,
"pidoutputtime" : 257.60736120,
"prevdiffx256" : "000000000240e1e32fa7578cbe9d5e32fa7578cbe9d5e32fa7578cbe9d5e32fa",
"hitlimits" : false,
"nextdiffbits" : "1c033add",
"nextdifflog2" : 38.30849247,
"nextdiffx256" : "00000000033add5f3bc530b02247f5f3bc530b02247f5f3bc530b02247f5f3bb",
"tipspacing" : 215.95000000,
"blkspacing" : 87,
"prevshad" : "4d2392a5d6d13d9b5580fabf5f3dc9ea4b246d0400c583f1b1b3e647fd696eaa"
}

The new difficulty target is given by "nextdiffbits" or "nextdiffx256". The pools software will use this number as described in https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Difficulty

The profitability of mining for the casual user when the PID will engage at block 555555, when there will be quite variation in difficulty block to block to maintain the targetspacing to 180, shall best be known on an averaged value. The difficulty value returned by "getdifficulty" is only for next block, and not an average. Two values can thus be used to assess an recent average of difficulty.

First is "prevdiff" or "prevdiffx256" which is the smoothed average of difficulty on the last 21 blocks (tipfilter). Once again the smaller the more difficult. "Prevdiff" is the blue line in the next chart, "Newdiff" is the red line in the chart and the actual difficulty, the limits down (green) and up (purple) of the PID are seen too.


The second way to know indirectly the difficulty on average was stated in a post above, and it is by typing 'getnetworkhashps #'. With # being the number of blocks, 21 (Tipfilter) or 120 (6 hours) are good numbers.

Code:
16:27:04

getnetworkhashps 120


16:27:04

2877270143


16:28:37

getnetworkhashps 21


16:28:37

2184023236

With the getnetworkhashps value and your own hashrate it is easy to know how much blocks you shall receive in an interval of time. There are 480 blocks a day in anoncoin, 2.5 ANC per block right now, knowing your hashrate and net hashrate and doing the math you can calculate profitability in ANC per day.

Code:
My hashrate = 100 MH/s = 100000000
getnetworkhashps 120 = 2877270143
Proportion of hashrate = 100000000/2877270143 = 0.035
ANC per day = 2.5 * 480 * 0.035 = 42

But to answer your question, both BFGminer and cgminer interpret nBits correctly on 0.9.6.11 with GR RetargetPID enabled, so Stratum shall works similarly.

nodes please?
-addnode=109.133.156.15:49362
-addnode=211.149.175.37:52736
-addnode=84.55.23.199:55863
-addnode=211.149.175.37:51950
-addnode=192.99.13.67:54869
-addnode=108.61.10.90:56562

There are hardcoded DNSseednodes (https://github.com/Anoncoin/anoncoin/blob/master/src/chainparams.cpp#L124) and hardcoded seednodes (https://github.com/Anoncoin/anoncoin/blob/master/src/chainparams.cpp#L29) and hardcoded I2P nodes (https://github.com/Anoncoin/anoncoin/blob/master/src/chainparams.cpp#L36). There is no need to add other nodes.
full member
Activity: 201
Merit: 100
so cryptopia is still on chain v0.8.5.1-132-g73a4219-beta, did you contact them?

The old wallet displayed the difficulty as a number which was a multiple of the minimum difficulty. That is why you cannot directly tell what difficulty relates to the old wallet difficulty for the user, as they are displayed differently, but the difficulty algorithms (Kimoto Gravity Well v2 and GroundRod Retarget PID) understand the difficulty very well, as the proof-of-work required difficulty algorithm did not change between KGW v1 and KGW v2. But after block 555555 with the change of the difficulty algorithm to GroundRod PID, the way the proof-of-work required is calculated will change and this is the reason why this is an hardfork.
In truth the PID Difficulty is a number of 256 bits such as 0x00000000010a2d19999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999, and the PID use this number as it is, but the displayed number by getdifficulty was simplified as shown above.
so will pools have to change something after block 555555? ( will stratum difficulty change etc? )

nodes please?
-addnode=109.133.156.15:49362
-addnode=211.149.175.37:52736
-addnode=84.55.23.199:55863
-addnode=211.149.175.37:51950
-addnode=192.99.13.67:54869
-addnode=108.61.10.90:56562
legendary
Activity: 1270
Merit: 1000
Thank you for putting the fork at least a month out...I don't follow every coin closely and only just now realized ANC was forking by chance from another thread (myriad). Hate it when coins decide to fork and only give a couple weeks notice. Now I got to get to work compiling the new version in Linux...tomorrow.

Edit: Compiled with no issues.
hero member
Activity: 553
Merit: 500
Pages:
Jump to: