Topic: [ANN][BCC] Bitconnect Coin - Decentralized Cryptocurrency - page 101. (Read 384600 times)

Somebody hunt me a shovel, for it's gettin' deep in here.

From the link I enlarged above, I read the following below the fold ...


At the beginning of the article I read this ...


Following that link, I read this ...


Now somebody enlighten me as to how it's Texan possible for an governing body to declare that the bad guys don't have a home, but literally in the same Texan breath provide a link to another page of the same governing body depicting an address that was declared nonexistent?

Actuly, mes haz a klue ...

REFERENCE:
https://news.bitcoin.com/autopsy-of-the-bitconnect-implosion-ponzi-centralization-governance/


Let's learn from history and do not repeat the same mistake over again.

Bitconnect-BCC coin was mined through a Centralized UK exchange so they were served with a potential lawsuit if they did not cease or desist.

Unlike other coins like BTC, LTC, ETH, etc which are mined through open decentralized miners, coins not controlled by a particular centralized, private exchange with registered owners in a government jurisdiction as in the case of BCC and maybe also BCCX, these type of coins and exchanges will always be prone to lawsuits and scam failure.

Bitconnect has closed its private exchange and BCC coin has no more support but the API but staking and minting coin in private desktop wallets do not work well, are unreliable do not reward and 1/2 of the time the mints do not get accepted. I suppose one has to carry a lot of weight to get any reward because when I held over 72 coins for almost 2 months I never got a staking reward and only received minute mints not worth the time and PC electricity expense having an unlocked wallet producing no return. So, staking BCC forget it, it does not work for small investors as the big guy eat all your rewards with their weight.

Centralized lending exchanges with the same characteristics as Bitconnect or Ethconnect THAT offer BIG % on daily lending through private closed exchanges are all fraud and will fail on the same principles as bitconnect.

Everyone should do their due diligence and research before speaking out or investing in anything, and that includes the former Bitconnect users/loaners. However, I "suppose" Amazon and other companies should cease and desist from having "affiliates" as well?

https://www.ssb.texas.gov/news-publications/4-billion-crypto-promoter-ordered-halt-fraudulent-sales

I admonish myself for cast pearls into swine muck.
I'm glad it's salvaged by you, Gleb. I believe this is our first aquantance.

I just loathe to see history interpreted & rewritten by survivors who risked nothing. Its easy to call defeated humans war criminals.  For all i know there was a bot, and owners were JFK'd, by the same group that sank the titanic to insert the Federal Reserve under the ribs of western civilization.

What's the percent return of BTC sprinting from $2k to 20k then back to 10k? 1% a day is not surprising.  A lot of home based server bot users claim more % daily.

Life is generally horrible enough.  Then there's catastrophe chasers strafing lifeboats here for kicks.

When disaster wiggles their vacuous conscience they voluntarily strike to action like craven trap door spiders.
Contemporary waifs raised by Hollywood contemptuous pinciples wander eforums reaching to inflict injury upon anyone within intellectual sphere of their zombified humor.
"Survival of the Rapist" gene programming toggles full on, to compensate for their foul minded shriveled synapses where compassion normally exists, launching them autonomically into regurgitating demoralizing attacks upon those who inadvertently tingled their deadened empathy nerve.

Basically empathy-eunuch jerks, sculpted so by genetic flaw & garbage media diet, punch out @ any victim & every situation that 'hurts them in the feels'.
[/quote]


Very well said! So good to see that some people can think outside the box and are not preprogrammed to be simple emotional reactionaries/insulters!

fck that, Mintpal and Mt.Gox were providing actual service "exchange" unlike bitconnect it was a ponzi from the beginning.

I've heard this one with MintPal, Mt.Gox, and now BitConnect.
If it looks like a duck, walks like a duck, and quacks like a duck - it's probably a Ponzzi Scheme

"A great industrial nation is controlled by its system of credit. Our system of credit is privately concentrated. The growth of the nation, therefore, and all our activities are in the hands of a few men who, even if their action be honest and intended for the public interest, are necessarily concentrated upon the great undertakings in which their own money is involved and who necessarily, by very reason of their own limitations, chill and check and destroy genuine economic freedom. This is the greatest question of all, and to this statesmen must address themselves with an earnest determination to serve the long future and the true liberties of men." -Woodrow Wilson contributed by C. Whitaker --214.26.214.162 22:27, 24 January 2012 (UTC) 

Source: https://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Talk:Woodrow_Wilson

This is the user I was thinking of - https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/loupgaroux-41159 - albeit I'd say his account has been hacked given his writing style has changed considerably downward from his last post in 2012 to subsequent posts starting in 2017.

These "survivors" risked nothing because they saw that this was a scam a year ago. They have been warning everyone who would listen that it was a scam. History isn't being rewritten. Today's history is the same as the future they were predicting for a year now. Obvious Ponzi is obvious.


Going from 1k to 10k in a year is 0.633% per day. Going from 1k to 20k in a year is 0.824% per day.

Bitcoin isn't a Ponzi. There's no Bitcoin company promising daily returns, paying them for a while and eventually failing to pay out the promised returns. Anyone who promises to pay 0.25% per day in USD value is lying to you. BitConnect can try to argue that they paid everyone back, but they paid them back in a token that dropped 90% in value before most people could exchange it for anything useful. The USD value of people's "investments" shrunk instead of growing as promised.

Do you see the difference? Bitcoin doesn't promise anyone that they will make a positive return. BitConnect's lending platform did.


They can keep scamming you as long as you keep giving them money.

So people can buy the old BCC and sell it to the new exchange for $150? LOL. They returned everyone's money at 363. Holy shit. How much scamming can this company do?

That is the best thing we have to because already many people lost their money by just believing this coin. So it is better to convert their coin into BTC and start buying the good altcoin in the market.

[quote ]
CryptToad, your prose style reads familiar. Have we rapped with one another before? This is Gleb Gamow aka Phinnaeus Gage aka Bruno.
[/quote]

I admonish myself for cast pearls into swine muck.
I'm glad it's salvaged by you, Gleb. I believe this is our first aquantance.

I just loathe to see history interpreted & rewritten by survivors who risked nothing. Its easy to call defeated humans war criminals.  For all i know there was a bot, and owners were JFK'd, by the same group that sank the titanic to insert the Federal Reserve under the ribs of western civilization.

What's the percent return of BTC sprinting from $2k to 20k then back to 10k? 1% a day is not surprising.  A lot of home based server bot users claim more % daily.

Life is generally horrible enough.  Then there's catastrophe chasers strafing lifeboats here for kicks.

When disaster wiggles their vacuous conscience they voluntarily strike to action like craven trap door spiders.
Contemporary waifs raised by Hollywood contemptuous pinciples wander eforums reaching to inflict injury upon anyone within intellectual sphere of their zombified humor.
"Survival of the Rapist" gene programming toggles full on, to compensate for their foul minded shriveled synapses where compassion normally exists, launching them autonomically into regurgitating demoralizing attacks upon those who inadvertently tingled their deadened empathy nerve.

Basically empathy-eunuch jerks, sculpted so by genetic flaw & garbage media diet, punch out @ any victim & every situation that 'hurts them in the feels'.

There was no "investing in BCC". There was a massive scam. The rest of your rant - amusing as it is - has nothing to do with BitConnect. You sound like you should disconnect from the evil capitalist intertubes and chill out.

According to Team BitConnect, supposedly they've received cease and desist letters from two US states, and if true, which I believe is a lie, part of their exit strategy, then some entities have their vitals.

Meanwhile, somewhere in New York ...

If they offer $150 "worth" of their new BCCX ICO per BCC, it helps prop up the price of BCC. Some people are going to think that BCC is now "worth" $150 per coin. This allows BitConnect to cash out more of their remaining BCC tokens for BTC before it goes to zero.

Remember Garza's scam where he let his victims trade their hashlets for paycoin tokens instead of admitting that they were worthless? It's much the same thing here.

So true. This was a ponzi scam right out of the gate! I hope the authorities can track down the perpetrators that ran this scam and also go after some of the biggest ponzi pimps that scammed others into it!

Take your money and buy good coins like Onix and many more

Because BCC is the new "on black" ... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cIasr2AiyZ0&feature=youtu.be&t=140