Thanks to "Dooglus" for giving me negative feedback for 'promoting a ponzi' lol Has he bought any bitcoin in his life I wonder, which is far more of a ponzi? Also, looking at his feedback he does this a lot whenever he thinks people are talking about a 'ponzi'. One of the deluded ones.
You're welcome for the negative feedback. As you see I often leave negative feedback for people promoting Ponzi scams, so don't feel special about it. I do what I can to alert potential victims about scams before they get caught up in them. Your lies are less likely to trick a new victim if they have a red trust rating beside them.
I have bought Bitcoin, but Bitcoin obviously isn't a Ponzi.I would be interested to hear about how you think Bitcoin is more of a Ponzi than the BitConnect "lending" platform was before it was shut down. Are you capable of making any kind of a convincing argument for your case?
I have explained many times that bitconnect have made massive profits from the demand of their coin. They could afford to pay everyone three months 'interest' all at the same time in their coin. How were they a Ponzi? Bitcoin or other cryptos can be dumped by devs or whales at any point but bitconnect (by far the largest holders and who stake millions too a month) are not able to dump their own coin, for the reasons I've said many times too (they pay all interest in their coin so the lower it is the more of the coin they need).
There are also PoS coins (like bitconnect) that give users a percentage of extra coins per month. Bitconnect managed to get to its high valuation despite massive staking rewards and inflation of about 100% per year!! Are you calling staking coins ponzis?
Remember when people lend the BCC, they lose the gain in the coin value (it is set to USD at the time of the lend and they only get the USD value back at the end too) and bitconnect have always PAID LESS BCC back including all the interest and capital releases. In other words they are just sharing the growth of their coin price with the lenders. They are calling it lending but it is not much different to staking coins (PoS) BUT IN REVERSE cos lenders get paid less coins lol. Bitconnect always paid less interest than the growth of their coin so have always accumulated more and more BCC which proves they don't need to be a Ponzi (which they could have been if their interest payments were higher than the growth of their coin). The way they paid everyone back also shows they could have easily carried on and weren't even going into their BCC reserves for the reasons given before.