Author

Topic: [ANN][BLC] Blakecoin Blake-256 for GPU/FPGA With Merged Mined Pools Stable Net - page 160. (Read 409569 times)

sr. member
Activity: 384
Merit: 250
@ALL:
Please download the new version of cgminer from the pool's website: http://blakecoinpool.org/cgminer-blake256.rar and let me know how it goes the H-not-zero issue.

The rar just contains the windows executable. Could you update the github with the changes too please Smiley

PS The (high-hash) errors stopped at 3am (GMT) but I've been getting (H-not-zero) errors (1714 rejected in around 8.5 hours, compare 4215 accepted) using the fpga cgminer 3.1.1 (hence the request for the github update).
hero member
Activity: 938
Merit: 501
@ALL:
Please download the new version of cgminer from the pool's website: http://blakecoinpool.org/cgminer-blake256.rar and let me know how it goes the H-not-zero issue.
legendary
Activity: 1509
Merit: 1030
Solutions Architect
Just started it up. I'll keep an eye on it.
I'm also pool mining now. I've seen a few high Hash lines but only a few then back to normal.

feedback on the wallet is always welcome, if you get a chance to try solo over the weekend let me know if it is any more stable

I am sure kr105 will fix the high hash issue on the pool soon   Undecided

I did some tweaks, I have not got a high-hash error since a lot of time, please let me know if you do.

sounds good I will give it some testing  Grin
hero member
Activity: 938
Merit: 501
Just started it up. I'll keep an eye on it.
I'm also pool mining now. I've seen a few high Hash lines but only a few then back to normal.

feedback on the wallet is always welcome, if you get a chance to try solo over the weekend let me know if it is any more stable

I am sure kr105 will fix the high hash issue on the pool soon   Undecided

I did some tweaks, I have not got a high-hash error since a lot of time, please let me know if you do.
legendary
Activity: 1509
Merit: 1030
Solutions Architect
Just started it up. I'll keep an eye on it.
I'm also pool mining now. I've seen a few high Hash lines but only a few then back to normal.

feedback on the wallet is always welcome, if you get a chance to try solo over the weekend let me know if it is any more stable

I am sure kr105 will fix the high hash issue on the pool soon   Undecided
legendary
Activity: 1470
Merit: 1001
Use Coinbase Account almosanywhere with Shift card
Just started it up. I'll keep an eye on it.
I'm also pool mining now. I've seen a few high Hash lines but only a few then back to normal.
legendary
Activity: 1509
Merit: 1030
Solutions Architect
It finally finished compiling (I did say raspi was slow) seems to be OK


cool  Grin

I did do some testing at least on the windows build last night and it does seem stable, no sync issues or dropping connections

but if anyone is getting an issue with 0.8.9 please report
sr. member
Activity: 384
Merit: 250
It finally finished compiling (I did say raspi was slow) seems to be OK

pi@tvpi ~/.blakecoin $ ./blakecoind getinfo
{
    "version" : 80900,
    "protocolversion" : 70001,
    "walletversion" : 60000,
    "balance" : 0.04261342,
    "blocks" : 39494,
    "timeoffset" : 0,
    "connections" : 3,
    "proxy" : "",
    "difficulty" : 3816.54040249,
    "testnet" : false,
    "keypoololdest" : 1386504023,
    "keypoolsize" : 101,
    "paytxfee" : 0.00000000,
    "errors" : ""
}


legendary
Activity: 1509
Merit: 1030
Solutions Architect
ok rpcnet.cpp updated try it now Smiley

I continued the make from where it left off, rpcnet.cpp compiled OK. It may be some time until it completes (raspi is not quick).

PS It did say this (just before it got to rcpnet.cpp), but I guess that's not critical ...

pi@tvpi ~/blakecoin_compile/Blakecoin-master/src $ make -f makefile.unix
/bin/sh ../share/genbuild.sh obj/build.h
fatal: Not a git repository (or any of the parent directories): .git


should build ok but I also noticed the git warning in Linux  Undecided


Edit:

Wallet version 0.8.9 is out

ported some bug fixes from Bitcoin 0.8.6 and updated the checkpoints

Github Updated to 0.8.9

Windows
http://blakecoin.org/Blakecoin-0.8.9-WIN.7z

Linux
http://blakecoin.org/Blakecoin-0.8.9-LIN.7z

Please report any problems  
sr. member
Activity: 384
Merit: 250
ok rpcnet.cpp updated try it now Smiley

I continued the make from where it left off, rpcnet.cpp compiled OK. It may be some time until it completes (raspi is not quick).

PS It did say this (just before it got to rcpnet.cpp), but I guess that's not critical ...

pi@tvpi ~/blakecoin_compile/Blakecoin-master/src $ make -f makefile.unix
/bin/sh ../share/genbuild.sh obj/build.h
fatal: Not a git repository (or any of the parent directories): .git
legendary
Activity: 1509
Merit: 1030
Solutions Architect
Please report any problems  

Roughly one hour into raspi compilation ...

Code:
g++ -c -O2 -pthread -Wall -Wextra -Wformat -Wformat-security -Wno-unused-parameter -g -DBOOST_SPIRIT_THREADSAFE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -I/home/pi/blakecoin_compile/Blakecoin-master/src -I/home/pi/blakecoin_compile/Blakecoin-master/src/obj -DUSE_UPNP=0 -DUSE_IPV6=1 -I/home/pi/blakecoin_compile/Blakecoin-master/src/leveldb/include -I/home/pi/blakecoin_compile/Blakecoin-master/src/leveldb/helpers -DHAVE_BUILD_INFO -fno-stack-protector -fstack-protector-all -Wstack-protector -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2  -MMD -MF obj/rpcnet.d -o obj/rpcnet.o rpcnet.cpp
rpcnet.cpp: In function âjson_spirit::Value getpeerinfo(const Array&, bool)â:
rpcnet.cpp:58:44: error: âconst class CNodeStatsâ has no member named âstrSubVerâ
make: *** [obj/rpcnet.o] Error 1

ok rpcnet.cpp updated try it now Smiley
sr. member
Activity: 384
Merit: 250
Please report any problems  

Roughly one hour into raspi compilation ...

Code:
g++ -c -O2 -pthread -Wall -Wextra -Wformat -Wformat-security -Wno-unused-parameter -g -DBOOST_SPIRIT_THREADSAFE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -I/home/pi/blakecoin_compile/Blakecoin-master/src -I/home/pi/blakecoin_compile/Blakecoin-master/src/obj -DUSE_UPNP=0 -DUSE_IPV6=1 -I/home/pi/blakecoin_compile/Blakecoin-master/src/leveldb/include -I/home/pi/blakecoin_compile/Blakecoin-master/src/leveldb/helpers -DHAVE_BUILD_INFO -fno-stack-protector -fstack-protector-all -Wstack-protector -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2  -MMD -MF obj/rpcnet.d -o obj/rpcnet.o rpcnet.cpp
rpcnet.cpp: In function âjson_spirit::Value getpeerinfo(const Array&, bool)â:
rpcnet.cpp:58:44: error: âconst class CNodeStatsâ has no member named âstrSubVerâ
make: *** [obj/rpcnet.o] Error 1
legendary
Activity: 1509
Merit: 1030
Solutions Architect
Wallet version 0.8.9 is out

some bug fixes from Bitcoin 0.8.6 and updated the checkpoints

Github Updated to 0.8.9

Linux and Windows wallet binaries due soon

Edit:

Windows
http://blakecoin.org/Blakecoin-0.8.9-WIN.7z

Linux
http://blakecoin.org/Blakecoin-0.8.9-LIN.7z

Please report any problems  
sr. member
Activity: 384
Merit: 250
vardiff *should* be disabled, but I'm going to check again.

MPOS also has some settings for difficulty, double check the global.inc files in the include - config folder?

also I guess try diff=4 as that's what it keeps trying to set just before it goes (high-hash)

It is weird though, as (high-hash) is what gets returned when you submit a share which is below target (I temporarily hacked cgminer to do this for diff=1 shares as I was worried that I was missing out on these shares, seeing as I was finding twice as many blocks than my credited BLC, its catching up now though).

Unfortunately when its (high-hash)ing it rejects everything, even perfectly good blocks!

Code:
pi@tvpi ~/blakemine/cgminer-ztex $ grep BLOCK log.txt
 [2013-12-16 14:41:16] Rejected 000700b3 Diff 9.36K/2 BLOCK! ZTX 0  (high-hash)
 [2013-12-16 16:46:42] Accepted 0009a2d6 Diff 6.8K/2 BLOCK! ZTX 2
 [2013-12-16 17:09:29] Accepted 00088cb5 Diff 7.67K/2 BLOCK! ZTX 2
 [2013-12-16 18:27:48] Accepted 00070243 Diff 9.35K/2 BLOCK! ZTX 0
 [2013-12-16 18:35:22] Accepted 000fc068 Diff 4.16K/2 BLOCK! ZTX 1
 [2013-12-16 20:20:46] Accepted 001268f9 Diff 3.56K/2 BLOCK! ZTX 3
 [2013-12-16 22:03:06] Accepted 0006d3fa Diff 9.6K/2 BLOCK! ZTX 0
 [2013-12-16 22:07:25] Rejected 000db825 Diff 4.78K/2 BLOCK! ZTX 1  (high-hash)
 [2013-12-16 22:41:50] Accepted 00039cfe Diff 18.1K/2 BLOCK! ZTX 2
 [2013-12-16 22:56:04] Accepted 0002537c Diff 28.2K/2 BLOCK! ZTX 2
 [2013-12-17 05:55:30] Rejected 000c3019 Diff 5.38K/2 BLOCK! ZTX 1  (high-hash)
 [2013-12-17 05:55:31] Rejected 5f549b7b Diff 2/2 BLOCK! ZTX 1  (high-hash)
 [2013-12-17 06:19:04] Accepted 00192e2c Diff 2.6K/2 BLOCK! ZTX 3
 [2013-12-17 08:37:07] Accepted 00104786 Diff 4.03K/2 BLOCK! ZTX 1
 [2013-12-17 09:56:06] Accepted 000f8b55 Diff 4.22K/2 BLOCK! ZTX 1
 [2013-12-17 11:02:33] Accepted 00197991 Diff 2.57K/2 BLOCK! ZTX 1
 [2013-12-17 11:29:29] Accepted 001afc84 Diff 2.43K/2 BLOCK! ZTX 1
 [2013-12-17 13:42:50] Accepted 000ddeec Diff 4.72K/2 BLOCK! ZTX 2
 [2013-12-17 14:10:56] Rejected 001592dd Diff 3.04K/2 BLOCK! ZTX 3  (high-hash)
 [2013-12-17 14:11:01] Rejected 5a01601d Diff 2/2 BLOCK! ZTX 3  (high-hash)
 [2013-12-17 16:06:44] Accepted 0009a7e5 Diff 6.79K/2 BLOCK! ZTX 2
 [2013-12-17 17:16:34] Accepted 00062c43 Diff 10.6K/2 BLOCK! ZTX 0
 [2013-12-17 17:53:01] Rejected 000dc130 Diff 4.76K/2 BLOCK! ZTX 3  (high-hash)
 [2013-12-17 17:53:01] Rejected 64bb6968 Diff 2/2 BLOCK! ZTX 3  (high-hash)
 [2013-12-17 19:41:49] Rejected 0008c64e Diff 7.47K/2 BLOCK! ZTX 0  (high-hash)
 [2013-12-17 22:44:34] Accepted 000f00e6 Diff 4.37K/2 BLOCK! ZTX 1
 [2013-12-18 03:11:17] Rejected 0000cab4 Diff 82.8K/2 BLOCK! ZTX 1  (high-hash)
 [2013-12-18 04:08:04] Accepted 0005b14f Diff 11.5K/2 BLOCK! ZTX 2
 [2013-12-18 04:08:57] Accepted 000f0699 Diff 4.36K/2 BLOCK! ZTX 1
 [2013-12-18 07:39:51] Rejected 001399ca Diff 3.34K/2 BLOCK! ZTX 2  (high-hash)
 [2013-12-18 11:44:53] Accepted 000b045d Diff 5.95K/2 BLOCK! ZTX 1
 [2013-12-18 13:42:35] Accepted 000d60d5 Diff 4.9K/2 BLOCK! ZTX 0
 [2013-12-18 13:51:20] Rejected 00097f95 Diff 6.9K/2 BLOCK! ZTX 2  (high-hash)
 [2013-12-18 16:07:27] Accepted 00026ae3 Diff 27.1K/2 BLOCK! ZTX 0
 [2013-12-18 17:29:17] Accepted 00131ecc Diff 3.43K/2 BLOCK! ZTX 3
 [2013-12-18 20:03:17] Accepted 00041716 Diff 16K/2 BLOCK! ZTX 2
 [2013-12-18 20:14:35] Rejected 000adc2a Diff 6.03K/2 BLOCK! ZTX 1  (high-hash)
 [2013-12-18 22:00:07] Rejected 00104fe0 Diff 4.02K/2 BLOCK! ZTX 2  (high-hash)
 [2013-12-19 04:15:02] Rejected 000a0178 Diff 6.55K/2 BLOCK! ZTX 1  (high-hash)
 [2013-12-19 04:28:57] Accepted 0010fb80 Diff 3.86K/2 BLOCK! ZTX 3
 [2013-12-19 05:45:14] Accepted 0008c6a6 Diff 7.47K/2 BLOCK! ZTX 1
 [2013-12-19 08:11:53] Rejected 000b9363 Diff 5.66K/2 BLOCK! ZTX 3  (high-hash)
 [2013-12-19 09:23:25] Accepted 000b2ef3 Diff 5.86K/2 BLOCK! ZTX 1
 [2013-12-19 09:33:38] Accepted 0009cf5a Diff 6.68K/2 BLOCK! ZTX 3
 [2013-12-19 10:03:50] Accepted 000a8ba6 Diff 6.21K/2 BLOCK! ZTX 1
 [2013-12-19 10:19:14] Accepted 000211f3 Diff 31.7K/2 BLOCK! ZTX 0
 [2013-12-19 13:10:25] Accepted 0010933c Diff 3.95K/2 BLOCK! ZTX 0
 [2013-12-19 13:17:42] Accepted 00132d1f Diff 3.42K/2 BLOCK! ZTX 3
 [2013-12-19 15:31:02] Accepted 0009c30d Diff 6.71K/2 BLOCK! ZTX 1
 [2013-12-19 15:40:56] Accepted 00162787 Diff 2.96K/2 BLOCK! ZTX 2
 [2013-12-19 18:07:40] Accepted 0000b15e Diff 94.6K/2 BLOCK! ZTX 1

In fact I can't see any instances of a block being accepted in the log when the prior share was rejected (high-hash). Though there are a couple of instances where a block is accepted normally, then the very next share is rejected (high-hash), so it seems it can change mode as a result of a block being found. Confusing.

PS. A few HW errors have crept into that log file (the nonces that don't start 00), it seems they don't get properly filtered out before submission.
PPS. Nope, I'm wrong. Those aren't nonces, its hash32[6] (the next to last 4 bytes of the hash), hence the leading 0's. The bit about HW errors still applies though (I think that diff1targ patch broke the filter).
legendary
Activity: 1509
Merit: 1030
Solutions Architect
vardiff *should* be disabled, but I'm going to check again.

MPOS also has some settings for difficulty, double check the global.inc files in the include - config folder?

also I guess try diff=4 as that's what it keeps trying to set just before it goes (high-hash)
hero member
Activity: 938
Merit: 501
I'm back, I will be looking into the pool issue today.

I think kramble described the issue best


Yep, its going through cycles of working OK, then high-hash, then working OK again. The "high-hash" message is in the JSON returned by the pool, not generated locally in cgminer. Interestingly I've seen my worker change between diff=2 and diff=4 on the pool dashboard, but cgminer always reports diff=2 as the target.

I've also taken a look at the calc_diff code in cgminer, and the diff1target in submit_share. I think this is just cosmetic, the miner is actually using the standard target sent by the pool (which must be for a 0x000000007fffffff hash I guess since its diff=2).

is vardiff on?
issue with cron jobs?
vardiff *should* be disabled, but I'm going to check again.
full member
Activity: 132
Merit: 100
BitCoin
Cryptsy added a bunch of coins today but BLC was not one of them.  Cry

Anyone know what is needed to get added?

Support@:

https://cryptsy.freshdesk.com/support/discussions/forums/191571
legendary
Activity: 1470
Merit: 1001
Use Coinbase Account almosanywhere with Shift card
Cryptsy added a bunch of coins today but BLC was not one of them.  Cry

Anyone know what is needed to get added?
legendary
Activity: 1470
Merit: 1001
Use Coinbase Account almosanywhere with Shift card
Connected to poll with krambel's FPGA cgminer. No high hash yet but have not been mining long.
legendary
Activity: 1509
Merit: 1030
Solutions Architect
I'm back, I will be looking into the pool issue today.

I think it is being worked on atm

Edit:
I have found 280 blocks on the pool even with the (high-hash) issue so its not all bad just not perfect yet Wink
Jump to: