What are these duplicate shares?
High rejection rate suddenly.
[INFO] [2018-01-18T11:59:09+02:00] [GPU 5] Speed: 302.04 Sol/s 160.07 Nonce/s
[WARN] [2018-01-18T11:59:16+02:00] Rejected share #645 ([22,"duplicate share"])
[INFO] [2018-01-18T11:59:16+02:00] [GPU 0] Speed: 719.80 Sol/s 385.21 Nonce/s
[INFO] [2018-01-18T11:59:17+02:00] [GPU 1] Speed: 519.35 Sol/s 278.28 Nonce/s
[INFO] [2018-01-18T11:59:19+02:00] [GPU 2] Speed: 307.09 Sol/s 163.84 Nonce/s
[INFO] [2018-01-18T11:59:20+02:00] Accepted share #646
[INFO] [2018-01-18T11:59:20+02:00] [GPU 6] Speed: 306.90 Sol/s 164.35 Nonce/s
[INFO] [2018-01-18T11:59:21+02:00] Accepted share #647
[INFO] [2018-01-18T11:59:23+02:00] [GPU 3] Speed: 305.92 Sol/s 163.75 Nonce/s
[INFO] [2018-01-18T11:59:30+02:00] [GPU 4] Speed: 518.88 Sol/s 274.61 Nonce/s
[INFO] [2018-01-18T11:59:35+02:00] [GPU 7] Speed: 305.21 Sol/s 162.63 Nonce/s
[INFO] [2018-01-18T11:59:35+02:00] Total 3285.18 Sol/s 1752.74 Nonce/s Accepted shares 629 Rejected shares 15
[INFO] [2018-01-18T11:59:39+02:00] [GPU 5] Speed: 302.29 Sol/s 160.07 Nonce/s
[WARN] [2018-01-18T11:59:42+02:00] Rejected share #648 ([22,"duplicate share"])
[INFO] [2018-01-18T11:59:46+02:00] [GPU 0] Speed: 711.33 Sol/s 379.96 Nonce/s
[INFO] [2018-01-18T11:59:47+02:00] [GPU 1] Speed: 515.11 Sol/s 275.02 Nonce/s
[INFO] [2018-01-18T11:59:49+02:00] [GPU 2] Speed: 304.38 Sol/s 162.63 Nonce/s
[INFO] [2018-01-18T11:59:50+02:00] [GPU 6] Speed: 304.11 Sol/s 163.04 Nonce/s
[INFO] [2018-01-18T11:59:53+02:00] [GPU 3] Speed: 304.17 Sol/s 162.60 Nonce/s
[INFO] [2018-01-18T11:59:55+02:00] Accepted share #649
17 rejected shares in 5 minutes.
Topic: [ANN]Bminer: a fast Equihash/Ethash/Cuckaroo29z miner for AMD/NVIDIA GPUs 16.4.9 - page 146. (Read 148347 times)
January 18, 2018, 05:02:12 AM
January 18, 2018, 12:34:07 AM
Either one of you fellas can help me out? 100% rejects higher than target, running pimp 2.4.2, 6 x 1070's stock clocks
Can you share your command line?
January 17, 2018, 11:03:39 PM
Either one of you fellas can help me out? 100% rejects higher than target, running pimp 2.4.2, 6 x 1070's stock clocks
January 17, 2018, 10:47:44 PM
I did a test on v5.1.0 for 6x 1080Ti and 2x 1070 (all on the same motherboard, Biostar H110+) for 1h each. Ubuntu 16.04 with nvidia 384.110.
v5.1 is definitely slower. v5.0 has always a Total > 5620 sol/s. v5.1 has always a Total < 5595 Sol/s.
I did want Nicehash support but would like to keep the speed. Could you please add Nicehash support in 5.0.0 and don't change anything else and release v5.0.0a?
v5.0.0
v5.1.0
v5.1 is definitely slower. v5.0 has always a Total > 5620 sol/s. v5.1 has always a Total < 5595 Sol/s.
I did want Nicehash support but would like to keep the speed. Could you please add Nicehash support in 5.0.0 and don't change anything else and release v5.0.0a?
v5.0.0
Code:
[INFO] [2018-01-18T03:22:05Z] [GPU 0] Speed: 768.95 Sol/s 410.28 Nonce/s
[INFO] [2018-01-18T03:22:06Z] [GPU 1] Speed: 520.95 Sol/s 277.22 Nonce/s
[INFO] [2018-01-18T03:22:07Z] [GPU 2] Speed: 773.16 Sol/s 410.65 Nonce/s
[INFO] [2018-01-18T03:22:08Z] [GPU 3] Speed: 760.29 Sol/s 405.85 Nonce/s
[INFO] [2018-01-18T03:22:09Z] [GPU 4] Speed: 776.17 Sol/s 412.18 Nonce/s
[INFO] [2018-01-18T03:22:11Z] [GPU 5] Speed: 767.18 Sol/s 408.86 Nonce/s
[INFO] [2018-01-18T03:22:13Z] [GPU 6] Speed: 507.81 Sol/s 270.04 Nonce/s
[INFO] [2018-01-18T03:22:16Z] [GPU 7] Speed: 751.90 Sol/s 401.03 Nonce/s
[INFO] [2018-01-18T03:22:17Z] Total 5626.42 Sol/s 2996.10 Nonce/s Accepted shares 726 Rejected shares 1
v5.1.0
Code:
[INFO] [2018-01-18T03:40:37Z] [GPU 0] Speed: 765.94 Sol/s 409.58 Nonce/s
[INFO] [2018-01-18T03:40:37Z] [GPU 1] Speed: 519.76 Sol/s 277.65 Nonce/s
[INFO] [2018-01-18T03:40:38Z] [GPU 2] Speed: 763.17 Sol/s 407.02 Nonce/s
[INFO] [2018-01-18T03:40:39Z] [GPU 3] Speed: 754.50 Sol/s 403.33 Nonce/s
[INFO] [2018-01-18T03:40:41Z] [GPU 4] Speed: 766.66 Sol/s 408.59 Nonce/s
[INFO] [2018-01-18T03:40:43Z] [GPU 5] Speed: 762.75 Sol/s 407.08 Nonce/s
[INFO] [2018-01-18T03:40:45Z] [GPU 6] Speed: 502.60 Sol/s 269.74 Nonce/s
[INFO] [2018-01-18T03:40:47Z] [GPU 7] Speed: 748.88 Sol/s 399.55 Nonce/s
[INFO] [2018-01-18T03:40:47Z] Total 5584.27 Sol/s 2982.54 Nonce/s Accepted shares 225 Rejected shares 1
January 17, 2018, 10:04:08 PM
I tried to test this miner, but, for me... this does not work, it just quit on start
what I am doing wrong???
what I am doing wrong???
can you give some information about your rig?
January 17, 2018, 08:13:09 PM
https://s18.postimg.org/fvpk8tf1l/Screenshot-2018-1-15_Bminer_When_Crypto-mining_Made_Fast.png
0.0016% rejected shares.
0.0016% rejected shares.
is 0.0016% good or bad?
newbie question here
It is hard to tell why you have rejected shares because there are alot of reason. But with 0.0016% only, it is a good mining result.
January 17, 2018, 08:07:49 PM
I tried to test this miner, but, for me... this does not work, it just quit on start
what I am doing wrong???
what I am doing wrong???
January 17, 2018, 07:35:04 PM
Trying out 5.1.0, ive got it running just getting "rejected above target" errors. Any ideas?
January 17, 2018, 04:56:09 PM
i just see you today ,
im testing it on windows 10 3 rigs of 7 . 1060 3gb
on rig 1 , look a bit slower than dstm , 1940 vs 1892 for Bminer.
on rig 2 (6 card at this time) dstm 1503 vs 1547 for Bminer
this info was on dos windows on win10
but i let it work and see the diff on few days ....
thx for release ,u look have a watch dog and api ?
you look work on miner
can you add for control pool ? when pool1 not answers use pool2 ?
or include a Zproxy ?
all i want ,miner never stop ...
thank's
im testing it on windows 10 3 rigs of 7 . 1060 3gb
on rig 1 , look a bit slower than dstm , 1940 vs 1892 for Bminer.
on rig 2 (6 card at this time) dstm 1503 vs 1547 for Bminer
this info was on dos windows on win10
but i let it work and see the diff on few days ....
thx for release ,u look have a watch dog and api ?
you look work on miner
can you add for control pool ? when pool1 not answers use pool2 ?
or include a Zproxy ?
all i want ,miner never stop ...
thank's
Just curious about the configuration of rig 1. How does it look like? What kinds of cards does the rig have? And how many cards do you have on that rig?
I'm working on supporting multiple pools to make things even more reliable. Please stay tuned.
January 17, 2018, 11:53:56 AM
Can't be bothered reading all the posts here or do my own testing - win version of this miner is slower than dstm's ? Correct ?
i tested it since yesterday , loook be 3% faster than dstm.
i got 301 with dstm ,and im at 310 with bminer ... ( on flypool)
but just one night here ....
the blue line ( current effective hashrate , look more regular with bminer)
with dstm ( the blue line goes higher and lower , and average is lower ...)
bminer let me think have a "zecproxy" include , more régular about job found .....
Newbie here! My very second post.
Can you pls share your result one more time here tomorrow?
if this miner is so good! I will definitely try Bminer
u cant dstm vs bminer
market crash = less miner on zcash ( for me )
that's why i have better result ....
if i just look stats , dstm = 3.1 kH/s (3.06) , Bminer = 3.3 kH/s (3.27)
( yes i speak about 24h/average from the pool )
but market still in change ....
January 17, 2018, 07:43:15 AM
What are system requirements for this miner to run? I have it successfully running on one PC, but on a different PC it doesn't even start. It throws no errors, so I don't know where to even begin... (vc++ is already installed).
Linux x64 and Windows x64
This is the official website: https://www.bminer.me/releases/
There's nothing about system requirements on the website... I already read it multiple times...
January 17, 2018, 07:37:34 AM
What are system requirements for this miner to run? I have it successfully running on one PC, but on a different PC it doesn't even start. It throws no errors, so I don't know where to even begin... (vc++ is already installed).
Linux x64 and Windows x64
This is the official website: https://www.bminer.me/releases/
January 17, 2018, 07:25:03 AM
What are system requirements for this miner to run? I have it successfully running on one PC, but on a different PC it doesn't even start. It throws no errors, so I don't know where to even begin... (vc++ is already installed).
January 17, 2018, 07:00:01 AM
I tested Bminer with single GTX1080Ti for several hours and got the following:
With EWBF 0.3.4b I get 745-755 Sol/s (230-240W power consumption)
With Bminer I get 750-760 Sol/s (same power consumption)
So the difference in the limits of statistical error
With EWBF 0.3.4b I get 745-755 Sol/s (230-240W power consumption)
With Bminer I get 750-760 Sol/s (same power consumption)
So the difference in the limits of statistical error
January 17, 2018, 06:58:24 AM
0.0016% rejected shares.
is 0.0016% good or bad?
newbie question here
January 17, 2018, 06:55:35 AM
Can't be bothered reading all the posts here or do my own testing - win version of this miner is slower than dstm's ? Correct ?
i tested it since yesterday , loook be 3% faster than dstm.
i got 301 with dstm ,and im at 310 with bminer ... ( on flypool)
but just one night here ....
the blue line ( current effective hashrate , look more regular with bminer)
with dstm ( the blue line goes higher and lower , and average is lower ...)
bminer let me think have a "zecproxy" include , more régular about job found .....
Newbie here! My very second post.
Can you pls share your result one more time here tomorrow?
if this miner is so good! I will definitely try Bminer
January 17, 2018, 05:59:35 AM
https://s18.postimg.org/fvpk8tf1l/Screenshot-2018-1-15_Bminer_When_Crypto-mining_Made_Fast.png
0.0016% rejected shares.
0.0016% rejected shares.
is 0.0016% good or bad?
newbie question here
January 17, 2018, 03:29:44 AM
Can't be bothered reading all the posts here or do my own testing - win version of this miner is slower than dstm's ? Correct ?
i tested it since yesterday , loook be 3% faster than dstm.
i got 301 with dstm ,and im at 310 with bminer ... ( on flypool)
but just one night here ....
the blue line ( current effective hashrate , look more regular with bminer)
with dstm ( the blue line goes higher and lower , and average is lower ...)
bminer let me think have a "zecproxy" include , more régular about job found .....
January 17, 2018, 01:11:32 AM
Can't be bothered reading all the posts here or do my own testing - win version of this miner is slower than dstm's ? Correct ?
January 16, 2018, 10:36:10 PM
MPH shows my hash rate as substantially higher than what the miner is showing (its estimating based on last 5 minutes of shares). So for some pool appears to be lower, while for others like myself it appears to be higher. Not sure if this is related to the miner or just share luck. The amount of rejected shares does concern me a bit, its around 0.5%
Jump to: