Author

Topic: [ANN]Bminer: a fast Equihash/Ethash/Cuckaroo29z miner for AMD/NVIDIA GPUs 16.4.9 - page 147. (Read 148347 times)

jr. member
Activity: 56
Merit: 2
i just see you today ,

im testing it on windows 10 3 rigs of 7 . 1060 3gb

on rig 1 , look a bit slower than dstm , 1940 vs 1892 for Bminer.
on rig 2 (6 card at this time) dstm 1503 vs 1547 for Bminer

this info was on dos windows on win10
but i let it work and see the diff on few days ....

thx for release ,u look have a watch dog and api ?

you look work on miner
can you add for control pool ? when pool1 not answers use pool2 ?
or include a Zproxy ?

all i want ,miner never stop ...

thank's Wink
newbie
Activity: 6
Merit: 0
could anyone post their .bat setup for slushpool? thanks in advance
member
Activity: 461
Merit: 49
The miner doesn't work on Ubuntu 14 (Ethos)

./bminer: relocation error: ./bminer: symbol _ZTTNSt7__cxx1118basic_stringstreamIcSt11char_traitsIcESaIcEEE, version GLIBCXX_3.4.21 not defined in file libstdc++.so.6 with link time reference

What to do?


Can you please try the following?

Quote

sudo add-apt-repository ppa:ubuntu-toolchain-r/test
sudo apt-get update
sudo apt-get install libstdc++6



Quote
sudo add-apt-repository ppa:ubuntu-toolchain-r/test

Done


Quote
sudo apt-get update

Done


Quote
sudo apt-get install libstdc++6

Already the newest version installed

The same error...


Did not have an environment to reproduce it yet -- but will look into it.
member
Activity: 461
Merit: 49
The version 5.1.0 has released:

  • Support NiceHash.
  • Fix unstable network connections in 5.0.0.
  • Fix performance regressions for 1080Ti under Linux.

Enjoy mining!
It actually shows all sols computed by the bminer. Note that the number remains the same even the devfee is turned off (which does not submit devfee shares but it disables *quite a few* optimizations).
Im curious what these optimizations do?

1) You can add GPU temps on miner window?
2) You can add colors to miner window for best reading?

Many of optimizations are around how to schedule CPU / GPU jobs to maximize the effective utilizations.

For the other two questions is the UI sufficient?

member
Activity: 461
Merit: 49
The version 5.1.0 has released:

  • Support NiceHash.
  • Fix unstable network connections in 5.0.0.
  • Fix performance regressions for 1080Ti under Linux.

Enjoy mining!

The performance regression hasn't been fixed. Instead it has been made another 0.5% worse.

I'm using 384.111 and it seems working pretty well.

Will look into it more closely.
newbie
Activity: 5
Merit: 0
The version 5.1.0 has released:

  • Support NiceHash.
  • Fix unstable network connections in 5.0.0.
  • Fix performance regressions for 1080Ti under Linux.

Enjoy mining!

The performance regression hasn't been fixed. Instead it has been made another 0.5% worse.
member
Activity: 461
Merit: 49
This is really weird, the miner seems faster in miner and on API, but slower on the pool than DTSM.

Checked on 1080Ti cards: reports ~800h/s in miner and API per card; DTSM shows ~780h/s
Checked on Titan Xp cards: reports ~840h/s in miner and API per card; DTSM shows ~810h/s

Aggregated hash rate for 15 cards total (2x titan xp and 13x 1080ti) ~9 Khash in pool.

On DTSM aggregated hash rate for 15 cards total (2x titan xp and 13x 1080ti) ~11 Khash in pool.

Checked with ZCASH on flypool and with ZCLASSIC on Coinmine.pl

Optimizations are on. nofee command isn't listed.
What gives?




How long have the miners been running?

The pool is estimating the speeds based on the number of submitted shares. Therefore you'll need at least 24 hours to get accurate results.

What are the percentages of rejected shares?

Many people have tried on nanopool / miningpoolhub / suprnova and the numbers seem pretty accurate. Can you try these pools?

hero member
Activity: 630
Merit: 502
full member
Activity: 420
Merit: 184
I was also averaging about 1% rejected shares with 5.0.0, and virtually 0% with dstm 0.5.7.
member
Activity: 216
Merit: 13
Additionally to all previous comments, seeing about ~1 out of 100 rejects on shares, with DTSM literally no rejects.
newbie
Activity: 176
Merit: 0
Quote
Same results in my side : the hashrate in the pool in less with BMiner than DSTM (all with fees, 1080Ti, 1070, 1050Ti...).
Numbrs in the miner are suspicious for me.
Same for me.
sr. member
Activity: 810
Merit: 444
You are running under Linux right? I'm running under Win 10 x64.
Meaning it's not OS specific either.

For now advise caution with this miner


This is really weird, the miner seems faster in miner and on API, but slower on the pool than DTSM.

Checked on 1080Ti cards: reports ~800h/s in miner and API per card; DTSM shows ~780h/s
Checked on Titan Xp cards: reports ~840h/s in miner and API per card; DTSM shows ~810h/s

Aggregated hash rate for 15 cards total (2x titan xp and 13x 1080ti) ~9 Khash in pool.

On DTSM aggregated hash rate for 15 cards total (2x titan xp and 13x 1080ti) ~11 Khash in pool.

Checked with ZCASH on flypool and with ZCLASSIC on Coinmine.pl

Optimizations are on. nofee command isn't listed.
What gives?



Same results in my side : the hashrate in the pool in less with BMiner than DSTM (all with fees).
Numbrs in the miner are suspicious for me.
Yes, Linux (Ubuntu 16.04).
member
Activity: 216
Merit: 13
You are running under Linux right? I'm running under Win 10 x64.
Meaning it's not OS specific either.

For now advise caution with this miner


This is really weird, the miner seems faster in miner and on API, but slower on the pool than DTSM.

Checked on 1080Ti cards: reports ~800h/s in miner and API per card; DTSM shows ~780h/s
Checked on Titan Xp cards: reports ~840h/s in miner and API per card; DTSM shows ~810h/s

Aggregated hash rate for 15 cards total (2x titan xp and 13x 1080ti) ~9 Khash in pool.

On DTSM aggregated hash rate for 15 cards total (2x titan xp and 13x 1080ti) ~11 Khash in pool.

Checked with ZCASH on flypool and with ZCLASSIC on Coinmine.pl

Optimizations are on. nofee command isn't listed.
What gives?



Same results in my side : the hashrate in the pool in less with BMiner than DSTM (all with fees).
Numbrs in the miner are suspicious for me.
sr. member
Activity: 810
Merit: 444
This is really weird, the miner seems faster in miner and on API, but slower on the pool than DTSM.

Checked on 1080Ti cards: reports ~800h/s in miner and API per card; DTSM shows ~780h/s
Checked on Titan Xp cards: reports ~840h/s in miner and API per card; DTSM shows ~810h/s

Aggregated hash rate for 15 cards total (2x titan xp and 13x 1080ti) ~9 Khash in pool.

On DTSM aggregated hash rate for 15 cards total (2x titan xp and 13x 1080ti) ~11 Khash in pool.

Checked with ZCASH on flypool and with ZCLASSIC on Coinmine.pl

Optimizations are on. nofee command isn't listed.
What gives?



Same results in my side : the hashrate in the pool in less with BMiner than DSTM (all with fees, 1080Ti, 1070, 1050Ti...).
Numbrs in the miner are suspicious for me.
member
Activity: 216
Merit: 13
This is really weird, the miner seems faster in miner and on API, but slower on the pool than DTSM.

Checked on 1080Ti cards: reports ~800h/s in miner and API per card; DTSM shows ~780h/s
Checked on Titan Xp cards: reports ~840h/s in miner and API per card; DTSM shows ~810h/s

Aggregated hash rate for 15 cards total (2x titan xp and 13x 1080ti) ~9 Khash in pool.

On DTSM aggregated hash rate for 15 cards total (2x titan xp and 13x 1080ti) ~11 Khash in pool.

Checked with ZCASH on flypool and with ZCLASSIC on Coinmine.pl

Optimizations are on. nofee command isn't listed.
What gives?


sr. member
Activity: 810
Merit: 444
The version 5.1.0 has released:

  • Support NiceHash.
  • Fix unstable network connections in 5.0.0.
  • Fix performance regressions for 1080Ti under Linux.

Enjoy mining!
Are you sure for the increase hashrate ?
I use GTX 1080Ti under Linux (Ubuntu 16.04) and I've not seen any hashrate increase between 5.0.0 and 5.1.0...
jr. member
Activity: 119
Merit: 3
The version 5.1.0 has released:

  • Support NiceHash.
  • Fix unstable network connections in 5.0.0.
  • Fix performance regressions for 1080Ti under Linux.

Enjoy mining!

New version same thing: Miner it use 2 extra internet connection 100% of time beside mining pool & appi so agen i will say pass on using this miner

Code:
bminer.exe	TCP 	104.31.68.221		https
bminer.exe TCP gre14.anti-ddos.pro 6633
newbie
Activity: 11
Merit: 0
The version 5.1.0 has released:

  • Support NiceHash.
  • Fix unstable network connections in 5.0.0.
  • Fix performance regressions for 1080Ti under Linux.

Enjoy mining!
It actually shows all sols computed by the bminer. Note that the number remains the same even the devfee is turned off (which does not submit devfee shares but it disables *quite a few* optimizations).
Im curious what these optimizations do?

1) You can add GPU temps on miner window?
2) You can add colors to miner window for best reading?
member
Activity: 461
Merit: 49
Thanks everybody for the feedback. The 5.0.0 version has been released:

  • Minor performance improvement for GTX 1060.
  • Fixed performance regressions in 4.0.0 on Windows.
  • Optimization on the networking layer.
  • Show GPU ID in case of hardware errors.
  • Introduced the option -no-timestamps which suppresses the timestamps in the logging messages.

Happy mining!

You should probably put the Version number in the subject of this thread so ppl know easily when you update your miner.
e.g. [ANN] Bminer (v5.0): a fast Equihash miner for CUDA GPUs

That way ppl wont have to look at page 1 or 13 everytime to figure out if there's been an update.

Good job on bringing new versions I havent tested it yet but the last one didnt work for me. Will do so over the weekend.

Thanks for the suggestions. I made the changes.
newbie
Activity: 4
Merit: 0
Does it work with nicehash GUI?
Jump to: