Topic: [ANN][BURST] Burst | Efficient HDD Mining | New 1.2.3 Fork block 92000 - page 205. (Read 2170648 times)

I'm 1 week ahead of you here. I shut down a very large mining setup.  I want to see a peer reviewed white paper too.

Karl, I review each tweet carefully before I re-tweet them. If or if it not includes the video of the windows wallet. The windows wallet is for sure very important. However, I feel it is a pure advertisement of a certain pool and as pool operator myself, I can not promote other pools.

1. I am able to list whatever I want, regardless if you like it or not!

Said this:
2. Of dev pool v1 I have no information. It is nowhere listed any more. If you provide info about them, I am glad to add this as well. I asked here if there are other pools, NOBODY replied, not even YOU. I have no idea what it would change though.

3. I asked how to calculate the estimated network size, but no answer. Of course you could not see that, since you put me on the ignore list. Glad you have your ear again.

4. The pool statistics is complete, unlike the ones posted on other sites!

5. I use REAL name, real phone numbers, real identity, even on SSL certicficates. Therefore you can always trust who I am, where I am, ... unlike ....

Have a nice day.

Hello,

Thank you. No pools or names are mentioned as it is intended to spread the word of BURST's features and through that do promotion.

Regards,
Karl

First of all, why do you report that pool statistics? The balance and registered miners is completely useless info. Interesting information would be the mining capacity of each pool, perhaps estimated by found blocks. Second, your useless list still miss dev1.

That's what we asked already months!

To be "good" is not enough!

Developers left the ship. That is a fact. We are sailing around in the open sea without a destination, without a PLAN. To make a windows clone of a coin not any more developed is just useless. It covers up for the moment. And even there I can not jump on it. The provided video of the new windows wallet is just pure advertisement for one pool. I cannot promote it! I have to make my own ads (video).

Don't mis-understand. BURST is a brilliant idea of low cost mining, has enormous amount of features, but there are no developers to "finish" or continue developing, nor is there a marketing ("pr team" or whatever you want to call it).

I review all tweets of Karl, if it is a pure ad for another pool, I have to skip it! Others I promote.

The alphabetical pool statistics for today is:
BURST.MiningHere.com
Pool balance: 66,518
Registered Miners: 280

burst.ninja
Pool balance: 14,988
Registered Miners: 399

burst.poolto.be
Pool balance: 3,937
Registered Miners: 255

cryptomining.farm
Pool balance: 41,743
Registered Miners: 1,859

DevPool v2
Pool balance: 584,576
Registered Miners: 551

mining.tompool.org
Pool balance: 1,349
Registered Miners: 56

pool.blago
Pool balance: 8
Registered Miners: 113

pool.burstcoin.de
Pool balance: 24,983
Registered Miners: 119

pool.burstcoin.it
Pool balance: 37
Registered Miners: 52

as i do know a bit from here any 3 TB to doulbe or more its good for even windows mine its just a few dollars earnings and some eletrecity bill to pay but you get a good grip of it soo if you have 3TB to more do try your HDD into it

Yes, of course. But to me it sounds like Irontiga as a dev sits on inside information. More correctly would be to ask if that is the case and if he can share the content of that information. However, I'm pretty sure Irontiga understood what I meant. The price is down -15%


By the way, you do know that it is "et cetera" and "etc.", and not what you state in your sig, right...?

You're wrong. It's the other way around:
If it can't be proven that it is not flawed and secure, there doesn't need to be a reasoning to argument that it might be flawed and insecure.

What do you mean not flawed and not secure? You can't leave your reasoning out of a statement like that.


Edit, someone just dumped 3-4mil on polo, down to 38sat.

I am quitting Burst until the dev returns, shows us a whitepaper, and proves that PoC is NOT flawed. Byte Ent continues, and I still support it fully. I am just not doing anything core related until I see some evidence for PoC being 100% secure.

Hello,

15-20 tweets on BURST's undervaluation have now been posted, following the first batch. Twitter account:

https://twitter.com/karl_perkin/

First tweet of the new ones:
https://twitter.com/karl_perkin/status/636610597208068097

Please help to spread this by retweeting some or all of the numbered tweets (these are directed at BURST, while I tweet on other subjects too.

Thank you for doing promotional work! The next tweet will probably come tomorrow.

Warm regards,
Karl

it will use CPU and HDD slightly, for about 1 min or so per block. But that's it. it is about 25% less efficient than just leaving your computer on I mine on my main rig all day long and notice no decrease in performance or any issues whatsoever.

I watched the video, after ploting which use CPU and HDD write/read at the maximum speed. After this will it use only the cpu or only the hdd or both? I have 500gb free.

I'm just getting sick on all the lazy bastards, who 1) think they have all the solutions, 2) do not understand that their ideas are everything but novel, and 3) just expect that a handful of people are supposed to work night and day to make them money while they don't contribute themselves.

If just everyone contributed with something little at least, BURST would be totally different.

We all do, that's why we are here! 

of course that you can mine, just check the OP thread and you will notice how to do that.

Also the PR team release a new and usefull tool ALL in ONE from where you should be able to start to mine this coin in a few easy steps, you can check it here -> https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.12174611

Welcome to the BURST world

i have 4,5 Tb on a win pc, could i mine?

So, why do you care so much about BURST...?