Topic: [ANN][BURST] Burst | Efficient HDD Mining | New 1.2.3 Fork block 92000 - page 489. (Read 2171056 times)

tnx mate

wallet.burstcoin.io

that will do the trick

Glad to know - I will make a note to update all the test cases (as many of the op codes are going to have the same issues). Unfortunately when the test cases were first created the precise syntax had not been worked out (am happy to see that burstdev has been very accurate to what had been intended). This was mostly an issue of the "list" output from the original C++ prototype and the Java version of that (rather than an issue with the specification itself).

The use of @ indicates a variable to be "assigned" whereas the use of $ indicates a variable to be "read" (of course @ could mean read and write but $ should never indicate write and normally the first variable will be the one to be assigned if there are two).

Creating a simple and consistent syntax for a "virtual CPU" is actually not so easy (as I discovered).

I will say that you are in good hands with the Burst developer as he has even corrected myself over inconsistencies with AT.

If you are keen to participate more with AT then feel free to make more direct contact with those involved to become "part of the team" (there is no intention to make ATs "too hard" but we are at the very start of creating tools to make that easier so I hope people can be tolerant while we work on making it more accessible).

Apart from using a "testnet" you could use the C++ prototype, however, it can only emulate API functions with appropriately provided test data (and doesn't implement the A and B 256 bit registers at this stage).

I agree that it would make things easier to have a better "emulator" for testing (but am unfortunately rather too busy at the moment to put a lot more effort into the C++ prototype).

Perhaps this is something that Burst could consider creating (having an Assembler tool is a great start as writing pure machine code is very time consuming).

Is there an easy way to run AT code independently of the blockchain?

Thanks, that worked and produced matching output.

callmejack thank you for your advice but i cannot find the url now...

found it must be here i think http://www.shabal.com/?p=213#more-213

Is this ok ?

THE REASON IS YOU NEED INTERNET. OFFLINE=NO_INTERNET=NO_P2PCONNECTION=NO_SYNC

any working web wallet?
my offline wallet not syncing

replace the shabal.s file with the one for the arm platform.
the url for the shabal.s file is mentioned in the source.
worked for me fine.

Hello All.

Does anyone have non java miner for ARM cpu? i tried to compile dcct's c miner for Linux but no success...

Thanx!

Try my little tool (AutoIt script): https://yadi.sk/d/jlbEbj73djZRK



How it works:
1) Open Blago-miner`s "stat-log.csv"
2) Read best deadlines from every line
3) Compare it with blockchain data (Burst daemon API - "http://localhost:8125/burst?requestType=getBlock&height="&$blockHeight)
4) Write and execute "results.txt"

Now there`s two types of behavior:
1) write only if your best deadline is less then blockchain data
2) write all (append blockchain data to every line for further analysis)

Sample log and source included.

P.S. you can close working script by right-clicking tray icon.

Although I haven't played with that assembler tool myself perhaps try this instead:


(I've just noticed that the test case listings are different to when I use the current C++ prototype)

Oh, it's the way I'm invoking it.  You have to compile the file first, or it does something inscrutable with stdout.  Still not sure it's behaving correctly, though.

Oh, I tried it that way too.  Same result.


Thought it might be an interaction with the system-installed 2.9 version, but removing that didn't help.

The code is correct. But if you want to pass it through the assembler to get the final machine code you need to remove the first column ( 00000000*, 0000000d etc )

Thanks.  It runs without error with 2.11.2 (and .4, the latest version) but produces no output, even with garbage files.  Here is what I was testing it on recently.  Is it correct?

Since I only know the basics of batch file commands, I did a search on Stack Overflow for an alternative method of launching the wallet that will not be affected by the version of Java installed. I found other solutions like scanning the registry for the version of Java and then running from that particular folder, but the solution below was less complicated. 

Using the FOR loop from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/638301/discover-from-a-batch-file-where-is-java-installed, I created the following bat file because I use Java 8 and uninstalled Java 7. It will search for java.exe and set a variable called JAVA_HOME. The command to start the wallet is the same as the original run.bat.  Feel free to test it out or if it does not work, I can post another solution that has worked for me. I added the first IF statement so the FOR loop would not run every time, but that IF may need to be removed if the batch file does not work after a Java update.  If you see something wrong, feel free to make the correction.

I more meant that this graph, doesn't seem to be very precise.. wonder if there is a way you could get more data.. which I assume would mean having access to a significant amount of mining power and checking how many blocks are mined with those HDDs: http://burstcoin.eu/charts/estimated-network-size

That being said.. that sounds like a nice chart as well.