you both are giving your harddrives a run for the money
Your results (assuming all plots are completed):
10976174530077743023_507843_4507843_8191: Number of nonces (4507843) is not a multiple of stagger size (8191)
No overlapping nonces
Totals:
0 nonces overlap (0 KB)
4507843 nonces total (1100 GB)
550 disk seeks per Scoop (4.4 seconds @ 8ms)
Your results (assuming all plots are completed):
4651495086655359966_19532000_307999_1000: Number of nonces (307999) is not a multiple of stagger size (1000)
I see your point smaller staggers/more plot files per hdd plus optimised stagger is more read writesper second thus better efficient mining. so currently I am not perform8ng at best. ffs a re plot again
No overlapping nonces
Totals:
0 nonces overlap (0 KB)
307999 nonces total (75 GB)
307 disk seeks per Scoop (2.4 seconds @ 8ms)
You missed my point... look at the disk reads per scoop needed with that settings.
Couple of posts back I`ve posted some comparative result with diff. settings.. have a look.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.8713947