Question.
Is there any difference in terms of mining (not plot) when using stagger 1000 VS stagger 8000 ?
BIIIGGG difference, bigger stagger requires more RAM, but lowers disk stress.Is there any difference in terms of mining (not plot) when using stagger 1000 VS stagger 8000 ?
i am talking about mining , is that true for mining ? I am not asking for plot
He said the mining
I plot way faster with 1000 stagger than 8000 stagger. What does disk stress actually means ? I have to sacrifice plotting performance for less disk stress ?
The idea behind the plots is that if you use 8000 stagger the disk will seek once. If you use 1000 stagger the disk will seek 8 times in the same file of 8000 nonces.
Thats the difference regarding disk stress.
The real difference in mining is that with a larger stagger you will be able to submit shares faster.
There is no memory usage difference in mining, unlike irontiga said.
All miner only submit share once, is there any benefit for submitting share faster other than if ur share is a block find ? Even if it took me 10 sec to submit share , as long as within that 10 sec no block is found , it's no difference submitting share in 1 sec or 10 sec. Am i right ?
If i am right, lower stagger actually work way better if CPU is not i7 , 8 gb ram because i can plot faster and there is no difference in mining.
