Is there a fix underway?
The fix would be to mine more if this really was a double spend attack.
i am so happy that i dumped all my c2 around 1500 satoshi.
this coin just fucked up every one
Topic: [ANN][C2.1] Coin2 | Pow/PoS | ChainOfConflict[FPS] The Future of Gaming is Now - page 278. (Read 499723 times)
May 16, 2014, 10:21:16 AM
The fix would be to mine more if this really was a double spend attack.
i am so happy that i dumped all my c2 around 1500 satoshi.
this coin just fucked up every one
May 16, 2014, 10:20:32 AM
OIC, a guy spamming C2 to himself?
May 16, 2014, 10:17:11 AM
Is there a fix underway?
The fix would be to mine more if this really was a double spend attack.
May 16, 2014, 10:15:38 AM
May 16, 2014, 10:14:50 AM
Is there a fix underway?
May 16, 2014, 10:08:27 AM
http://nc2chain.info/address/CT6hK54g9MT3gnK72YGWgVYNUEqQu56HCc
yup, confirmed 84
http://nc2chain.info/tx/8420671f22c9647c24185f9a4c0d37c35b1d0ff50987a9b2a55b4c5271328189
the original transaction in has gone, replaced with unparsed address
May 16, 2014, 10:01:23 AM
really? a 51% attack again? on the POS C2? i'm losing all my faith on this coin, damit
May 16, 2014, 10:00:51 AM
May 16, 2014, 09:49:50 AM
So, is here any explanation about Mintpal tweet and suspending trade pair?
Something about a 51% attack. Which would require one wallet to hold >51% of all C2 and have >51% of the total network computational power?
so.....
anyone have > 30,600,000 C2?
on a side note, how would then even work? it's not like you can 51% millions of C2 into minty and sell it, too many confirmations required.
NO its a double spend attack...its an issue with the wallet software itself..devs need to fix it
A double spend attack with POW is usually made a hell of alot easier when you have 51% of the hashrate. so no its not a problem with the wallet software. While NC2 isn't POW but POS that wouldn't require 51% technically, just for you to stake coins to you are getting every block in stake for quite a number of blocks and hoping no one solves one between yours. which again wouldn't be a problem with the wallet software that the dev could fix. the problem would be having 10's of millions of coins stuck on exchanges, so someone with a couple million can cause a double spend by staking coins and solving blocks
Is this the sort of thing that must be a deliberate act, or could it just be a function of a mega wallet left to stake in such a manner?
From the looks of that wallet its only got 20* transactions, Each stake and solving of a block would count towards transactions, its pretty much impossible for it to be that big wallet, althou that being said, with 22 million being held in a single wallet. it would technically make it a hell of alot easier to perform a double spend attack on the network with a smaller wallet size.
this is mostly theoretical POS double spend attack theory until it is actually successfully done and observed. This might not even be a double spend and might be something completely different. Looking at the blockchain it doesn't seem to be a major chuck on blocks in a row being solved by the same person
the 12 unconfirmed have made me second guess myself lol
May 16, 2014, 09:43:49 AM
So, is here any explanation about Mintpal tweet and suspending trade pair?
Something about a 51% attack. Which would require one wallet to hold >51% of all C2 and have >51% of the total network computational power?
so.....
anyone have > 30,600,000 C2?
on a side note, how would then even work? it's not like you can 51% millions of C2 into minty and sell it, too many confirmations required.
NO its a double spend attack...its an issue with the wallet software itself..devs need to fix it
A double spend attack with POW is usually made a hell of alot easier when you have 51% of the hashrate. so no its not a problem with the wallet software. While NC2 isn't POW but POS that wouldn't require 51% technically, just for you to stake coins to you are getting every block in stake for quite a number of blocks and hoping no one solves one between yours. which again wouldn't be a problem with the wallet software that the dev could fix. the problem would be having 10's of millions of coins stuck on exchanges, so someone with a couple million can cause a double spend by staking coins and solving blocks
Is this the sort of thing that must be a deliberate act, or could it just be a function of a mega wallet left to stake in such a manner?
May 16, 2014, 09:39:27 AM
So, is here any explanation about Mintpal tweet and suspending trade pair?
Something about a 51% attack. Which would require one wallet to hold >51% of all C2 and have >51% of the total network computational power?
so.....
anyone have > 30,600,000 C2?
on a side note, how would then even work? it's not like you can 51% millions of C2 into minty and sell it, too many confirmations required.
NO its a double spend attack...its an issue with the wallet software itself..devs need to fix it
A double spend attack with POW is usually made a hell of alot easier when you have 51% of the hashrate. so no its not a problem with the wallet software. While NC2 isn't POW but POS that wouldn't require 51% technically, just for you to stake coins to you are getting every block in stake for quite a number of blocks and hoping no one solves one between yours. which again wouldn't be a problem with the wallet software that the dev could fix. the problem would be having 10's of millions of coins stuck on exchanges, so someone with a couple million can cause a double spend by staking coins and solving blocks
May 16, 2014, 09:38:50 AM
could you possibly explain?
Well, thats alot of C2!
http://nc2chain.info/address/CT6hK54g9MT3gnK72YGWgVYNUEqQu56HCc
May 16, 2014, 09:36:29 AM
i dont understand too...
May 16, 2014, 09:35:01 AM
So, is here any explanation about Mintpal tweet and suspending trade pair?
Something about a 51% attack. Which would require one wallet to hold >51% of all C2 and have >51% of the total network computational power?
so.....
anyone have > 30,600,000 C2?
on a side note, how would then even work? it's not like you can 51% millions of C2 into minty and sell it, too many confirmations required.
NO its a double spend attack...its an issue with the wallet software itself..devs need to fix it
May 16, 2014, 09:34:04 AM
double spend attack
May 16, 2014, 09:31:10 AM
May 16, 2014, 09:27:25 AM
So, is here any explanation about Mintpal tweet and suspending trade pair?
Something about a 51% attack. Which would require one wallet to hold >51% of all C2 and have >51% of the total network computational power?
so.....
anyone have > 30,600,000 C2?
on a side note, how would then even work? it's not like you can 51% millions of C2 into minty and sell it, too many confirmations required.
May 16, 2014, 09:23:41 AM
So, is here any explanation about Mintpal tweet and suspending trade pair?
May 16, 2014, 09:22:27 AM
No worries mate. I'm getting back to the books. Check PM.
Jump to: