Topic: [ANN][CACH] CACHeCoin released based on scrypt-jane - page 6. (Read 224457 times)
2 hours and n-factor 16 
and again new config setup
vertoe thx for p2pool
and again new config setupvertoe thx for p2pool
How was it, do cpu's ever gonna past gpu's in hashing power with rising n? i know it got debated but i can't remember the outcome.
The outcome was that GPUs usually always perform better.
Timestamp for NFactor change tonight: 1430892923 - Heads up!
Vertoe's Timestamp Converter Service:
1430892923 Is equivalent to:
05/06/2015 @ 6:15am (UTC)
2015-05-06T06:15:23+00:00 in ISO 8601
Wed, 06 May 2015 06:15:23 +0000 in RFC 822, 1036, 1123, 2822
Wednesday, 06-May-15 06:15:23 UTC in RFC 2822
2015-05-06T06:15:23+00:00 in RFC 3339
I had that somewhere in my backhead
HAPPY n-factor 16 EVERYBODY!!!
2 hours and n-factor 16 and again new config setup
vertoe thx for p2pool
and again new config setupvertoe thx for p2pool
How was it, do cpu's ever gonna past gpu's in hashing power with rising n? i know it got debated but i can't remember the outcome.
The outcome was that GPUs usually always perform better.
Timestamp for NFactor change tonight: 1430892923 - Heads up!
Vertoe's Timestamp Converter Service:
1430892923 Is equivalent to:
05/06/2015 @ 6:15am (UTC)
2015-05-06T06:15:23+00:00 in ISO 8601
Wed, 06 May 2015 06:15:23 +0000 in RFC 822, 1036, 1123, 2822
Wednesday, 06-May-15 06:15:23 UTC in RFC 2822
2015-05-06T06:15:23+00:00 in RFC 3339
2 hours and n-factor 16 and again new config setup
vertoe thx for p2pool
and again new config setupvertoe thx for p2pool
How was it, do cpu's ever gonna past gpu's in hashing power with rising n? i know it got debated but i can't remember the outcome.
2 hours and n-factor 16 and again new config setup
vertoe thx for p2pool
and again new config setupvertoe thx for p2pool
Something tells me vertoe's got additional things to announce.
Something tells me that the something that tells you tells me there could be something to it 
so to say 
Something tells me vertoe's got additional things to announce.
Nice job Vertoe.
P2Pool is finally working again and we had 4 blocks tonight.
There was an issue with the found block's timestamp. The initial p2pool devs never thought there would be an Scrypt-Coin with variable N-Factor and such a low overall network hashrate.
Recent P2Pool Block:
http://explorer.cach.co/block/0000000deeba4ddee05908afb38854ce9b00a6475b1957e7b4bd6f70fbc6416b
P2Pool Source code:
https://github.com/vertoe/p2pool-cach/ (P2Pool)
https://github.com/vertoe/p2pool-scanner/ (Scanner)
https://github.com/vertoe/cachecoin/ (Daemon)
P2Pool Node scanner:
http://windsor.cach.co:8337/
Currently active nodes:
http://windsor.cach.co:8336/
0.00% Fees, 0.6 days Uptime
http://cach.happymining.de:8336/
0.00% Fees, 0.6 days Uptime
http://mehrangarh.cach.co:8336/
0.00% Fees, 0.5 days Uptime
Thanks to all the guys helping me debugging, reading logs and wasting hashrate on malformed blocks
Spread your hash \o/
There was an issue with the found block's timestamp. The initial p2pool devs never thought there would be an Scrypt-Coin with variable N-Factor and such a low overall network hashrate.
Recent P2Pool Block:
http://explorer.cach.co/block/0000000deeba4ddee05908afb38854ce9b00a6475b1957e7b4bd6f70fbc6416b
P2Pool Source code:
https://github.com/vertoe/p2pool-cach/ (P2Pool)
https://github.com/vertoe/p2pool-scanner/ (Scanner)
https://github.com/vertoe/cachecoin/ (Daemon)
P2Pool Node scanner:
http://windsor.cach.co:8337/
Currently active nodes:
http://windsor.cach.co:8336/
0.00% Fees, 0.6 days Uptime
http://cach.happymining.de:8336/
0.00% Fees, 0.6 days Uptime
http://mehrangarh.cach.co:8336/
0.00% Fees, 0.5 days Uptime
Thanks to all the guys helping me debugging, reading logs and wasting hashrate on malformed blocks
Spread your hash \o/
Buying 100k CACH for 10 BTC, pm.
I could do 10k CACH for 100 BTC
Singula, what version of cachecoind backend are you using?
We are having a hard time getting P2Pool to work again, kal did break something in the client and we can't figure out what's the issue. I'm wondering which version it is your MPOS is using which still works...
I was running P2Pool myself last year and the code is unchanged, so there must be an issue with the client.
We are having a hard time getting P2Pool to work again, kal did break something in the client and we can't figure out what's the issue. I'm wondering which version it is your MPOS is using which still works...
I was running P2Pool myself last year and the code is unchanged, so there must be an issue with the client.
It's commit bb986cafcc7abc1879177394a5012b4d25579ed2 from kal's repo, with only minor changed to the makefile on top of that:
diff --git a/src/makefile.unix b/src/makefile.unix
index aeeeb8f..2d66e9c 100644
--- a/src/makefile.unix
+++ b/src/makefile.unix
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
# Distributed under the MIT/X11 software license, see the accompanying
# file COPYING or http://www.opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.php.
-USE_UPNP:=0
+#USE_UPNP:=0
USE_IPV6:=1
LINK:=$(CXX)
@@ -93,7 +93,7 @@ DEBUGFLAGS=#-g -pg
# CXXFLAGS can be specified on the make command line, so we use xCXXFLAGS that only
# adds some defaults in front. Unfortunately, CXXFLAGS=... $(CXXFLAGS) does not work.
-xCXXFLAGS=-O2 -msse2 -pthread -Wall -Wextra -Wformat -Wformat-security -Wno-unused-parameter \
+xCXXFLAGS=-O3 -march=native -pthread -Wall -Wextra -Wformat -Wformat-security -Wno-unused-parameter \
$(DEBUGFLAGS) $(DEFS) $(HARDENING) $(CXXFLAGS)
# scrypt-jane specific parameters
Vertoe, I support you in whatever direction you take CACH, but the many recent decisions regarding Darkcoin including this: https://dashtalk.org/threads/self-sustainable-decentralized-governance-by-blockchain.4708/ make it veryvulnerable to a viable competitor. The deliciousness of a competitor operated by the top-tier developer that was never shown the respect they deserve at Darkcoin overtaking it would be mind-blowing.
Agree 100%
Buying 100k CACH for 10 BTC, pm.
I don't think that's going to happen. But it never hurts to ask
Buying 100k CACH for 10 BTC, pm.
Vertoe, I support you in whatever direction you take CACH, but the many recent decisions regarding Darkcoin including this: https://dashtalk.org/threads/self-sustainable-decentralized-governance-by-blockchain.4708/ make it veryvulnerable to a viable competitor. The deliciousness of a competitor operated by the top-tier developer that was never shown the respect they deserve at Darkcoin overtaking it would be mind-blowing.
Looks to be working alright then uplodex. You'll need a better CPU (or better yet, one to many GPUs) for higher hashrate.
Perhaps the pool owner can step in and say a word about lowering the minimum difficulty. That would get you to submit shares more frequently.
Perhaps the pool owner can step in and say a word about lowering the minimum difficulty. That would get you to submit shares more frequently.
The initial difficulty is now halved and minimal difficulty is 8 times less.
The pool is set to 30 second target, however if you hit the min. difficulty, you may be submitting shares less frequently than that.
I hope this helps, although CPU mining is relatively ineffective for Scrypt-Jane(-N) coins when compared to GPU, so getting some decent GPU(s) will definitely help to mine more
.Singula, what version of cachecoind backend are you using?
We are having a hard time getting P2Pool to work again, kal did break something in the client and we can't figure out what's the issue. I'm wondering which version it is your MPOS is using which still works...
I was running P2Pool myself last year and the code is unchanged, so there must be an issue with the client.
Pretty chart now. Volume dried up. Price going sideways now for nearly a week. Major consolidation.
Next stop.... Possibly 150-200k sats...possibly within next 3 weeks. Major fractal action which is prevalent in crypto... Particularly the good Cryptos.
Whatever vertoe is up to the chart says it's big.
JL
Next stop.... Possibly 150-200k sats...possibly within next 3 weeks. Major fractal action which is prevalent in crypto... Particularly the good Cryptos.
Whatever vertoe is up to the chart says it's big.
JL
Could also be a distribution phase, we'll see a confirmation of either in future. but i'm also leaning towards a consolidation followed by a new markup.
I've reverted the min-diff to 1 (initial diff is 2) and set the stratum to use only integer difficulty for the moment.
I think I'll set up another port with float diff instead (for those who wish to use it and have compatible miner), keeping the default to integer-only difficulties as it is now.
I think I'll set up another port with float diff instead (for those who wish to use it and have compatible miner), keeping the default to integer-only difficulties as it is now.
Looks to be working alright then uplodex. You'll need a better CPU (or better yet, one to many GPUs) for higher hashrate.
Perhaps the pool owner can step in and say a word about lowering the minimum difficulty. That would get you to submit shares more frequently.
Perhaps the pool owner can step in and say a word about lowering the minimum difficulty. That would get you to submit shares more frequently.
The initial difficulty is now halved and minimal difficulty is 8 times less.
The pool is set to 30 second target, however if you hit the min. difficulty, you may be submitting shares less frequently than that.
I hope this helps, although CPU mining is relatively ineffective for Scrypt-Jane(-N) coins when compared to GPU, so getting some decent GPU(s) will definitely help to mine more
.wow that is a big problem
you know ... yacminer can only handle integer difficulties
please open a port with a static difficulty of 1
Looks to be working alright then uplodex. You'll need a better CPU (or better yet, one to many GPUs) for higher hashrate.
Perhaps the pool owner can step in and say a word about lowering the minimum difficulty. That would get you to submit shares more frequently.
Perhaps the pool owner can step in and say a word about lowering the minimum difficulty. That would get you to submit shares more frequently.
The initial difficulty is now halved and minimal difficulty is 8 times less.
The pool is set to 30 second target, however if you hit the min. difficulty, you may be submitting shares less frequently than that.
I hope this helps, although CPU mining is relatively ineffective for Scrypt-Jane(-N) coins when compared to GPU, so getting some decent GPU(s) will definitely help to mine more
.
Either way, I'm checking Github daily for insight and Vertoe is working away
Jump to: