The individual under this nickname - iconfirm is a former knight who left the project. He is now very upset he left the project - because he acts before thinking...
Also, he left for a project which wants to integrate crowncoin......and supernodes is a feature that would potentially threaten this integration.
This is the reason why he is against everything the knights decide to do. But he has 0 influence on further development now
Just to be sure everyone here is aware of this fact.
More pools won't bring a substantial amount of full nodes. If every MM pool mined CRW it would add 20, max!
That's not quite true - miners who use merge mined pools would more than likely have their own wallets also. If just one pool had 200 miners, then they would more than likely have a CRW wallet to withdraw their coins to. Times that by 20 (pools) & the number will be far more accurate. Also, p2pool users who merge mine CRW run full wallets.
With masternodes (or whatever we call them) we could be looking at 250 full nodes within 6 months and 500 within 18 months.
Where are you getting this info from?
But until you can come up with a better idea to attract hundereds of full nodes, we're going to keep planning.
We did. More PR & marketing. Get the word out there.
ED: I also think you shaoul add the option in the poll to say no to masternodes (or whatever you want to call them).
Also, he left for a project which wants to integrate crowncoin......and supernodes is a feature that would potentially threaten this integration.
This is the reason why he is against everything the knights decide to do. But he has 0 influence on further development now
Just to be sure everyone here is aware of this fact.
More pools won't bring a substantial amount of full nodes. If every MM pool mined CRW it would add 20, max!
That's not quite true - miners who use merge mined pools would more than likely have their own wallets also. If just one pool had 200 miners, then they would more than likely have a CRW wallet to withdraw their coins to. Times that by 20 (pools) & the number will be far more accurate. Also, p2pool users who merge mine CRW run full wallets.
With masternodes (or whatever we call them) we could be looking at 250 full nodes within 6 months and 500 within 18 months.
Where are you getting this info from?
But until you can come up with a better idea to attract hundereds of full nodes, we're going to keep planning.
We did. More PR & marketing. Get the word out there.
ED: I also think you shaoul add the option in the poll to say no to masternodes (or whatever you want to call them).
What?
First of all - "he" is a "she" as I explained to you earlier.
Secondly, I was & have never been involved in this project. I do however mine it & have done since the coins launch & still run 2 full nodes 24/7.
Thirdly:
Also, he left for a project which wants to integrate crowncoin.
Did I? Please tell me which project that would be, as I'm not aware of being involved in any projects whatsoever, including this one.
Lastly - asking for the option in your poll to not have masternodes can hardly be described as "against everything the knights decide to do."
I'm a bit confused by your statements actually, & your reasons for posting such untruths.
But hey, it's your coin, do what you want with it.
