For anyome with past experience of developing a crypto and interested in becoming the new developer of Cypher in a takeover?
I offering a bounty of 200,000 Cypher coins to the new developer
it went into discussion a couple of weeks ago - and i have yet to hear since mate ...
the coin needs a dev who is willing to work WITH the rest of us rather than just take control over it ...
its also about making something of the coin also - which is difficult when the whole purpose of the coin was a fake cryptography key in a piece of hardware that was also fake by the looks of things ...
apart from that - its PoS only now - and i would want it hardforked so we could mine it again ...
im interested only on a few prerequisites - and ive just mentioned two of them ...
bounties are one thing - and its nice to see your enthusiasm for it - but its the future ideas for development that would bring a community back to the coin ...
and mining as well on my end
...
#crysx
Mining this crypto, again, would not be following a few macro economic rules and there are already some major new cryptos in that crowded mineable crypto market!
Therefore, you are asking existing investors to buy more Cypher or make major new BTC commitments, which makes no sense at all!
It would be cheaper to simply get a new developer and create an easier set of innovations.
That's my opinion.
i respect your opinion on this ...
but as i have stated earlier - this would be something that i would like to see and would do as a suggestion to move the coin forward ...
macro economics? ... without starting an argument here - or sounding like im condescending - as im not in anyway ... but are you not fetching a little too far by comparing crypto to fiscal economics? ...
im sure there are 'some' similarities - but look around the crypto arena and you will see that it really has no real resemblance to the fiscal world at all ...
in fact - crypto itself is SO young - its still finding its feet in the 'real' world - which fiscal economics ( and all the 'rules' that apply ) are based ...
it is obvious that you are quite experienced in trading in the real world - but this is crypto ... it is a systematic set of small steps that either go one way or another ... NOT based on any real-world rules or values - NOT based on any fiscal economic rules - NOT based on any systems of engagement by the general public ...
its too new mate ... so why the hell NOT restructure the internals of cypher? ... because its just cheaper? ...
any dev would do a 'job' for a price if they see fit - and leave ... that is the pure definition of a contractor ( i should know - ive been an IT contractor for a very long time ) ... this is not what a takeover should be all about ... it should be about the worth to the community as a whole and the forward steps ( as little or as big as they maybe ) for the currency to take ...
with all due respect thevictimofuktyranny - but this is NOT the real world ... its crypto ... so the real world set of rules dont apply here ... they are being created and broken / bent as we go along in crypto ...
if there is anything that is glaring proof of this - take a look at the debacle of bitcoin forking and discussion currently taking place ... and the forward momentum that is taking place WITHOUT majority vote consensus ...
making rules and the breaking / bending of them as crypto 'grows' and 'matures' ... how would you apply ANY real world economics to this? ...
im a miner - its in my blood ... i also hold some cypher ... ill be very disinterested in the coin if it doesnt make any moves forward and creates new 'frontiers' to tackle ...
if i have learnt anything from takeovers ( like what i did with granitecoin - which is the main reason it has grown VERY slowly and organically ) - its this one thing ... nothing is set in stone ... it ALWAYS changes - and NEVER abides by any rules ... especially real world ones ...
the other main thing i have learned is that you can contract ( ie pay ) any dev to code - any web or graphic designer to do just that - but it is only the community of devotees that will move the coin forward with NEW ideas and fresh ways of moving forward ...
rebuild the coin ... recode it ... refresh it ...
what ever a takeover does - just dont let it sit the way it is ...
my suggestion is simply to breathe some life back into it and CHANGE the original direction it was going - which is obviously nowhere at the moment - by changing the way it does things again ... interest in the coin was mining initially and THEN the 'cryptography thingy' ... not the other way around ...
anyway - thats my take on it mate ...
if i took over the coin - i would have it redone ... simple ...
#crysx