Topic: [ANN][DASH] Dash (dash.org) | First Self-Funding Self-Governing Crypto Currency - page 2559. (Read 9723748 times)

Are we gonna check 0.0185 again?  
Next stop - 0.02080

The gap in understanding is larger even than the Valles Marineris Canyon on Mars  

Well, I think I'm gonna like having you around

Great Job once again!
I like this one but i liked your original one better. After someone mentioned it i keep seeing the A as an R. Never noticed until then though, lol. I also prefer it to just say Digital Cash like the original.

Hopefully they will keep tweaking the winning logo until it's perfect. I think it's almost there.

Great Job once again!
I like this one but i liked your original one better. After someone mentioned it i keep seeing the A as an R. Never noticed until then though, lol. I also prefer it to just say Digital Cash like the original.

Hopefully they will keep tweaking the winning logo until it's perfect. I think it's almost there.

If your basic understanding is on that level, then there's no point in explaining how it works or what it does.

I've update the animation to include the new logo...  



All donations welcome 

yes :

https://bitcoinwisdom.com/markets/cryptsy/drkbtc
http://dc-charts.com/depth_drk.php?ex=2&cu=0&sw=2&tz=5&ar=0&dl=2&js=1&sc=0&ba=2&re=0

Again - I think JL was posing a genuine point. I don't think he's a "thick skull".

*************** TESTNET UPDATE - 11.2.9 *******************

DarkcoinTalk is down, so I'm posting this here. Propulsion must be migrating atm.

- Protocol Bump / Version Bump
- Fixed race condition with PoSe and new blocks
- Fixed MasternodeRanking algorithm for unknown blocks
- Fixed Masternode Donation miscalculations
- Updated placement of transaction-amount adjusted - Crowning
- Resized transaction icons - Crowning

*still compiling, try again in a bit if you get a 404

Linux:
http://bamboo.darkcoin.qa/artifact/DRKL-DEV/JOB1/build-151/gitian-linux-dash-bin/bin/64/dash-qt
http://bamboo.darkcoin.qa/artifact/DRKL-DEV/JOB1/build-151/gitian-linux-dash-bin/bin/64/dashd

Mac:
http://bamboo.darkcoin.qa/browse/DRKM-DEV-127/artifact/JOB1/gitian-osx-dash-dist/dash-0.11.2.8-osx.dmg

Windows:
http://bamboo.darkcoin.qa/artifact/DRKW-DEV/JOB1/build-147/gitian-win-darkcoin-bin/32/dash-qt.exe
http://bamboo.darkcoin.qa/artifact/DRKW-DEV/JOB1/build-147/gitian-win-darkcoin-bin/32/dashd.exe

So you're going to get tribal then. Okay, I guess you are off my short list of non-retarded DRK supporters.


Incorrect. There are technical questions and there are questions about the scam instamine/premine. Both are legitimate criticisms of this project, but they distinct and one does not supersede the other.


Incorrect. Nobody decided to "clean up the scene." In the cryptonote case, we saw some best-of-breed cryptography (acknowledged by many experts, I won't bore you with the references, as I'm sure you've seen them) that was being run as a scam in a deceptive manner using a fraudulently concealed premined, and coins spamming campaign, and a bunch of nonsense stories about the dark web and aliens. So logically we decided to fork it and run it as an open-source project independent of the crazy premine-hiding and alien-crediting people.

In this case I see some mediocre technology and a lot of stories being repeated in order to cast the most innocent possible light on an instamine/premine scam that when examined critically looks highly suspicious at best.

There is no plot and no plan, just a couple of different situations, involving a different people for different reasons.

Furthermore I find this who anti-cryptography rant you seem to be on to be quite absurd, give that we are all here because of cryptocurrencies. Its very amusing to see you spin using sound cryptography and rigorous methods as solutions to problems as being somehow inappropriate. With that attitude toward software design and development, you should probably go work on web sites or something else equally trivial.


You're grasping. The issues here are the instamine/premine, what actually happened vs. how it is being expalined/spun today, mediocre snake-oil anonymity, and a dangerous ponzi-like investment scheme.  If you don't like where that leads when examined critically, that is your burden to bear.


That's rather hilarious I have to say. i doubt you can find a single shred of evidence that anyone associated with Moenro has ever had or expressed any interest in forking darkcoin or doing anything whatsoever with darkcoin, nor that any of us ever viewed cryptonote as an alternative to anything. I've suggested that someone go ahead and fork it to get out from under the shadow of the instamine/premine if the technology is supposedly so damn good, but I'm sure not interested in anything like that.

You should also go ahead and trace some Monero ring signatures while sitting on a toilet. It's so easy, just do it or GTFO.

actually his voice is getting put on ignore by a lot of us

Again - I think JL was posing a genuine point. I don't think he's a "thick skull".

There are loads of possibilities when you've got hypothetical attack vectors at your disposal. How they play out in practice I don't know.

The fiat banking system leaks like a seive and is probably the poorest security model you could imagine in your wildest dreams. Yet the whole world runs on it. Every time I use a cash machine I reflect to myself on how totally stone age it feels compared to any crypto - yet I still use it without a worry.

It's a legitimate question - that business of the "NSA" commandeering masternodes, but what most people miss is that the challenge isn't taking control of the machine, it's taking control of the coin supply which is a prerequisite. That's a question of budget and market liquidity and it brings us into a domain of consideration that goes beyond any one coin.

I look at that scenario as "the NSA vs all of crypto" because that's how they would look at it. Each cryptocurrency has different strengths and weaknesses and different types of market appeal. The only defence any of them have against being "bought up" is the very market diversity that we fight over in these stupid troll debates.

Strix,I think you got confused, people were trying to say there was an issue with someone controlling lets say 51% of Masternodes, is a misplaced extrapolation from the 51% mining issue or how much we are used to simple majority meaning something.

In the case of Masternodes, a set of 20 Masternodes is randomly selected for each transaction, so even if you control a large percentage of the network lets say 90% your chances of following transaction are non existent.

Here are the probabilities of someone actually following through the Darksend process as it stands today.


With regards to the  51% mining thing, I think you can read online about that a lot as it relates to all Proof of Work coins.

How is this blinding going to work? LMFAO .. the nodes will need to communicate with the network and each other, sniffing traffic from one node will yield other nodes..... WOW THICK SKULLS.