[ANN][DASH] Dash (dash.org) | First Self-Funding Self-Governing Crypto Currency - page 2765.

dotnetmin

hero member

Activity: 756

Merit: 500

Quote from: LiteMine on March 11, 2015, 02:28:53 AM

Quote from: TaoOfSaatoshi on March 11, 2015, 02:21:20 AM

Quote from: njs811 on March 11, 2015, 02:16:50 AM

Quote from: dotnetmin on March 11, 2015, 02:15:11 AM

My masternode count shows 2092 masternodes. So we lost a bit more than 200 nodes.
But consider that it is much easier to close one than open a new one.
After redistributing a lot of coins it will take a bit longer until the new nodes are online again.
Maybe otoh can say something if he has set up new ones.

I think it should seriously be considered lowering the amount needed for a MN. If it were half of the original value then sales would increase and there would be far more masternodes in existence.

I don't think we lost a single node. We are still well above 2300. You guys are really running out of ideas.
EDIT : Well played Flowerpots! Beaten by a smidge!

2305 MN's on my 0.11.1.25

Holding strong

Why do they bother lying?

I did not try to lie. I only post my result of masternode count. Its now 2087.
To double check i did delete my peers.dat and did start the ./darkcoind again
Will post results soon while over time the number is growing slowly over time

njs811

sr. member

Activity: 406

Merit: 250

Quote from: RenegadeMan on March 11, 2015, 02:36:48 AM

Quote from: njs811 on March 11, 2015, 02:28:53 AM

Have you no shame? You've been caught out lying. You've come in here claiming "Oh....I've only just heard....I'm disappointed...."

You're wasting everyone's time trying to start the whole branding discussion all over again from the beginning yet you're over on Spreadcointalk saying "Hey guys, Darkcoin's changing their name.....we should leverage off this....yeah, this could be our great moment...."

It's just dishonest, lame and true troll behaviour.

If you're invested in DRK then add to DRK's success by taking part honestly and positively; not like some snake in the grass.

First of all, I did just hear about it. And I am disappointed. I think Darkcoin got its name from being anonymous and that's what people wanted. It fulfilled a need. Secondly referring to a coin as "Dash" is cause for concern. I would never insist that anyone call there coin; dash, dodge, ditch, run away, get out, leave, etc. Thirdly I am a capitalist. It would be foolish of me not to Capitalize on this opportunity. I think DRK would be making a terrible mistake by changing there name and I for one have no problem profiting off of fools. Fourthly here is my positive contribution: Do not change the name, it would be foolish.

So you're "invested" in Darkcoin....

Quote

Thirdly I am a capitalist. It would be foolish of me not to Capitalize on this opportunity.

....and you're looking to "Capitalize" on this situation which sounds awfully like you're looking to grab hold of Darkcoin's old name and leverage off all the hard work that's gone into that? Yes?

I think you have the mindset of a domain name squatter.

No wonder Spread's not working out very well with this low-down, poverty/theft based mindset.

You can be quite sure that Evan Duffield and the Foundation will take numerous steps to ensure Darkcoin's name change will not expose the existing IP and brand cache to rogue elements like that.

Maybe you should head back on over to Spread because I don't think your intentions here are even remotely honourable and you've clearly been caught out.

[/quote]

Why the hell would I grab Darkcoin's name? If Darkcoin dumped it that would give us no leverage.

RenegadeMan

hero member

Activity: 658

Merit: 500

Quote from: njs811 on March 11, 2015, 02:28:53 AM

Have you no shame? You've been caught out lying. You've come in here claiming "Oh....I've only just heard....I'm disappointed...."

You're wasting everyone's time trying to start the whole branding discussion all over again from the beginning yet you're over on Spreadcointalk saying "Hey guys, Darkcoin's changing their name.....we should leverage off this....yeah, this could be our great moment...."

It's just dishonest, lame and true troll behaviour.

If you're invested in DRK then add to DRK's success by taking part honestly and positively; not like some snake in the grass.

Quote

First of all, I did just hear about it. And I am disappointed. I think Darkcoin got its name from being anonymous and that's what people wanted. It fulfilled a need. Secondly referring to a coin as "Dash" is cause for concern. I would never insist that anyone call there coin; dash, dodge, ditch, run away, get out, leave, etc. Thirdly I am a capitalist. It would be foolish of me not to Capitalize on this opportunity. I think DRK would be making a terrible mistake by changing there name and I for one have no problem profiting off of fools. Fourthly here is my positive contribution: Do not change the name, it would be foolish.

So you're "invested" in Darkcoin....

Quote

Thirdly I am a capitalist. It would be foolish of me not to Capitalize on this opportunity.

....and you're looking to "Capitalize" on this situation which sounds awfully like you're looking to grab hold of Darkcoin's old name and leverage off all the hard work that's gone into that? Yes?

I think you have the mindset of a domain name squatter.

No wonder Spread's not working out very well with this low-down, poverty/theft based mindset.

You can be quite sure that Evan Duffield and the Foundation will take numerous steps to ensure Darkcoin's name change will not expose the existing IP and brand cache to rogue elements like that.

Maybe you should head back on over to Spread because I don't think your intentions here are even remotely honourable and you've clearly been caught out.

EDIT: fixed your quote/quote problem.

njs811

sr. member

Activity: 406

Merit: 250

Quote from: illodin on March 11, 2015, 02:32:32 AM

Quote from: njs811 on March 11, 2015, 02:28:53 AM

First of all, I did just hear about it. And I am disappointed. I think Darkcoin got its name from being anonymous and that's what people wanted. It fulfilled a need. Secondly referring to a coin as "Dash" is cause for concern. I would never insist that anyone call there coin; dash, dodge, ditch, run away, get out, leave, etc. Thirdly I am a capitalist. It would be foolish of me not to Capitalize on this opportunity. I think DRK would be making a terrible mistake by changing there name and I for one have no problem profiting off of fools. Fourthly here is my positive contribution: Do not change the name, it would be foolish.

How would you profit off of fools in this case exactly?

Have you not read my Spreadcoin contribution page? It's all anyone can talk about. Turns out everyone here can psychoanalyze my motives based off of my post.

illodin

hero member

Activity: 966

Merit: 1003

Quote from: njs811 on March 11, 2015, 02:28:53 AM

First of all, I did just hear about it. And I am disappointed. I think Darkcoin got its name from being anonymous and that's what people wanted. It fulfilled a need. Secondly referring to a coin as "Dash" is cause for concern. I would never insist that anyone call there coin; dash, dodge, ditch, run away, get out, leave, etc. Thirdly I am a capitalist. It would be foolish of me not to Capitalize on this opportunity. I think DRK would be making a terrible mistake by changing there name and I for one have no problem profiting off of fools. Fourthly here is my positive contribution: Do not change the name, it would be foolish.

How would you profit off of fools in this case exactly?

dotnetmin

hero member

Activity: 756

Merit: 500

Quote from: TaoOfSaatoshi on March 11, 2015, 02:21:20 AM

Quote from: njs811 on March 11, 2015, 02:16:50 AM

Quote from: dotnetmin on March 11, 2015, 02:15:11 AM

My masternode count shows 2092 masternodes. So we lost a bit more than 200 nodes.
But consider that it is much easier to close one than open a new one.
After redistributing a lot of coins it will take a bit longer until the new nodes are online again.
Maybe otoh can say something if he has set up new ones.

I think it should seriously be considered lowering the amount needed for a MN. If it were half of the original value then sales would increase and there would be far more masternodes in existence.

I don't think we lost a single node. We are still well above 2300. You guys are really running out of ideas.
EDIT : Well played Flowerpots! Beaten by a smidge!

@tao, nobody is running out of any ideas. For me it is a fact the we are close under 2100 MN.
Use the function masternode count on your own MN and you will see the number.
The number you can see on any website is maybe not correct.

I do not see a problem with comming down the number of nodes. Some guys did panic and sold their coins so it is normal that the number is going down. It also normal that it needs some time until the new owners are
online with nodes again.

Dont start again the discussion with lowering the 1k coins needed for set up a node.
The 1k is a perfect selection. Still more than 40% of the whole supply is invested on the long term solution.

kointrend

hero member

Activity: 655

Merit: 500

Darkcoin's CNY market has been opened at https://bter.com/trade/drk_cny , deposit at https://bter.com/myaccount/deposit/DRK … , withdraw at https://bter.com/myaccount/withdraw/DRK …

LiteMine

sr. member

Activity: 380

Merit: 250

Quote from: TaoOfSaatoshi on March 11, 2015, 02:21:20 AM

Quote from: njs811 on March 11, 2015, 02:16:50 AM

Quote from: dotnetmin on March 11, 2015, 02:15:11 AM

My masternode count shows 2092 masternodes. So we lost a bit more than 200 nodes.
But consider that it is much easier to close one than open a new one.
After redistributing a lot of coins it will take a bit longer until the new nodes are online again.
Maybe otoh can say something if he has set up new ones.

I think it should seriously be considered lowering the amount needed for a MN. If it were half of the original value then sales would increase and there would be far more masternodes in existence.

I don't think we lost a single node. We are still well above 2300. You guys are really running out of ideas.
EDIT : Well played Flowerpots! Beaten by a smidge!

2305 MN's on my 0.11.1.25

Holding strong

Why do they bother lying?

njs811

sr. member

Activity: 406

Merit: 250

Have you no shame? You've been caught out lying. You've come in here claiming "Oh....I've only just heard....I'm disappointed...."

You're wasting everyone's time trying to start the whole branding discussion all over again from the beginning yet you're over on Spreadcointalk saying "Hey guys, Darkcoin's changing their name.....we should leverage off this....yeah, this could be our great moment...."

It's just dishonest, lame and true troll behaviour.

If you're invested in DRK then add to DRK's success by taking part honestly and positively; not like some snake in the grass.

[/quote]

First of all, I did just hear about it. And I am disappointed. I think Darkcoin got its name from being anonymous and that's what people wanted. It fulfilled a need. Secondly referring to a coin as "Dash" is cause for concern. I would never insist that anyone call there coin; dash, dodge, ditch, run away, get out, leave, etc. Thirdly I am a capitalist. It would be foolish of me not to Capitalize on this opportunity. I think DRK would be making a terrible mistake by changing there name and I for one have no problem profiting off of fools. Fourthly here is my positive contribution: Do not change the name, it would be foolish.

Lyricz

legendary

Activity: 1457

Merit: 1033

The name-change was one of the best dessicion ever.
Now this coin can start to get big.

I also think that for the most people darkcoins sounds like something from the ubderground and illegal.
Of course, if you are a 15 year old boy i sounds much cooler to your friends then Dcash, but thats's not all, ...now it's time to go and make buissines.

I bought yesterday my first 500 DRK, ....thanks for the nice price

...looking expectant to the near future.

Are there any date for the officially name-change? (Exchanges, Wallet,..)

Artoodeetoo

hero member

Activity: 518

Merit: 500

Quote from: njs811 on March 11, 2015, 02:16:50 AM

Quote from: dotnetmin on March 11, 2015, 02:15:11 AM

My masternode count shows 2092 masternodes. So we lost a bit more than 200 nodes.
But consider that it is much easier to close one than open a new one.
After redistributing a lot of coins it will take a bit longer until the new nodes are online again.
Maybe otoh can say something if he has set up new ones.

I think it should seriously be considered lowering the amount needed for a MN. If it were half of the original value then sales would increase and there would be far more masternodes in existence.

No need at all to lower the cost, considering the income, the cost is fine...

RenegadeMan

hero member

Activity: 658

Merit: 500

Quote from: njs811 on March 11, 2015, 02:06:48 AM

Quote from: MasterMined710 on March 11, 2015, 01:30:47 AM

I've added a few more trolls to my ignore list today bringing the total to over 20 in the last 48 hours. Thanks to illodin, tok, minotaur and everybody else here fighting them!

I hope we keep the Darkcoin "D" logo as there is a ton of great artwork/Memes associated with it...

So is anyone who disagrees with you a troll? I had legitimate concerns. Is my voice not allowed to be heard?

Quote from: Minotaur26 on March 10, 2015, 10:45:09 PM

Quote from: njs811 on March 10, 2015, 10:38:43 PM

Quote from: Minotaur26 on March 10, 2015, 10:34:01 PM

Quote from: njs811 on March 10, 2015, 10:30:19 PM

Quote from: Minotaur26 on March 10, 2015, 10:29:21 PM

Quote from: njs811 on March 10, 2015, 10:25:36 PM

This is honestly the first I am hearing about a re-branding... I am a bit disappointed.

Just Lol

Have you no shame? You've been caught out lying. You've come in here claiming "Oh....I've only just heard....I'm disappointed...."

You're wasting everyone's time trying to start the whole branding discussion all over again from the beginning yet you're over on Spreadcointalk saying "Hey guys, Darkcoin's changing their name.....we should leverage off this....yeah, this could be our great moment...."

It's just dishonest, lame and true troll behaviour.

If you're invested in DRK then add to DRK's success by taking part honestly and positively; not like some snake in the grass.

TaoOfSaatoshi

legendary

Activity: 2156

Merit: 1014

Dash Nation Founder | CATV Host

Quote from: njs811 on March 11, 2015, 02:16:50 AM

Quote from: dotnetmin on March 11, 2015, 02:15:11 AM

My masternode count shows 2092 masternodes. So we lost a bit more than 200 nodes.
But consider that it is much easier to close one than open a new one.
After redistributing a lot of coins it will take a bit longer until the new nodes are online again.
Maybe otoh can say something if he has set up new ones.

I think it should seriously be considered lowering the amount needed for a MN. If it were half of the original value then sales would increase and there would be far more masternodes in existence.

I don't think we lost a single node. We are still well above 2300. You guys are really running out of ideas.
EDIT : Well played Flowerpots! Beaten by a smidge!

flowerpots

full member

Activity: 205

Merit: 100

Quote from: dotnetmin on March 11, 2015, 02:15:11 AM

My masternode count shows 2092 masternodes. So we lost a bit more than 200 nodes.
But consider that it is much easier to close one than open a new one.
After redistributing a lot of coins it will take a bit longer until the new nodes are online again.
Maybe otoh can say something if he has set up new ones.

According to https://drk.mn/masternodes.html we have 2323 active masternodes, so we did not lose 200...

njs811

sr. member

Activity: 406

Merit: 250

Quote from: dotnetmin on March 11, 2015, 02:15:11 AM

My masternode count shows 2092 masternodes. So we lost a bit more than 200 nodes.
But consider that it is much easier to close one than open a new one.
After redistributing a lot of coins it will take a bit longer until the new nodes are online again.
Maybe otoh can say something if he has set up new ones.

I think it should seriously be considered lowering the amount needed for a MN. If it were half of the original value then sales would increase and there would be far more masternodes in existence.

dotnetmin

hero member

Activity: 756

Merit: 500

My masternode count shows 2092 masternodes. So we lost a bit more than 200 nodes.
But consider that it is much easier to close one than open a new one.
After redistributing a lot of coins it will take a bit longer until the new nodes are online again.
Maybe otoh can say something if he has set up new ones.

hashinfo.ru

newbie

Activity: 7

Merit: 0

gut you!

njs811

sr. member

Activity: 406

Merit: 250

Quote from: MasterMined710 on March 11, 2015, 01:30:47 AM

I've added a few more trolls to my ignore list today bringing the total to over 20 in the last 48 hours. Thanks to illodin, tok, minotaur and everybody else here fighting them!

I hope we keep the Darkcoin "D" logo as there is a ton of great artwork/Memes associated with it...

So is anyone who disagrees with you a troll? I had legitimate concerns. Is my voice not allowed to be heard?

droptable

sr. member

Activity: 363

Merit: 250

Quote from: MasterMined710 on March 11, 2015, 01:30:47 AM

I've added a few more trolls to my ignore list today bringing the total to over 20 in the last 48 hours. Thanks to illodin, tok, minotaur and everybody else here fighting them!

I hope we keep the Darkcoin "D" logo as there is a ton of great artwork/Memes associated with it...

yea.
the (special) D is important.
and it will be recognizable even if the name is changed.

MasterMined710

legendary

Activity: 1182

Merit: 1000

I've added a few more trolls to my ignore list today bringing the total to over 20 in the last 48 hours. Thanks to illodin, tok, minotaur and everybody else here fighting them!

I hope we keep the Darkcoin "D" logo as there is a ton of great artwork/Memes associated with it...

Topic: [ANN][DASH] Dash (dash.org) | First Self-Funding Self-Governing Crypto Currency - page 2765. (Read 9723733 times)