Author

Topic: [ANN][DASH] Dash (dash.org) | First Self-Funding Self-Governing Crypto Currency - page 3837. (Read 9723733 times)

sr. member
Activity: 363
Merit: 250
What should we name this release?

Thinking about a meme using "dark matter"...
Maybe we could take the periodic table of chemical elements and put the word "DARK" in front of every element, starting with Hydrogen:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Periodic_table

so

Dark Hydrogen (would be the first name to use)
then
Dark Helium
then
Dark Lithium
then
Dark Beryllium

etc...

the good thing about this is we will not run out of consistent names for a while, to name all the following versions.  Wink
Also we could create a sub logo for every version that consists of an atomic model with changing numbers of protons/neutrons and electrons.

EDIT: Here is what it might look like:



When we reach Version Dark Gold in 10 years, how awesome will that be?  Grin



nice too!

btw: coin101 ... let it run for at least 24h so everyone has a chance to cast a vote.
full member
Activity: 210
Merit: 100
Need To Contact Me? Go To My Site!
Announcement:

You can now earn 100% FREE Darkcoins @ MoneyInPjs.com  Smiley

Make your free MIP account and start earning "MIP coins" that now can be cashed in for Bitcoin or Darkcoin.

We offer tons of 100% free ways to earn more MIP coins and we are always adding more.

Feel free to PM me if you need help or have questions about the MoneyInPjs website.

Long Live DRK!  Grin

join us and start earning free DRK  Grin
legendary
Activity: 1484
Merit: 1007
spreadcoin.info

Let's not name all builds after the same type of thing. Darkcoin should be more creative than that. Let's think up a cool name each time.

True, ... who knows... in 1 year maybe it's not even called Darkcoin anymore, lol... it started with XCoin, remember?
Though it gets more complicated the more adoption a name gets to suddenly change it.
legendary
Activity: 1442
Merit: 1018
https://drk.mn/masternodes.html

looks strange to me. Is there an MN net attack attempt going on or something?
or one desperatly trying to setup an MN behind a Tor NET? see XwzmEE1cJ6HG84CgJvAt7ADmJ8W9Wh65Tq with ever changeing IP's

Total Masternodes: 1596 = 1415 actives + 181 inactives (Last refresh: Tue Oct 07 2014 19:42:34)
-> 35% unknown masternode version ...


 Huh Huh

balance 10.613 DRK. No chance.

Then how is he being awarded: XwzmEE1cJ6HG84CgJvAt7ADmJ8W9Wh65Tq
legendary
Activity: 2674
Merit: 3000
Terminated.
https://drk.mn/masternodes.html

looks strange to me. Is there an MN net attack attempt going on or something?
or one desperatly trying to setup an MN behind a Tor NET? see XwzmEE1cJ6HG84CgJvAt7ADmJ8W9Wh65Tq with ever changeing IP's

Total Masternodes: 1596 = 1415 actives + 181 inactives (Last refresh: Tue Oct 07 2014 19:42:34)
-> 35% unknown masternode version ...


 Huh Huh
We have so many masternodes? When did the number almost double?
Last time I checked it was around the 800 mark?
sr. member
Activity: 363
Merit: 250
Why not name the versioning with popular things trending on google, so that darkcoin will trend along with it?

Darkcoin Collins

Darkcoin Peterson

Darkcoin Seahawks

Darkcoin Twin Peaks


.. dunno maybe it's not the best idea

http://www.google.com/trends/hottrends#pn=p1

 Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin

DarkHillary, DarkNippleGate, Dark911     
legendary
Activity: 1456
Merit: 1000
https://drk.mn/masternodes.html

looks strange to me. Is there an MN net attack attempt going on or something?
or one desperatly trying to setup an MN behind a Tor NET? see XwzmEE1cJ6HG84CgJvAt7ADmJ8W9Wh65Tq with ever changeing IP's

Total Masternodes: 1596 = 1415 actives + 181 inactives (Last refresh: Tue Oct 07 2014 19:42:34)
-> 35% unknown masternode version ...


 Huh Huh

balance 10.613 DRK. No chance.
newbie
Activity: 28
Merit: 0
Why not name the versioning with popular things trending on google, so that darkcoin will trend along with it?

Darkcoin Collins

Darkcoin Peterson

Darkcoin Seahawks

Darkcoin Twin Peaks


.. dunno maybe it's not the best idea

http://www.google.com/trends/hottrends#pn=p1
legendary
Activity: 1456
Merit: 1000
Quote
This release includes:

- Spork: True masternode payment enforcement and increasing masternode rewards
- Masternode Hardening, I've fixed over 10 vulnerabilities in Darksend that could have possibly caused DOS attacks
- Changed the way Masternode pinging works, using a timestamp calculated from the average block timestamp instead of the local time. This should fix some cases where nodes went offline after awhile.
- Added a simple list that will provide who gets paid on what blocks.
- Turned back on collateral transactions
- Added collateral to the queuing process (dsa and dsq protocol commands)
- Improved collateral strategy: Collateral is now paid in the form of mining fees. This creates a situation where to double spend the inputs, you would need to pay the miners higher fees then 0.1DRK (the collateral fee). This makes it impossible to double spend attack our collateral system.
- New command "masternode winners", shows the next 20 payees
- New Darksend branding

What we need to test:

- If anyone gets hit with a collateral charge, please send your debug.log and wallet.dat to [email protected]
- "masternode winners" must always be in sync across the whole network. We'll need to figure out a way to test this
- Make sure the reward adjustment is working
- Make sure darksend is working properly
- Update pools and make sure the spork goes smoothly

What should we name this release?




https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.9073745
hero member
Activity: 965
Merit: 515
https://drk.mn/masternodes.html

looks strange to me. Is there an MN net attack attempt going on or something?
or one desperatly trying to setup an MN behind a Tor NET? see XwzmEE1cJ6HG84CgJvAt7ADmJ8W9Wh65Tq with ever changeing IP's

Total Masternodes: 1596 = 1415 actives + 181 inactives (Last refresh: Tue Oct 07 2014 19:42:34)
-> 35% unknown masternode version ...


 Huh Huh
sr. member
Activity: 363
Merit: 250
wait111

fiction writers: asimov, pratchett, suarez, ....



edit: ps: if you havent read "deamon" and "freedom[tm]" you should. just to understand darkcoin  Grin

to late. so what.
coin101 is doing a great job.

these are the candidates, may the odds be in your favor....
legendary
Activity: 1456
Merit: 1000

I do understand that a simple poll is really practical.
BUT
i would prefer a cardinal-voting-system or something like it.

there are a few options i could live with, and some i would really not like to win.
casting a single vote doesn´t reflect that.

ps: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voting_system#Rated_voting_methods

Could do short-list, revote?

yea, or that. like "the final for" or something

ok. suggestions slow now.

Opening survey, then at 9.30pm GMT, gonna do a quick fire short list voting round.

full member
Activity: 163
Merit: 100
A légpárnás hajóm tele van angolnákkal.
What should we name this release?

Thinking about a meme using "dark matter"...
Maybe we could take the periodic table of chemical elements and put the word "DARK" in front of every element, starting with Hydrogen:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Periodic_table

so

Dark Hydrogen (would be the first name to use)
then
Dark Helium
then
Dark Lithium
then
Dark Beryllium

etc...

the good thing about this is we will not run out of consistent names for a while, to name all the following versions.  Wink
Also we could create a sub logo for every version that consists of an atomic model with changing numbers of protons/neutrons and electrons.

EDIT: Here is what it might look like:



When we reach Version Dark Gold in 10 years, how awesome will that be?  Grin


I'd drop the word "Dark" from the name. Remember that "Darkcoin" will come before the release name. Darkcoin Dark Lithium.
sr. member
Activity: 363
Merit: 250

I do understand that a simple poll is really practical.
BUT
i would prefer a cardinal-voting-system or something like it.

there are a few options i could live with, and some i would really not like to win.
casting a single vote doesn´t reflect that.

ps: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voting_system#Rated_voting_methods

Could do short-list, revote?

yea, or that. like "the final for" or something
legendary
Activity: 1456
Merit: 1000

I do understand that a simple poll is really practical.
BUT
i would prefer a cardinal-voting-system or something like it.

there are a few options i could live with, and some i would really not like to win.
casting a single vote doesn´t reflect that.

ps: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voting_system#Rated_voting_methods

Could do short-list, revote?
sr. member
Activity: 363
Merit: 250


I do understand that a simple poll is really practical.
BUT
i would prefer a cardinal-voting-system or something like it.

there are a few options i could live with, and some i would really not like to win.
casting a single vote doesn´t reflect that.

ps: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voting_system#Rated_voting_methods
sr. member
Activity: 294
Merit: 250
Cheesy

Look at that... network compliance & masternode payouts... makes me smile! Only wished I could afford more DRK.



My stat is 100%

legendary
Activity: 1456
Merit: 1000
legendary
Activity: 1988
Merit: 1000
Jump to: