Topic: [ANN][DASH] Dash (dash.org) | First Self-Funding Self-Governing Crypto Currency - page 4195. (Read 9723787 times)

fernando on the darkcointalk.org has the statistical percentages given various rounds and masternode counts.

I don't want to sound like a whiner, but I'm going to whine, LOL.

I don't get it, why is lightcoin worth $5.50+ right now?  What the heck?  Why?

And darkcoin in a hole... yah....

And I really wish I understood statistics so I could figure out what the chances of being found out are for 3, 5 and 8 rounds of darksend?

Finally, I agree with the guys above.  Auditing takes a long time if you do a thorough job of it, and we (the community) wanted a job well done.   Kristov has a moral obligation to us, foremost and primarily.  His coins are his to do with as he likes, including selling off asap if he thinks they're not up to snuff so he can cash in before he sends in his verdict.

How else are we going to pay him?  This makes his obligation to us, though he gives his report to our CEO, our CEO did not pay him, and shouldn't control his loyalty, we should.

Now I have a crazy idea.  What would happen if you could, along with denominating your coins as it is now, darksend them with a front end mixer like it was?  Man, I'd think that would be incredibly messed up!  How could anyone/thing follow the bread crumb trail then?

Also, I think I glimpsed a question about the blockchain getting bigger.  Yah, I think it'll probably be getting.... guessing.... 5% bigger/faster than a "normal" block chain  (pulling out of my @$$, but...)  But the thing is, we're planning to have masternodes serve up the blockchain for our users (also will still need to be on hand for miners)  So eventually, users will only need to use a lightweight blockchain while the miners and masternodes will keep the ledger decentralized and in check. (and of course, anyone else who wishes to keep a copy).

Also, stonehedge, anyone could at least study the way DS works, or get someone they trust to look into it and get at least the idea reviewed for themselves.  True, you can't see if the code has flaws, but you can extensively test it in testnet (without any risks) and see how it performs.  So I think your financial dude is a bit myopic and not seeing the big picture.  We are also a small community here.  We know whom we trust (really trust) and it's as good as we can get it.  Yet, I'll bet my life, yes my life, that we as a community can figure out whom to trust better than any business out there in the "normal world".

All pump and dumpers are scammers trying to bleed newbs.  That's the only way money gets into the system for them to win. They always hurt crypto coins when they do that as well, all cryptos.  But there are bad players everywhere, and I dare say the subject is easily written on every wall, all over the floors and on the ceilings, so anyone who gets burned in that game should have known better.  Point being, we have all kinds here, yet as in the real world (outside cryptos) we, as a whole, can figure out what's what

Price stability is very positive for the continuity of the project, the last major update was exactly 1 week ago on the 19th, and it detailed what the roadmap was, I expect the audit to come in about 2 weeks or so anything sooner than that would be a nice surprise. We were stable for about 2 months or more between 0.0010 - 0.0013,  the price right now seems like a good opportunity without any hype to buy some coins. We've come a long way since January and these periods of time without so much hype or pressure from the market are great for development,  think about all Evan can acomplish in the next month if we leave him be. Any smart investor should have recognized the pure talent of the Darkcoin team so let them do what they do best and take the opportunity to accumulate and let new people join at a fair and stable price point.

People forget or are unaware that Evan differs from most coin devs in one critical way: he knows what he's doing.

Development > external review(s) > open source.  

People also don't seem to understand that RC4 was basically a rewrite from the ground up, and was brought to market very successfully in a remarkably short space of time, all while maintaining a completely transparent public testing environment.

I'm not big on faith and hope, but I know talent and competence when I see it.

i think he is on public video record saying he will do the review, but he can afford to do it sooner rather than later if he received some financial support - we all have to pay the rent -

he has since said the review was 'crowd funded' and he very much appreciated that small contributions that were made.

auditing it auditing.  Auditors need to be paid by someone. Whether its auditing financial accounts or penetration testing.  At some point you have to trust that they value their future revenue generation potential more than a short--term gain.

Fearcoka don`t sell it now. Don`t do anything with it, if....when someone need the domain he will come to you and you will dictade the price. Thats all.
Something else if you talk about darkcoin.com but still 50k is much IMHO

As much as I trust any website, why not?

So you would trust a website called x819xinfias.com

You may not have noticed, but since about 1998 browsers can save a bookmark under any name the user wants, the underlying name is of no consequence, and a site full of garbage isn't going to fool Google regardless of the domain name. Domain squatting ceased to be a viable business strategy a long time ago mate.  

^

This is the reason why there are 1%ers and those who live their lives at the bear minimum and never go above their comfort zone.

Keep defending away, no one is going to buy your domain. No one is going to make the kind of revenue you suggest, at least not in any foreseeable future. Had you owned darkcoin.com, maybe you'd have a shot in the future, but you don't. I'm done arguing, you're ignored.

It could offer a service that the Darkcoin.io domain does not.

Therefore your arguments are shitty in comparison

Darkcoin actually offers a service (utility), your domain does not. They are not the same and it's a shitty comparison.

Thats what the fudders said about Darkcoin when it was 30c

$50,000 for that.... dude you're delusional. Try to sell it for $20 and you can at least double your money. You bought it for what, $9.99?

LOL, good luck, you'll absolutely need it.

Im tied up in so many projects. Im sure some people are waiting for something like this to pop up. I am ready to negociate the price

...then hire someone to write content and do it yourself. Why sell your domain for "$50k" when you could be making $180k a year! Come on bro, do it!

lol, publicly traded companies pay for independent CPAs to audit their company's financials every quarter. The excuse holds no water. Frankly, I would be floored if 1k DRK (~$3k USD) was enough for KA to sell his reputation for. Get real people.

Not at all. You need to visit the blackhat forums.

An email list + Articles + Advertising you would be surprised.

Www.darkcoin.io has received an estimated 343,300 visits over the last 30 days.

Almost all of it is from google traffic. If you can have drkcoin.com on the top 3 on google youre in business.

On top of that you can have referrals to mintpal, bittrex and all other exchanges as well as a startup guide to buy darkcoins under referral links.