[ANN][DASH] Dash (dash.org) | First Self-Funding Self-Governing Crypto Currency - page 4539.

thelonecrouton

legendary

Activity: 966

Merit: 1000

Quote from: Lauda on August 03, 2014, 04:46:48 PM

Quote from: thelonecrouton on August 03, 2014, 03:26:31 PM

Quote from: coinzcoinzcoinz on August 03, 2014, 03:12:34 PM

Agreed. Perhaps some confidence was lost after RC3, but that slight loss in confidence will be compensated by epic new features in RC4. I wouldn't be surprised if we surpassed $100m cap. Also the failure of other anonymous coins the past weeks will work in our advantage.

DS+ in RC4 is working very well on testnet. Just a few minor UI niggles to tidy up.
As for the competition, all the bytecoin clones have big issues and the rest are pure vapourware.
Darkcoin works.

edit: and when it's open sourced, good luck to anyone trying to copy and paste one thousand Masternodes.

Well we are waiting for it on the mainnet. I guess we should expect it in a week or two? They have said early August.
We shall see an insane spike on interest here. If it were up to me I'd make a small portion (but important one) closed source, to prevent copies. Wink

Thankfully it isn't up to you. Cheesy

vertoe

hero member

Activity: 518

Merit: 505

2nd "WHO AM I?" DarkSend+ testnet game: 9 DS+ rounds.
https://darkcointalk.org/threads/2nd-who-am-i-darksend-testnet-game-9-ds-rounds.1954/

The first one was a real success revealing DS+ exploits. Get me, guys!
http://test.explorer.darkcoin.qa/tx/6663441ecdbbe3f4ca454b4f79a9a67bd752f0e0a419ba478c331abf93d91267

Quote from: Lauda on August 03, 2014, 04:46:48 PM

Quote from: thelonecrouton on August 03, 2014, 03:26:31 PM

Quote from: coinzcoinzcoinz on August 03, 2014, 03:12:34 PM

Agreed. Perhaps some confidence was lost after RC3, but that slight loss in confidence will be compensated by epic new features in RC4. I wouldn't be surprised if we surpassed $100m cap. Also the failure of other anonymous coins the past weeks will work in our advantage.

DS+ in RC4 is working very well on testnet. Just a few minor UI niggles to tidy up.
As for the competition, all the bytecoin clones have big issues and the rest are pure vapourware.
Darkcoin works.

edit: and when it's open sourced, good luck to anyone trying to copy and paste one thousand Masternodes.

Well we are waiting for it on the mainnet. I guess we should expect it in a week or two? They have said early August.
We shall see an insane spike on interest here. If it were up to me I'd make a small portion (but important one) closed source, to prevent copies. Wink

I expect RC4 within a few days. Darksend+ is finished.

Lauda

legendary

Activity: 2674

Merit: 3000

Terminated.

Quote from: thelonecrouton on August 03, 2014, 03:26:31 PM

Quote from: coinzcoinzcoinz on August 03, 2014, 03:12:34 PM

Agreed. Perhaps some confidence was lost after RC3, but that slight loss in confidence will be compensated by epic new features in RC4. I wouldn't be surprised if we surpassed $100m cap. Also the failure of other anonymous coins the past weeks will work in our advantage.

DS+ in RC4 is working very well on testnet. Just a few minor UI niggles to tidy up.
As for the competition, all the bytecoin clones have big issues and the rest are pure vapourware.
Darkcoin works.

edit: and when it's open sourced, good luck to anyone trying to copy and paste one thousand Masternodes.

Well we are waiting for it on the mainnet. I guess we should expect it in a week or two? They have said early August.
We shall see an insane spike on interest here. If it were up to me I'd make a small portion (but important one) closed source, to prevent copies. Wink

DubFX

sr. member

Activity: 434

Merit: 250

Quote from: AlexGR on August 03, 2014, 04:35:13 PM

Quote from: gadado on August 03, 2014, 02:44:12 PM

Quote from: tombtc on August 03, 2014, 02:24:30 PM

He chose DRK because in a few weeks his coins will be worth 2x more and untraceable

More likely dark was used to wash the coins anonymous. I guess that's the dark side of anon coins.. uh.

With RC4 going live soon, and the ability to launder multi-thousand DRK amounts, fungibility of these coins will not be an issue (like it would be with stolen BTCs). So yeah, DRK was a good choice by the hacker...

Why just the hacker, also by anybody that doesn't want every step of their money beign watched by goverment?

AngusCanine

legendary

Activity: 1414

Merit: 1001

To weird to live To rare to die

Quote from: DaveyJones on August 03, 2014, 02:20:57 PM

Quote from: qwizzie on August 03, 2014, 02:11:19 PM

Quote from: tifozi on August 03, 2014, 02:01:17 PM

Reminds me of the c-cex hack back in Feb/March causing Darkcoiners endless agony but lucky to pick up cheap Darkcoins.

also looks like there is a typo in the above explanation. Should be,

Quote

as far I can see... the hacker bought MYC for about 7 BTC (until 100sat)

MYC was a Chinese scam and all this MYC engagement indicates the hacker is most likely from China.

Darkcoin just cannot stay out of trouble in one way or another. I don't know what else to say. As usual the Cloakcoin thread is bashing Darkcoin for all this. It is a trend since the last run up throughout BTCTalk, blame Darkcoin for everything and anything Huh

. In fact I might open a parody thread in the Alt subforum.

i dont think there is a typo here.. just check at Mintpal the recent market history : buy price went up from 8 sat (16:14) to 130 sat (16:40)

edit : i see what you mean .. yr right.. suspect typo there too

i for myself as cloakholder would not blame drk for it .... my guess drk is the target because of its high volume... so its easy for him to resell the drk on other exchanges for btc. the hacker probably gives a shit about anons at all ^^

exactly dark has volume .... That's all. Not because investment...lol

AlexGR

legendary

Activity: 1708

Merit: 1049

Quote from: gadado on August 03, 2014, 02:44:12 PM

Quote from: tombtc on August 03, 2014, 02:24:30 PM

He chose DRK because in a few weeks his coins will be worth 2x more and untraceable

More likely dark was used to wash the coins anonymous. I guess that's the dark side of anon coins.. uh.

With RC4 going live soon, and the ability to launder multi-thousand DRK amounts, fungibility of these coins will not be an issue (like it would be with stolen BTCs). So yeah, DRK was a good choice by the hacker...

thelonecrouton

legendary

Activity: 966

Merit: 1000

Quote from: coinzcoinzcoinz on August 03, 2014, 03:12:34 PM

Quote from: Lauda on August 03, 2014, 02:45:35 PM

Quote from: Bitcoin_CFO on August 03, 2014, 02:32:28 PM

Quote from: tombtc on August 03, 2014, 02:24:30 PM

He chose DRK because in a few weeks his coins will be worth 2x more and untraceable

2x's?! cute...

Well look at this way, we had a failed (pretty much right?) RC3 and we hit 70m cap. If everything that has been mentioned in RC4 rolls out and works, I'm thinking that we might surpass this cap and go much further, don't you too?

Agreed. Perhaps some confidence was lost after RC3, but that slight loss in confidence will be compensated by epic new features in RC4. I wouldn't be surprised if we surpassed $100m cap. Also the failure of other anonymous coins the past weeks will work in our advantage.

DS+ in RC4 is working very well on testnet. Just a few minor UI niggles to tidy up.

As for the competition, all the bytecoin clones have big issues and the rest are pure vapourware.

Darkcoin works.

edit: and when it's open sourced, good luck to anyone trying to copy and paste one thousand Masternodes.

coinzcoinzcoinz

hero member

Activity: 530

Merit: 500

Quote from: Lauda on August 03, 2014, 02:45:35 PM

Quote from: Bitcoin_CFO on August 03, 2014, 02:32:28 PM

Quote from: tombtc on August 03, 2014, 02:24:30 PM

He chose DRK because in a few weeks his coins will be worth 2x more and untraceable

2x's?! cute...

Well look at this way, we had a failed (pretty much right?) RC3 and we hit 70m cap. If everything that has been mentioned in RC4 rolls out and works, I'm thinking that we might surpass this cap and go much further, don't you too?

Agreed. Perhaps some confidence was lost after RC3, but that slight loss in confidence will be compensated by epic new features in RC4. I wouldn't be surprised if we surpassed $100m cap. Also the failure of other anonymous coins the past weeks will work in our advantage.

chaeplin

sr. member

Activity: 294

Merit: 250

Quote from: Phillis on August 03, 2014, 01:04:37 PM

the cloak account hack looks like it got sent to these two addresses:

http://chainz.cryptoid.info/drk/address.dws?XshMBRG2iUb5stPRQZQdTnsdz6ZaeLTkM1.htm - 2,000 drk
http://chainz.cryptoid.info/drk/address.dws?Xhx1f7RpYueq3j5C21tDe5msU6eeVv4mcn.htm - 4,905 drk

from block 112977: http://chainz.cryptoid.info/drk/block.dws?112977.htm

I think block 112976 is the one.
http://chainz.cryptoid.info/drk/block.dws?112976.htm
http://chainz.cryptoid.info/drk/tx.dws?486043.htm

http://chainz.cryptoid.info/drk/address.dws?XtoUXWJ8cmaxsN1boLyghNPxGUDAqtVcav.htm

0   37abcb8d5c39...   Xhx1f7RpYueq3j5C21tDe5msU6eeVv4mcn   4,905.21645385 DRK ---> sit in new addresses
1   ca667b3ce048...   XshMBRG2iUb5stPRQZQdTnsdz6ZaeLTkM1   2,000.0 DRK ---> 1821 to MintPal, 179 to new address(Maybe Cryptsy)

Xhx1f7RpYueq3j5C21tDe5msU6eeVv4mcn --->
1   Not yet redeemed   Xps4qsgBGQi2u8WUnEJYKHokz4rZc3Kmdc   500.0 DRK
0   Not yet redeemed   XowhfESC7DcHu6mvhY4YvERiqvhF2qw7oj    1,500.0 DRK
0   Not yet redeemed   Xgf6Yp5kb9JeyKbnpZepqupXWFe3XQ57Np   1,005.21645385 DRK
1   Not yet redeemed   Xexd9cMAP7Sq9cwydmudiJuVfkC6DYXJmn   1,900.0 DRK

XshMBRG2iUb5stPRQZQdTnsdz6ZaeLTkM1 -> Xh4m14MmBnWFDcqLfHTdgCnqoSnykz8xuA + Xjvyat6gtCyXvxtfooG3MsjKaNaRCCEmFU + Xonz2M89FdJrhNb3yzvcYDardQwV8SQKJC + Xrva55NphWSq2XmvMNDLY34s8Pt3y62Wxo
0   Not yet redeemed   Xjvyat6gtCyXvxtfooG3MsjKaNaRCCEmFU MintPal   120.196 DRK
1   Not yet redeemed   Xh4m14MmBnWFDcqLfHTdgCnqoSnykz8xuA MintPal   499.996 DRK
0   Not yet redeemed   Xonz2M89FdJrhNb3yzvcYDardQwV8SQKJC MintPal   99.9949 DRK
1   Not yet redeemed   Xh4m14MmBnWFDcqLfHTdgCnqoSnykz8xuA MintPal   499.996 DRK
1   Not yet redeemed   Xh4m14MmBnWFDcqLfHTdgCnqoSnykz8xuA MintPal   499.996 DRK
0   Not yet redeemed   Xrva55NphWSq2XmvMNDLY34s8Pt3y62Wxo   179.8263 DRK
1   Not yet redeemed   Xonz2M89FdJrhNb3yzvcYDardQwV8SQKJC MintPal   99.9948 DRK

1)

Code:

Inputs
Index Previous output Address Amount
0 e8739c083b01...:1 XtoUXWJ8cmaxsN1boLyghNPxGUDAqtVcav 6,905.21645385 DRK
Outputs
Index Redeemed in Address Amount
0 37abcb8d5c39... Xhx1f7RpYueq3j5C21tDe5msU6eeVv4mcn 4,905.21645385 DRK
1 ca667b3ce048... XshMBRG2iUb5stPRQZQdTnsdz6ZaeLTkM1 2,000.0 DRK

Code:

Inputs
Index Previous output Address Amount
0 a264fe97fc82...:0 Xhx1f7RpYueq3j5C21tDe5msU6eeVv4mcn 4,905.21645385 DRK
Outputs
Index Redeemed in Address Amount
0 1a17020ef738... XqgLcGoqhbD1uMzghvVzdyqLXfeLF2jLNk 4,405.21645385 DRK
1 Not yet redeemed Xps4qsgBGQi2u8WUnEJYKHokz4rZc3Kmdc 500.0 DRK

Code:

Inputs
Index Previous output Address Amount
0 37abcb8d5c39...:0 XqgLcGoqhbD1uMzghvVzdyqLXfeLF2jLNk 4,405.21645385 DRK
Outputs
Index Redeemed in Address Amount
0 Not yet redeemed XowhfESC7DcHu6mvhY4YvERiqvhF2qw7oj 1,500.0 DRK
1 23ebe4b1c0b1... XjvHzpfUCDgFKpQ3tvLQPLrb4VF1kM27Bp 2,905.21645385 DRK

Code:

Inputs
Index Previous output Address Amount
0 1a17020ef738...:1 XjvHzpfUCDgFKpQ3tvLQPLrb4VF1kM27Bp 2,905.21645385 DRK
Outputs
Index Redeemed in Address Amount
0 Not yet redeemed Xgf6Yp5kb9JeyKbnpZepqupXWFe3XQ57Np 1,005.21645385 DRK
1 Not yet redeemed Xexd9cMAP7Sq9cwydmudiJuVfkC6DYXJmn 1,900.0 DRK

2)

Code:

Inputs
Index Previous output Address Amount
0 a264fe97fc82...:1 XshMBRG2iUb5stPRQZQdTnsdz6ZaeLTkM1 2,000.0 DRK
Outputs
Index Redeemed in Address Amount
0 Not yet redeemed Xjvyat6gtCyXvxtfooG3MsjKaNaRCCEmFU MintPal 120.196 DRK
1 4a56f5834865... XxtcffkdqvgmfvSQyB2aVU5FH7j5GaMayF 1,879.804 DRK

Code:

Inputs
Index Previous output Address Amount
0 ca667b3ce048...:1 XxtcffkdqvgmfvSQyB2aVU5FH7j5GaMayF 1,879.804 DRK
Outputs
Index Redeemed in Address Amount
0 d0994e8bb36d... Xz1RYkPuZmY8DQZ1Y4kx27XwNTTJ64qJRT 1,379.808 DRK
1 Not yet redeemed Xh4m14MmBnWFDcqLfHTdgCnqoSnykz8xuA MintPal 499.996 DRK

Code:

Inputs
Index Previous output Address Amount
0 4a56f5834865...:0 Xz1RYkPuZmY8DQZ1Y4kx27XwNTTJ64qJRT 1,379.808 DRK
Outputs
Index Redeemed in Address Amount
0 Not yet redeemed Xonz2M89FdJrhNb3yzvcYDardQwV8SQKJC MintPal 99.9949 DRK
1 c1a417eee85f... XxqXRT7ErsKPs5nSNogNoF6xSzRdt3GmNc 1,279.8131 DRK

Code:

Inputs
Index Previous output Address Amount
0 d0994e8bb36d...:1 XxqXRT7ErsKPs5nSNogNoF6xSzRdt3GmNc 1,279.8131 DRK
Outputs
Index Redeemed in Address Amount
0 fbfbea09aa2b... XwhsA3Ntbh62PdWNdYYCtyxCyaGRyN5749 779.8171 DRK
1 Not yet redeemed Xh4m14MmBnWFDcqLfHTdgCnqoSnykz8xuA MintPal 499.996 DRK

Code:

Inputs
Index Previous output Address Amount
0 c1a417eee85f...:0 XwhsA3Ntbh62PdWNdYYCtyxCyaGRyN5749 779.8171 DRK
Outputs
Index Redeemed in Address Amount
0 d6b1151c5275... XeJZsKga4cpHeZJuJ4UaDnWJfACzbBDbTX 279.8211 DRK
1 Not yet redeemed Xh4m14MmBnWFDcqLfHTdgCnqoSnykz8xuA MintPal 499.996 DRK

Code:

Inputs
Index Previous output Address Amount
0 fbfbea09aa2b...:0 XeJZsKga4cpHeZJuJ4UaDnWJfACzbBDbTX 279.8211 DRK
Outputs
Index Redeemed in Address Amount
0 Not yet redeemed Xrva55NphWSq2XmvMNDLY34s8Pt3y62Wxo 179.8263 DRK
1 Not yet redeemed Xonz2M89FdJrhNb3yzvcYDardQwV8SQKJC MintPal 99.9948 DRK

illodin

hero member

Activity: 966

Merit: 1003

Quote from: Bitcoin_CFO on August 03, 2014, 02:32:28 PM

Quote from: tombtc on August 03, 2014, 02:24:30 PM

He chose DRK because in a few weeks his coins will be worth 2x more and untraceable

2x's?! cute...

Ok, 4x. We're just trying not to pump it up with hype around here. Wink

Lauda

legendary

Activity: 2674

Merit: 3000

Terminated.

Quote from: Bitcoin_CFO on August 03, 2014, 02:32:28 PM

Quote from: tombtc on August 03, 2014, 02:24:30 PM

He chose DRK because in a few weeks his coins will be worth 2x more and untraceable

2x's?! cute...

Well look at this way, we had a failed (pretty much right?) RC3 and we hit 70m cap. If everything that has been mentioned in RC4 rolls out and works, I'm thinking that we might surpass this cap and go much further, don't you too?

gadado

hero member

Activity: 965

Merit: 515

Quote from: tombtc on August 03, 2014, 02:24:30 PM

He chose DRK because in a few weeks his coins will be worth 2x more and untraceable

More likely dark was used to wash the coins anonymous. I guess that's the dark side of anon coins.. uh.

Crazzy story. But I have to say I just learnt something new that I didn't know.

qwizzie

legendary

Activity: 2548

Merit: 1245

Quote from: tombtc on August 03, 2014, 02:24:30 PM

He chose DRK because in a few weeks his coins will be worth 2x more and untraceable

he is most likely the most interested person in RC4 right now

Freckleg

hero member

Activity: 508

Merit: 500

Quote from: eduffield

****** Please Update To 10.12.11 or 9.12.11 *******

More progress! I'm moving on to testing the voting system, then I think we're ready to launch. Let me know if there's anything else that needs to be addressed with Darksend.

- Darksend Denominate Outputs are now in a random order:

http://test.explorer.darkcoin.fr/tx/072ca56cbf705b87749513a2d2ee02080d506adcf8fe178f6dc2967f0711788e
http://test.explorer.darkcoin.fr/tx/32daa8ca46462e7e99f3532251d68a8c3835a080c937bd83b11db74e47b770ff

- Darksend now uses 3 participants instead of two.
- SplitUpMoney can now make collateral inputs when needed
- Transactions now shows darksend transaction types for easier understanding of what's going on:

- Fixed a couple more cases where collateral was charged when it shouldn't have happened (let me know if it happens after this version)
- Fixed the money destruction bug, it was caused by "darksend denominate 8000". I missed a reference and the client passed an empty address to SendMoneyToDestination. rcp darksend source: http://pastebin.com/r14piKuq
- Unlocking/Locking wallet fixes (was spamming the logs)
- Unencrypted wallet fixes (was trying to lock every 10 seconds)
- Flare found and fixed an issue with DGW3 for win32
--------------

https://darkcointalk.org/threads/rc4-testing.1830/page-47#post-14407

Note only update for test net

Bitcoin_CFO

newbie

Activity: 31

Merit: 0

Quote from: tombtc on August 03, 2014, 02:24:30 PM

He chose DRK because in a few weeks his coins will be worth 2x more and untraceable

2x's?! cute...

tombtc

sr. member

Activity: 471

Merit: 250

He chose DRK because in a few weeks his coins will be worth 2x more and untraceable

DaveyJones

hero member

Activity: 768

Merit: 505

Quote from: qwizzie on August 03, 2014, 02:11:19 PM

Quote from: tifozi on August 03, 2014, 02:01:17 PM

Reminds me of the c-cex hack back in Feb/March causing Darkcoiners endless agony but lucky to pick up cheap Darkcoins.

also looks like there is a typo in the above explanation. Should be,

Quote

as far I can see... the hacker bought MYC for about 7 BTC (until 100sat)

MYC was a Chinese scam and all this MYC engagement indicates the hacker is most likely from China.

Darkcoin just cannot stay out of trouble in one way or another. I don't know what else to say. As usual the Cloakcoin thread is bashing Darkcoin for all this. It is a trend since the last run up throughout BTCTalk, blame Darkcoin for everything and anything Huh

. In fact I might open a parody thread in the Alt subforum.

i dont think there is a typo here.. just check at Mintpal the recent market history : buy price went up from 8 sat (16:14) to 130 sat (16:40)

edit : i see what you mean .. yr right.. suspect typo there too

i for myself as cloakholder would not blame drk for it .... my guess drk is the target because of its high volume... so its easy for him to resell the drk on other exchanges for btc. the hacker probably gives a shit about anons at all ^^

qwizzie

legendary

Activity: 2548

Merit: 1245

Quote from: tifozi on August 03, 2014, 02:01:17 PM

Reminds me of the c-cex hack back in Feb/March causing Darkcoiners endless agony but lucky to pick up cheap Darkcoins.

also looks like there is a typo in the above explanation. Should be,

Quote

as far I can see... the hacker bought MYC for about 7 BTC (until 100sat)

MYC was a Chinese scam and all this MYC engagement indicates the hacker is most likely from China.

Darkcoin just cannot stay out of trouble in one way or another. I don't know what else to say. As usual the Cloakcoin thread is bashing Darkcoin for all this. It is a trend since the last run up throughout BTCTalk, blame Darkcoin for everything and anything Huh

. In fact I might open a parody thread in the Alt subforum.

i dont think there is a typo here.. just check at Mintpal the recent market history : buy price went up from 8 sat (16:14) to 130 sat (16:40)

edit : i see what you mean .. yr right.. suspect typo there too

tifozi

hero member

Activity: 742

Merit: 501

Reminds me of the c-cex hack back in Feb/March causing Darkcoiners endless agony but lucky to pick up cheap Darkcoins.

also looks like there is a typo in the above explanation. Should be,

Quote

as far I can see... the hacker bought MYC for about 7 BTC (until 100sat)

MYC was a Chinese scam and all this MYC engagement indicates the hacker is most likely from China.

Darkcoin just cannot stay out of trouble in one way or another. I don't know what else to say. As usual the Cloakcoin thread is bashing Darkcoin for all this. It is a trend since the last run up throughout BTCTalk, blame Darkcoin for everything and anything Huh

. In fact I might open a parody thread in the Alt subforum.

qwizzie

legendary

Activity: 2548

Merit: 1245

Quote from: braxx on August 03, 2014, 01:44:06 PM

Quote from: akujin on August 03, 2014, 01:42:05 PM

Quote from: qwizzie on August 03, 2014, 01:16:13 PM

Quote from: akujin on August 03, 2014, 01:07:29 PM

Quote from: qwizzie on August 03, 2014, 12:53:56 PM

following seems to have happened :

An account at Mintpal was hacked without 2FA . This account had 100 BTC in Cloak , this was sold , then also MYC was sold and they bought with all BTC DRK.
This DRK got withdrawn from Mintpal.

EDIT : fixed MYR to MYC

MYC history says it was a buy

weird, i'm basing it on this info btw found on the ANN Cloak thread :

This is MYC history

he (or she) worked this way:
own account: by a small amount of MYC, put sell order really high (120sat)
hacked account: sell all cloak, buy with btc MYC until 120 sat
own account: freshly new BTC trade for DRK => withdraw DRK
probably traded to dark to bypass "huge amount btc withdraw"-watchdog.

as far I can see... the hacker bought MYC for about 7 BTC (until 10sat)
4 minutes later a buy (from hacked account) until 120 sat

ahh, that explains a lot, i wasnt totally getting how it worked as they couldnt get to the emailverification of the hacked account.

Thanks for explaining it.

Topic: [ANN][DASH] Dash (dash.org) | First Self-Funding Self-Governing Crypto Currency - page 4539. (Read 9723748 times)