Topic: [ANN][DASH] Dash (dash.org) | First Self-Funding Self-Governing Crypto Currency - page 5261. (Read 9723787 times)

This. RPC is how most websites interface with it and the commands are exactly the same... It takes a few minutes and poof, sites with BTC infrastructure are using DRK. Zero barriers to entry. No new crap to be vetted on the web dev end. Backend already proven...

Well, if they're dead, they can't sell me their DRKs...

Dammit, I dangled my participle again... It's like I'm becoming one of them... It starts with literacy, next thing you know I'm getting blowjobs from deadheads and buying XC/MRO...

So you left a trail of your spending all over the internet. That's cool.

DRK is based off similar code to bitcoin, if there is ever a privacy backlash against bitcoin, DRK will be easy to implement. Or it can simply be slotted in next to Bitcoin at any point, again because of similar code. Might take a little work and effort, but still easier than completely different source code.

I've sat in the fucking boring implementation, cost vs. benefit, lets do the less risky options meetings....I know how the discussions work. Cryptonote hasn't got a fucking chance of going into merchant acceptance, even if it might have some reasonably good tech.

No.

Since you wanted to make a guessing game out of it, I'll suggest you try again instead of telling you.

Hint, I provide pain to those who can't/won't learn the easy way. If that makes me a bad person, then I aim to be the most horrendous person you've ever known. Please call me names some more. It supports your argument brilliantly.

LIVs can't stand reality...

Closed source cryptocurrency is bad.  Many people think so.  

My belief in cryptonote coins does not make me a Monero man.  I believe cryptonote will evolve and be a better anonymous solution that Darkcoin and it's masternode network ever will be.  I like that developers of several  cryptonote coins are actually working together to make a better cryptocurrency for everyone.  They actually share improvements with each other.  Unlike Darkcoins closed source masternode approach where a few wealthy individuals will be able to charge fees from users and also collect percentage from miners also.

Already you read post from people brag about how many masternodes they have/are setting up.  It will be just like today global banking firms.  Where a few control the network.  One guy will be Bank of America, Another Wells Fargo, US Bank, Chase, etc...  

I would never send my money through a closed source, unregulated network. I'm not on here slamming Darkcoin, I just state my beliefs.  Too many people are buying into hype from a few loud large holders of Darkcoin who are only here for the money.  Don't be fooled by them.  They are selling while at the same time calling people weak hands.  They have done a good job with their propaganda.

Like I said early.  Darkcoin is good coin to make profit if do it right.  Beyond that, it never will be a widely adopted currency.  Neither will 99% of any of altcoins.  Bitcoin is the only one that will widely adopted.  I just bought laptop on Overstock.com, you can pay Dish Network bill in bitcoin, PayPal/Ebay is likely start accepting bitcoin near future.  That will never happen Darkcoin.  Bitcoin is the first and everything else will just fight each other over some niche market.

That, and the number of bullets he has on tap to shoot people.

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.6335710

Got a message from Satoshi asking to update this survey.

How do you define your self worth? I'm curious. Is it by the amount of narcissism, arrogance, and self righteousness you can ooze out?

If you want DarkSend open sourced sooner, pay some DRKs to the development fund so more help can be hired to do some of the non-core technical development work.

Evan-the-boy-genius can then spend more time on your I-want-to-clone-Darkcoin work.

LMAO  

I think he will look himself in the mirror next time and say the same thing to himself and most likely never forget it going forward too. You just messed this guy permanently.


A few pages ago, he was looking for professional services


I am still waiting for updated troll level list by Freckleg.

I don't define myself or my self worth by the volume of stupid animals willing to hump me. If one of those even tried to do me I'd be all; "Get your stinkin' paws off me you damn, dirty ape!"

The human race is full of dumb animals who dispose of their humanity to act like trash. Finding a non-degenerate among the deadhead crowd would be a needle in a haystack. I'm not saying it's impossible, just that there are better places to look for a needle if you want to actually find one in this lifetime...

Aw douchetroll. If that asswipe wasn't on your ignore list already, he should be now.

Some people are trolls. This one is a douchetroll.

This doesn't make sense to me. What is your definition of mid and long term? They seem to match the definition of short term... We're looking at a roadmap that currently, after prudent delays, says 1.5 months to full implementation... Even if delayed by 100% of that time frame, 3 months away, that still fits my definition of the short side of mid term... That argument just doesn't make any sense to me since even at a stretch all of this is on the roadmap to be handled in the short term, and even with tremendous delays, still on the stretched end of short term...

I'm really annoyed by this ring sig talk... I'd still be happy if it weren't included at all. It's really cool and a big deal, no doubt. But, it's not a fundamental requirement. DRK would work fine without it. We still haven't even seen what Evan has up his sleeve for that role, and I'm glad he hasn't blabbed.

DRK is in a make-or-break phase as everything planned depends upon the masternode incentive to go with the external loop proof of service genius. But, I really don't see the uncertainty everyone else is seeing. It'll work. Once it does, everything else is just feature adds. This is the hard part, but there's no reason to think the software can't be written, oh no, abandon ship! It's software... The iterations I go through just goofing with PHP are worse than this... It's not like mechanical engineering where you're limited by the laws of physics. Anything can be done in software.

As long as the coin supply and mining algo aren't tampered with, the rest is (largely) investment-ineffectual sandbox and can only make the coin better.

BitCoin was, and is, an experiment. DRK improves upon it where needed, and doesn't try to re-invent the whole wheel in the process. If a coin were invented that could blow me, no doubt, I'd be interested, but bottom line is that it doesn't have to blow me to be a good coin, and half the target demographic wouldn't have a use for that feature...

easy there guy, i have been growing my dreads since 1992. deadhead chicks love dreads. so much so that you anint getting any pussy at all from the true heads with that beaver cleaver haircut lol!

Pretty useful for now. And a bad feature for you (after looking through your post history you are clearly a monero man) as drk would be washed away in a sea of clones if it open sourced too early. So instead of trolling drk why don't you go back to monero and try and make it better competition, I dunno solve block chain bloat or pump the price or make it a little more useable so DRK can have actual competition. Competition is good. Being cloned to death is bad. Close source for now is good.

it is no different - market PAYS for open-source first mover advantage, always everywhere. the shitcoins can clone as much as they want, they will never reach the originals implementation - in my opinion dark makes two significant errors: it concentrates too little on ring signature with the promise of adding something better + keeping it closed sourced.

I am not trolling but I could start singing a farewell - not for short term, but for mid and long term

A bad feature.

So they should do it, right? Oh, they're waiting to copypasta Evan's work and he's not giving it to them which makes their douchedevery even more obvious...

Dumbasses, shitcoins and douchedevs, oh my!

Being closed source in the new crypto environment is not a bug, it's a feature.

+1, I've seen a lot of 1 post, newbie, accounts trolling because darksend is closed source. I'm 99.9% sure that those shill accounts are from people wanting to copy darksend as soon as it's open sourced.


I've also seen posts by multiple devs of coins wanting to add masternodes to their own coin.

Last night before I went to bed I saw someone post "wait until the Americans wake up in the morning"  LOL  Yah!

I know I'm a fan girl, but I just love this coin.  It's the most exciting thing in my life right now (bar my kids, LOL, always giving me too much excitement, LOL).  Seriously, When I do finally sell some of my coins, I'll be very sad, even so I won't be selling all of them, and I'll do it because I need $$$  LOL, it'll feel like I've severed some of my connection!  LOL.  Wish I could just buy!

So yah, fan girl all the way!  I know Darkcoin is here to stay, and by that I mean, it'll still be useful 50 years from now.  Why? (I know, you didn't ask, it was rhetorical)  Because:

Darksend is Quantum computer proof

Masternodes will keep mining and the blockchain decentralized

Every time Evan solves a problem, it seems to enhance other cryptocoin issues making it all better such as ^^^


BTC Address: 14LxvsuoKAb6ZiWBRJQt2BJLqRpvsjnYEi  in case I get hacked again.