Can someone please give a link to the info on how super nodes work?
masternodes*
https://darkcointalk.org/threads/darkcoin-update-masternode-requirements-masternode-payments.225/
Topic: [ANN][DASH] Dash (dash.org) | First Self-Funding Self-Governing Crypto Currency - page 6080. (Read 9723858 times)
May 08, 2014, 08:11:45 AM
masternodes*
https://darkcointalk.org/threads/darkcoin-update-masternode-requirements-masternode-payments.225/
May 08, 2014, 08:04:54 AM
Can someone please give a link to the info on how super nodes work?
May 08, 2014, 08:03:28 AM
...
+1 for lowendbox. it is website where hosting services post their specials for plans that don't require lots of resources.
Lowendbox has some reasonable options. Some alternatives;
http://www.orangewebsite.com/vps.php - accepts Bitcoin - hosted in Iceland
http://www.ccihosting.com/vps.php - accepts Bitcoin - hosted in Panama
http://www.anonymoushosting.in/vps.php - hosted in the Netherlands
http://www.yohost.org/offshore-hosting.html - accepts Bitcoin - hosted in the Netherlands
http://www.securehost.com/dedicated-servers/ - hosted in The Bahamas and Bermuda
http://www.cinipac.com - accepts Bitcoin - various locations including Iceland and Romania
https://www.1984hosting.com/ - hosted in Iceland
Most of these companies have been in business for a good while and have competitive pricing.
They should really consider accepting Darkcoin !
Thank you for this list!
May 08, 2014, 08:02:58 AM
Bit of a tradeoff security wise though, I prefer keeping my wallets separate, with separate passwords, in separate physical locations, with separate backups. Guarded by separate assault-crocodiles. Then again I'm both paranoid and inept.
I just have regular crocodiles. Where do you get them trained to become assault crocs? WI?
My regimen includes forced viewing of X Factor and daily injections of supplemental crocosterone, about 300mg/half-ton of bodymass.
Mine are in very cold storage and guarded by :
May 08, 2014, 07:59:13 AM
mark
May 08, 2014, 07:58:59 AM
Ok, hold on, another idea.
Lets say 3 masternodes, 1 local wallet.
1) local wallet - address 0 -> 1k DRK -> Masternode 1 start -> close local wallet -> backup_wallet_MN1.dat -> cold storage
2) stop local daemon, delete local wallet.dat
3) start daemon -> address 0 -> 1k DRK -> Masternode 2 start -> close local wallet -> backup_wallet_MN2.dat -> cold storage
4) stop local daemon, delete local wallet.dat
5) etc etc...
This should work too, right? Better even.
Lets say 3 masternodes, 1 local wallet.
1) local wallet - address 0 -> 1k DRK -> Masternode 1 start -> close local wallet -> backup_wallet_MN1.dat -> cold storage
2) stop local daemon, delete local wallet.dat
3) start daemon -> address 0 -> 1k DRK -> Masternode 2 start -> close local wallet -> backup_wallet_MN2.dat -> cold storage
4) stop local daemon, delete local wallet.dat
5) etc etc...
This should work too, right? Better even.
That's basically the current procedure. Being able to hold all the MN balances in one wallet would save a little faffing about though.
May 08, 2014, 07:50:49 AM
Bit of a tradeoff security wise though, I prefer keeping my wallets separate, with separate passwords, in separate physical locations, with separate backups. Guarded by separate assault-crocodiles. Then again I'm both paranoid and inept.
I just have regular crocodiles. Where do you get them trained to become assault crocs? WI?
My regimen includes forced viewing of X Factor and daily injections of supplemental crocosterone, about 300mg/half-ton of bodymass.
May 08, 2014, 07:44:06 AM
Ok, hold on, another idea.
Lets say 3 masternodes, 1 local wallet.
1) local wallet - address 0 -> 1k DRK -> Masternode 1 start -> close local wallet -> backup_wallet_MN1.dat -> cold storage
2) stop local daemon, delete local wallet.dat
3) start daemon -> address 0 -> 1k DRK -> Masternode 2 start -> close local wallet -> backup_wallet_MN2.dat -> cold storage
4) stop local daemon, delete local wallet.dat
5) etc etc...
This should work too, right? Better even.
Lets say 3 masternodes, 1 local wallet.
1) local wallet - address 0 -> 1k DRK -> Masternode 1 start -> close local wallet -> backup_wallet_MN1.dat -> cold storage
2) stop local daemon, delete local wallet.dat
3) start daemon -> address 0 -> 1k DRK -> Masternode 2 start -> close local wallet -> backup_wallet_MN2.dat -> cold storage
4) stop local daemon, delete local wallet.dat
5) etc etc...
This should work too, right? Better even.
May 08, 2014, 07:43:35 AM
Does that mean we can run multiple masternodes from the same local wallet?
Dunno, but running multiple "nodes" from one wallet / computer kind of goes against the distributed mixing network idea. So I hope the answer is "no".
That is absolutely not the idea. Its for the remote/local setup. the masternodes would still do the mixing, authored by the local wallet. At least that my understanding of it.
1000 DRK, one masternode @illodin is right, the idea is to make it costly to run a masternode.
You'd still need 4000 DRK to run 4 MNs, just each 1000 in it's own addr 0.
Bit of a tradeoff security wise though, I prefer keeping my wallets separate, with separate passwords, in sepatate physical locations, with sepatate backups. Guarded by separate assault-crocodiles. Then again I'm both paranoid and inept.
Wouldn't surprise me if eduffield made this possible weeks/months ago and just forgot to mention it to anyone.
I thought each masternode needed it's own static ip
It still would have, this is for setups where the 1000 DRK MN balance is stored remotely, each MN still runs on a unique box/VM/IP
May 08, 2014, 07:43:20 AM
Bit of a tradeoff security wise though, I prefer keeping my wallets separate, with separate passwords, in separate physical locations, with separate backups. Guarded by separate assault-crocodiles. Then again I'm both paranoid and inept.
I just have regular crocodiles. Where do you get them trained to become assault crocs? WI?
May 08, 2014, 07:40:25 AM
Does that mean we can run multiple masternodes from the same local wallet?
Dunno, but running multiple "nodes" from one wallet / computer kind of goes against the distributed mixing network idea. So I hope the answer is "no".
That is absolutely not the idea. Its for the remote/local setup. the masternodes would still do the mixing, authored by the local wallet. At least that my understanding of it.
1000 DRK, one masternode @illodin is right, the idea is to make it costly to run a masternode.
You'd still need 4000 DRK to run 4 MNs, just each 1000 in it's own addr 0.
Bit of a tradeoff security wise though, I prefer keeping my wallets separate, with separate passwords, in sepatate physical locations, with sepatate backups. Guarded by separate assault-crocodiles. Then again I'm both paranoid and inept.
Wouldn't surprise me if eduffield made this possible weeks/months ago and just forgot to mention it to anyone.
I thought each masternode needed it's own static ip
May 08, 2014, 07:36:42 AM
Ok I misundersood - now that what you are saying would be awesome.
EDIT: Kai Proctor - you'd still need 5000 DRK to run 5 nodes, I think.
So I misunderstood too
You'd still need 4000 DRK to run 4 MNs, just each 1000 in it's own addr 0.
Bit of a tradeoff security wise though, I prefer keeping my wallets separate, with separate passwords, in sepatate physical locations, with sepatate backups. Then again I'm both paranoid and inept.
Me too
May 08, 2014, 07:34:41 AM
...
+1 for lowendbox. it is website where hosting services post their specials for plans that don't require lots of resources.
Lowendbox has some reasonable options. Some alternatives;
http://www.orangewebsite.com/vps.php - accepts Bitcoin - hosted in Iceland
http://www.ccihosting.com/vps.php - accepts Bitcoin - hosted in Panama
http://www.anonymoushosting.in/vps.php - hosted in the Netherlands
http://www.yohost.org/offshore-hosting.html - accepts Bitcoin - hosted in the Netherlands
http://www.securehost.com/dedicated-servers/ - hosted in The Bahamas and Bermuda
http://www.cinipac.com - accepts Bitcoin - various locations including Iceland and Romania
https://www.1984hosting.com/ - hosted in Iceland
Most of these companies have been in business for a good while and have competitive pricing.
They should really consider accepting Darkcoin !
Thank you for this list!
May 08, 2014, 07:33:37 AM
Does that mean we can run multiple masternodes from the same local wallet?
Dunno, but running multiple "nodes" from one wallet / computer kind of goes against the distributed mixing network idea. So I hope the answer is "no".
That is absolutely not the idea. Its for the remote/local setup. the masternodes would still do the mixing, authored by the local wallet. At least that my understanding of it.
1000 DRK, one masternode @illodin is right, the idea is to make it costly to run a masternode.
You'd still need 4000 DRK to run 4 MNs, just each 1000 in it's own addr 0.
Bit of a tradeoff security wise though, I prefer keeping my wallets separate, with separate passwords, in separate physical locations, with separate backups. Guarded by separate assault-crocodiles. Then again I'm both paranoid and inept.
Wouldn't surprise me if eduffield made this possible weeks/months ago and just forgot to mention it to anyone.
May 08, 2014, 07:28:22 AM
Does that mean we can run multiple masternodes from the same local wallet?
Dunno, but running multiple "nodes" from one wallet / computer kind of goes against the distributed mixing network idea. So I hope the answer is "no".
That is absolutely not the idea. Its for the remote/local setup. the remote masternodes would still do the mixing, authored by the local wallet. At least that my understanding of it.
Ok I misundersood - now that what you are saying would be awesome.
EDIT: Kai Proctor - you'd still need 5000 DRK to run 5 nodes, I think.
May 08, 2014, 07:26:37 AM
Does that mean we can run multiple masternodes from the same local wallet?
Dunno, but running multiple "nodes" from one wallet / computer kind of goes against the distributed mixing network idea. So I hope the answer is "no".
That is absolutely not the idea. Its for the remote/local setup. the masternodes would still do the mixing, authored by the local wallet. At least that my understanding of it.
1000 DRK, one masternode @illodin is right, the idea is to make it costly to run a masternode.
May 08, 2014, 07:25:40 AM
...
+1 for lowendbox. it is website where hosting services post their specials for plans that don't require lots of resources.
Lowendbox has some reasonable options. Some alternatives;
http://www.orangewebsite.com/vps.php - accepts Bitcoin - hosted in Iceland
http://www.ccihosting.com/vps.php - accepts Bitcoin - hosted in Panama
http://www.anonymoushosting.in/vps.php - hosted in the Netherlands
http://www.yohost.org/offshore-hosting.html - accepts Bitcoin - hosted in the Netherlands
http://www.securehost.com/dedicated-servers/ - hosted in The Bahamas and Bermuda
http://www.cinipac.com - accepts Bitcoin - various locations including Iceland and Romania
https://www.1984hosting.com/ - hosted in Iceland
Most of these companies have been in business for a good while and have competitive pricing.
They should really consider accepting Darkcoin !
May 08, 2014, 07:24:10 AM
What are You prognosis for DRK price next ~10 days?
I see that there's going to be a Hard Fork 14 May. Will that make price go up?
Thanks in advance for argumentative and realistic opinions
1.- I dont care, I play long term only (in a few months darkcoin will be huge)
2.- I dont care, I play long term only (in a few months darkcoin will be huge)
you are welcome!
May 08, 2014, 07:16:08 AM
Does that mean we can run multiple masternodes from the same local wallet?
Dunno, but running multiple "nodes" from one wallet / computer kind of goes against the distributed mixing network idea. So I hope the answer is "no".
That is absolutely not the idea. Its for the remote/local setup. the remote masternodes would still do the mixing, authored by the local wallet. At least that my understanding of it.
May 08, 2014, 07:12:48 AM
Does that mean we can run multiple masternodes from the same local wallet?
Dunno, but running multiple "nodes" from one wallet / computer kind of goes against the distributed mixing network idea. So I hope the answer is "no".
Jump to: