[ANN][DCN] Deepcoin secure hashing (CPU/GPU) New algo/ No premine/ No IPO/ PoW - page 84.

marada

sr. member

Activity: 442

Merit: 250

Quote from: kahir on July 03, 2014, 06:18:32 PM

Quote from: marada on July 03, 2014, 06:15:14 PM

I hope someone optimize this algo for AMD better.
It seems to be the future of GPU mining.

X11/X13 is already overtaken by FPGA unfortunately.
Is see the diff at DRK and some other coins rising to the level GPU mining became unprofitable. Sad

Scrypt-n, due to it's extremely memory intensive design, makes cards hot and draws a lot of electricity.

Qubitcoin algo uses the memory in the way it is hard to make ASIC or FPGA, but is more eco friendly at the other hand.

in fact this algo is X5 ....

so its easier to make FPGA :d ...

its just unknown Cheesy

i know it from the first qubit coin

Well, you may be right. I was just looking for details and found the same.
What made me to think so was higher GPU memory temperature and how the memclock affects the hashrate.
I used lower memclocks for x11 and had to rise it up.

kahir

legendary

Activity: 1050

Merit: 1000

Quote from: marada on July 03, 2014, 06:15:14 PM

I hope someone optimize this algo for AMD better.
It seems to be the future of GPU mining.

X11/X13 is already overtaken by FPGA unfortunately.
Is see the diff at DRK and some other coins rising to the level GPU mining became unprofitable. Sad

Scrypt-n, due to it's extremely memory intensive design, makes cards hot and draws a lot of electricity.

Qubitcoin algo uses the memory in the way it is hard to make ASIC or FPGA, but is more eco friendly at the other hand.

in fact this algo is X5 ....

so its easier to make FPGA :d ...

its just unknown Cheesy

i know it from the first qubit coin

kahir

legendary

Activity: 1050

Merit: 1000

i have 1x 7790 and 1x 260x ..... both give same hash power around 2 M/HASH or 2.1 M/HASH

my setting

GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT=100
sgminer.exe -k qubitcoin -o stratum+tcp://deep.suprnova.cc:3222 -u x -p x -I 16 -g 2 -w 64 --difficulty-multiplier 256

marada

sr. member

Activity: 442

Merit: 250

I hope someone optimize this algo for AMD better.
It seems to be the future of GPU mining.

X11/X13 is already overtaken by FPGA unfortunately.
Is see the diff at DRK and some other coins rising to the level GPU mining became unprofitable. Sad

Scrypt-n, due to it's extremely memory intensive design, makes cards hot and draws a lot of electricity.

~~Qubitcoin algo uses the memory in the way it is hard to make ASIC or FPGA, but is more eco friendly at the other hand.~~

* edit: appeared to be more my wish than true Wink

ajeef

sr. member

Activity: 728

Merit: 251

Quote from: marada on July 03, 2014, 05:37:32 PM

750Ti is a low wattage card. Only about 60W.
Does it mean NVIDIA outperforms radeon in this algo?

750ti=270 many algo
only 60W.
But I think that AMD can also more optimized

Markos

member

Activity: 108

Merit: 10

Probably yes, but versatility is what I like the most. Especially when you have cheap or free electricity Wink

marada

sr. member

Activity: 442

Merit: 250

750Ti is a low wattage card. Only about 60W.
Does it mean NVIDIA outperforms radeon in this algo?

Markos

member

Activity: 108

Merit: 10

Oh, but I think that 7950 has the best profitability. About 170-200W power consumption, 2.5x better performance and in comparison to 750Ti more versatile for other algorithms

marada

sr. member

Activity: 442

Merit: 250

My hardware performance:

Radeon 7950 Sapphire dual-xcore: 1100, memory: 1250, -g 1 -I 18   4,4 Mh/s
Radeon 7950 Sapphire dual-x   core: 1200, memory: 1500, -g 1, -I 18   4,6 Mh/s
Radeon 7950 Gigabyte core: 1100, memory: 1400, -g 1, -I 18   4,5 Mh/s
Radeon R9 270 Gigabyte   core: 1100, memory: 1100, -g 2, -I 15   2,9 Mh/s
Radeon 7790 Asus   core: 1200, memory: 1200, -g 1, -I 16   2,2 Mh/s
Radeon 5570 Sapphire   core: 880, memory: 800, -g 1, -I 16   0,5 Mh/s

The 7790 performance is surprisingly high. The card is very cool and takes about 85W.

th00ber

hero member

Activity: 789

Merit: 501

4Mh/s with a 750ti, The maxwell is doing well compare to a 280x

Markos

member

Activity: 108

Merit: 10

-g 1 is not optimal, 200-300 Khash lower than -g 2 Sad

TC/xintensity is set to auto...

What hash rates you have on other cards? I'm curious if hardware comparision for qubit algorithm exists.

marada

sr. member

Activity: 442

Merit: 250

Quote from: Markos on July 03, 2014, 04:42:35 PM

My R9 280X Vapor-X + 3 x R9 290 Tri-X, which are running on Mint 13 have a low hash rate compared to R9 280X Vapor-X on Windows. Catalysts (14.6 beta) and frequencies on R9 280X (1080/1550) are the same Sad

Mint 13:

R9 280X Vapor-X - 4.5 Mhash with -I 19 and -g 2
R9 290 Tri-X @ 1000/1250 - 5.2-5.3 Mhash with -I 20 and -g 2

Windows:

R9 280X Vapor-X - 5.05 Mhash with -I 19 and -g 2

I think there are different optimal settings as I have noticed with the other algos.
The same version of fglrx doesn't necessary have to be the same under linux and windows.

Try i.e. -g 1, try out setting I, tc or xintensity.

Markos

member

Activity: 108

Merit: 10

My R9 280X Vapor-X + 3 x R9 290 Tri-X, which are running on Mint 13 have a low hash rate compared to R9 280X Vapor-X on Windows. Catalysts (14.6 beta) and frequencies on R9 280X (1080/1550) are the same Sad

Mint 13:

R9 280X Vapor-X - 4.5 Mhash with -I 19 and -g 2
R9 290 Tri-X @ 1000/1250 - 5.2-5.3 Mhash with -I 20 and -g 2

Windows:

R9 280X Vapor-X - 5.05 Mhash with -I 19 and -g 2

alicea

hero member

Activity: 1050

Merit: 501

Quote from: jox on July 03, 2014, 02:51:39 PM

Quote from: alicea on July 03, 2014, 12:31:15 PM

It's great that there's a pool!
How to set difficulty-multiplier properly? Or it should always be 256? What does this parameter mean?

Quote

A new option was added: --difficulty-multiplier. It allows to set stratum difficulty multiplier. For QubitCoin, Quark and Animecoin it will be usually 256. For Groestlcoin, Fuguecoin and Twecoin it will be usually 0.0039062500 (1/256). Default value is 1.0. If you have "share above target" errors then set it to 256. If difficulty required by pool is strangely large, set it to 0.0039062500 (1/256). Other values are unlikely to be used. Hopefully this will fix all remaining stratum problems.

Thank you very much for this info!!!!

Quote from: jox on July 03, 2014, 02:51:39 PM

and for the end, you just find block #9701 on suprnova Grin

marada

sr. member

Activity: 442

Merit: 250

Now have some questions to the DEVs team.
How is the development of the website?
Could you provide a forum?

The coin is technically very suitable for some purposes and it soon may become a rising star.
We need a place to create a community.

jox

hero member

Activity: 681

Merit: 500

Quote from: alicea on July 03, 2014, 12:31:15 PM

It's great that there's a pool!
How to set difficulty-multiplier properly? Or it should always be 256? What does this parameter mean?

You can set it like this:

Code:

sgminer -k qubitcoin -o stratum+tcp://deep.suprnova.cc:3222 -u Weblogin.WorkerName -p WorkerPassword -w 128 --difficulty-multiplier 256

from https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=475795.0;all

Quote

A new option was added: --difficulty-multiplier. It allows to set stratum difficulty multiplier. For QubitCoin, Quark and Animecoin it will be usually 256. For Groestlcoin, Fuguecoin and Twecoin it will be usually 0.0039062500 (1/256). Default value is 1.0. If you have "share above target" errors then set it to 256. If difficulty required by pool is strangely large, set it to 0.0039062500 (1/256). Other values are unlikely to be used. Hopefully this will fix all remaining stratum problems.

and for the end, you just find block #9701 on suprnova Grin

alicea

hero member

Activity: 1050

Merit: 501

It's great that there's a pool!
How to set difficulty-multiplier properly? Or it should always be 256? What does this parameter mean?

bigc1984

hero member

Activity: 658

Merit: 534

can anyone use this to build a block explorer: https://github.com/bitcoin-abe/bitcoin-abe#more-information

ocminer

legendary

Activity: 2688

Merit: 1240

Quote from: romeshomey on July 03, 2014, 10:58:27 AM

Quote from: ocminer on July 03, 2014, 10:06:04 AM

Quote from: th00ber on July 03, 2014, 09:55:48 AM

suprnova Yeah !
I use to mine a lot of coin in your pool, sounds good !

thanks !

I've also modified our "getting started" page, it fits the requirements of qubit coin now .

Hope to get some more miners in, looks like a cool coin !

For some reason I am getting all rejects (share is below target). I was mining at the other pool just fine previously.

Any ideas?

EDIT:

Nevermind, I didn't set the difficulty multiplier. That solved it. Thanks

There are some other users having the same problem, please set your multiplier correctly, otherwise you'll only produce INVALID shares !

ocminer

legendary

Activity: 2688

Merit: 1240

Quote from: sungrely on July 03, 2014, 10:54:32 AM

Quote from: ocminer on July 03, 2014, 09:09:14 AM

DeepCoin Pool for you:

https://deep.suprnova.cc

This is a Suprnova NG Pool, you can use your unified login there and all your pool workers from earlier setups too.

SSO Single-Sign-On on this Pool - You can also use your previously set up workers !
Payouts every 30 seconds
DDoS protected
Suprnova Quality, lots of experience in all kind of hashes - we had the first X13 Stratum and were among the first X11 and NIST5 Pools !
Highly optimized Stratums and MPOS implementations.
Idle Worker Notifications
Two Factor Authentication if wanted
Support 24x7 via IRC,Mail,PM etc.
Only 1 % fee ! (thats 50% lower than most other Pools !)
We have full SSL encryption on all pools ! (https:// instead of http:// !!)

How could I miss this coin Huh

Very sorry for being so late guys !

I cannot connect your pool

What is not working ? My miners are hashing away nicely..

Just had the first payout, everything looks good

Topic: [ANN][DCN] Deepcoin secure hashing (CPU/GPU) New algo/ No premine/ No IPO/ PoW - page 84. (Read 182607 times)