It's all about Crypto 2.0 this year. What does Decred do that other coins don't"
Let me offer you rephrase of your question to: What did Decred actually do/is doing atm that other coins are trying to do ?
1. First true approach to decentralized governance by voting with tickets directly on chain (I believe this is huge improvement over Bitcoin's approach - it might not be apparent right now, but this might mark the real advancement of block chain tech).
2. Experienced team of dev's (c0) are working their asses off on improvements of base code - some mentioned by _ingsoc&others in the thread + for more - scan through Decred github commits to see the scope and abilities of c0 devs.
3. Great community that want to participate - look for their participation on Decred official forum (forum.decred.org) or on RFPs (0-6) and their results (most are coming to mainnet pretty soon).
4. Decred actually does not need that ICO/IPO approach like: "give me money first and then I will maybe develop something that's not broken in couple of months" to actually accomplish something -> development subsidy (10% of each block reward) is going to sustain the development long term - either by members of community or original devs. At the moment there is around 76993DCR/or 117k USD (at today's prices) available to pay for the advancement & development of Decred.
I am not trying to do exhaustive list here, just wanted to point certain things Decred does differently that others are trying to do.
How would you guys compare Decred's voting system to the DAO ( of Ethereum) ?
there seems to be much more hype around DAO but Decred's going to implement something similar to Eth/DAO if I understand correctly?
I'm looking at both Decred and DAO and studying them both from teh PoV of decentralized voting crypto
As for DAO approach - imho, Decred approach might be better if not for anything then for one simple thing - Decred devs do not ask you to pour 100mil USD first for the privilege to buy into something that might / or might not give you something that might / or might not actually work couple of months/years(?) later... but let's wait and see - I just honestly do not like this 21st century approach of: give me hard earned money first, then I might be able to build something that might work - imho, it is wrong approach to do R&D in new tech space.
DAO and Decred have the best chance of making their crypto-democracy projects work.
Agreed, at the moment it seems so.
imho, Darkcoin ended the same as bitcoin is now - pretty centralized block chain without any governance model, that is happily building centralized services on top of that instead of embracing Satoshi's original plan. With this approach, one might never be able to R&D and build any decentralized on chain governance (that said - my full respect to few brave groups working tirelessly on decentralized solutions on top of the bitcoin).