How come cgminer for decred has a maximum Intensity of 14? ( -I 14 ) I used to mine Dogecoin in the past with this same GPU and was able to set a much higher intensity on my card to get more hashing power. I'm now mining with I 14 on my 5850 card, but I'm sure it can handle a bit more, I don't get any hardware errors or rejects and the desktop is still very responsive. I'm running at 68 celcius.. Anyone know why that is? Is it compiled that way?
i'm running: cgminer --blake256 -o http://dcr.suprnova.cc:9110 -u my.worker -p worker -I 14 --gpu-engine 950 --gpu-memclock 1100
Topic: [ANN][DCR] Decred - Community Governance | Bitcoin Devs | Lightning Network - page 414. (Read 1201663 times)
February 13, 2016, 06:30:35 PM
February 13, 2016, 06:30:35 PM
Why I get only rejects. My conf
cgminer.exe --blake256 --benchmark -o http://dcr.suprnova.cc:9111 -u xxx -p xxx -I 10
cgminer.exe --blake256 --benchmark -o http://dcr.suprnova.cc:9111 -u xxx -p xxx -I 10
loose the --benchmark, add (optional) --no-submit-stale --gpu-threads 2 --scan-time 2 --queue 0
fwiw i'm running @ -I 4 and ~90o C
TY m8. 90oC even we have middle of winter it's unacceptable temp. It's more profitable to mine ETH and buy DCR from exchange.
What GPUs are you using?
With 280X i am having 72C with 25C ambient temperature
hey badam, i'm using a 280x also, underclocked, undervolted, intensity = 1 atm, and 86oC atm. honestly stumped as to what else to try, could you share your cli?
@
Quote from: wolf0
It's funny how people still recommend using --no-submit-stale - I'm starting to think it's to sabotage new miners lol
- i did say it was optional
My 280X is doing 1.527MH/s and just touching 70C.
It's not going to really give you much of a frame of reference, as all Blake-256 code (CPU and GPU) was removed and replaced, plus many other edits, but intensity 22 (what the stock miner would call intensity 7) with four GPU threads.
cgminer.exe --blake256 -o http://dcr.suprnova.cc:9111 -u Username.1 -p x -I 14 -g 2 --gpu-engine 1150,1150,1100 --gpu-memclock 750,750,625 --gpu-fan 65
February 13, 2016, 06:02:59 PM
Why I get only rejects. My conf
cgminer.exe --blake256 --benchmark -o http://dcr.suprnova.cc:9111 -u xxx -p xxx -I 10
cgminer.exe --blake256 --benchmark -o http://dcr.suprnova.cc:9111 -u xxx -p xxx -I 10
loose the --benchmark, add (optional) --no-submit-stale --gpu-threads 2 --scan-time 2 --queue 0
fwiw i'm running @ -I 4 and ~90o C
TY m8. 90oC even we have middle of winter it's unacceptable temp. It's more profitable to mine ETH and buy DCR from exchange.
What GPUs are you using?
With 280X i am having 72C with 25C ambient temperature
hey badam, i'm using a 280x also, underclocked, undervolted, intensity = 1 atm, and 86oC atm. honestly stumped as to what else to try, could you share your cli?
@
Quote from: wolf0
It's funny how people still recommend using --no-submit-stale - I'm starting to think it's to sabotage new miners lol
- i did say it was optional
My 280X is doing 1.527MH/s and just touching 70C.
February 13, 2016, 05:26:05 PM
w0w, thanks, already did my dusting, clean air filters etc. it's a full size desktop (atx) w/the r-9 and an older 5670 hd. the older unit runs nice and cool, even with inside temps often over 100oF. i guess that's the problem, but even if i remove the side panel it doesn't seem to help much. the 280x has been running for two years at ~80ish+o
Connect a thermal peltier to the rear side of the card to help cool it. If your case is good enough you can use it to spread the heat from the warm side of the peltier.
You could also remove the case completely and mount the set up to the side of your desk. That reduced my Tempsford on the 290trix by 15 degrees
^^very interesting idea!
I've been modding the crap out of everything I can for the last 10 year and came across these when I was modding an air con exhaust system. They worked a treat
February 13, 2016, 05:15:58 PM
w0w, thanks, already did my dusting, clean air filters etc. it's a full size desktop (atx) w/the r-9 and an older 5670 hd. the older unit runs nice and cool, even with inside temps often over 100oF. i guess that's the problem, but even if i remove the side panel it doesn't seem to help much. the 280x has been running for two years at ~80ish+o
Connect a thermal peltier to the rear side of the card to help cool it. If your case is good enough you can use it to spread the heat from the warm side of the peltier.
You could also remove the case completely and mount the set up to the side of your desk. That reduced my Tempsford on the 290trix by 15 degrees
^^very interesting idea!
February 13, 2016, 04:39:04 PM
w0w, thanks, already did my dusting, clean air filters etc. it's a full size desktop (atx) w/the r-9 and an older 5670 hd. the older unit runs nice and cool, even with inside temps often over 100oF. i guess that's the problem, but even if i remove the side panel it doesn't seem to help much. the 280x has been running for two years at ~80ish+o
Connect a thermal peltier to the rear side of the card to help cool it. If your case is good enough you can use it to spread the heat from the warm side of the peltier.
You could also remove the case completely and mount the set up to the side of your desk. That reduced my Tempsford on the 290trix by 15 degrees
February 13, 2016, 04:31:43 PM
w0w, thanks, already did my dusting, clean air filters etc. it's a full size desktop (atx) w/the r-9 and an older 5670 hd. the older unit runs nice and cool, even with inside temps often over 100oF. i guess that's the problem, but even if i remove the side panel it doesn't seem to help much. the 280x has been running for two years at ~80ish+o
February 13, 2016, 04:15:46 PM
Why I get only rejects. My conf
cgminer.exe --blake256 --benchmark -o http://dcr.suprnova.cc:9111 -u xxx -p xxx -I 10
cgminer.exe --blake256 --benchmark -o http://dcr.suprnova.cc:9111 -u xxx -p xxx -I 10
loose the --benchmark, add (optional) --no-submit-stale --gpu-threads 2 --scan-time 2 --queue 0
fwiw i'm running @ -I 4 and ~90o C
TY m8. 90oC even we have middle of winter it's unacceptable temp. It's more profitable to mine ETH and buy DCR from exchange.
What GPUs are you using?
With 280X i am having 72C with 25C ambient temperature
hey badam, i'm using a 280x also, underclocked, undervolted, intensity = 1 atm, and 86oC atm. honestly stumped as to what else to try, could you share your cli?
@
Quote from: wolf0
It's funny how people still recommend using --no-submit-stale - I'm starting to think it's to sabotage new miners lol
- i did say it was optional
I am using -I 13 stock clocks and volts no additional fine tuning. All i am having is good ventilation and i recently cleared with a vacuum cleaner the gpu heatsinks from dust, before that i was running at 85C too
February 13, 2016, 04:07:17 PM
arg, it's painful to watch these devs disregard your words Wolf. Anyone who knows your name knows you are THE GUY when it comes to making miners,forks for miners, and such. Not impressing me that's for sure , but decred devs don't really seem to care much now that the money's been made...
(this is my opinion, let the bagholders hate)
(this is my opinion, let the bagholders hate)
That's not true at all - and a bit unfair to be honest. Just because it's not visible here at all times doesn't mean it's not happening. As a matter of fact, I just spoke to Wolf` in private and in public. As for your other point about the devs not caring, that's baseless too. They're working around the clock - a testnet stake pool was released just a day ago. If they were chatting on here all day I'd be worried. As a matter of fact, the first RFPs are going up this week too for other developers to get involved. So please, I don't want to be rude, but you must base what you say on evidence and not just opinion - the world has a lot of opinions, we need evidence-based reasoning - the world needs it!
well it's good to know that then
meh im an action guy, i hold only small amount of decred and am mainly watching, i expect really nothing, so you guys just do your thing and don't worry, when your done what your working on all will work out im sure
don't be worried about my opinion, i'm a guy that thinks eth is full of holes, alot of hype, and broke begging (tho it did open the floodgates for other platforms to build on.)
all of this is just ideas till it's not.
and im sure you guys will pull thru
, it's just my opinion that a "team" that pushes away the community and acts above it will never have mainstream adoption, then again maybe you don't want that, im still unsure what decred even stands for or offers ;p (tho i have spent time reading it's just technical and vague, not simple user friendly thats for sure)but i digress, again, that all may change when w.e you guys are working on happens ;p
hedging your bet lol. I am pretty sure you are the guy who created lot of rukus on forum & here because you either lost your seed or were removed from airdrop at the last time. Just writing this so people know your perspective & where your opinions were formed.
February 13, 2016, 04:03:23 PM
Why I get only rejects. My conf
cgminer.exe --blake256 --benchmark -o http://dcr.suprnova.cc:9111 -u xxx -p xxx -I 10
cgminer.exe --blake256 --benchmark -o http://dcr.suprnova.cc:9111 -u xxx -p xxx -I 10
loose the --benchmark, add (optional) --no-submit-stale --gpu-threads 2 --scan-time 2 --queue 0
fwiw i'm running @ -I 4 and ~90o C
TY m8. 90oC even we have middle of winter it's unacceptable temp. It's more profitable to mine ETH and buy DCR from exchange.
What GPUs are you using?
With 280X i am having 72C with 25C ambient temperature
hey badam, i'm using a 280x also, underclocked, undervolted, intensity = 1 atm, and 86oC atm. honestly stumped as to what else to try, could you share your cli?
@
Quote from: wolf0
It's funny how people still recommend using --no-submit-stale - I'm starting to think it's to sabotage new miners lol
- i did say it was optional
February 13, 2016, 03:55:32 PM
arg, it's painful to watch these devs disregard your words Wolf. Anyone who knows your name knows you are THE GUY when it comes to making miners,forks for miners, and such. Not impressing me that's for sure , but decred devs don't really seem to care much now that the money's been made...
(this is my opinion, let the bagholders hate)
(this is my opinion, let the bagholders hate)
That's not true at all - and a bit unfair to be honest. Just because it's not visible here at all times doesn't mean it's not happening. As a matter of fact, I just spoke to Wolf` in private and in public. As for your other point about the devs not caring, that's baseless too. They're working around the clock - a testnet stake pool was released just a day ago. If they were chatting on here all day I'd be worried. As a matter of fact, the first RFPs are going up this week too for other developers to get involved. So please, I don't want to be rude, but you must base what you say on evidence and not just opinion - the world has a lot of opinions, we need evidence-based reasoning - the world needs it!
well it's good to know that then
meh im an action guy, i hold only small amount of decred and am mainly watching, i expect really nothing, so you guys just do your thing and don't worry, when your done what your working on all will work out im sure
don't be worried about my opinion, i'm a guy that thinks eth is full of holes, alot of hype, and broke begging (tho it did open the floodgates for other platforms to build on.)
all of this is just ideas till it's not.
and im sure you guys will pull thru
, it's just my opinion that a "team" that pushes away the community and acts above it will never have mainstream adoption, then again maybe you don't want that, im still unsure what decred even stands for or offers ;p (tho i have spent time reading it's just technical and vague, not simple user friendly thats for sure)but i digress, again, that all may change when w.e you guys are working on happens ;p
Even though i don't agree with fully i must agree with the fact that decred needs to work on a User friendly documentation. So much technical stuff with technical language that a regular user(or sometimes even me) doesn't understands. A high priority work has to be done in making decred extremely user friendly, and i am saying this in concordance with the fact that i love and fully support decred, but many documentation and function needs to be simplified to be "noob friendly", and i am not demanding this to happen right now, but imo some resources must be dedicated to this aspect. Please take this as a constructive feedback not a criticism
February 13, 2016, 03:52:42 PM
arg, it's painful to watch these devs disregard your words Wolf. Anyone who knows your name knows you are THE GUY when it comes to making miners,forks for miners, and such. Not impressing me that's for sure , but decred devs don't really seem to care much now that the money's been made...
(this is my opinion, let the bagholders hate)
(this is my opinion, let the bagholders hate)
That's not true at all - and a bit unfair to be honest. Just because it's not visible here at all times doesn't mean it's not happening. As a matter of fact, I just spoke to Wolf` in private and in public. As for your other point about the devs not caring, that's baseless too. They're working around the clock - a testnet stake pool was released just a day ago. If they were chatting on here all day I'd be worried. As a matter of fact, the first RFPs are going up this week too for other developers to get involved. So please, I don't want to be rude, but you must base what you say on evidence and not just opinion - the world has a lot of opinions, we need evidence-based reasoning - the world needs it!
Don't defend yourselves to these planks and trolls! Carry on working. Anyone that has an real interest in crypto and learning the basics only needs to look at github.
Thanks for stopping by though
February 13, 2016, 03:38:49 PM
arg, it's painful to watch these devs disregard your words Wolf. Anyone who knows your name knows you are THE GUY when it comes to making miners,forks for miners, and such. Not impressing me that's for sure , but decred devs don't really seem to care much now that the money's been made...
(this is my opinion, let the bagholders hate)
(this is my opinion, let the bagholders hate)
That's not true at all - and a bit unfair to be honest. Just because it's not visible here at all times doesn't mean it's not happening. As a matter of fact, I just spoke to Wolf` in private and in public. As for your other point about the devs not caring, that's baseless too. They're working around the clock - a testnet stake pool was released just a day ago. If they were chatting on here all day I'd be worried. As a matter of fact, the first RFPs are going up this week too for other developers to get involved. So please, I don't want to be rude, but you must base what you say on evidence and not just opinion - the world has a lot of opinions, we need evidence-based reasoning - the world needs it!
well it's good to know that then
meh im an action guy, i hold only small amount of decred and am mainly watching, i expect really nothing, so you guys just do your thing and don't worry, when your done what your working on all will work out im sure
don't be worried about my opinion, i'm a guy that thinks eth is full of holes, alot of hype, and broke begging (tho it did open the floodgates for other platforms to build on.)
all of this is just ideas till it's not.
and im sure you guys will pull thru
, it's just my opinion that a "team" that pushes away the community and acts above it will never have mainstream adoption, then again maybe you don't want that, im still unsure what decred even stands for or offers ;p (tho i have spent time reading it's just technical and vague, not simple user friendly thats for sure)but i digress, again, that all may change when w.e you guys are working on happens ;p
February 13, 2016, 03:25:05 PM
arg, it's painful to watch these devs disregard your words Wolf. Anyone who knows your name knows you are THE GUY when it comes to making miners,forks for miners, and such. Not impressing me that's for sure , but decred devs don't really seem to care much now that the money's been made...
(this is my opinion, let the bagholders hate)
(this is my opinion, let the bagholders hate)
That's not true at all - and a bit unfair to be honest. Just because it's not visible here at all times doesn't mean it's not happening. As a matter of fact, I just spoke to Wolf` in private and in public. As for your other point about the devs not caring, that's baseless too. They're working around the clock - a testnet stake pool was released just a day ago. If they were chatting on here all day I'd be worried. As a matter of fact, the first RFPs are going up this week too for other developers to get involved. So please, I don't want to be rude, but you must base what you say on evidence and not just opinion - the world has a lot of opinions, we need evidence-based reasoning - the world needs it!
February 13, 2016, 03:03:40 PM
It's funny how people still recommend using --no-submit-stale - I'm starting to think it's to sabotage new miners lol
What's this command about? I got it in my conf file
It's completely stupid. As the miner can only GUESS if a share is considered stale by the pool, and because there is ZERO harm in trying, it not only will result in you sometimes not submitting valid shares, but will also hide the actual reject rate.
arg, it's painful to watch these devs disregard your words Wolf. Anyone who knows your name knows you are THE GUY when it comes to making miners,forks for miners, and such. Not impressing me that's for sure , but decred devs don't really seem to care much now that the money's been made...
(this is my opinion, let the bagholders hate)
February 13, 2016, 02:47:47 PM
It's funny how people still recommend using --no-submit-stale - I'm starting to think it's to sabotage new miners lol
What's this command about? I got it in my conf file
February 13, 2016, 02:45:37 PM
Why I get only rejects. My conf
cgminer.exe --blake256 --benchmark -o http://dcr.suprnova.cc:9111 -u xxx -p xxx -I 10
cgminer.exe --blake256 --benchmark -o http://dcr.suprnova.cc:9111 -u xxx -p xxx -I 10
loose the --benchmark, add (optional) --no-submit-stale --gpu-threads 2 --scan-time 2 --queue 0
fwiw i'm running @ -I 4 and ~90o C
TY m8. 90oC even we have middle of winter it's unacceptable temp. It's more profitable to mine ETH and buy DCR from exchange.
What GPUs are you using?
With 280X i am having 72C with 25C ambient temperature
February 13, 2016, 02:35:21 PM
Why I get only rejects. My conf
cgminer.exe --blake256 --benchmark -o http://dcr.suprnova.cc:9111 -u xxx -p xxx -I 10
cgminer.exe --blake256 --benchmark -o http://dcr.suprnova.cc:9111 -u xxx -p xxx -I 10
loose the --benchmark, add (optional) --no-submit-stale --gpu-threads 2 --scan-time 2 --queue 0
fwiw i'm running @ -I 4 and ~90o C
TY m8. 90oC even we have middle of winter it's unacceptable temp. It's more profitable to mine ETH and buy DCR from exchange.
February 13, 2016, 12:47:51 PM
Any predictions on the price? It seems to always slowly rise to 0.004 and then drop back down to 0.0027. What do you think?
Seems that it's stabile now around at 0.003 i think it's a pretty fair price, since Decred was launched few days ago. Looking to github, if the updates are coming day to day i'm sure that the price will rise continouslyI would expect something around 0.0015-0.002 as the right level for anyone who wants to accumulate, I'm mainly having in mind the amount of new DCR created daily (the amount of BTC the market needs daily to sustain the price).
February 13, 2016, 12:34:04 PM
You are right, because I wanted to buy their seed ..... I don't force the others to give me the 20% of their DCR for an help , instead I will (or wanted to ) buy their seed
.I don't think this is greedy , or am I wrong?
you would prefer they lose all coins, right?
Because you knew how they could recover but don't offered any help.
no, because basically I'm buying their seed (if they want) it is a deal between two users.
I have found how to recover the airdrop's coin from an hex only today... I've searched hex airdrop in the search bar at decred.forum.org
Jump to: