Topic: [ANN][DRKC] DarkCash | 0 PREMINE | POW/POS | X11 | P2P Exchange | ATM | ANON (Read 71144 times)
July 27, 2014, 08:57:48 PM
There is just too much FUD and people that hate on this coin I do not know what to tell you guys. It was a mistake cloning concealcoin and why reinvent the wheel when you can clone an existing feature. I can work on developing other features for the stealthcoin clone. Just think of it from a development point of view.
July 27, 2014, 08:57:44 PM
yea lol DarkCash
July 27, 2014, 08:57:12 PM
There are alot of ideas out there, just compile it and put into darkcash.
Imma bag hold these since it was from my profit, i made x10 here anyways.
Looking forward to your projects.
Just be like Ms.Collec, but don't resign lol
Imma bag hold these since it was from my profit, i made x10 here anyways.
Looking forward to your projects.
Just be like Ms.Collec, but don't resign lol
July 27, 2014, 08:55:43 PM
Stick with Darkcoin if you can deliver. Take your time and do it right. we just need regular updates.
Ya stick with Darkcoin.
I think he meant DarkCash...lol
July 27, 2014, 08:51:14 PM
Stick with Darkcoin if you can deliver. Take your time and do it right. we just need regular updates.
Ya stick with Darkcoin.
July 27, 2014, 08:50:07 PM
Stick with Darkcoin if you can deliver. Take your time and do it right. we just need regular updates.
July 27, 2014, 08:47:46 PM
Just focus on DarkCash, it will be better 
I agree. time being focus on the bringing this coin to stability. Dont rush. it has been a hard day.
Stick to DarkCash and deliver your features. Launching another coin just because it will be easy for tor implementation will be bad idea. Only question is if its impossible to deliver features on this coin as you promised then thats the different story.
Anyway Ask yourself if you cant deliver with this coin, how the other coin will be seen as?
July 27, 2014, 08:45:02 PM
This dev sounds a lot like Carsen Klock. He just released webcoin last week and mentioned a few days ago that he has ideas on starting another coin and wanted to see if anyone was willing to take over webcoin for the time being. Just speculation though.
July 27, 2014, 08:44:13 PM
The tor implementation is as follows:
I was going to first setup a tor relay node that you can enter in your wallet's socks5 network entry. Then I was going to look at stealthcoin's source and use it's implementation to add it to the coin. I was in the process of doing it until all this drama happened. It just takes some time as there are alot of files do edit.
Now here is the other option. Since you guys are sticking with me I was thinking of releasing another coin which will be a clone of stealthcoin (because it already has tor implemented) however, I will tailor the X13 algorithm back to X11. That way the tor implementation for DarkCash would be the relay nodes that could be used in conjunction to the new coin.
This coin will still get the anon transactions developed as that is also a real idea which is not far in reach. It is a lot to work on but I am trying to work with you guys. I will also open a moderated thread in the next few minutes.
You're stupid as f.I was going to first setup a tor relay node that you can enter in your wallet's socks5 network entry. Then I was going to look at stealthcoin's source and use it's implementation to add it to the coin. I was in the process of doing it until all this drama happened. It just takes some time as there are alot of files do edit.
Now here is the other option. Since you guys are sticking with me I was thinking of releasing another coin which will be a clone of stealthcoin (because it already has tor implemented) however, I will tailor the X13 algorithm back to X11. That way the tor implementation for DarkCash would be the relay nodes that could be used in conjunction to the new coin.
This coin will still get the anon transactions developed as that is also a real idea which is not far in reach. It is a lot to work on but I am trying to work with you guys. I will also open a moderated thread in the next few minutes.
I'm out.
Smart move. Real identity exposes the next scam coin, get two for one! Anyway, the only thing that matters is the anon newbie dev shit has to go! Look what happens when people are responsible for what they are making, they try! Nobody will want this now though, people want to not have it.
July 27, 2014, 08:42:53 PM
Doesn't matter, most of alts are all clones.
It was the dev and backed by community who made all successful alts flourish in this crypto land
As long as you keep your steve jobs attitude, steal ideas and put them all together, this coin will moon.
It was the dev and backed by community who made all successful alts flourish in this crypto land
As long as you keep your steve jobs attitude, steal ideas and put them all together, this coin will moon.
July 27, 2014, 08:42:01 PM
The tor implementation is as follows:
I was going to first setup a tor relay node that you can enter in your wallet's socks5 network entry. Then I was going to look at stealthcoin's source and use it's implementation to add it to the coin. I was in the process of doing it until all this drama happened. It just takes some time as there are alot of files do edit.
Now here is the other option. Since you guys are sticking with me I was thinking of releasing another coin which will be a clone of stealthcoin (because it already has tor implemented) however, I will tailor the X13 algorithm back to X11. That way the tor implementation for DarkCash would be the relay nodes that could be used in conjunction to the new coin.
This coin will still get the anon transactions developed as that is also a real idea which is not far in reach. It is a lot to work on but I am trying to work with you guys. I will also open a moderated thread in the next few minutes.
I was going to first setup a tor relay node that you can enter in your wallet's socks5 network entry. Then I was going to look at stealthcoin's source and use it's implementation to add it to the coin. I was in the process of doing it until all this drama happened. It just takes some time as there are alot of files do edit.
Now here is the other option. Since you guys are sticking with me I was thinking of releasing another coin which will be a clone of stealthcoin (because it already has tor implemented) however, I will tailor the X13 algorithm back to X11. That way the tor implementation for DarkCash would be the relay nodes that could be used in conjunction to the new coin.
This coin will still get the anon transactions developed as that is also a real idea which is not far in reach. It is a lot to work on but I am trying to work with you guys. I will also open a moderated thread in the next few minutes.
So in short, your abandoning this coin? True, deadlines in the crypto world are tentative, but you should try to stick to them as close as possible. Making another clone coin just to get a feature that you can fork into this coin would be more respectable. Doing this might hurt your credibility.
what credibility this noob have? fraud stanford no amaze, fake facebook account with copy pasta profile pic. same thing with coin stealing ideas and innovation from darkcoin and copypasta from many coin. guy no developer in sense of word. guy is copy pasta
mewmewmew out
July 27, 2014, 08:41:37 PM
Just focus on DarkCash, it will be better
I agree. time being focus on the bringing this coin to stability. Dont rush. it has been a hard day.
Stick to DarkCash and deliver your features. Launching another coin just because it will be easy for tor implementation will be bad idea. Only question is if its impossible to deliver features on this coin as you promised then thats the different story.
July 27, 2014, 08:39:56 PM
Here is the thing. Cloning stealthcoin with tor functionality and a new algorithm is the easy way out. But then it looks like I am abandoning this coin. So that is what I am saying for the investors who lost money because was asleep I can launch a stealthcoin clone with the tor functionality, build a mobile wallet, and go from there. However, the harder way is to build the tor functionality to the ConcealCoin clone which DarkCash really is.
I am asking the comunity's response in regard to this.
I am asking the comunity's response in regard to this.
Eww, this was a clone to CNL, that just doesn't sound right.
My honest opinion, stick with DRKC and fix/improve it. Trust me, you'll gain a lot of respect and credibility doing that than making another clone coin.
July 27, 2014, 08:37:40 PM
The tor implementation is as follows:
I was going to first setup a tor relay node that you can enter in your wallet's socks5 network entry. Then I was going to look at stealthcoin's source and use it's implementation to add it to the coin. I was in the process of doing it until all this drama happened. It just takes some time as there are alot of files do edit.
Now here is the other option. Since you guys are sticking with me I was thinking of releasing another coin which will be a clone of stealthcoin (because it already has tor implemented) however, I will tailor the X13 algorithm back to X11. That way the tor implementation for DarkCash would be the relay nodes that could be used in conjunction to the new coin.
This coin will still get the anon transactions developed as that is also a real idea which is not far in reach. It is a lot to work on but I am trying to work with you guys. I will also open a moderated thread in the next few minutes.
I was going to first setup a tor relay node that you can enter in your wallet's socks5 network entry. Then I was going to look at stealthcoin's source and use it's implementation to add it to the coin. I was in the process of doing it until all this drama happened. It just takes some time as there are alot of files do edit.
Now here is the other option. Since you guys are sticking with me I was thinking of releasing another coin which will be a clone of stealthcoin (because it already has tor implemented) however, I will tailor the X13 algorithm back to X11. That way the tor implementation for DarkCash would be the relay nodes that could be used in conjunction to the new coin.
This coin will still get the anon transactions developed as that is also a real idea which is not far in reach. It is a lot to work on but I am trying to work with you guys. I will also open a moderated thread in the next few minutes.
If you guys cannot read between the lines, you deserve to loose all your BTC. Its clear as day this dev is messing with you guys and will not deliver in any way possible.
July 27, 2014, 08:37:01 PM
The tor implementation is as follows:
I was going to first setup a tor relay node that you can enter in your wallet's socks5 network entry. Then I was going to look at stealthcoin's source and use it's implementation to add it to the coin. I was in the process of doing it until all this drama happened. It just takes some time as there are alot of files do edit.
Now here is the other option. Since you guys are sticking with me I was thinking of releasing another coin which will be a clone of stealthcoin (because it already has tor implemented) however, I will tailor the X13 algorithm back to X11. That way the tor implementation for DarkCash would be the relay nodes that could be used in conjunction to the new coin.
This coin will still get the anon transactions developed as that is also a real idea which is not far in reach. It is a lot to work on but I am trying to work with you guys. I will also open a moderated thread in the next few minutes.
I was going to first setup a tor relay node that you can enter in your wallet's socks5 network entry. Then I was going to look at stealthcoin's source and use it's implementation to add it to the coin. I was in the process of doing it until all this drama happened. It just takes some time as there are alot of files do edit.
Now here is the other option. Since you guys are sticking with me I was thinking of releasing another coin which will be a clone of stealthcoin (because it already has tor implemented) however, I will tailor the X13 algorithm back to X11. That way the tor implementation for DarkCash would be the relay nodes that could be used in conjunction to the new coin.
This coin will still get the anon transactions developed as that is also a real idea which is not far in reach. It is a lot to work on but I am trying to work with you guys. I will also open a moderated thread in the next few minutes.
So in short, your abandoning this coin? True, deadlines in the crypto world are tentative, but you should try to stick to them as close as possible. Making another clone coin just to get a feature that you can fork into this coin would be more respectable. Doing this might hurt your credibility.
July 27, 2014, 08:36:49 PM
July 27, 2014, 08:36:26 PM
Just focus on DarkCash, it will be better
I agree. time being focus on the bringing this coin to stability. Dont rush. it has been a hard day.
July 27, 2014, 08:35:09 PM
Just focus on DarkCash, it will be better
July 27, 2014, 08:33:15 PM
Dumped all I had.
He's mad because he failed to instamine in the first place. Then 2nd time again, he screwed it, because the majority didn't agree to continue on the fork he was on.
This is becoming a shitfest.
He's mad because he failed to instamine in the first place. Then 2nd time again, he screwed it, because the majority didn't agree to continue on the fork he was on.
This is becoming a shitfest.
July 27, 2014, 08:32:53 PM
Here is the thing. Cloning stealthcoin with tor functionality and a new algorithm is the easy way out. But then it looks like I am abandoning this coin. So that is what I am saying for the investors who lost money because was asleep I can launch a stealthcoin clone with the tor functionality, build a mobile wallet, and go from there. However, the harder way is to build the tor functionality to the ConcealCoin clone which DarkCash really is.
I am asking the comunity's response in regard to this.
I am asking the comunity's response in regard to this.
Jump to: