[ANN][ECASH]E-Money Advertising Revenue In Wallet | 8% Daily Stake for 21 days - page 81.

topcat363

sr. member

Activity: 392

Merit: 250

Quote from: MickGhee on March 01, 2015, 02:14:35 PM

Quote from: vegasguy on March 01, 2015, 02:02:40 PM

Quote from: AZIZ1977 on March 01, 2015, 02:00:52 PM

iGotSpots: ''You won't get a PoS block until at least 2nd Mar 2015 10:17:55'' Wink

.... and thats scary, because if anyone knows..he does. Guys can you pm Igotspots and ask him for help.

Vegas

worst case scenario 24 hrs to stake than

Quote from: CryptoClub on March 01, 2015, 02:07:32 PM

I run a community with 4300 crypto traders, and have over 1 million views on my blog, not a big deal, nor am I bragging, but I can provide some free promotions for the coin.

i can vouch for that as i am a member

i too can vouch...i stalk your twitter haha

MickGhee

legendary

Activity: 1428

Merit: 1001

Fucker of "the system"

Quote from: vegasguy on March 01, 2015, 02:02:40 PM

Quote from: AZIZ1977 on March 01, 2015, 02:00:52 PM

iGotSpots: ''You won't get a PoS block until at least 2nd Mar 2015 10:17:55'' Wink

.... and thats scary, because if anyone knows..he does. Guys can you pm Igotspots and ask him for help.

Vegas

worst case scenario 24 hrs to stake than

Quote from: CryptoClub on March 01, 2015, 02:07:32 PM

I run a community with 4300 crypto traders, and have over 1 million views on my blog, not a big deal, nor am I bragging, but I can provide some free promotions for the coin.

i can vouch for that as i am a member

topcat363

sr. member

Activity: 392

Merit: 250

Quote from: CryptoClub on March 01, 2015, 02:07:32 PM

Quote from: jc12345 on March 01, 2015, 01:54:52 PM

It seems the community has some decisions to make.

1) Wait for the dev to appear and fix the code
2) Ditch the dev and get a third party to fix the code asap. Get a new committed dev.
3) Ditch the coin

A coin dev has a vision and commitment to make something with a coin. A new dev might be just a hired hand that is not necessarily committed to a coin's future. There has been exceptions to this though where a takeover was done successfully.

Due to my risk management strategy I am not materially exposed to emoney that is stuck in my wallet so I am indifferent to the option chosen. If it is going to be a lot of effort to fix the code, to hire a third party for the fix or to get a new committed dev, then it might be best to just ditch the coin and move on. But then there are many who are heavily invested with coins stuck in their wallet and their interests have to be considered as well.

I can lose the money if need be and take option 3), but I don't see the point in that, as I like the branding, a lot is in a name really. (Look at "Darkcoin") I have helped with a coin that started at 9 sats and now is trading at 150 sats. I run a community with 4300 crypto traders, and have over 1 million views on my blog, not a big deal, nor am I bragging, but I can provide some free promotions for the coin. My idea would be just to make it into what it really is anyway, a trading/staking coin, but maybe go all out with that angle instead of some advertising stuff? Maybe that could still work though, if there were a reason for people to use the coin a lot. Staking gambling games or something, a reason people would see the ads? Make it an honest staking coin, we have the premine, we have donations, we already have the Bittrex slot. We have people that want it to work. I can't personally fix the code however, so it does require someone with coding talent that wants to make some profit.

use your resources to recruit some talent. we are not derailed yet by any means

leetcoiner

sr. member

Activity: 1056

Merit: 251

fix the code you noobies to start staking and bring this coin to the future

don't let another coin die...

i'll get really mad this time if this happen Shocked

CryptoClub

legendary

Activity: 1470

Merit: 1000

cryptocollectorsclub.com

Quote from: jc12345 on March 01, 2015, 01:54:52 PM

It seems the community has some decisions to make.

1) Wait for the dev to appear and fix the code
2) Ditch the dev and get a third party to fix the code asap. Get a new committed dev.
3) Ditch the coin

A coin dev has a vision and commitment to make something with a coin. A new dev might be just a hired hand that is not necessarily committed to a coin's future. There has been exceptions to this though where a takeover was done successfully.

Due to my risk management strategy I am not materially exposed to emoney that is stuck in my wallet so I am indifferent to the option chosen. If it is going to be a lot of effort to fix the code, to hire a third party for the fix or to get a new committed dev, then it might be best to just ditch the coin and move on. But then there are many who are heavily invested with coins stuck in their wallet and their interests have to be considered as well.

I can lose the money if need be and take option 3), but I don't see the point in that, as I like the branding, a lot is in a name really. (Look at "Darkcoin") I have helped with a coin that started at 9 sats and now is trading at 150 sats. I run a community with 4300 crypto traders, and have over 1 million views on my blog, not a big deal, nor am I bragging, but I can provide some free promotions for the coin. My idea would be just to make it into what it really is anyway, a trading/staking coin, but maybe go all out with that angle instead of some advertising stuff? Maybe that could still work though, if there were a reason for people to use the coin a lot. Staking gambling games or something, a reason people would see the ads? Make it an honest staking coin, we have the premine, we have donations, we already have the Bittrex slot. We have people that want it to work. I can't personally fix the code however, so it does require someone with coding talent that wants to make some profit.

topcat363

sr. member

Activity: 392

Merit: 250

im not sure the dev has left ppl..he willing gave up the premine in respect to the communities wants. ppl do have lives besides the experiment of crypto...things really are not that bad atm. and we have march 2 at 10a to look forward to. if nothing then someone will fix what needs fixing and well bounce right back. this week looks good still nonetheless

vegasguy

legendary

Activity: 1610

Merit: 1003

"Yobit pump alert software" Link in my signature!

Quote from: AZIZ1977 on March 01, 2015, 02:00:52 PM

iGotSpots: ''You won't get a PoS block until at least 2nd Mar 2015 10:17:55'' Wink

.... and thats scary, because if anyone knows..he does. Guys can you pm Igotspots and ask him for help.

Vegas

vegasguy

legendary

Activity: 1610

Merit: 1003

"Yobit pump alert software" Link in my signature!

Its simple. Its exactly as you said. *IF* we can hire I got spots, thats the best dev there is. Im really hoping he can help us, and he is a master of POS coins.

Vegas

AZIZ1977

hero member

Activity: 504

Merit: 500

iGotSpots: ''You won't get a PoS block until at least 2nd Mar 2015 10:17:55'' Wink

topcat363

sr. member

Activity: 392

Merit: 250

Quote from: jc12345 on March 01, 2015, 01:54:52 PM

It seems the community has some decisions to make.

1) Wait for the dev to appear and fix the code
2) Ditch the dev and get a third party to fix the code asap. Get a new committed dev.
3) Ditch the coin

A coin dev has a vision and commitment to make something with a coin. A new dev might be just a hired hand that is not necessarily committed to a coin's future. There has been exceptions to this though where a takeover was done successfully.

Due to my risk management strategy I am not materially exposed to emoney that is stuck in my wallet so I am indifferent to the option chosen. If it is going to be a lot of effort to fix the code, to hire a third party for the fix or to get a new committed dev, then it might be best to just ditch the coin and move on. But then there are many who are heavily invested with coins stuck in their wallet and their interests have to be considered as well.

if dev doesnt log on by midnight we should direct the premine and added donations to someone else. We need to fix the code and then during the 21 days decide on the coin direction. you guys are making things really complicated, for no reason.

vegasguy

legendary

Activity: 1610

Merit: 1003

"Yobit pump alert software" Link in my signature!

Quote from: ohmygod21 on March 01, 2015, 01:57:10 PM

pleast stop call this guy "dev"

+1000

ohmygod21

full member

Activity: 224

Merit: 100

pleast stop call this guy "dev"

vegasguy

legendary

Activity: 1610

Merit: 1003

"Yobit pump alert software" Link in my signature!

Quote from: jc12345 on March 01, 2015, 01:54:52 PM

It seems the community has some decisions to make.

1) Wait for the dev to appear and fix the code
2) Ditch the dev and get a third party to fix the code asap. Get a new committed dev.
3) Ditch the coin

A coin dev has a vision and commitment to make something with a coin. A new dev might be just a hired hand that is not necessarily committed to a coin's future. There has been exceptions to this though where a takeover was done successfully.

Due to my risk management strategy I am not materially exposed to emoney that is stuck in my wallet so I am indifferent to the option chosen. If it is going to be a lot of effort to fix the code, to hire a third party for the fix or to get a new committed dev, then it might be best to just ditch the coin and move on.

AT this point we need a new dev, BAD. The dev has made error after error, and dont you think if a dev gave a shit, he we be here at block 6000 to see everything working!?!? That says sooo much!! THANK YOU TO WHOEVER SUGGESTED OCMINER TO HOLD PREMINE, BEST MOVE WE EVER MADE AS NOW WE CAN USE THIS TO GET A REAL DEV.

Vegas

jc12345

legendary

Activity: 1638

Merit: 1013

It seems the community has some decisions to make.

1) Wait for the dev to appear and fix the code
2) Ditch the dev and get a third party to fix the code asap. Get a new committed dev.
3) Ditch the coin

A coin dev has a vision and commitment to make something with a coin. A new dev might be just a hired hand that is not necessarily committed to a coin's future. There has been exceptions to this though where a takeover was done successfully.

Due to my risk management strategy I am not materially exposed to emoney that is stuck in my wallet so I am indifferent to the option chosen. If it is going to be a lot of effort to fix the code, to hire a third party for the fix or to get a new committed dev, then it might be best to just ditch the coin and move on. But then there are many who are heavily invested with coins stuck in their wallet and their interests have to be considered as well.

vegasguy

legendary

Activity: 1610

Merit: 1003

"Yobit pump alert software" Link in my signature!

I just sent a pm to spots , asking for help in exchange for some of the premine. Me and him are tight, and he is the best dev there is. All hope is not lost.

Vegas

bones261

legendary

Activity: 1806

Merit: 1828

Quote from: plast555 on March 01, 2015, 12:35:38 PM

Quote from: bones261 on March 01, 2015, 12:26:19 PM

Well, it looks like I spent $20.00 at nicehash and westhash to do someone's alpha testing. LOL Lips sealed

ooo poor you, all of us done that Wink

and I spent around 150$ and made much more than that so...

Well, there where times I had my little rockminer pointed at Westhash. so I'm sure I got a few satoshi from this project for that. I give this dev a D- for his coin. Grin

vegasguy

legendary

Activity: 1610

Merit: 1003

"Yobit pump alert software" Link in my signature!

Quote from: iGotSpots on March 01, 2015, 12:44:57 PM

I don't see this switch that's mentioned, either, but I might be missing it in here. I can't find anywhere else it could be, but again, I could be wrong. I'm not really familiar with whatever coin this was cloned from. This is also where leap years are just thrown out and it's a flat 365 division

Code:

int64 GetProofOfStakeReward(int64 nCoinAge, unsigned int nBits, unsigned int nTime, int nHeight)
{
   int64 nRewardCoinYear;

   if (nHeight > PROTO_CHANGE_BLOCK) // E-Money New PoS Calculations begin here.
   {
   nRewardCoinYear = MAX_MINT_PROOF_OF_STAKE;
   int64 nSubsidy = nCoinAge * nRewardCoinYear / 365;
   return nSubsidy;
   }
   else
   {
   // E-Money Original PoS Calculations
   CBigNum bnRewardCoinYearLimit = MAX_MINT_PROOF_OF_STAKE; // Base stake mint rate, 1% year interest
   CBigNum bnTarget;
   bnTarget.SetCompact(nBits);
   CBigNum bnTargetLimit = bnProofOfStakeLimit;
   bnTargetLimit.SetCompact(bnTargetLimit.GetCompact());
   CBigNum bnLowerBound = 1 * CENT; // Lower interest bound is 1% per year
   CBigNum bnUpperBound = bnRewardCoinYearLimit;
   while (bnLowerBound + CENT <= bnUpperBound)
   {
   CBigNum bnMidValue = (bnLowerBound + bnUpperBound) / 2;
   if (fDebug && GetBoolArg("-printcreation"))
   printf("GetProofOfStakeReward() : lower=%"PRI64d" upper=%"PRI64d" mid=%"PRI64d"\n", bnLowerBound.getuint64(), bnUpperBound.getuint64(), bnMidValue.getuint64());
   if (bnMidValue * bnMidValue * bnMidValue * bnMidValue * bnTargetLimit > bnRewardCoinYearLimit * bnRewardCoinYearLimit * bnRewardCoinYearLimit * bnRewardCoinYearLimit * bnTarget)
   bnUpperBound = bnMidValue;
   else
   bnLowerBound = bnMidValue;
   }
   nRewardCoinYear = bnUpperBound.getuint64();
   nRewardCoinYear = min(nRewardCoinYear, MAX_MINT_PROOF_OF_STAKE);
   int64 nSubsidy = nCoinAge * 33 / (365 * 33 + 8) * nRewardCoinYear;
   if (fDebug && GetBoolArg("-printcreation"))
   printf("GetProofOfStakeReward(): create=%s nCoinAge=%"PRI64d" nBits=%d\n", FormatMoney(nSubsidy).c_str(), nCoinAge, nBits);
   return nSubsidy;
   }
}

Essentially, this is:

int64 nSubsidy = nCoinAge * 29.2 * COIN / 365;

Are you saying that the code is correct, and without error? Whats stopping is from passing block 6000? Please help?!?!

Rols

hero member

Activity: 636

Merit: 500

Quote from: vegasguy on March 01, 2015, 01:45:23 PM

yup.. far too many people vested in this to leave it broke. My vote is to use some of the premine to hire a talented dev to get this working again.

Vegas

Dev was logged in yesterday. So he is not exactly missing yet. So Ocminer cant release the premine

If you dont have a plan with this coin then why fixing the code?

CryptoClub

legendary

Activity: 1470

Merit: 1000

cryptocollectorsclub.com

Quote from: HKBvM on March 01, 2015, 01:43:23 PM

Quote from: CryptoClub on March 01, 2015, 01:38:14 PM

Quote from: topcat363 on March 01, 2015, 01:36:22 PM

too much has been invest to just abandon...thats stupid. use the premine towards community take over after staking period...simple

Totally agree

If something had been invested and turned into something usefull, that would be correct. But right now the argument is just:

we have too many bagholders, so we need to fix it.

If you don't have any stake in this and don't want to help, that is fine, there are lot of other alts out there and Bitcoin is wonderful. Plenty of us have invested into this, at least a lot of mining time, and we want it to work. Stuff like Asiacoin was infinitely worse and saved, hidden premine dumped. This is just some staking bug.

vegasguy

legendary

Activity: 1610

Merit: 1003

"Yobit pump alert software" Link in my signature!

Quote from: iGotSpots on March 01, 2015, 12:44:57 PM

I don't see this switch that's mentioned, either, but I might be missing it in here. I can't find anywhere else it could be, but again, I could be wrong. I'm not really familiar with whatever coin this was cloned from. This is also where leap years are just thrown out and it's a flat 365 division

Code:

int64 GetProofOfStakeReward(int64 nCoinAge, unsigned int nBits, unsigned int nTime, int nHeight)
{
   int64 nRewardCoinYear;

   if (nHeight > PROTO_CHANGE_BLOCK) // E-Money New PoS Calculations begin here.
   {
   nRewardCoinYear = MAX_MINT_PROOF_OF_STAKE;
   int64 nSubsidy = nCoinAge * nRewardCoinYear / 365;
   return nSubsidy;
   }
   else
   {
   // E-Money Original PoS Calculations
   CBigNum bnRewardCoinYearLimit = MAX_MINT_PROOF_OF_STAKE; // Base stake mint rate, 1% year interest
   CBigNum bnTarget;
   bnTarget.SetCompact(nBits);
   CBigNum bnTargetLimit = bnProofOfStakeLimit;
   bnTargetLimit.SetCompact(bnTargetLimit.GetCompact());
   CBigNum bnLowerBound = 1 * CENT; // Lower interest bound is 1% per year
   CBigNum bnUpperBound = bnRewardCoinYearLimit;
   while (bnLowerBound + CENT <= bnUpperBound)
   {
   CBigNum bnMidValue = (bnLowerBound + bnUpperBound) / 2;
   if (fDebug && GetBoolArg("-printcreation"))
   printf("GetProofOfStakeReward() : lower=%"PRI64d" upper=%"PRI64d" mid=%"PRI64d"\n", bnLowerBound.getuint64(), bnUpperBound.getuint64(), bnMidValue.getuint64());
   if (bnMidValue * bnMidValue * bnMidValue * bnMidValue * bnTargetLimit > bnRewardCoinYearLimit * bnRewardCoinYearLimit * bnRewardCoinYearLimit * bnRewardCoinYearLimit * bnTarget)
   bnUpperBound = bnMidValue;
   else
   bnLowerBound = bnMidValue;
   }
   nRewardCoinYear = bnUpperBound.getuint64();
   nRewardCoinYear = min(nRewardCoinYear, MAX_MINT_PROOF_OF_STAKE);
   int64 nSubsidy = nCoinAge * 33 / (365 * 33 + 8) * nRewardCoinYear;
   if (fDebug && GetBoolArg("-printcreation"))
   printf("GetProofOfStakeReward(): create=%s nCoinAge=%"PRI64d" nBits=%d\n", FormatMoney(nSubsidy).c_str(), nCoinAge, nBits);
   return nSubsidy;
   }
}

Essentially, this is:

int64 nSubsidy = nCoinAge * 29.2 * COIN / 365;

Spots, I *KNOW* you can fix this better than anyone. Can we pay you some of the premine? Please?

Topic: [ANN][ECASH]E-Money Advertising Revenue In Wallet | 8% Daily Stake for 21 days - page 81. (Read 91495 times)