Topic: [ANN][EGC] EverGreenCoin® | 7% PoS | Foundation | Bittrex | Android - page 26. (Read 82062 times)

If you understood the industry, the technology, and the world around you, you would understand the unique role dynamic staking for charity coupled with grass-roots efforts under the umbrella of a 501c3 provides. Sorry if this understanding escapes you presently, but do not allow that to prevent you from trying.

No one is making fun of your lacks. But it is comical to watch you continue to convey them with your poor grammar skills and childish attacks.

after being insulted for reporting bugs in the wallet and proposing ideas, i decided to sell for a huge loss


i wish you all the best but this doesn't look good at all

what does this coin offers technically that others don't ?


bear market made people more esigent regarding the tech, shitcoins are just dying (finally)
staking for charity? ahhaaha
one could donate bitcoin, or stake coins that have a real team behind them with cutting edge technologies, and then donate

(a random example cardano, that has millions of fundings for its development , while egc refused to pay 0.1 btc for a listing ahahah)

so the other reason to buy this coin is the greater fool theory, hoping that someone is more fool than you to buy at higher price ( i tried and it didn't work)

Why? To make a gigantic chore with no benefit but a buzzword or two while flushing years of work and postponing existing plans for an unknown time? And what do you suggest we do for coin generation and a swap? Do you understand the resources needed to facilitate either? You do know the devs would have to do all that also, correct?
Wait, I thought you wanted an ETH codebase? ERC20 has no codebase per se. It is a token on another's chain. You have contradicted yourself, unless you are suggesting we make an ETH clone and then make an ERC20 token on it, but then, which would be EverGreenCoin? Or do you suggest the devs rip the fabric of time to make things easier also?
In neither of the above cases you have confused as the same case would it be easier on the devs and at no point in time. In the later case (ERC20), what do you suggest we do when ETH decides to support another fork or the next Satoshi-rolling-in-his-grave blockchain debacle?
Read the prior as needed. Exchanges != volume.
It would sooner bring death to an existing project. Especially one that has so few contributing and such grand plans. I have integrity. So will EverGreenCoin. So will its blockchain.

So to summarise:

After many hours last week of one to one help trying to get the wallet running on your chosen platform during which you ignored what you were being asked to do several times you then state there's a glitch in the EverGreenCoin wallet which means you can't resize the window, an issue that no one else has seen. I suspect that this is probably more an issue with your laptop (I suspect your laptop is in reality a netbook which tend to have limited screen resolutions).

After being asked a few questions you decide to rage quit stating saying you've been attacked. I see no such attack just a few questions trying to clarify where the issue might lie. There could have been some frustration about the way you stated there was a bug and the little information you provided about it and maybe some of the questions could have been worded a bit better better but I don't see anything insulting. There are many places an issue like that might be and from what else has been said I think the issue is more in your choice of hardware than anything else.

Your posts last night where you suggest there's another bug is similar. The only detail you appear to have provided is a single poor screenshot with a caption from you saying "it does not respond". There's no detail of what your trying to do and nothing about the system it's running on.

Reading through the last weeks worth of telegram and discord chat is seems your mostly interested in hype and raising the price rather than any of the goals EverGreenCoin actually has. Other than a possible minimal donation to the tree planting efforts I don't see that you've given anything back to the community (you've even been suggested how to find out what you could do to help). Given the amount of time you've taken from various members of the community the only person who appears to have been offensive to anyone else is you (I'm not going to repeat what could be considered verbal abuse and/or name calling).

Anyway the whole history of what's happened in the last 10 days is available for anyone to see on telegram and discord and they can make their own minds up. Personally I think the community generally come over as trying their best to help you and the only person who comes off looking bad is you!

Kindly, thank you!

Great things coming better be ready crypto space Smiley  Need to make you a gift Steven for EGC birthday Cheesy Continuing Support for EGC and Steven!! This guy is amazing.

You're welcome, mate!
 

We had submitted the 2nd application on May 9th after they had revised the application process. At that time all requested legal documents were provided. I do believe this is the current application process.

They do have a webpage for submitting news of applicant coins. The CEO tweeted a bit back that submitting news would help applicants. Sorry I have yet to find the time to do so, but I will add it to this eve's to do list.

Thanks Greg!

EDIT: Sorry, the 2nd application was submitted June 12th. The 1st was the mentioned May 9th. I glanced at the notes too quick.

EDIT 2: That 2nd was actually the 3rd.

A good idea will also be contact with Binance because they have changed the rules for introducing new coins.
What you think ?

Thanks mate ...

#crysx

Mac users: Your v1.8 binary is now ready for download from https://drive.google.com/open?id=12wL_Q-HFhuNqRMYBMXuQWCDCPfTe_IMi

So very sorry for the delay in getting it to you!

I have finally been able to record the September update, https://youtu.be/-yQMeehX6Zo

Apologies for the delay on getting that to you!

Oh FFS ...

Another imbecile on the loose.

Your justification and choice of words to use in relation to EGC as a coin AND a project are moot. YOUR decisions YOU made on the buy/sell of the coin is YOUR responsibility. The EGC team and partners have done their due diligence, as well as taken their responsibilities for the work laid have been taken very seriously, and shows in the results we ALL can see at hand. With Steven at the helm, and the team behind project, price is almost irrelevant in the broad scheme of things, especially when this is NO pump and dump, or get rich quick project. This is a project that is designed to HELP people, and our environment, NOT focus on making YOU rich with your shallow values and weak decision making (lack of) skills.

Make some valid points, and you will be heard. Ramble on like a lunatic about to lose his house because of bad decisions YOU made, then the results are clear to be seen.

Enjoy your 'losses' thanks to your own idealistic and greedy decisions. Stop blaming the coin, the project or the people behind the project, who never forced your hand at anything.

Can you tell I am feeling MUCH better from my illness?

#crysx

I will look at this soon ...

There are many things that break compiles, but because Fedora itself is the precursor for the codebase for the RHEL codebase, and also bleeding edge, there will always be things that break and almost impossible to compile. BOOST libs are the worst in that department, as well as OpenSSL libs, though finally Fedora has included the secp256k1 ECC into the latest OpenSSL libs for Fedora 27/28 x64. CentOS though is another story altogether, and we have to build a (mostly) static binary for use in CentOS 7 x64 in a sandboxed environment for it to work.

Either way, will look into those links you have provided and see whether a standard and non-standard OS install works in both methods.

Much appreciated.

#crysx

Thanks mate ...

Feeling much better today - the first time in two weeks.

Let the work begin

#crysx

This is not the first time Chol_gol has said that, he also say Bittrex is a scam so there is no credibility to what he says. I believe he was banned from Bittrex for undesirable trading behaviors that are bad for the industry as that is the only way i know to get banned from Bittrex. He complained about getting banned and Bittrex is a scam in one of his other posts. I see him openly asking for pump and dump targets claiming any coin he cant profit off of in that way is a scam. It is hard for me to believe the few efforts in the industry complying with US regulations and not pump and dumping are the scams to watch out for. It is sad people will log on and see that kind of stupidity posted here in our thread.

ECG Target for acquisition?

egc is a terrible coin. its buy order in bittrex is less than 1 btc. it has no supporters and it may crash any time. I suggest everyone to sell it quickly and invest in other coins. I bought 2.2btc of egc at price of 0.3 dollars and sold them at 0.05 dollars totally about 0.35 btc
just get rid of this terrible coin

There was some discussion of this a few months ago (around page 40-42) which included links to what I've done so far on the wiki - The software page I linked to initially are still valid although I've started re-organising some of it so other pages might not exist.

You, or anyone else is welcome to contribute to that documentation or even contribute fixes or a .spec file to the main github (I know Steven is generally happy to receive pull requests).

In the case of Fedora 28 I know Steven spent a lot of time with matteo96 a few days ago trying to get it working finally with success, it looks like the latest boost libraries broke something so this will likely also affect Ubuntu and then Debian at some point in the future (I think there are now some patches in the tree to fix that although I've not looked at that in detail).

In terms of discussion of the codebase, most of that happens on Discord

Get well soon Crysx!