Please add Cloudcoin.
-1no CCC please (CrapCloudCoin)
Topic: [ANN][Exchange] Latest Cryptsy Additions, News and announcements. - page 140. (Read 199385 times)
July 28, 2013, 04:22:35 PM
no CCC please (CrapCloudCoin)
July 28, 2013, 01:05:46 PM
wonder how many accounts Cloudcoin bought
+1Who supports such shitcoins in these numbers anyways..
July 28, 2013, 12:03:20 PM
Please add Cloudcoin.
July 28, 2013, 11:57:55 AM
wonder how many accounts Cloudcoin bought
That gave me the lol I needed this morning.
July 28, 2013, 11:56:19 AM
wonder how many accounts Cloudcoin bought
July 28, 2013, 11:51:38 AM
Please add Cloudcoin.
+1
Please add Cloudcoin. It is such a nice new coin.
+1
Great coin. Great team
July 28, 2013, 11:33:45 AM
Please add Cloudcoin.
+1
Please add Cloudcoin. It is such a nice new coin.
July 28, 2013, 11:19:29 AM
Please add Cloudcoin.
July 28, 2013, 11:16:04 AM
Please add GLC, STR and HBN
I have absolutely no idea what GLC and STR are, but yes. Please add HBN
They are already worth 0.001 each ;3 
July 28, 2013, 10:11:37 AM
Please add GLC, STR and HBN
July 28, 2013, 07:20:49 AM
You know how people ask you to put coins on the exchange? Well, I'm going to do the opposite.
Please do NOT add Gascoin, Spots, Cryptobits, and Cloudcoin.
Gascoin is ecologically irresponsible, as the orphan rate because of four second block times will be absurd. The electricity wasted and thus its contribution to all-things-global-warming will be substantial. It's an argument Cryptsy cannot win if they tried to justify accepting Gascoin. FST, WDC, and DGC already push the limit...
Because the dev of Spots is the same as Gascoin, and since Spots has a sizeable premine/dev tax, I refuse to support Spots by default. Bad reputation should stand for something and we should draw the line by not accepting these criminal losers as part of the cryptocoin community.
Cryptobit was announced in a truly shady manner. They were announced on a dead forum then, by mere chance or collaboration, someone not part of the dev team decided to post a announcement thread in this forum. And when the point is brought up about their strategic use of a dead forum to instamine/premine their own coin, the devs of CYB feign ignorance. This type of shady behavior should be punished.
Another coin I won't support is Cloudcoin. Date was scheduled and devs decided to secretly launch much earlier, essentially creating an instamine situation for themselves. A quick look at cryptometer.org shows well over 90% of all coins currently in existence was mined in the first two hours. Moreover, the dev of Cloudcoin (ahmed_bodi) has some morally questionable beliefs: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=255361.msg2725066#msg2725066
I commend Cryptsy for having the guts to adopt altcoins, and I'm happy for their growth. But there needs to be a line drawn so that criminals and bad practices are punished instead of being rewarded.
-Merc
Please do NOT add Gascoin, Spots, Cryptobits, and Cloudcoin.
Gascoin is ecologically irresponsible, as the orphan rate because of four second block times will be absurd. The electricity wasted and thus its contribution to all-things-global-warming will be substantial. It's an argument Cryptsy cannot win if they tried to justify accepting Gascoin. FST, WDC, and DGC already push the limit...
Because the dev of Spots is the same as Gascoin, and since Spots has a sizeable premine/dev tax, I refuse to support Spots by default. Bad reputation should stand for something and we should draw the line by not accepting these criminal losers as part of the cryptocoin community.
Cryptobit was announced in a truly shady manner. They were announced on a dead forum then, by mere chance or collaboration, someone not part of the dev team decided to post a announcement thread in this forum. And when the point is brought up about their strategic use of a dead forum to instamine/premine their own coin, the devs of CYB feign ignorance. This type of shady behavior should be punished.
Another coin I won't support is Cloudcoin. Date was scheduled and devs decided to secretly launch much earlier, essentially creating an instamine situation for themselves. A quick look at cryptometer.org shows well over 90% of all coins currently in existence was mined in the first two hours. Moreover, the dev of Cloudcoin (ahmed_bodi) has some morally questionable beliefs: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=255361.msg2725066#msg2725066
I commend Cryptsy for having the guts to adopt altcoins, and I'm happy for their growth. But there needs to be a line drawn so that criminals and bad practices are punished instead of being rewarded.
-Merc
This is a strange way of saying I haven't mined these yet so don't put them on the exchange until I can mine a ton of them.
Let the MARKET DECIDE what coin has merit or not! Nobody knows all details about all coins. Look at the reactions to your absurd allegations. You try to use the moral high ground to leave out competition from your coin or your favorite coin. Come on! Stop pretending. All coins with a viable network should eventually make it to an exchange and all should trade against BTC. Let the market decide what has merit and what the price should be. Cryptsy's method of slowly adding coins is a good one, how they rank coins may be arbitrary but so what. Add the coins however they like but eventually they should add all viable coins.
Denouncing coins before trying them 'cause the orphan rate will be absurd' and using inflammatory words like 'Global-Warming' is kinda childish to me as well as wrong. Of *ALL* the coins on the market today, there is only 1 that I can see has value in what it produces, and it's not just a 'contribution to all-things-global-warming', so if that is your arguement, let's trash *ALL* of these electricity wasting coins that are causeing global warning. Bitcoin should be the first one tossed for global warming if that is your arguement! Check it out: http://blockchain.info/stats clearly shows that estimated power usage is 4,290.33 MEGA WATTS costing $643,549.55 to produce $421,364.93 worth of coins. I know, I know, you're going to bleat ASIC's and power reduction and blah de blah blah, but it's still a valid point. Bitcoin likely has more electricity usage than all the other coins combined. So, now how do you feel about getting rid of 'global warming causing' coins?
July 28, 2013, 07:00:54 AM
redcoin
thanks
thanks
July 28, 2013, 05:59:08 AM
Gamecoin update: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/ann-gamecoin-gme-current-version-v0842-263600
Far more promising than some other coins on cryptsy imho
Far more promising than some other coins on cryptsy imho
July 28, 2013, 05:54:54 AM
Please add Elephantcoin Starcoin and Redcoin
Yes, all 3 please
July 28, 2013, 05:05:46 AM
Please add Elephantcoin Starcoin and Redcoin
July 27, 2013, 08:40:48 PM
You know how people ask you to put coins on the exchange? Well, I'm going to do the opposite.
Please do NOT add Gascoin, Spots, Cryptobits, and Cloudcoin.
Gascoin is ecologically irresponsible, as the orphan rate because of four second block times will be absurd. The electricity wasted and thus its contribution to all-things-global-warming will be substantial. It's an argument Cryptsy cannot win if they tried to justify accepting Gascoin. FST, WDC, and DGC already push the limit...
Because the dev of Spots is the same as Gascoin, and since Spots has a sizeable premine/dev tax, I refuse to support Spots by default. Bad reputation should stand for something and we should draw the line by not accepting these criminal losers as part of the cryptocoin community.
Cryptobit was announced in a truly shady manner. They were announced on a dead forum then, by mere chance or collaboration, someone not part of the dev team decided to post a announcement thread in this forum. And when the point is brought up about their strategic use of a dead forum to instamine/premine their own coin, the devs of CYB feign ignorance. This type of shady behavior should be punished.
Another coin I won't support is Cloudcoin. Date was scheduled and devs decided to secretly launch much earlier, essentially creating an instamine situation for themselves. A quick look at cryptometer.org shows well over 90% of all coins currently in existence was mined in the first two hours. Moreover, the dev of Cloudcoin (ahmed_bodi) has some morally questionable beliefs: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=255361.msg2725066#msg2725066
I commend Cryptsy for having the guts to adopt altcoins, and I'm happy for their growth. But there needs to be a line drawn so that criminals and bad practices are punished instead of being rewarded.
-Merc
Please do NOT add Gascoin, Spots, Cryptobits, and Cloudcoin.
Gascoin is ecologically irresponsible, as the orphan rate because of four second block times will be absurd. The electricity wasted and thus its contribution to all-things-global-warming will be substantial. It's an argument Cryptsy cannot win if they tried to justify accepting Gascoin. FST, WDC, and DGC already push the limit...
Because the dev of Spots is the same as Gascoin, and since Spots has a sizeable premine/dev tax, I refuse to support Spots by default. Bad reputation should stand for something and we should draw the line by not accepting these criminal losers as part of the cryptocoin community.
Cryptobit was announced in a truly shady manner. They were announced on a dead forum then, by mere chance or collaboration, someone not part of the dev team decided to post a announcement thread in this forum. And when the point is brought up about their strategic use of a dead forum to instamine/premine their own coin, the devs of CYB feign ignorance. This type of shady behavior should be punished.
Another coin I won't support is Cloudcoin. Date was scheduled and devs decided to secretly launch much earlier, essentially creating an instamine situation for themselves. A quick look at cryptometer.org shows well over 90% of all coins currently in existence was mined in the first two hours. Moreover, the dev of Cloudcoin (ahmed_bodi) has some morally questionable beliefs: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=255361.msg2725066#msg2725066
I commend Cryptsy for having the guts to adopt altcoins, and I'm happy for their growth. But there needs to be a line drawn so that criminals and bad practices are punished instead of being rewarded.
-Merc
This is a strange way of saying I haven't mined these yet so don't put them on the exchange until I can mine a ton of them.
Let the MARKET DECIDE what coin has merit or not! Nobody knows all details about all coins. Look at the reactions to your absurd allegations. You try to use the moral high ground to leave out competition from your coin or your favorite coin. Come on! Stop pretending. All coins with a viable network should eventually make it to an exchange and all should trade against BTC. Let the market decide what has merit and what the price should be. Cryptsy's method of slowly adding coins is a good one, how they rank coins may be arbitrary but so what. Add the coins however they like but eventually they should add all viable coins.
July 27, 2013, 08:19:44 PM
Oh, and the coin I'd like to see added is Lebowskis, if my opinion means anything at all.
July 27, 2013, 08:12:42 PM
Because the dev of Spots is the same as Gascoin, and since Spots has a sizeable premine/dev tax, I refuse to support Spots by default. Bad reputation should stand for something and we should draw the line by not accepting these criminal losers as part of the cryptocoin community.
Hey, I keep hearing people say that Spots had a premine, and I want to avoid it if that's true. But I haven't found evidence of it. I was looking for something to solo mine because all I'd ever done was pooled mining, so I looked for the newest coin I could and it was Spots, a little more than 24 hours after launch. Maybe I just don't know what to look for in the blockchain but the dev said he mined four blocks before posting and that was all. Whatever else he may have done wrong I'm not willing to condemn him for four blocks. (or should I?)
Can you point to some evidence of this premining? If it's true we can add "lying about it" to the reasons not to trust that developer, but if it isn't we shouldn't lump Spots in with the rest. Unless there are other reasons, of course.
July 27, 2013, 07:52:56 PM
XPM Dscoin
July 27, 2013, 07:21:55 PM
could we get jpc added as well?
Jump to: