Oh common, if anyone can't see this is a blatant scam then I don't feel sorry for them and I won't refund their SYNX. The real question should be, if real qualified developers were working on SYNX then why couldn't they fix those easy fixes and continue on? Why go to the extreme of creating a brand new coin off of synx, why not just fork it off dash or another similar coin? Answer = they just want to rewrite the specs of the SYNX code so that the investors lose out on the rewards and the new whales that own this coin will win huge. So scamy, should change the launch date to Halloween. And the graphics of this! If they can't pay to at least hire an intern graphic designer, then they got problems. My prediction, SYNX will still do just fine and even better after this attempting a "take-over" and the real loosers will be the noobs that bought into this hype in telegram and the severe whale price manipulation.
You complicate what's actually quite simple. We wanted to fork the code to incorporate some projects that current Synx code is not permitting. How do you think the new whales will benefit from this new GRAV? It's not a premine we are not holding any and everything will be as fair as it can be. GRAV and SYNX will have the same team. As you can see we did in 2 months more progress than the past developers did from the beginning of the coin (website, media, wallets, design, Bittrex wallets updated and so on). But now we want to work even more. The GRAV Airdop is fair, nobody but the investors will benefit. Keep your SYNX in the wallet at the snapshot and you receive free GRAV coins. I can't see anything wrong with that. You are probably mad for some personal reasons and you take it on our project and team. Please stop the negativity and if you have something positive to share you're welcome.
@SyndicateLTD do you know how stupid this lines of yours is
We wanted to fork the code to incorporate some projects that current Synx code is not permitting.
?
You're effectively saying you're copying the SYNX code, to add some stuff that isn't possible with the SYNX code
Well it clearly is possible to add it to the SYNX code or you wouldn't be forking, the SYNX code! So why not just develop this on SYNX like you originally planned???
Makes no sense at all!
I don't know a whole lot about blockchain tech under the hood, but I would bet that there are probably many aspects of a coin that might be salvageable, while others, like adding radically new functionality, may require entirely new code via a fork.
Again, I can't say for sure, but it's not like this hasn't happened before. Look at Ethereum. And even more so, look no further than Bitcoin. To make Satoshi's vision truly work and drive economies, the code undoubtedly needed some serious improvements. Enter: all the forks we see of mainstream coins.
So I don't think it's as simple as complaining about old code being forked if that's what is required. Am I a little disappointed that it needs to happen? Yeah, I guess. But I believe in the vision of the team, so if they need to do it... Well, it is what it is