Topic: [ANN][ICO] Bitcoin Growth Bot, Lending Platform​ 2.0​ [DECEMBER TOKEN SALE] - page 17. (Read 7854 times)

Is it too late to switch to ERC20 since some people already purchased Waves tokens



Jordan needs some assistance, can we see bot in action at least so we can build team around it

Coins must be given regardless of whether a participant or not participates, otherwise this is a good and good scam. People who have taken the time to advertise your project must be rewarded even if they do not participate in pre-sale !!

If you really have something to offer you should postpone the ico. If you are open to suggestions make this a community project.
Let us all share ideas and build the lending platform together. This will build the trust we don't have in all the other projects.

The email you send us today was something that drove me away from your ico.
You asked us to send btc to a random adress and reply to a "no-reply" email adress with tx-code.
That seemed very unprofessional and overhasty.

If you can build trust you don't need to hurry.

I am not sure how that would work. It seems it would a full time job trying to organize everyone in itself.
Have you seen this type of community project work anywhere else? I would like to look into that more.
As well as if you have any expanded ideas on what that would look like.

I'm not selling anything. I'm giving something for FREE which I spent a lot of time an effort to compile, some of which I had to pay for.  If anyone is interested in signing up with this program (as I am) then why not sign up where you can get the most value. I'm willing to share my research regarding the responsible parties so if by some chance the platform turns out to be a scam, at least those that signed up under my referral link https://www.bitcoingrowthbot.io/?mwr=5946-41e8f17e will have enough information on the scammer(s) to pursue the matter legally. Not to mention, signing up with me will yield you 50% more FREE NCL tokens than if you sign up elsewhere.

I lack the eloquence and skills of a Youtuber or a blogger, I have no other means to bring value to the table to incentivize others to sign up under my referral link and I have invested money and time to bring that value to you for FREE. So stop hating and click on the link below to get the most value and efficiency out of what you are going to do anyway if you intend to use their platform.

Personally, I would not endorse Bitcoin Growth Bot if I did not think it was legit.

Click below to sign up and get maximum value that you cannot get anywhere else:

https://www.bitcoingrowthbot.io/?mwr=5946-41e8f17e
https://www.bitcoingrowthbot.io/?mwr=5946-41e8f17e
https://www.bitcoingrowthbot.io/?mwr=5946-41e8f17e

Thanks for your time and interest. I appreciate it very much.

We would to offer bounties. I am sure you probably receive offers all of the time with bounties included. We can't offer that because every penny needs to go towards building this project.

I am simple asking for your consideration if you believe this could be good for community as a whole.

The launch offer is very generous:

All channels of communication open. The project is not without it's challenges, it is a big undertaking but we will communicate with everyone throughout.

If you really have something to offer you should postpone the ico. If you are open to suggestions make this a community project.
Let us all share ideas and build the lending platform together. This will build the trust we don't have in all the other projects.

The email you send us today was something that drove me away from your ico.
You asked us to send btc to a random adress and reply to a "no-reply" email adress with tx-code.
That seemed very unprofessional and overhasty.

If you can build trust you don't need to hurry.

Selling information you dig online is a pretty cheap way of getting referral links. I believe in putting the information out first and then if people think you did a good job they will happily sign under you. This is completely against the idea of openness and transparency of the blockchain. Thumbs down.

Yeah, transparency clearly means extra scrutiny which is in the end will be worth it and good for all, most especially the space. Doesn't mean it is easy, but it is right and needed.

Thanks for the input. I really appreciate it. I am just going to absorb for a bit here, listening, open to everything, and work on building this the best way to completion.

I vote for no 2 option

Option #2

Purchase as many tokens as you are able in the presale under free market conditions.

Bonuses are as orginally listed:

   0 - 1 million tokens 0.55 (25% bonus) = price of 0.41 USD

   1 - 2 million tokens 0.65 (20% bonus) = price of 0.52 USD

   2 - 3 million tokens 0.75 (15% bonus) = price of 0.64 USD

The pre-sale is an open market with no limits on decentralized exchange. Pure supply and demand.

Purchase methods accepted: BTC, LTC, ETH, WAVES, USD, EUR





Nothing beats the free market BUT you have to stop promoting it to avoid UCOIN cash scenario.

Maybe close new signups and we will buy all tokes available.  3 million tokens isn't much when we have so many hungry investors here.

Shut it down pls, no new members

Wondering how many registered users do you have so far, excluding ghost accounts? If you have more than 1000 then you will be ok, Credence coin had only 1000 investors and they sold 2.2 m tokens.

Im glad you are transparent about not afraid of scrutiny, we lack that in cryptosphere

 Obviously this are early stages and it is work in progress, since you are open to suggestions ,  here are some:

*many of us agree you should drop Waves and do it on Ethereum blockchain, ERC20 tokens. People are more familiar with Ether and im sure there are other reasons, technical people can chime in. Waves had bad rep and not as smart as Eth
*redesign website, make it look and feel professional,  functional/login/backend etc
*do not start pumping it yet till  you recruit all the right people and pre-sale is over
* try to move ICO earlier if possible/ as well as exchange listing (Feb/March seems  too far away)

Thanks for the detective work didi-man. So far I have nothing bad to say about Jordan Lindsey. But I am still not 100% convinced about the transparency aspect of this project.
The main concern for me is not who is behind BitConnect or Regal coin or Ethconnect. The real question is who is holding the private keys to the trading bot's address?
Why not create a smart contract on Ethereum where we can all see where the money for the ICO is going. I understand very clearly how all these platforms work and I can tell it is no rocket science. But I do believe in being 100% transparent and just having a decentralized exchange when you conduct your ICO is not enough.

Here are some of my suggestions:
- Use Ethereum smart contracts to hold the ICO funds so we can all see where they are going.
- Create a website on blockstack or running on Ethereum for the trading bot. This way the website can't be shut down.
- The person/people that puts the site up should be able to sign their public address on the site and also outside the site so we can see who is behind it.
- We should be able to confirm and see all the tokens we lend to the bot going to a wallet which should be controlled by a smart contract.
- I don't really care if the bot is trading with us (this is how I think bitconnect functions https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HviRDE_wPI0) and if it is we should be able to see it is fully automated. I am not asking to see the code of the bot. Because I believe if people see the code they will try to game the system and the system will stop working because no one will be actually lending to the bot. It's a catch 22 problem here.
- On the ICO, why not make it that the pre-sale coins go to a smart contract that automatically get loaned to the bot. The system needs a head start and the people that are getting the coins for cheapest should be the ones making the head start. That is the "price" they would have to pay for the system to work and for getting the cheapest coins.
- Let's all discuss how this system could work under this thread. Let's make it truly an open system.

I still have many more ideas, but I would like Jordan to participate in the conversation openly and here. I still believe the pre-sale is a bit too rushed. If you really need all that money to start the project Jordan, why don't we all just create a multi sig. bitconnect/bitcoin wallet and use that to fund the beginning of this project.

There is only one thing that really captivated me about this project, and this was this one phrase on the website:
"If you live in the Bay Area and are a highly capable, genuinely good, and friendly please apply for the open position below you are qualified for."

Call me naive, but I truly believe people are first and far most good by nature. I would be more than happily participate and help in this project. Not because I can get cheap coins and become rich (even though that is a nice incentive) But because I truly believe decentralization and blockchain technology are the only thing that can help humanity move away from the sad state of affairs we live in. And I will do anything in my power to make that happen.

How about law and taxes? I dont think US gov will let people run ponzi and avoid paying taxes on fat profits?

What are the chances of gov closing his biz down and investors lose all money?  better to move down south just to be safe