Topic: [ANN][ICO] EHF eHealth First - page 209. (Read 97846 times)
Yes i also think that the sucess of the ehf ico depend of the visbility and the marketing of the project. A lot of sucessfull ico was a sucess because of a good management of the communication and marketing by the team. I think ehf team handle the hype well, it will now depend of the future developpement.
In a span of 2 months a lot will happen eHealth may become the best ICO to invest in and it may also be the worst depending on the team, how they will handle the project.
Yes, everhything will depend on the development of the project. If the team able to promote and get a lot of attentions from investors, the chance to be success is exist.
There have been other ICOs last year that raised more than 100 million. It's not impossible. But those project were hyped. I don't see such a big hype for EHF yet.
Well, most of them were overhyped. And they hurt their investors at the end. I really not sure any ico raised more than 100m $ and make their investors happy at the end.
EOS is not doing so bad, it's already beaten Litecoin.
Hey do u know what happened with filecoin, wasn't it the biggest ICO yet, is it already on CMC?
There have been other ICOs last year that raised more than 100 million. It's not impossible. But those project were hyped. I don't see such a big hype for EHF yet.
Well, most of them were overhyped. And they hurt their investors at the end. I really not sure any ico raised more than 100m $ and make their investors happy at the end.
There have been other ICOs last year that raised more than 100 million. It's not impossible. But those project were hyped. I don't see such a big hype for EHF yet.
EHF team will attend Invest Forum in Moscow and will present eHealth First Project and ICO.
Save the date - April 26, 2018!
It would be great, if you come and we can get acquainted personally.
Welcome!
Have we some Russian people here?
Save the date - April 26, 2018!
It would be great, if you come and we can get acquainted personally.
Welcome!
Have we some Russian people here?
Of course there are) And a happy coincidence at this time I will be in Moscow, on the job, if it's to emerge successfully, I will definitely attend this event!
EHF team will attend Invest Forum in Moscow and will present eHealth First Project and ICO.
Save the date - April 26, 2018!
It would be great, if you come and we can get acquainted personally.
Welcome!
Have we some Russian people here?
Save the date - April 26, 2018!
It would be great, if you come and we can get acquainted personally.
Welcome!
Have we some Russian people here?
Of course there are) And a happy coincidence at this time I will be in Moscow, on the job, if it's to emerge successfully, I will definitely attend this event!
Yes the team seems to be really busy right now, maybe it’s normal cause there is a lot of things to develop and I don’t now if they have the time to change the bitcointalk. Also the roadmap is on very long term, maybe it’s realistic for a health care project , so they have time to change and work more on bitcointalk.
I think the main reason is the preparation for pre-sales. Before the start of sales remains very little.There is a good performance of the team in relation to marketing, but for the value they want to achieve, I believe that they should still be more aggressive yet, it is possible to reach an even higher level of disclosure
In vain you do aggressive marketing if you do not have any to do. I find it normal for them to focus their attention on the project right now and then on a market promotion. I think what they have done so far has made the project known. And as far as his promotion is concerned, he will be very aggressive when he has some finished parts of it.
Yes the team seems to be really busy right now, maybe it’s normal cause there is a lot of things to develop and I don’t now if they have the time to change the bitcointalk. Also the roadmap is on very long term, maybe it’s realistic for a health care project , so they have time to change and work more on bitcointalk.
I think the main reason is the preparation for pre-sales. Before the start of sales remains very little.There is a good performance of the team in relation to marketing, but for the value they want to achieve, I believe that they should still be more aggressive yet, it is possible to reach an even higher level of disclosure
a lot of attention is also needed, the hartcap is probably quite high. so 100 millionen?
yes but unsold tokens will be burned. so its reasonable to set a high hardcap, so you have a lot of tokens (which will be created on coin creation, irreversebly) for investors and raising the coinvalue by burning the unsold tokens.
That's actually a very good point, I never thought about it in this way. But on the other hand, hardcaps shouldn't be too high, because then they simply seem unrealistic and discourage investors from investing.
$ 100 million is a lot but in December almost any whitepaper could achieve that. given the scope and the long roadmap $100 million does not sound so unrealistic.
I am not sure about it.
If it was a security and giving out dividends it may reach but for a utility, 100m is a hard target to reach.
I agree, 100 mil is too high, but then again as long as the project continues it doesn't matter to me if it's achieved.
a lot of attention is also needed, the hartcap is probably quite high. so 100 millionen?
yes but unsold tokens will be burned. so its reasonable to set a high hardcap, so you have a lot of tokens (which will be created on coin creation, irreversebly) for investors and raising the coinvalue by burning the unsold tokens.
That's actually a very good point, I never thought about it in this way. But on the other hand, hardcaps shouldn't be too high, because then they simply seem unrealistic and discourage investors from investing.
$ 100 million is a lot but in December almost any whitepaper could achieve that. given the scope and the long roadmap $100 million does not sound so unrealistic.
I am not sure about it.
If it was a security and giving out dividends it may reach but for a utility, 100m is a hard target to reach.
Yes the team seems to be really busy right now, maybe it’s normal cause there is a lot of things to develop and I don’t now if they have the time to change the bitcointalk. Also the roadmap is on very long term, maybe it’s realistic for a health care project , so they have time to change and work more on bitcointalk.
I think the main reason is the preparation for pre-sales. Before the start of sales remains very little.
Yes the team seems to be really busy right now, maybe it’s normal cause there is a lot of things to develop and I don’t now if they have the time to change the bitcointalk. Also the roadmap is on very long term, maybe it’s realistic for a health care project , so they have time to change and work more on bitcointalk.
I think the main reason is the preparation for pre-sales. Before the start of sales remains very little.
a lot of attention is also needed, the hartcap is probably quite high. so 100 millionen?
yes but unsold tokens will be burned. so its reasonable to set a high hardcap, so you have a lot of tokens (which will be created on coin creation, irreversebly) for investors and raising the coinvalue by burning the unsold tokens.
That's actually a very good point, I never thought about it in this way. But on the other hand, hardcaps shouldn't be too high, because then they simply seem unrealistic and discourage investors from investing.
$ 100 million is a lot but in December almost any whitepaper could achieve that. given the scope and the long roadmap $100 million does not sound so unrealistic.
a lot of attention is also needed, the hartcap is probably quite high. so 100 millionen?
yes but unsold tokens will be burned. so its reasonable to set a high hardcap, so you have a lot of tokens (which will be created on coin creation, irreversebly) for investors and raising the coinvalue by burning the unsold tokens.
That's actually a very good point, I never thought about it in this way. But on the other hand, hardcaps shouldn't be too high, because then they simply seem unrealistic and discourage investors from investing.
$ 100 million is a lot but in December almost any whitepaper could achieve that. given the scope and the long roadmap $100 million does not sound so unrealistic.
a lot of attention is also needed, the hartcap is probably quite high. so 100 millionen?
yes but unsold tokens will be burned. so its reasonable to set a high hardcap, so you have a lot of tokens (which will be created on coin creation, irreversebly) for investors and raising the coinvalue by burning the unsold tokens.
That's actually a very good point, I never thought about it in this way. But on the other hand, hardcaps shouldn't be too high, because then they simply seem unrealistic and discourage investors from investing.
In a span of 2 months a lot will happen eHealth may become the best ICO to invest in and it may also be the worst depending on the team, how they will handle the project.
Yes, everhything will depend on the development of the project. If the team able to promote and get a lot of attentions from investors, the chance to be success is exist.
a lot of attention is also needed, the hartcap is probably quite high. so 100 millionen?
yes but unsold tokens will be burned. so its reasonable to set a high hardcap, so you have a lot of tokens (which will be created on coin creation, irreversebly) for investors and raising the coinvalue by burning the unsold tokens.
Yes the team seems to be really busy right now, maybe it’s normal cause there is a lot of things to develop and I don’t now if they have the time to change the bitcointalk. Also the roadmap is on very long term, maybe it’s realistic for a health care project , so they have time to change and work more on bitcointalk.
They mentioned they are going to produce a mvp maybe they are working on that, os going to require time to get it ready
Indeed they have hired a community manager but is beyond my comprehension why he is just active in telegram while actually all the active discussions are basically happening in here.
I would say it is a pretty tough job to take care of a huge Telegram group. So he is probably busy managing everything there. It could make sense to hire a second community manager, whos task is only to answer questions here in the forum and discuss with us here.
They should definitely. Just Telegram is not enough in my eyes. There are a lot of people who don't use Telegram or at least not regularely.
A professional and well thought project like Ehealth shouldn't avoid these types of expenses and hire a second community manager i think.
They make all important announcements here, all major project-related questions were covered in the beginning of the topic, they have videos coming out on Youtube on a regular basis, I think they are doing enough in this department. Answering the same questions over and over again doesn't improve the quality of the project, in my opinion.
a lot of attention is also needed, the hartcap is probably quite high. so 100 millionen?
Jump to: