Author

Topic: [ANN][ICO] EHF eHealth First - page 208. (Read 97846 times)

newbie
Activity: 238
Merit: 0
April 23, 2018, 10:40:30 AM
Yes i also think that the sucess of the ehf ico depend of the visbility and the marketing of the project. A lot of sucessfull ico was a sucess because of a good management of the communication and marketing by the team. I think ehf team handle the hype well, it will now depend of the future developpement.

I'm quite curios to see the mvp they will come up with. Plus i hope they will have more blockchain convention they plan to participate, to promote the project.

There will be some event in Russia in a couple of days that eHealth will participate in, so they are being quite active. This is now the best time for promotion, because the token sale starts in a couple of weeks. Also, they must have a lot of work in order to finish an MVP before the ICO.

that's great, but they should be active here as well, answering questions.
I agree marketing is many times the key of the success. We have seen many times how the best product doesn't win due to a good marketing campaign of the competition.

Marketing without a good product for sure will be hard to do but yes there are facts that such thing can happen. In the long term, good product will win instead. As I do believe with ehealth project.
member
Activity: 266
Merit: 10
Presale is live!
April 23, 2018, 10:32:22 AM
Yes i also think that the sucess of the ehf ico depend of the visbility and the marketing of the project. A lot of sucessfull ico was a sucess because of a good management of the communication and marketing by the team. I think ehf team handle the hype well, it will now depend of the future developpement.

I'm quite curios to see the mvp they will come up with. Plus i hope they will have more blockchain convention they plan to participate, to promote the project.

There will be some event in Russia in a couple of days that eHealth will participate in, so they are being quite active. This is now the best time for promotion, because the token sale starts in a couple of weeks. Also, they must have a lot of work in order to finish an MVP before the ICO.

that's great, but they should be active here as well, answering questions.
I agree marketing is many times the key of the success. We have seen many times how the best product doesn't win due to a good marketing campaign of the competition.
sr. member
Activity: 980
Merit: 276
$CYBERCASH METAVERSE
April 23, 2018, 07:08:02 AM
Whether or not the team here has a lack of communicating with the community, I'm still supporting them because the idea is good. Any time there is the ability to make forward progress in healthcare, I'm all for it. Hopefully all this disruption in the healthcare industry will trickle down into America where the system is so focused on their greedy bottom line that they dont give a shit about the people that they are supposed to be helping.

I am not happy with the lack of communication here but at least they are active in telegram.

Also i believe they can add lots of things to health industry so i can live with they are not active in here.
member
Activity: 434
Merit: 10
April 23, 2018, 06:49:15 AM
Yes i also think that the sucess of the ehf ico depend of the visbility and the marketing of the project. A lot of sucessfull ico was a sucess because of a good management of the communication and marketing by the team. I think ehf team handle the hype well, it will now depend of the future developpement.

I'm quite curios to see the mvp they will come up with. Plus i hope they will have more blockchain convention they plan to participate, to promote the project.

There will be some event in Russia in a couple of days that eHealth will participate in, so they are being quite active. This is now the best time for promotion, because the token sale starts in a couple of weeks. Also, they must have a lot of work in order to finish an MVP before the ICO.

that's great, but they should be active here as well, answering questions.
full member
Activity: 798
Merit: 115
April 23, 2018, 06:35:30 AM
Yes i also think that the sucess of the ehf ico depend of the visbility and the marketing of the project. A lot of sucessfull ico was a sucess because of a good management of the communication and marketing by the team. I think ehf team handle the hype well, it will now depend of the future developpement.

I'm quite curios to see the mvp they will come up with. Plus i hope they will have more blockchain convention they plan to participate, to promote the project.

There will be some event in Russia in a couple of days that eHealth will participate in, so they are being quite active. This is now the best time for promotion, because the token sale starts in a couple of weeks. Also, they must have a lot of work in order to finish an MVP before the ICO.
sr. member
Activity: 1134
Merit: 279
My blockchain can beat up your blockchain
April 23, 2018, 06:31:44 AM
Whether or not the team here has a lack of communicating with the community, I'm still supporting them because the idea is good. Any time there is the ability to make forward progress in healthcare, I'm all for it. Hopefully all this disruption in the healthcare industry will trickle down into America where the system is so focused on their greedy bottom line that they dont give a shit about the people that they are supposed to be helping.
member
Activity: 476
Merit: 10
April 23, 2018, 06:08:48 AM
The pictures in the opening post are still missing... It would be nice if the team could arrange a reupload.

Yeah, you are right.

It can cause a bad first impression for possible investors.

I agree. They should fix this asap because it would give a wrong impression. The team is quite active but maybe overworked.
sr. member
Activity: 980
Merit: 276
$CYBERCASH METAVERSE
April 23, 2018, 05:36:23 AM
The pictures in the opening post are still missing... It would be nice if the team could arrange a reupload.

Yeah, you are right.

It can cause a bad first impression for possible investors.
full member
Activity: 336
Merit: 112
April 23, 2018, 05:22:15 AM
The pictures in the opening post are still missing... It would be nice if the team could arrange a reupload.
jr. member
Activity: 182
Merit: 1
April 23, 2018, 05:06:33 AM
a lot of attention is also needed, the hartcap is probably quite high. so 100 millionen?

yes but unsold tokens will be burned. so its reasonable to set a high hardcap, so you have a lot of tokens (which will be created on coin creation, irreversebly) for investors and raising the coinvalue by burning the unsold tokens.

That's actually a very good point, I never thought about it in this way. But on the other hand, hardcaps shouldn't be too high, because then they simply seem unrealistic and discourage investors from investing.

$ 100 million is a lot but in December almost any whitepaper could achieve that. given the scope and the long roadmap $100 million does not sound so unrealistic.

I am not sure about it.

If it was a security and giving out dividends it may reach but for a utility, 100m is a hard target to reach.

I agree, 100 mil is too high, but then again as long as the project continues it doesn't matter to me if it's achieved.

I hope they have working scenarios for cases when they collect less than hardcap, because 100 mil is a huge amount of money and in current market conditions I'm being rather skeptic of them being able to raise that much.

There is actually a lot of time to go till the end of the ico, plus they could find some big investor which see the value of the project, 100 mil is very hard but not impossible.

100 mil is certainly on the higher end of the spectrum and only if there's a huge bull market it could be achieved but who knows.

I don't see any ICO raise 100M again in the near future. But eHealth also doesn't need that much money. The primary goal should be to reach the softcap, which I think will be achieved easily. Then we will see.

yeah the softcap will be easy, i think. its kind of hard to really trust crypto at the moment. and many people are scared off. but i think there are still some investers which will make good use of the current market situation, so not everything is forsaken.
member
Activity: 546
Merit: 12
April 23, 2018, 05:03:52 AM
a lot of attention is also needed, the hartcap is probably quite high. so 100 millionen?

yes but unsold tokens will be burned. so its reasonable to set a high hardcap, so you have a lot of tokens (which will be created on coin creation, irreversebly) for investors and raising the coinvalue by burning the unsold tokens.

That's actually a very good point, I never thought about it in this way. But on the other hand, hardcaps shouldn't be too high, because then they simply seem unrealistic and discourage investors from investing.

$ 100 million is a lot but in December almost any whitepaper could achieve that. given the scope and the long roadmap $100 million does not sound so unrealistic.

I am not sure about it.

If it was a security and giving out dividends it may reach but for a utility, 100m is a hard target to reach.

I agree, 100 mil is too high, but then again as long as the project continues it doesn't matter to me if it's achieved.

I hope they have working scenarios for cases when they collect less than hardcap, because 100 mil is a huge amount of money and in current market conditions I'm being rather skeptic of them being able to raise that much.

There is actually a lot of time to go till the end of the ico, plus they could find some big investor which see the value of the project, 100 mil is very hard but not impossible.

100 mil is certainly on the higher end of the spectrum and only if there's a huge bull market it could be achieved but who knows.

I don't see any ICO raise 100M again in the near future. But eHealth also doesn't need that much money. The primary goal should be to reach the softcap, which I think will be achieved easily. Then we will see.
member
Activity: 476
Merit: 10
April 23, 2018, 03:47:24 AM
a lot of attention is also needed, the hartcap is probably quite high. so 100 millionen?

yes but unsold tokens will be burned. so its reasonable to set a high hardcap, so you have a lot of tokens (which will be created on coin creation, irreversebly) for investors and raising the coinvalue by burning the unsold tokens.

That's actually a very good point, I never thought about it in this way. But on the other hand, hardcaps shouldn't be too high, because then they simply seem unrealistic and discourage investors from investing.

$ 100 million is a lot but in December almost any whitepaper could achieve that. given the scope and the long roadmap $100 million does not sound so unrealistic.

I am not sure about it.

If it was a security and giving out dividends it may reach but for a utility, 100m is a hard target to reach.

I agree, 100 mil is too high, but then again as long as the project continues it doesn't matter to me if it's achieved.

I hope they have working scenarios for cases when they collect less than hardcap, because 100 mil is a huge amount of money and in current market conditions I'm being rather skeptic of them being able to raise that much.

There is actually a lot of time to go till the end of the ico, plus they could find some big investor which see the value of the project, 100 mil is very hard but not impossible.

100 mil is certainly on the higher end of the spectrum and only if there's a huge bull market it could be achieved but who knows.
hero member
Activity: 784
Merit: 1416
April 23, 2018, 03:42:15 AM
a lot of attention is also needed, the hartcap is probably quite high. so 100 millionen?

yes but unsold tokens will be burned. so its reasonable to set a high hardcap, so you have a lot of tokens (which will be created on coin creation, irreversebly) for investors and raising the coinvalue by burning the unsold tokens.

That's actually a very good point, I never thought about it in this way. But on the other hand, hardcaps shouldn't be too high, because then they simply seem unrealistic and discourage investors from investing.

$ 100 million is a lot but in December almost any whitepaper could achieve that. given the scope and the long roadmap $100 million does not sound so unrealistic.

I am not sure about it.

If it was a security and giving out dividends it may reach but for a utility, 100m is a hard target to reach.

I agree, 100 mil is too high, but then again as long as the project continues it doesn't matter to me if it's achieved.

I hope they have working scenarios for cases when they collect less than hardcap, because 100 mil is a huge amount of money and in current market conditions I'm being rather skeptic of them being able to raise that much.

There is actually a lot of time to go till the end of the ico, plus they could find some big investor which see the value of the project, 100 mil is very hard but not impossible.
sr. member
Activity: 672
Merit: 261
April 23, 2018, 03:25:43 AM
a lot of attention is also needed, the hartcap is probably quite high. so 100 millionen?

yes but unsold tokens will be burned. so its reasonable to set a high hardcap, so you have a lot of tokens (which will be created on coin creation, irreversebly) for investors and raising the coinvalue by burning the unsold tokens.

That's actually a very good point, I never thought about it in this way. But on the other hand, hardcaps shouldn't be too high, because then they simply seem unrealistic and discourage investors from investing.

$ 100 million is a lot but in December almost any whitepaper could achieve that. given the scope and the long roadmap $100 million does not sound so unrealistic.

I am not sure about it.

If it was a security and giving out dividends it may reach but for a utility, 100m is a hard target to reach.

I agree, 100 mil is too high, but then again as long as the project continues it doesn't matter to me if it's achieved.

I hope they have working scenarios for cases when they collect less than hardcap, because 100 mil is a huge amount of money and in current market conditions I'm being rather skeptic of them being able to raise that much.

How can you say its high, What if the project need that much for progress.
full member
Activity: 798
Merit: 115
April 23, 2018, 03:15:18 AM
a lot of attention is also needed, the hartcap is probably quite high. so 100 millionen?

yes but unsold tokens will be burned. so its reasonable to set a high hardcap, so you have a lot of tokens (which will be created on coin creation, irreversebly) for investors and raising the coinvalue by burning the unsold tokens.

That's actually a very good point, I never thought about it in this way. But on the other hand, hardcaps shouldn't be too high, because then they simply seem unrealistic and discourage investors from investing.

$ 100 million is a lot but in December almost any whitepaper could achieve that. given the scope and the long roadmap $100 million does not sound so unrealistic.

I am not sure about it.

If it was a security and giving out dividends it may reach but for a utility, 100m is a hard target to reach.

I agree, 100 mil is too high, but then again as long as the project continues it doesn't matter to me if it's achieved.

I hope they have working scenarios for cases when they collect less than hardcap, because 100 mil is a huge amount of money and in current market conditions I'm being rather skeptic of them being able to raise that much.
member
Activity: 434
Merit: 10
April 23, 2018, 02:26:44 AM
Yes the team seems to be really busy right now, maybe it’s normal cause there is a lot of things to develop and I don’t now if they have the time to change the bitcointalk. Also the roadmap is on very long term, maybe it’s realistic for a health care project , so they have time to change and work more on bitcointalk.
I think the main reason is the preparation for pre-sales. Before the start of sales remains very little.

Let them work the most important thing is that they make a good working project. Marketing etc will come later. Better to create marketing when you have a good project and good product.

I agree, I guess investors now often prefer ICO's with a MVP or at least a demo version but it also depends on the teams efforts to set up a successful ICO.
A successful project will depend on many things including good teamwork and something that can be used as a reference like demo version. Ehealth should be able to combine all the good stuffs therefore they will have a chance to bring the platform work as expected.


When it started it seems to me like Ehealth was just a one man project, but slowly the team and partner grew, but I still have the impression of lack in marketing and community management.

EHF has always had people working on it, but it's a long term project so it's natural to have the team develop over time.
sr. member
Activity: 672
Merit: 261
April 23, 2018, 01:33:06 AM
Yes the team seems to be really busy right now, maybe it’s normal cause there is a lot of things to develop and I don’t now if they have the time to change the bitcointalk. Also the roadmap is on very long term, maybe it’s realistic for a health care project , so they have time to change and work more on bitcointalk.
I think the main reason is the preparation for pre-sales. Before the start of sales remains very little.

Let them work the most important thing is that they make a good working project. Marketing etc will come later. Better to create marketing when you have a good project and good product.

I agree, I guess investors now often prefer ICO's with a MVP or at least a demo version but it also depends on the teams efforts to set up a successful ICO.
A successful project will depend on many things including good teamwork and something that can be used as a reference like demo version. Ehealth should be able to combine all the good stuffs therefore they will have a chance to bring the platform work as expected.


When it started it seems to me like Ehealth was just a one man project, but slowly the team and partner grew, but I still have the impression of lack in marketing and community management.
jr. member
Activity: 182
Merit: 1
April 23, 2018, 01:05:27 AM
Yes the team seems to be really busy right now, maybe it’s normal cause there is a lot of things to develop and I don’t now if they have the time to change the bitcointalk. Also the roadmap is on very long term, maybe it’s realistic for a health care project , so they have time to change and work more on bitcointalk.
I think the main reason is the preparation for pre-sales. Before the start of sales remains very little.

Let them work the most important thing is that they make a good working project. Marketing etc will come later. Better to create marketing when you have a good project and good product.

I agree, I guess investors now often prefer ICO's with a MVP or at least a demo version but it also depends on the teams efforts to set up a successful ICO.
A successful project will depend on many things including good teamwork and something that can be used as a reference like demo version. Ehealth should be able to combine all the good stuffs therefore they will have a chance to bring the platform work as expected.

Marketing and developement are 2 completly different things. Thats why usually a salesman is hired at some point. But that might be a bit expensive for this project.
Selling a project only on the base of its developement is hard but I'm sure the team can handle that. There are already many publications and interviews.
sr. member
Activity: 1022
Merit: 252
April 23, 2018, 12:28:06 AM
Yes the team seems to be really busy right now, maybe it’s normal cause there is a lot of things to develop and I don’t now if they have the time to change the bitcointalk. Also the roadmap is on very long term, maybe it’s realistic for a health care project , so they have time to change and work more on bitcointalk.
I think the main reason is the preparation for pre-sales. Before the start of sales remains very little.

Let them work the most important thing is that they make a good working project. Marketing etc will come later. Better to create marketing when you have a good project and good product.

I agree, I guess investors now often prefer ICO's with a MVP or at least a demo version but it also depends on the teams efforts to set up a successful ICO.
A successful project will depend on many things including good teamwork and something that can be used as a reference like demo version. Ehealth should be able to combine all the good stuffs therefore they will have a chance to bring the platform work as expected.
hero member
Activity: 784
Merit: 1416
April 22, 2018, 10:08:39 PM
Yes i also think that the sucess of the ehf ico depend of the visbility and the marketing of the project. A lot of sucessfull ico was a sucess because of a good management of the communication and marketing by the team. I think ehf team handle the hype well, it will now depend of the future developpement.

I'm quite curios to see the mvp they will come up with. Plus i hope they will have more blockchain convention they plan to participate, to promote the project.
Jump to: