Topic: [ANN][ICO] EHF eHealth First - page 330. (Read 97848 times)

Quote from: omwibya on March 01, 2018, 01:54:14 PM

eHealth First was evaluated by Icobench platform, 4.6 excellent rating!
https://icobench.com/ico/ehealth-first

4.6 is good rating. Also ehealth is the best project until now in health area as far as i see.

This rating actually doesn't say anything and is imo completely useless as it's just the bot rating, not a single expert has given his score.

As far as i know arent there some certain rules about grading the project? Or some standard?

Regarding the evaluations, they have Time review, as informed in their Telegran, the ratings are based on analysis of past projects with Team participation, project competitors and their development, Team support, not only the Bot evaluates, everything goes by a Human Review. And many sites monetize human assessments

I wouldn't count on these ratings. they're just a tool but not the end all be all for an investment.

From the research I have done on the project, it seems to me one of the best health projects.
I do not say that evaluations on icobench, foundico, or other sites are not good.
But I prefer to do research myself and not to trust 100% in the evaluations on the sites.

You are right about this it's always recommendable to do your own due diligence. There is always a chance that these rating pages are paid to write good reviews.

tudor_simion

member

Activity: 349

Merit: 12

Quote from: belechau on March 01, 2018, 01:30:20 PM

Quote from: belechau on March 01, 2018, 01:30:20 PM

eHealth First was evaluated by Icobench platform, 4.6 excellent rating!
https://icobench.com/ico/ehealth-first

4.6 is good rating. Also ehealth is the best project until now in health area as far as i see.

This rating actually doesn't say anything and is imo completely useless as it's just the bot rating, not a single expert has given his score.

As far as i know arent there some certain rules about grading the project? Or some standard?

Regarding the evaluations, they have Time review, as informed in their Telegran, the ratings are based on analysis of past projects with Team participation, project competitors and their development, Team support, not only the Bot evaluates, everything goes by a Human Review. And many sites monetize human assessments

I wouldn't count on these ratings. they're just a tool but not the end all be all for an investment.

From the research I have done on the project, it seems to me one of the best health projects.
I do not say that evaluations on icobench, foundico, or other sites are not good.
But I prefer to do research myself and not to trust 100% in the evaluations on the sites.

omwibya

member

Activity: 434

Merit: 10

eHealth First was evaluated by Icobench platform, 4.6 excellent rating!
https://icobench.com/ico/ehealth-first

4.6 is good rating. Also ehealth is the best project until now in health area as far as i see.

This rating actually doesn't say anything and is imo completely useless as it's just the bot rating, not a single expert has given his score.

As far as i know arent there some certain rules about grading the project? Or some standard?

Regarding the evaluations, they have Time review, as informed in their Telegran, the ratings are based on analysis of past projects with Team participation, project competitors and their development, Team support, not only the Bot evaluates, everything goes by a Human Review. And many sites monetize human assessments

I wouldn't count on these ratings. they're just a tool but not the end all be all for an investment.

belechau

full member

Activity: 686

Merit: 100

eHealth First was evaluated by Icobench platform, 4.6 excellent rating!
https://icobench.com/ico/ehealth-first

4.6 is good rating. Also ehealth is the best project until now in health area as far as i see.

This rating actually doesn't say anything and is imo completely useless as it's just the bot rating, not a single expert has given his score.

As far as i know arent there some certain rules about grading the project? Or some standard?

Regarding the evaluations, they have Time review, as informed in their Telegran, the ratings are based on analysis of past projects with Team participation, project competitors and their development, Team support, not only the Bot evaluates, everything goes by a Human Review. And many sites monetize human assessments

zgrdyg

full member

Activity: 602

Merit: 105

eHealth First was evaluated by Icobench platform, 4.6 excellent rating!
https://icobench.com/ico/ehealth-first

4.6 is good rating. Also ehealth is the best project until now in health area as far as i see.

This rating actually doesn't say anything and is imo completely useless as it's just the bot rating, not a single expert has given his score.

As far as i know arent there some certain rules about grading the project? Or some standard?

Jay2408

full member

Activity: 518

Merit: 101

🚀🚀 ATHERO.IO 🚀🚀

eHealth First was evaluated by Icobench platform, 4.6 excellent rating!
https://icobench.com/ico/ehealth-first

4.6 is good rating. Also ehealth is the best project until now in health area as far as i see.

This rating actually doesn't say anything and is imo completely useless as it's just the bot rating, not a single expert has given his score.

zgrdyg

full member

Activity: 602

Merit: 105

Quote from: lobat999 on March 01, 2018, 09:01:05 AM

eHealth First was evaluated by Icobench platform, 4.6 excellent rating!
https://icobench.com/ico/ehealth-first

4.6 is good rating. Also ehealth is the best project until now in health area as far as i see.

ParRus

full member

Activity: 490

Merit: 104

eHealth First was evaluated by Icobench platform, 4.6 excellent rating!
https://icobench.com/ico/ehealth-first

bitcoin-shark

hero member

Activity: 2968

Merit: 605

Quote from: nhungtruong379 on March 01, 2018, 08:30:37 AM

The project is developing and implementing an innovative IT platform for screening and optimal algorithms for maintaining health and diagnosing, treating and preventing various diseases and conditions. A project which is unique. Great job Devs.

Yeah, This is one of the best humane blockchain project that I've ever encountered. I hope there will be more projects like this that uplifts human lives.

yes, the project is one of the best I've ever seen on the blockchain it will help mankind to be healthier, i hope it will lead the way and many other similar projects will be made...

CryptoCutie

full member

Activity: 238

Merit: 131

yes medium is a great Blog for a Project how EHF.

sambuki

newbie

Activity: 238

Merit: 0

Quote from: Genesis07 on March 01, 2018, 09:53:44 AM

Quote from: Frickeladm on March 01, 2018, 09:11:26 AM

Quote from: jonnytracker on March 01, 2018, 04:17:24 AM

Quote from: premium_domainer on March 01, 2018, 04:10:12 AM

Quote from: jonnytracker on March 01, 2018, 02:37:16 AM

With so many competitions the one with the motto, Healthcare for everyone both rich and poor will win the competition.

I think competition is always beneficial. It drive companies forward.

Also, i checked all the similar projects and ehealth first really looks better than others.

Can you name some names I only know Medichain.

There are many, you can find some of them here:
https://www.trackico.io/category/health-medicine/1/

thats quite some competition. but i did not hear anything from the other projects yet instead of EHF

same, i guess the other companies are still working on their whitepaper

/hehe

Competition is good for galvanizing a project. They should be competing to provide the best for their respective projects. The one which able to satisfy their users will be able survive.

king_of_alts

member

Activity: 476

Merit: 10

Quote from: Genesis07 on March 01, 2018, 09:53:44 AM

Quote from: Frickeladm on March 01, 2018, 09:11:26 AM

Quote from: jonnytracker on March 01, 2018, 04:17:24 AM

Quote from: premium_domainer on March 01, 2018, 04:10:12 AM

Quote from: jonnytracker on March 01, 2018, 02:37:16 AM

With so many competitions the one with the motto, Healthcare for everyone both rich and poor will win the competition.

I think competition is always beneficial. It drive companies forward.

Also, i checked all the similar projects and ehealth first really looks better than others.

Can you name some names I only know Medichain.

There are many, you can find some of them here:
https://www.trackico.io/category/health-medicine/1/

thats quite some competition. but i did not hear anything from the other projects yet instead of EHF

same, i guess the other companies are still working on their whitepaper

/hehe

Many of them focus on a specific niche while eHealth is really ambitious and follows a more general approach. There will be tons of use cases for eHealth according to the WP.

Genesis07

member

Activity: 252

Merit: 10

Quote from: Frickeladm on March 01, 2018, 09:11:26 AM

Quote from: jonnytracker on March 01, 2018, 04:17:24 AM

Quote from: premium_domainer on March 01, 2018, 04:10:12 AM

Quote from: jonnytracker on March 01, 2018, 02:37:16 AM

With so many competitions the one with the motto, Healthcare for everyone both rich and poor will win the competition.

I think competition is always beneficial. It drive companies forward.

Also, i checked all the similar projects and ehealth first really looks better than others.

Can you name some names I only know Medichain.

There are many, you can find some of them here:
https://www.trackico.io/category/health-medicine/1/

thats quite some competition. but i did not hear anything from the other projects yet instead of EHF

same, i guess the other companies are still working on their whitepaper

/hehe

Frickeladm

jr. member

Activity: 182

Merit: 1