Topic: [ANN][ICO] GENESIS - Investment in Real Estate - page 41. (Read 27518 times)
The team will buy property for resale or renting?
Will it be possible for investors to purchase real estate from the project?
Quote
Experts will select for investment residential and commercial real estate?
If experts select different types of real estate, which one will be preferred: residential or commercial?
Commercial real estate brings a profit several times more. Therefore, it makes sense to work only with it
If experts select different types of real estate, which one will be preferred: residential or commercial?
Commercial real estate brings a profit several times more. Therefore, it makes sense to work only with it
What other type of real estate is possible for the project?
The fact that real estate will be bought in Europe is understandable to me. But in Europe, different prices. You did some kind of analytics where it is more profitable to buy real estate?
Experts will select for investment residential and commercial real estate?
If experts select different types of real estate, which one will be preferred: residential or commercial?
Commercial real estate brings a profit several times more. Therefore, it makes sense to work only with it
Experts will select for investment residential and commercial real estate?
They will work only with commersial real estate. It is more profitable.
If it is a really good project I think you shouldn't have too many problems to convince a large exchange to list you as they can also see the potential. At least that is how it should be. And bad projects shouldn't be able to afford the fee or get listed anyway.
I know some good project for which the listing for Binance is not available. At the same time, let me recall the BitConnect.
How is this explained?
The assumption "I think you shouldn't have too many problems to convince a large exchange to list you as they can also see the potential. At least that is how it should be. And bad projects shouldn't be able to afford the fee or get listed anyway." is incorrect. I gave an example of possible situations that show the opposite of this assumption.
There are always exceptions to the rule, but in general that is how it is supposed to work. There are a few other factors that play a role though, too.
Of course, but the rules in crypto quickly change. Since the beginning of the year, the market has been falling two months. Many good projects did not raise enough funds for their development. ICOs was postponed, stretched, but this did not help much. Thus, in order to survive, they are compelled to save money. Listing on big exchanges 5-20 BTC.
I hope this situation is already changing.
Not to depend from cryptocurrency market there is an internal exchanger. The price of tokens is in euro.
Seems to be a reliable project... The fact that the contacts are presented makes it even more truthworthy.
Still, what is the geography of the project at the moment? What are the countries which support the project and are ready to deal with crypto?
Still, what is the geography of the project at the moment? What are the countries which support the project and are ready to deal with crypto?
The company is registered in Estonia and for the first time they will buy a real estate in Europe because the team has a big experience with real estate in Europe.
If it is a really good project I think you shouldn't have too many problems to convince a large exchange to list you as they can also see the potential. At least that is how it should be. And bad projects shouldn't be able to afford the fee or get listed anyway.
I know some good project for which the listing for Binance is not available. At the same time, let me recall the BitConnect.
How is this explained?
The assumption "I think you shouldn't have too many problems to convince a large exchange to list you as they can also see the potential. At least that is how it should be. And bad projects shouldn't be able to afford the fee or get listed anyway." is incorrect. I gave an example of possible situations that show the opposite of this assumption.
The team is very experience and I dont think that it will be problems with cryptocurrency exchanges, at list they have a licence for cryptocurrency exchanger.
Experts will select for investment residential and commercial real estate?
If experts select different types of real estate, which one will be preferred: residential or commercial?
Experts will select for investment residential and commercial real estate?
If it is a really good project I think you shouldn't have too many problems to convince a large exchange to list you as they can also see the potential. At least that is how it should be. And bad projects shouldn't be able to afford the fee or get listed anyway.
I know some good project for which the listing for Binance is not available. At the same time, let me recall the BitConnect.
How is this explained?
The assumption "I think you shouldn't have too many problems to convince a large exchange to list you as they can also see the potential. At least that is how it should be. And bad projects shouldn't be able to afford the fee or get listed anyway." is incorrect. I gave an example of possible situations that show the opposite of this assumption.
There are always exceptions to the rule, but in general that is how it is supposed to work. There are a few other factors that play a role though, too.
Of course, but the rules in crypto quickly change. Since the beginning of the year, the market has been falling two months. Many good projects did not raise enough funds for their development. ICOs was postponed, stretched, but this did not help much. Thus, in order to survive, they are compelled to save money. Listing on big exchanges 5-20 BTC.
I hope this situation is already changing.
The prices of crypto coins really declined. But no rules have changed.
GENESIS international real estate funds and a harmonious combination of classical investment methods in real estate with the possibilities of achieving the most progressive and modern digital economy
With this project, investing in real estate will become safe. And it's nice.
It seems to me that with the help of this project we will be able to invest not just in real estate but in good real estate. And this is very important
The real estate will be selected by specialists. Therefore, bad options will not come across.
Good project from genesis, i hope this project success and can get the hardcap. Make some innovation technology blockchain it becomes simple i think this great idea.
If it is a really good project I think you shouldn't have too many problems to convince a large exchange to list you as they can also see the potential. At least that is how it should be. And bad projects shouldn't be able to afford the fee or get listed anyway.
I know some good project for which the listing for Binance is not available. At the same time, let me recall the BitConnect.
How is this explained?
Why do good projects not need to go to the best exchanges? It's good for every project to be on there.
I think so too. A good exchange only benefits the coin. But you have to pay for it, of course)
GENESIS international real estate funds and a harmonious combination of classical investment methods in real estate with the possibilities of achieving the most progressive and modern digital economy
With this project, investing in real estate will become safe. And it's nice.
It seems to me that with the help of this project we will be able to invest not just in real estate but in good real estate. And this is very important
Seems to be a reliable project... The fact that the contacts are presented makes it even more truthworthy.
Still, what is the geography of the project at the moment? What are the countries which support the project and are ready to deal with crypto?
Still, what is the geography of the project at the moment? What are the countries which support the project and are ready to deal with crypto?
If it is a really good project I think you shouldn't have too many problems to convince a large exchange to list you as they can also see the potential. At least that is how it should be. And bad projects shouldn't be able to afford the fee or get listed anyway.
I know some good project for which the listing for Binance is not available. At the same time, let me recall the BitConnect.
How is this explained?
This may be explained by the fact that good projects do not need to go to the best exchanges.
Are you joking? Without big exchanges, where the main liquidity, the project price will not be supported. Investors and users will stop believing in the project, and it will not be able to develop.
Then the coin will be doomed to failure.
If it is a really good project I think you shouldn't have too many problems to convince a large exchange to list you as they can also see the potential. At least that is how it should be. And bad projects shouldn't be able to afford the fee or get listed anyway.
I know some good project for which the listing for Binance is not available. At the same time, let me recall the BitConnect.
How is this explained?
Why do good projects not need to go to the best exchanges? It's good for every project to be on there.
Totally disagree with you. The coin should be hung and then it will be for someone else. And the better the stock exchange means the more trades, then more investment. It's all connected
And there is. There are many investors and traders on a good stock exchange. It means that the coin will be quickly paid attention and its value will grow.
Jump to: