Topic: [ANN][ICO] LOCI Thinking Better. Together. - page 13. (Read 9620 times)
Here is an nterview of our CEO John Wise http://www.the-blockchain.com/2017/10/08/bryan-feinberg-loci-blockchain-patent-world-thinking-better-together/
I was disappointed to hear that your token sale was postponed.however I am still interested in LociPro. The more I read the more I am look forward to the launch. It is good to know that you will have a working product at launch. Will we will be able to look under the hood before the token sale? Try before buy kind of thing.
That is our goal for the product to be ready and people can try it before the crowdsale
Last night I went to InnVenn's website located at https://innvenn.com/welcome. I signed up for a free account and and did an actual patent search. The program is impressive although many of it's advanced features are not available with the free account.
Thanks for the link I just tried it. pretty cool
but why the striped down version
why not let us try the full version.
anyway
InnVenn's design was great the visual interface gives you a ton of info instantly
I am really impressed with its simplicity and effectiveness.
Hello everybody! It is true that the date of the LOCI ICO is postponed? It is a pity... 
I was really interesred in this project. Until what time, who knows?
I was really interesred in this project. Until what time, who knows?We will announe the new dates very soon
hey,hey,
look at there. we finally get an answer!
kind of, well, not really.
Hello everybody! It is true that the date of the LOCI ICO is postponed? It is a pity... I was really interesred in this project. Until what time, who knows?
I was really interesred in this project. Until what time, who knows?its true, Loci's ICO has been postponed.
The new launch date has not been announced.
Hello everybody! It is true that the date of the LOCI ICO is postponed? It is a pity... I was really interesred in this project. Until what time, who knows?
I was really interesred in this project. Until what time, who knows?We will announe the new dates very soon
I just read that there are Organized copyright and patent trolling operations, were
lawyers establish themselves as company’s instead of law firms so they can circumvent the law.
As a company they are able to purchase patents or copyrights solely for the purpose of suing.
it seems that Our system lends itself almost perfectly to this kind of action .
The laws that were set up to protect the inventor are being used against them by lawyers who’s only intent is extortion.
Can Inn Venn help to protect against this?
lawyers establish themselves as company’s instead of law firms so they can circumvent the law.
As a company they are able to purchase patents or copyrights solely for the purpose of suing.
it seems that Our system lends itself almost perfectly to this kind of action .
The laws that were set up to protect the inventor are being used against them by lawyers who’s only intent is extortion.
Can Inn Venn help to protect against this?
Hello everybody! It is true that the date of the LOCI ICO is postponed? It is a pity... I was really interesred in this project. Until what time, who knows?
I was really interesred in this project. Until what time, who knows? I was disappointed to hear that your token sale was postponed.however I am still interested in LociPro. The more I read the more I am look forward to the launch. It is good to know that you will have a working product at launch. Will we will be able to look under the hood before the token sale? Try before buy kind of thing.
That is our goal for the product to be ready and people can try it before the crowdsale
Last night I went to InnVenn's website located at https://innvenn.com/welcome. I signed up for a free account and and did an actual patent search. The program is impressive although many of it's advanced features are not available with the free account.
Thanks for the info, I am going there to try it now.
Is there a minimal amount to invest?
The USPTO offers a free search engine, what is wrong with it?
To answer your question I am going to use the words of the US patent office’s.
Below is the intro for the USPTO seven steep process to conduct a patent search using there system.
This is a Seven Step Strategy for conducting preliminary searches of U.S. patents and
PTRCs provide online access to the PatFT (Patents Full-Text and Image)
and AppFT (Applications Full-Text and Image) databases on the USPTO website
and the Espacenet Worldwide Database on the EPO website.
In addition, most PTRCs provide access to additional USPTO patent databases
available through PubWEST (Public version of the Web-based Examiners Search Tool)
and PubEAST (Public version of the Examiners Assisted Search Tool).
The USPTO has transitioned from 100 year old U.S. Patent Classification (USPC) system
to Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC),).
The USPTO currently only uses CPC for classifying new utility patent documents;
it will continue to use U.S. Patent Classification for classifying design and plant patents.
Let me tell you, it only gets more convoluted from there. Do you see the problem?
Yea that is a bit obnoxious.
What about Google didn’t they come out with a Patent Search Engine?
Yes, In 2006 Google took their book search engine
and set it loose within a patent database going back to 1790 for the US and 1978 for Europe.
Then they kept working on it, updating it, adding country after country.
They integrated Google Scholar and google Books, along with all kinds of tools.
Today it is the best FREE search engine out there,
and a complete waste of time
Why do you say that?
I can see its use for an initial search to see what exists in the field of your invention, but it is a huge investment of time.
The more you put in the farther you have to go.
Page after page, its Click, scroll, zoom, click, scroll, zoom,
through drawings and technical jargon, until your mind is mush, eyes are glazed
and your finger is begging for a mouse with a ball on top.
After hours invested you feel like you missed something and you are less certain then when you began.
Have you tried Inn Venn?
No, I am waiting for their launch. I have read their White Page and seen their diagram. The page layout is exactly what I have wanted. The time saving alone makes is worth the cost to use.
They are also offering some other features that go beyond belief.
when I first read there White Page I thought "they cant do that,
no one can do that, it is years ahead of its time" .
However The more I read about what and how they are building,
the more I believe these guys are on to something.
Now, I eagerly await the applications release.
If the launch does not happen soon I will skip the coin offering and subscribe to their preexisting system.
They have addressed every issue I had with patent search engines and then some.
The USPTO offers a free search engine, what is wrong with it?
To answer your question I am going to use the words of the US patent office’s.
Below is the intro for the USPTO seven steep process to conduct a patent search using there system.
This is a Seven Step Strategy for conducting preliminary searches of U.S. patents and
PTRCs provide online access to the PatFT (Patents Full-Text and Image)
and AppFT (Applications Full-Text and Image) databases on the USPTO website
and the Espacenet Worldwide Database on the EPO website.
In addition, most PTRCs provide access to additional USPTO patent databases
available through PubWEST (Public version of the Web-based Examiners Search Tool)
and PubEAST (Public version of the Examiners Assisted Search Tool).
The USPTO has transitioned from 100 year old U.S. Patent Classification (USPC) system
to Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC),).
The USPTO currently only uses CPC for classifying new utility patent documents;
it will continue to use U.S. Patent Classification for classifying design and plant patents.
Let me tell you, it only gets more convoluted from there. Do you see the problem?
Yea that is a bit obnoxious.
What about Google didn’t they come out with a Patent Search Engine?
Yes, In 2006 Google took their book search engine
and set it loose within a patent database going back to 1790 for the US and 1978 for Europe.
Then they kept working on it, updating it, adding country after country.
They integrated Google Scholar and google Books, along with all kinds of tools.
Today it is the best FREE search engine out there,
and a complete waste of time
Why do you say that?
I can see its use for an initial search to see what exists in the field of your invention, but it is a huge investment of time.
The more you put in the farther you have to go.
Page after page, its Click, scroll, zoom, click, scroll, zoom,
through drawings and technical jargon, until your mind is mush, eyes are glazed
and your finger is begging for a mouse with a ball on top.
After hours invested you feel like you missed something and you are less certain then when you began.
Have you tried Inn Venn?
No, I am waiting for their launch. I have read their White Page and seen their diagram. The page layout is exactly what I have wanted. The time saving alone makes is worth the cost to use.
The USPTO offers a free search engine, what is wrong with it?
To answer your question I am going to use the words of the US patent office’s.
Below is the intro for the USPTO seven steep process to conduct a patent search using there system.
This is a Seven Step Strategy for conducting preliminary searches of U.S. patents and
PTRCs provide online access to the PatFT (Patents Full-Text and Image)
and AppFT (Applications Full-Text and Image) databases on the USPTO website
and the Espacenet Worldwide Database on the EPO website.
In addition, most PTRCs provide access to additional USPTO patent databases
available through PubWEST (Public version of the Web-based Examiners Search Tool)
and PubEAST (Public version of the Examiners Assisted Search Tool).
The USPTO has transitioned from 100 year old U.S. Patent Classification (USPC) system
to Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC),).
The USPTO currently only uses CPC for classifying new utility patent documents;
it will continue to use U.S. Patent Classification for classifying design and plant patents.
Let me tell you, it only gets more convoluted from there. Do you see the problem?
Yea that is a bit obnoxious.
What about Google didn’t they come out with a Patent Search Engine?
Yes, In 2006 Google took their book search engine
and set it loose within a patent database going back to 1790 for the US and 1978 for Europe.
Then they kept working on it, updating it, adding country after country.
They integrated Google Scholar and google Books, along with all kinds of tools.
Today it is the best FREE search engine out there,
and a complete waste of time
Why do you say that?
I can see its use for an initial search to see what exists in the field of your invention, but it is a huge investment of time.
The more you put in the farther you have to go.
Page after page, its Click, scroll, zoom, click, scroll, zoom,
through drawings and technical jargon, until your mind is mush, eyes are glazed
and your finger is begging for a mouse with a ball on top.
After hours invested you feel like you missed something and you are less certain then when you began.
Have you tried Inn Venn?
The USPTO offers a free search engine, what is wrong with it?
To answer your question I am going to use the words of the US patent office’s.
Below is the intro for the USPTO seven steep process to conduct a patent search using there system.
This is a Seven Step Strategy for conducting preliminary searches of U.S. patents and
PTRCs provide online access to the PatFT (Patents Full-Text and Image)
and AppFT (Applications Full-Text and Image) databases on the USPTO website
and the Espacenet Worldwide Database on the EPO website.
In addition, most PTRCs provide access to additional USPTO patent databases
available through PubWEST (Public version of the Web-based Examiners Search Tool)
and PubEAST (Public version of the Examiners Assisted Search Tool).
The USPTO has transitioned from 100 year old U.S. Patent Classification (USPC) system
to Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC),).
The USPTO currently only uses CPC for classifying new utility patent documents;
it will continue to use U.S. Patent Classification for classifying design and plant patents.
Let me tell you, it only gets more convoluted from there. Do you see the problem?
Yea that is a bit obnoxious.
What about Google didn’t they come out with a Patent Search Engine?
Yes, In 2006 Google took their book search engine
and set it loose within a patent database going back to 1790 for the US and 1978 for Europe.
Then they kept working on it, updating it, adding country after country.
They integrated Google Scholar and google Books, along with all kinds of tools.
Today it is the best FREE search engine out there,
and a complete waste of time
Why do you say that?
I can see its use for an initial search to see what exists in the field of your invention, but it is a huge investment of time.
The more you put in the farther you have to go.
Page after page, its Click, scroll, zoom, click, scroll, zoom,
through drawings and technical jargon, until your mind is mush, eyes are glazed
and your finger is begging for a mouse with a ball on top.
After hours invested you feel like you missed something and you are less certain then when you began.
The USPTO offers a free search engine, what is wrong with it?
To answer your question I am going to use the words of the US patent office’s.
Below is the intro for the USPTO seven steep process to conduct a patent search using there system.
This is a Seven Step Strategy for conducting preliminary searches of U.S. patents and
PTRCs provide online access to the PatFT (Patents Full-Text and Image)
and AppFT (Applications Full-Text and Image) databases on the USPTO website
and the Espacenet Worldwide Database on the EPO website.
In addition, most PTRCs provide access to additional USPTO patent databases
available through PubWEST (Public version of the Web-based Examiners Search Tool)
and PubEAST (Public version of the Examiners Assisted Search Tool).
The USPTO has transitioned from 100 year old U.S. Patent Classification (USPC) system
to Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC),).
The USPTO currently only uses CPC for classifying new utility patent documents;
it will continue to use U.S. Patent Classification for classifying design and plant patents.
Let me tell you, it only gets more convoluted from there. Do you see the problem?
Yea that is a bit obnoxious.
What about Google didn’t they come out with a Patent Search Engine?
Yes, In 2006 Google took their book search engine
and set it loose within a patent database going back to 1790 for the US and 1978 for Europe.
Then they kept working on it, updating it, adding country after country.
They integrated Google Scholar and google Books, along with all kinds of tools.
Today it is the best FREE search engine out there,
and a complete waste of time
Why do you say that?
The USPTO offers a free search engine, what is wrong with it?
To answer your question I am going to use the words of the US patent office’s.
Below is the intro for the USPTO seven steep process to conduct a patent search using there system.
This is a Seven Step Strategy for conducting preliminary searches of U.S. patents and
PTRCs provide online access to the PatFT (Patents Full-Text and Image)
and AppFT (Applications Full-Text and Image) databases on the USPTO website
and the Espacenet Worldwide Database on the EPO website.
In addition, most PTRCs provide access to additional USPTO patent databases
available through PubWEST (Public version of the Web-based Examiners Search Tool)
and PubEAST (Public version of the Examiners Assisted Search Tool).
The USPTO has transitioned from 100 year old U.S. Patent Classification (USPC) system
to Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC),).
The USPTO currently only uses CPC for classifying new utility patent documents;
it will continue to use U.S. Patent Classification for classifying design and plant patents.
Let me tell you, it only gets more convoluted from there. Do you see the problem?
Yea that is a bit obnoxious.
What about Google didn’t they come out with a Patent Search Engine?
Yes, In 2006 Google took their book search engine
and set it loose within a patent database going back to 1790 for the US and 1978 for Europe.
Then they kept working on it, updating it, adding country after country.
They integrated Google Scholar and google Books, along with all kinds of tools.
Today it is the best FREE search engine out there,
and a complete waste of time
The USPTO offers a free search engine, what is wrong with it?
To answer your question I am going to use the words of the US patent office’s.
Below is the intro for the USPTO seven steep process to conduct a patent search using there system.
This is a Seven Step Strategy for conducting preliminary searches of U.S. patents and
PTRCs provide online access to the PatFT (Patents Full-Text and Image)
and AppFT (Applications Full-Text and Image) databases on the USPTO website
and the Espacenet Worldwide Database on the EPO website.
In addition, most PTRCs provide access to additional USPTO patent databases
available through PubWEST (Public version of the Web-based Examiners Search Tool)
and PubEAST (Public version of the Examiners Assisted Search Tool).
The USPTO has transitioned from 100 year old U.S. Patent Classification (USPC) system
to Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC),).
The USPTO currently only uses CPC for classifying new utility patent documents;
it will continue to use U.S. Patent Classification for classifying design and plant patents.
Let me tell you, it only gets more convoluted from there. Do you see the problem?
Yea that is a bit obnoxious.
What about Google didn’t they come out with a Patent Search Engine?
The USPTO offers a free search engine, what is wrong with it?
To answer your question I am going to use the words of the US patent office’s.
Below is the intro for the USPTO seven steep process to conduct a patent search using there system.
This is a Seven Step Strategy for conducting preliminary searches of U.S. patents and
PTRCs provide online access to the PatFT (Patents Full-Text and Image)
and AppFT (Applications Full-Text and Image) databases on the USPTO website
and the Espacenet Worldwide Database on the EPO website.
In addition, most PTRCs provide access to additional USPTO patent databases
available through PubWEST (Public version of the Web-based Examiners Search Tool)
and PubEAST (Public version of the Examiners Assisted Search Tool).
The USPTO has transitioned from 100 year old U.S. Patent Classification (USPC) system
to Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC),).
The USPTO currently only uses CPC for classifying new utility patent documents;
it will continue to use U.S. Patent Classification for classifying design and plant patents.
Let me tell you, it only gets more convoluted from there. Do you see the problem?
i AM A NEWBIE AS FAR AS THIS CRYPTOCURRENCY BUSINESS GOES. BEING SOMEWHAT FAMILIAR WITH BASIC ECONOMICS, CAN ANYONE HELP ME WITH AN ANSWER TO MY VERY ELEMENTARY QUESTION, WHICH IS;
WHAT ARE THE MAIN DRIVERS OF BITCOIN PRICE?
WHAT ARE THE MAIN DRIVERS OF BITCOIN PRICE?
The biggest and perhaps most fundamental factor in bitcoin’s price – what gave a price at all, in fact, and what will continue to drive its growth and adoption – is its usefulness as a value-transfer network that can exist without the approval of any government or central authority. The second big driver of bitcoin’s value is an increasing interest among institutional investors and high net worth individuals. Government regulations are another important factor in bitcoin’s long-term price performance.
Below is a link to an interesting article about what drives the price of Bitcoin:
Bitcoin price drivers: what moves the long-term price of bitcoin?
http://www.breakingbitcoin.com/guides/bitcoin-price-drivers-what-moves-the-long-term-price-of-bitcoin/
To put it simply
usage in trade
money supply
price level
increasing price motivates users to become miners
and
Bitcoin is not a safe haven investment
The USPTO offers a free search engine, what is wrong with it?
i AM A NEWBIE AS FAR AS THIS CRYPTOCURRENCY BUSINESS GOES. BEING SOMEWHAT FAMILIAR WITH BASIC ECONOMICS, CAN ANYONE HELP ME WITH AN ANSWER TO MY VERY ELEMENTARY QUESTION, WHICH IS;
WHAT ARE THE MAIN DRIVERS OF BITCOIN PRICE?
WHAT ARE THE MAIN DRIVERS OF BITCOIN PRICE?
The biggest and perhaps most fundamental factor in bitcoin’s price – what gave a price at all, in fact, and what will continue to drive its growth and adoption – is its usefulness as a value-transfer network that can exist without the approval of any government or central authority. The second big driver of bitcoin’s value is an increasing interest among institutional investors and high net worth individuals. Government regulations are another important factor in bitcoin’s long-term price performance.
Below is a link to an interesting article about what drives the price of Bitcoin:
Bitcoin price drivers: what moves the long-term price of bitcoin?
http://www.breakingbitcoin.com/guides/bitcoin-price-drivers-what-moves-the-long-term-price-of-bitcoin/
Jump to: