Pages:
Author

Topic: 🌎【ANN】【ICO】🌎 LWF - First decentralized logistics platform - 🌎 - page 2. (Read 53154 times)

full member
Activity: 546
Merit: 111
FABA-BREAK THROUGH IN VENTURE CAPITAL MARKET
I created a new discord, LWFReboot. I am still a forger, not sure if anyone else is into this or might want to reboot the network. All are welcome.

https://discord.gg/n2yRaYw

Wallet: http://lwf.shabang.tech
Explorer: https://lwfexplorer.shabang.tech/

CoolCash



Why are you forging? The project is officially dead...
Or have they "sold" the project to someone who can continue with it (and I have missed the news)?

I already run some other nodes on severs, running a lwf node and forging doesn't really cost me any more. If Cryptopia comes back, I want a place for people to move their coins around if needed. Maybe someone wants to take it over. I am old school and actually think chains should exist if they are still working.

Coolcash

I understand. If it doesn't cost you anything it does make sense to forge and make the chain working. I actually still think that LWF is a good project and that the intentions were positive. Thus, I will continue to follow the LWF lifecycle and hopefully in the future it may rise again.
newbie
Activity: 30
Merit: 0
I created a new discord, LWFReboot. I am still a forger, not sure if anyone else is into this or might want to reboot the network. All are welcome.

https://discord.gg/n2yRaYw

Wallet: http://lwf.shabang.tech
Explorer: https://lwfexplorer.shabang.tech/

CoolCash



Why are you forging? The project is officially dead...
Or have they "sold" the project to someone who can continue with it (and I have missed the news)?

I already run some other nodes on severs, running a lwf node and forging doesn't really cost me any more. If Cryptopia comes back, I want a place for people to move their coins around if needed. Maybe someone wants to take it over. I am old school and actually think chains should exist if they are still working.

Coolcash
sr. member
Activity: 262
Merit: 250
I created a new discord, LWFReboot. I am still a forger, not sure if anyone else is into this or might want to reboot the network. All are welcome.

https://discord.gg/n2yRaYw

Wallet: http://lwf.shabang.tech
Explorer: https://lwfexplorer.shabang.tech/

CoolCash



Why are you forging? The project is officially dead...
Or have they "sold" the project to someone who can continue with it (and I have missed the news)?

delete
legendary
Activity: 1203
Merit: 1000
I created a new discord, LWFReboot. I am still a forger, not sure if anyone else is into this or might want to reboot the network. All are welcome.

https://discord.gg/n2yRaYw

Wallet: http://lwf.shabang.tech
Explorer: https://lwfexplorer.shabang.tech/

CoolCash



Why are you forging? The project is officially dead...
Or have they "sold" the project to someone who can continue with it (and I have missed the news)?

if some market awakening happens, probably someone will appear to try to wake up LWF project and take some money from there. I did not sell my bounty earnings from there, now with Cryptopia problem and no other exchange listed LWF, I can only to wait better time.
full member
Activity: 546
Merit: 111
FABA-BREAK THROUGH IN VENTURE CAPITAL MARKET
I created a new discord, LWFReboot. I am still a forger, not sure if anyone else is into this or might want to reboot the network. All are welcome.

https://discord.gg/n2yRaYw

Wallet: http://lwf.shabang.tech
Explorer: https://lwfexplorer.shabang.tech/

CoolCash



Why are you forging? The project is officially dead...
Or have they "sold" the project to someone who can continue with it (and I have missed the news)?
newbie
Activity: 30
Merit: 0
I created a new discord, LWFReboot. I am still a forger, not sure if anyone else is into this or might want to reboot the network. All are welcome.

https://discord.gg/n2yRaYw

Wallet: http://lwf.shabang.tech
Explorer: https://lwfexplorer.shabang.tech/

CoolCash

full member
Activity: 826
Merit: 103
So, what is the situation with this project? Is it definitely scam? Because there are not enough information about LWF. And if it really scam, it is very sad.
I myself do not know about that either, that the project is scam or not, but I hope the news is not true so let's see what happens later because until now there is no clarity
I had high hopes for this project in the beginning, but now I don't even know what to think . Possible impact of a bear market at all .

This is definitely the consequences of a bear market, but not only that, but also poor fund management.
The team was supposed to withdraw the required amount in fiat, for the development of the project. It was wrong to keep it in crypto, since crypto is a venture asset. They risked and lost.
copper member
Activity: 434
Merit: 2
So, what is the situation with this project? Is it definitely scam? Because there are not enough information about LWF. And if it really scam, it is very sad.
I myself do not know about that either, that the project is scam or not, but I hope the news is not true so let's see what happens later because until now there is no clarity
I had high hopes for this project in the beginning, but now I don't even know what to think . Possible impact of a bear market at all .
member
Activity: 476
Merit: 10
A Blockchain Mobile Operator With Token Rewards
So, what is the situation with this project? Is it definitely scam? Because there are not enough information about LWF. And if it really scam, it is very sad.
I myself do not know about that either, that the project is scam or not, but I hope the news is not true so let's see what happens later because until now there is no clarity
member
Activity: 476
Merit: 19
🚀🚀 ATHERO.IO 🚀🚀
So, what is the situation with this project? Is it definitely scam? Because there are not enough information about LWF. And if it really scam, it is very sad.
sr. member
Activity: 854
Merit: 257
Proof-of-Stake Blockchain Network
So any updates here or did Angelo just do a full on exit scam?
Although I have a certain amount of this coin. And i followed this project from the very beginning, and in my heart I have hope that it will have continuation, though it’s more like the second option: "full on exit scam".
Nothing yet.
hero member
Activity: 933
Merit: 500
So any updates here or did Angelo just do a full on exit scam?
member
Activity: 532
Merit: 13
Did they kill their discord?
I was not there, but if you were there, and it is not working now, then apparently it is. This is not surprising, after their latest news.
Very sorry. It was like a promising project. But because of the wrong management of funds, the project has an uncertain future.
hero member
Activity: 933
Merit: 500
Did they kill their discord?
sr. member
Activity: 854
Merit: 257
Proof-of-Stake Blockchain Network
Well, as I understood, we can only wait for the development of the situation. By the way, I think, that LWF will be tradable even after company will be bought.
The development of the situation? I wonder who will inform us, about the current status of the project? Probably, we will independently, to guess. And why do you think it will be tradable? Unfortunately, I strongly doubt it.
The future of the project is clearly stated in the official news of the project. There is a potential buyer and perhaps the project will be bought https://lwf.support/lwf-newsletter-12th-edition/

The question is, who gets the money if LWF will actually miraculously bought? It will not just stay in the firm for future projects and future costs of the company as that wouldn't make sense - it wouldn't be bought than.

Will just Angelo take the money and run? Most possibly. Most definitely... We all however know that investors should get that money as a "liquidation mass".

Afterwards, new management, new owner will not actually have any obligation towards the coinholders (legally or morally), as he bought the company and paid for it. And that means that he could form a private blockchain, revoke all the current tokens and nobody could do nothing.


You're right. Investors have already received, and this is the LWF Coin. And all we can do is hope, that it will have functionality in this ecosystem, if the ecosystem works.
And it seems to me that there are too many ifs here.

But this is exactly the problem with crypto and basically all the ICO's. Selling some coupons i.e. LWF coin for actual money. Don't you understand that this is why the regulator will never condone it in this form. There is no security for the investors. No guarantee.

It just doesn't make sense that the owner of the intellectual property are solely the developers, while we financed the project.
Investors themselves take such risks. They were not forced to invest in this project. While investors will not have more requirements for the project-such cases will occur constantly

Sure, you are right. Can't argue with that. Terms and conditions state that and nobody can complain.

However, this is due to the "evolution" of blockchain crowdfunding. I am just saying that it will not go on like this. Regulator won't let it and investors will see the shit behind it. The crypto hype allowed this and a lot of people had to burn themselves to proceed with the evolution. ICO in this form will however die in the next 2-3 years.
I do not think that investors will receive at least part of this money. This project is the intellectual property of its developers and they can sell it to anyone. And that will continue with the project from the new owner - not their problem
The regulator may not prohibit the ico. In addition, there are countries in which the ico is not limited. The controller may affect the exchange, but can not prohibit the ico to raise money. It's blockchain. Transactions cannot be blocked
You're the right guy, no one can ban this at an early stage of financing. We choose what we finance. This is a question of trust, to the developers.
Of course, it would be fair if the proceeds for the sale of the project were divided among holders. But this will not happen.

Say that to the Americans. Say that to Chinese. You can ban it easily...

And I am solely talking about raising funds. If you are raising funds and the investor obviously invested to earn money than you are practically always issuing security (token). Check the Howey test...

They may influence the founder of the company, but they cannot stop the fundraising. These are two different things. The founder of the company should not be a citizen of these countries and he will not have such problems

 Exactly. We are not talking about the legality of the project, it is clear, that the regulators have an influence here. But, No one can forbid making transactions on a block chain if the investor is interested and sees a perspectiv. People need to be careful, as regulators are not a panacea for all the bad things.
full member
Activity: 476
Merit: 101
”Decentralized Digital Billboards”
Well, as I understood, we can only wait for the development of the situation. By the way, I think, that LWF will be tradable even after company will be bought.
The development of the situation? I wonder who will inform us, about the current status of the project? Probably, we will independently, to guess. And why do you think it will be tradable? Unfortunately, I strongly doubt it.
The future of the project is clearly stated in the official news of the project. There is a potential buyer and perhaps the project will be bought https://lwf.support/lwf-newsletter-12th-edition/

The question is, who gets the money if LWF will actually miraculously bought? It will not just stay in the firm for future projects and future costs of the company as that wouldn't make sense - it wouldn't be bought than.

Will just Angelo take the money and run? Most possibly. Most definitely... We all however know that investors should get that money as a "liquidation mass".

Afterwards, new management, new owner will not actually have any obligation towards the coinholders (legally or morally), as he bought the company and paid for it. And that means that he could form a private blockchain, revoke all the current tokens and nobody could do nothing.


You're right. Investors have already received, and this is the LWF Coin. And all we can do is hope, that it will have functionality in this ecosystem, if the ecosystem works.
And it seems to me that there are too many ifs here.

But this is exactly the problem with crypto and basically all the ICO's. Selling some coupons i.e. LWF coin for actual money. Don't you understand that this is why the regulator will never condone it in this form. There is no security for the investors. No guarantee.

It just doesn't make sense that the owner of the intellectual property are solely the developers, while we financed the project.
Investors themselves take such risks. They were not forced to invest in this project. While investors will not have more requirements for the project-such cases will occur constantly

Sure, you are right. Can't argue with that. Terms and conditions state that and nobody can complain.

However, this is due to the "evolution" of blockchain crowdfunding. I am just saying that it will not go on like this. Regulator won't let it and investors will see the shit behind it. The crypto hype allowed this and a lot of people had to burn themselves to proceed with the evolution. ICO in this form will however die in the next 2-3 years.
I do not think that investors will receive at least part of this money. This project is the intellectual property of its developers and they can sell it to anyone. And that will continue with the project from the new owner - not their problem
The regulator may not prohibit the ico. In addition, there are countries in which the ico is not limited. The controller may affect the exchange, but can not prohibit the ico to raise money. It's blockchain. Transactions cannot be blocked
You're the right guy, no one can ban this at an early stage of financing. We choose what we finance. This is a question of trust, to the developers.
Of course, it would be fair if the proceeds for the sale of the project were divided among holders. But this will not happen.

Say that to the Americans. Say that to Chinese. You can ban it easily...

And I am solely talking about raising funds. If you are raising funds and the investor obviously invested to earn money than you are practically always issuing security (token). Check the Howey test...

They may influence the founder of the company, but they cannot stop the fundraising. These are two different things. The founder of the company should not be a citizen of these countries and he will not have such problems
full member
Activity: 546
Merit: 111
FABA-BREAK THROUGH IN VENTURE CAPITAL MARKET
Well, as I understood, we can only wait for the development of the situation. By the way, I think, that LWF will be tradable even after company will be bought.
The development of the situation? I wonder who will inform us, about the current status of the project? Probably, we will independently, to guess. And why do you think it will be tradable? Unfortunately, I strongly doubt it.
The future of the project is clearly stated in the official news of the project. There is a potential buyer and perhaps the project will be bought https://lwf.support/lwf-newsletter-12th-edition/

The question is, who gets the money if LWF will actually miraculously bought? It will not just stay in the firm for future projects and future costs of the company as that wouldn't make sense - it wouldn't be bought than.

Will just Angelo take the money and run? Most possibly. Most definitely... We all however know that investors should get that money as a "liquidation mass".

Afterwards, new management, new owner will not actually have any obligation towards the coinholders (legally or morally), as he bought the company and paid for it. And that means that he could form a private blockchain, revoke all the current tokens and nobody could do nothing.


You're right. Investors have already received, and this is the LWF Coin. And all we can do is hope, that it will have functionality in this ecosystem, if the ecosystem works.
And it seems to me that there are too many ifs here.

But this is exactly the problem with crypto and basically all the ICO's. Selling some coupons i.e. LWF coin for actual money. Don't you understand that this is why the regulator will never condone it in this form. There is no security for the investors. No guarantee.

It just doesn't make sense that the owner of the intellectual property are solely the developers, while we financed the project.
Investors themselves take such risks. They were not forced to invest in this project. While investors will not have more requirements for the project-such cases will occur constantly

Sure, you are right. Can't argue with that. Terms and conditions state that and nobody can complain.

However, this is due to the "evolution" of blockchain crowdfunding. I am just saying that it will not go on like this. Regulator won't let it and investors will see the shit behind it. The crypto hype allowed this and a lot of people had to burn themselves to proceed with the evolution. ICO in this form will however die in the next 2-3 years.
I do not think that investors will receive at least part of this money. This project is the intellectual property of its developers and they can sell it to anyone. And that will continue with the project from the new owner - not their problem
The regulator may not prohibit the ico. In addition, there are countries in which the ico is not limited. The controller may affect the exchange, but can not prohibit the ico to raise money. It's blockchain. Transactions cannot be blocked
You're the right guy, no one can ban this at an early stage of financing. We choose what we finance. This is a question of trust, to the developers.
Of course, it would be fair if the proceeds for the sale of the project were divided among holders. But this will not happen.

Say that to the Americans. Say that to Chinese. You can ban it easily...

And I am solely talking about raising funds. If you are raising funds and the investor obviously invested to earn money than you are practically always issuing security (token). Check the Howey test...
sr. member
Activity: 854
Merit: 257
Proof-of-Stake Blockchain Network
Well, as I understood, we can only wait for the development of the situation. By the way, I think, that LWF will be tradable even after company will be bought.
The development of the situation? I wonder who will inform us, about the current status of the project? Probably, we will independently, to guess. And why do you think it will be tradable? Unfortunately, I strongly doubt it.
The future of the project is clearly stated in the official news of the project. There is a potential buyer and perhaps the project will be bought https://lwf.support/lwf-newsletter-12th-edition/

The question is, who gets the money if LWF will actually miraculously bought? It will not just stay in the firm for future projects and future costs of the company as that wouldn't make sense - it wouldn't be bought than.

Will just Angelo take the money and run? Most possibly. Most definitely... We all however know that investors should get that money as a "liquidation mass".

Afterwards, new management, new owner will not actually have any obligation towards the coinholders (legally or morally), as he bought the company and paid for it. And that means that he could form a private blockchain, revoke all the current tokens and nobody could do nothing.


You're right. Investors have already received, and this is the LWF Coin. And all we can do is hope, that it will have functionality in this ecosystem, if the ecosystem works.
And it seems to me that there are too many ifs here.

But this is exactly the problem with crypto and basically all the ICO's. Selling some coupons i.e. LWF coin for actual money. Don't you understand that this is why the regulator will never condone it in this form. There is no security for the investors. No guarantee.

It just doesn't make sense that the owner of the intellectual property are solely the developers, while we financed the project.
Investors themselves take such risks. They were not forced to invest in this project. While investors will not have more requirements for the project-such cases will occur constantly

Sure, you are right. Can't argue with that. Terms and conditions state that and nobody can complain.

However, this is due to the "evolution" of blockchain crowdfunding. I am just saying that it will not go on like this. Regulator won't let it and investors will see the shit behind it. The crypto hype allowed this and a lot of people had to burn themselves to proceed with the evolution. ICO in this form will however die in the next 2-3 years.
I do not think that investors will receive at least part of this money. This project is the intellectual property of its developers and they can sell it to anyone. And that will continue with the project from the new owner - not their problem
The regulator may not prohibit the ico. In addition, there are countries in which the ico is not limited. The controller may affect the exchange, but can not prohibit the ico to raise money. It's blockchain. Transactions cannot be blocked
You're the right guy, no one can ban this at an early stage of financing. We choose what we finance. This is a question of trust, to the developers.
Of course, it would be fair if the proceeds for the sale of the project were divided among holders. But this will not happen.
full member
Activity: 476
Merit: 101
”Decentralized Digital Billboards”
Well, as I understood, we can only wait for the development of the situation. By the way, I think, that LWF will be tradable even after company will be bought.
The development of the situation? I wonder who will inform us, about the current status of the project? Probably, we will independently, to guess. And why do you think it will be tradable? Unfortunately, I strongly doubt it.
The future of the project is clearly stated in the official news of the project. There is a potential buyer and perhaps the project will be bought https://lwf.support/lwf-newsletter-12th-edition/

The question is, who gets the money if LWF will actually miraculously bought? It will not just stay in the firm for future projects and future costs of the company as that wouldn't make sense - it wouldn't be bought than.

Will just Angelo take the money and run? Most possibly. Most definitely... We all however know that investors should get that money as a "liquidation mass".

Afterwards, new management, new owner will not actually have any obligation towards the coinholders (legally or morally), as he bought the company and paid for it. And that means that he could form a private blockchain, revoke all the current tokens and nobody could do nothing.


You're right. Investors have already received, and this is the LWF Coin. And all we can do is hope, that it will have functionality in this ecosystem, if the ecosystem works.
And it seems to me that there are too many ifs here.

But this is exactly the problem with crypto and basically all the ICO's. Selling some coupons i.e. LWF coin for actual money. Don't you understand that this is why the regulator will never condone it in this form. There is no security for the investors. No guarantee.

It just doesn't make sense that the owner of the intellectual property are solely the developers, while we financed the project.
Investors themselves take such risks. They were not forced to invest in this project. While investors will not have more requirements for the project-such cases will occur constantly

Sure, you are right. Can't argue with that. Terms and conditions state that and nobody can complain.

However, this is due to the "evolution" of blockchain crowdfunding. I am just saying that it will not go on like this. Regulator won't let it and investors will see the shit behind it. The crypto hype allowed this and a lot of people had to burn themselves to proceed with the evolution. ICO in this form will however die in the next 2-3 years.
I do not think that investors will receive at least part of this money. This project is the intellectual property of its developers and they can sell it to anyone. And that will continue with the project from the new owner - not their problem
The regulator may not prohibit the ico. In addition, there are countries in which the ico is not limited. The controller may affect the exchange, but can not prohibit the ico to raise money. It's blockchain. Transactions cannot be blocked
full member
Activity: 546
Merit: 111
FABA-BREAK THROUGH IN VENTURE CAPITAL MARKET
Well, as I understood, we can only wait for the development of the situation. By the way, I think, that LWF will be tradable even after company will be bought.
The development of the situation? I wonder who will inform us, about the current status of the project? Probably, we will independently, to guess. And why do you think it will be tradable? Unfortunately, I strongly doubt it.
The future of the project is clearly stated in the official news of the project. There is a potential buyer and perhaps the project will be bought https://lwf.support/lwf-newsletter-12th-edition/

The question is, who gets the money if LWF will actually miraculously bought? It will not just stay in the firm for future projects and future costs of the company as that wouldn't make sense - it wouldn't be bought than.

Will just Angelo take the money and run? Most possibly. Most definitely... We all however know that investors should get that money as a "liquidation mass".

Afterwards, new management, new owner will not actually have any obligation towards the coinholders (legally or morally), as he bought the company and paid for it. And that means that he could form a private blockchain, revoke all the current tokens and nobody could do nothing.


You're right. Investors have already received, and this is the LWF Coin. And all we can do is hope, that it will have functionality in this ecosystem, if the ecosystem works.
And it seems to me that there are too many ifs here.

But this is exactly the problem with crypto and basically all the ICO's. Selling some coupons i.e. LWF coin for actual money. Don't you understand that this is why the regulator will never condone it in this form. There is no security for the investors. No guarantee.

It just doesn't make sense that the owner of the intellectual property are solely the developers, while we financed the project.
Investors themselves take such risks. They were not forced to invest in this project. While investors will not have more requirements for the project-such cases will occur constantly

Sure, you are right. Can't argue with that. Terms and conditions state that and nobody can complain.

However, this is due to the "evolution" of blockchain crowdfunding. I am just saying that it will not go on like this. Regulator won't let it and investors will see the shit behind it. The crypto hype allowed this and a lot of people had to burn themselves to proceed with the evolution. ICO in this form will however die in the next 2-3 years.
I do not think that investors will receive at least part of this money. This project is the intellectual property of its developers and they can sell it to anyone. And that will continue with the project from the new owner - not their problem
Pages:
Jump to: