Pages:
Author

Topic: [ANN][ICO] savedroid - BITCOIN SAVING MADE EASY! - page 50. (Read 55443 times)

legendary
Activity: 1652
Merit: 1007
i invest a lot in this project, still be patient until official news for exchange,, i hope in 5 june yassin talk with no more joke.

yes hopefully the next AMA no more bullshit (soon, soon .... sooooooooon .....)
and I hope Binance is a top 5 exchange, not OKEx

And then it is revealed that Savedroid is actually a scam, lol. Anyway, is Savedroid scheduled to be listed in any major crypto exchanges yet? I wonder if the exchanges will take Savedroid seriously after that stunt they pulled off.
full member
Activity: 546
Merit: 102
i invest a lot in this project, still be patient until official news for exchange,, i hope in 5 june yassin talk with no more joke.

yes hopefully the next AMA no more bullshit (soon, soon .... sooooooooon .....)
and I hope Binance is a top 5 exchange, not OKEx
full member
Activity: 966
Merit: 100
i invest a lot in this project, still be patient until official news for exchange,, i hope in 5 june yassin talk with no more joke.
newbie
Activity: 216
Merit: 0
Ok lets see this AMA, but FYI in this AMA Yassin will only talk shit, the word will be "No Exact date" "Soon" "We are working" Bla bla bla

I agree with you.

Stop creating shit telegram group, all your admin is only fake people with fake profile picture from google

No. This is not correct. They are real people.
newbie
Activity: 56
Merit: 0
I did not understand these voting requests for listing in certain exchanges, because the website is informing that it will be listed in 5 exchanges, I believe that this vote could be after the listing in those exchanges informed on the website
No one can announce about exchanges in advance, almost every time it is not the project's team decision, and i can assume that these 5 exchanges on the website are only tryings to manipulate investors and nothing more.

IDEX allready delete SVD
Hitbtc reject SVD
Bancor also reject SVD

Only Tidex still list, but they will remove SVD soon

No exchange will accept SCAMDROID

Lol, you are full of shit.

If idex delete it, because svd team asked for it. And hitbtc can list anything if you pay them.


They are waiting for bigger exchanges. Stop that nonsense.

Ok lets see this AMA, but FYI in this AMA Yassin will only talk shit, the word will be "No Exact date" "Soon" "We are working" Bla bla bla

SCAMDROID

Dear Community,

today we launch our official German Telegram Support Channel. The high experienced Admin Team will solve your Problems and Questions!
You can find the Telegram Groupe “savedroid Official German / Offizielle Deutsche Gruppe”

here: https://t.me/savedroid_de


Liebe Community,
seit heute gibt es einen offiziellen Deutschen Telegram Channel von savedroid. Das sehr erfahrene Administratorenteam hilft euch gerne bei Euren Fragen und Problemen.
Group Name: „ savedroid Official German / Offizielle Deutsche Gruppe“ offen!
Hier der Link zur Gruppe:

https://t.me/savedroid_de


Stop creating shit telegram group, all your admin is only fake people with fake profile picture from google

SCAMDROID
member
Activity: 202
Merit: 11
Dear Community,

today we launch our official German Telegram Support Channel. The high experienced Admin Team will solve your Problems and Questions!
You can find the Telegram Groupe “savedroid Official German / Offizielle Deutsche Gruppe”

here: https://t.me/savedroid_de


Liebe Community,
seit heute gibt es einen offiziellen Deutschen Telegram Channel von savedroid. Das sehr erfahrene Administratorenteam hilft euch gerne bei Euren Fragen und Problemen.
Group Name: „ savedroid Official German / Offizielle Deutsche Gruppe“ offen!
Hier der Link zur Gruppe:

https://t.me/savedroid_de
full member
Activity: 602
Merit: 101
Bcnex - The Ultimate Blockchain Trading Platform
I did not understand these voting requests for listing in certain exchanges, because the website is informing that it will be listed in 5 exchanges, I believe that this vote could be after the listing in those exchanges informed on the website
No one can announce about exchanges in advance, almost every time it is not the project's team decision, and i can assume that these 5 exchanges on the website are only tryings to manipulate investors and nothing more.

IDEX allready delete SVD
Hitbtc reject SVD
Bancor also reject SVD

Only Tidex still list, but they will remove SVD soon

No exchange will accept SCAMDROID

Lol, you are full of shit.

If idex delete it, because svd team asked for it. And hitbtc can list anything if you pay them.


They are waiting for bigger exchanges. Stop that nonsense.
full member
Activity: 266
Merit: 100
The Experience Layer of the Decentralized Internet
Before going to have next AMA session they should make sure listing on couple of good exchanges to save the time. I expect main focus of questioners will be again on when exchanges those from top 5. It is always accessible to take any token which claims to be legit to be listed on big exchanges under paid listing programs. 

In next AMA we will here same statement from AMA 2 weeks ago, all will ask about exchange and im sure yassin answer will same, wasting time
sr. member
Activity: 896
Merit: 251
Before going to have next AMA session they should make sure listing on couple of good exchanges to save the time. I expect main focus of questioners will be again on when exchanges those from top 5. It is always accessible to take any token which claims to be legit to be listed on big exchanges under paid listing programs. 
member
Activity: 1708
Merit: 13
KUWA.ai
I did not understand these voting requests for listing in certain exchanges, because the website is informing that it will be listed in 5 exchanges, I believe that this vote could be after the listing in those exchanges informed on the website
No one can announce about exchanges in advance, almost every time it is not the project's team decision, and i can assume that these 5 exchanges on the website are only tryings to manipulate investors and nothing more.

IDEX allready delete SVD
Hitbtc reject SVD
Bancor also reject SVD

Only Tidex still list, but they will remove SVD soon

No exchange will accept SCAMDROID

Where do you find this information ? Can you give us the link about your statement or screenshoot about this ? thank you
full member
Activity: 546
Merit: 102
hi dev i saw you online but you never respond people about when top 5 exchange will release at telegram
why you ignoring people asking about this exchange sir ?

wait for the next AMA on Tuesday next week June 5
in the AMA then they will tell you detailed update about BETA Launch and the Exchange Listing
full member
Activity: 530
Merit: 100
https://www.pax-coin.io/
hi dev i saw you online but you never respond people about when top 5 exchange will release at telegram
why you ignoring people asking about this exchange sir ?
newbie
Activity: 56
Merit: 0
I did not understand these voting requests for listing in certain exchanges, because the website is informing that it will be listed in 5 exchanges, I believe that this vote could be after the listing in those exchanges informed on the website
No one can announce about exchanges in advance, almost every time it is not the project's team decision, and i can assume that these 5 exchanges on the website are only tryings to manipulate investors and nothing more.

IDEX allready delete SVD
Hitbtc reject SVD
Bancor also reject SVD

Only Tidex still list, but they will remove SVD soon

No exchange will accept SCAMDROID
member
Activity: 574
Merit: 12
I did not understand these voting requests for listing in certain exchanges, because the website is informing that it will be listed in 5 exchanges, I believe that this vote could be after the listing in those exchanges informed on the website
No one can announce about exchanges in advance, almost every time it is not the project's team decision, and i can assume that these 5 exchanges on the website are only tryings to manipulate investors and nothing more.
sr. member
Activity: 1204
Merit: 252
I did not understand these voting requests for listing in certain exchanges, because the website is informing that it will be listed in 5 exchanges, I believe that this vote could be after the listing in those exchanges informed on the website
legendary
Activity: 1750
Merit: 1004
promising project. I think this project will be successful

Would you like to share your opinion which thing make you think like that it is promising project and it will be successful in future. Read posts above we need are good solution which decide the clear direction of this project and everything till now in shadows even devs also don't know how to make comeback.
newbie
Activity: 34
Merit: 0
promising project. I think this project will be successful
full member
Activity: 1288
Merit: 102
Just watching closely but nothing interesting even the efforts from dev team is not so impressive and doing good job to bring this project back into its real momentum where we was before finish of this ICO. Nobody knows what will happen to this instead of shouting scam.
newbie
Activity: 56
Merit: 0
I'm currently working on an article about ico's, and my intention was to implement the Guidelines SVD provided, now I think about if I should mention the project as a negative example -> Locked token = red flag. It makes me kinda mad cause I was a big supporter and now am split. I have foreseen any drop in community support. First the "Airdrop", then the "it's gone"-thing and finally the voting and huge delay. They totally underestimated the reactions of the community and its value. 181 Votes.

please write more article and spread the word that this is SCAM project, dont let this SCAMDROID scamming more people
legendary
Activity: 1960
Merit: 1128
I'm currently working on an article about ico's, and my intention was to implement the Guidelines SVD provided, now I think about if I should mention the project as a negative example -> Locked token = red flag. It makes me kinda mad cause I was a big supporter and now am split. I have foreseen any drop in community support. First the "Airdrop", then the "it's gone"-thing and finally the voting and huge delay. They totally underestimated the reactions of the community and its value. 181 Votes.

Thing is: The ICO-Manifesto-points are not even that bad. It's a bit superficial but all right as a first guideline. But the big problem is that Savedroid does not meet such standards and I believe that they may not even really understand that. They have understood that the PR-Stunt was a huge mistake and probably they've also figured that the way they've done the voting was damaging. But there is so much they obviously don't understand and think through. The other possibility is that they intentionally mislead people.


A few examples:

1. Transparency first
We put transparency first, we describe in depth the business and token model in a comprehensive prospectus or whitepaper. We inform visibly about the risks.


Besides the fact that they've shown little transparency after their ICO (the voting is a prime-example) I would also not necessarily agree that they've given an in-depth-description of the business model. Maybe they have and in that case Investors are to blame for not thinking through it all. Especially the token-model has to be seen in context of their fee-model and that needs to be seen in context of their business-model which needs to be seen out of customer-perspective. And if somebody takes a deeper look... it doesn't make any sense at all.



2. Serve the Community
We respond to community questions, concerns and take-up community feedback. We are part of the entire crypto community and build a trustworthy, reliable crypto ecosystem. We keep the community updated about the status, milestones, (insider) trading and failures without sugarcoating.


Probably they have communicated more and smarter during the ICO but since I pay attention nothing of that is true for Savedroid. Their communication still is terrible in my opinion.



5. Real Token Value
We create a token based on a crypto use case with real economic value - not just a speculative bubble. We do not hype or play with the greed of people (no “pump ‘n dump”, “FOMO”).


That is the most important aspect in my opinion (of course everything needs to be seen in context) and the most hyprocritical one.

1) Use-case, "real" economic value and the token / What I said above in numbers:
Their use case is to save money. The expected fee is: 15% avg. transaction fee for all Services! And a fraction of the collected Fee in SVD would be burned. Looks good on first sight? No. Who will save money if one action, let's say buying into a Portfolio Savedroid will offer, already takes 15% of the money somebody wants to save? And if such a guy wants to have his money back: Again 15%! Means: The portfolio has to rise about 30% just that such a customer gets the money back he wanted to save. Nobody with an IQ above a cake will do that! And even if the fee would be reduced to 3% it still would be too expensive. Usual exchanges take 0.x% per trade.

Now let's think about the possibility that they will reduce the fee: How much of the token burning will happen then? Near to nothing, because Savedroid will not be an exchange with big guys trading forth and back. Savedroid aims to target small guys who want to save a few Euro's here and there. That will not generate high volume and such guys won't pay a high fee because that contradicts their Intention and Savedroids whole business model. And if they really would want to invest and to trade: They would go to a good exchange. And just btw: There are others who do what Savedroid promises. One example: https://www.revolut.com/de/vaults?lang=en

2) Economic value:
They wanted to sell tokens for 60 M Euro. The total value (total supply * price) would be 100 M Euro! That is telling what they believe their "eco-system" should be worth, OR: It was intentionally misleading. They've "only" sold token for about 40 M Euro. But in which universe is it possible that a token for a usecase that contradicts itself with very high fees be worth more than the whole company? Or does anybody believe that Savedroid is worth about 60 - 100 Million? No way. I believe: Not even 10 Million.
 
3) Hype or no hype:
They say: "We do not hype or play with the greed of people (...)" while they have done exactly that. They've announced the top 5 exchange 4 days before their ICO ended. That was with intention. They've even used a price-simulation-chart on their website, and of course, it's a nice chart that only knows the north-direction. They've collected as much money as possible while much bigger projects give themselve a hard cap significantly below sums like that. Binance started with $15 million, NEO also started with about $15 million, Coinlion started with about $7 million. Savedroid needs more money than Ethereum to get their shit done? If they are not able to develop and deliver their goals with $10 million they will not be able to do it with $40 million.

The whole ICO was hype and their messed up PR-Stunt was hype. And the last posts of the Savedroid account: A voting on an exchange is "Big news" and an aridrop is "huge". Yep, very subtle!



7. Equality
We treat every token buyer equally. We do not unfairly privilege big ticket buyers by offering unfair discounts without compensating lock-ups. We prefer buyers that participate in the crypto community and not speculators.


Maybe they've not given big buyers better prices during the ICO. But they've contacted and encouraged pre-sale-Investors to vote for an exchange-option after the voting was officially closed. Besides the fact that they've not acted transparent during or after the voting, what makes it impossible to know if the results are not just made up, that already is a manipulation and it has nothing to do with equality.



8. Enforceable Rights
We ensure that the token buyer’s rights are enforceable. We do not set up offshore entities to avoid regulations but chose jurisdictions with advanced consumer rights protections. We provide an understandable token sale agreement and comply with the regulatory regime.


But what was their answer when many Investors demanded to be refunded after their PR-Stunt? A clear "No"! They've said that nothing has changed, while they've successfully damaged their credibility, trashed their own reputation, divided the community, delayed pretty much everything etc.




In my opinion these guys should not collect money, should not manage other people's money, should not give advice to others at all. I consider them as hypocritical, arrogant and naive and not able to properly plan what they are talking about. Even without the whole PR-Stunt-and-voting-mess this project already had many red flags before and during the ICO.






 
Pages:
Jump to: