Oh boy... If that text wasn't written by Yassir the guy was brainwashed into the selfhypnotic Savedroid dream bubble pretty effective. How subtle he uses Yassirs wording over and over again.
- all the scam happening, which threatens the sustainability of the ICO market
- need to genuinely appologize, because we gave our token buyers an emotionally very hard time durig there 24 hours of our action.
- On the other hand, the motivation behind the action was clearly positive.
- we need to develop and establish higher ICO quality standards to make this market sustainable.
- While savedroid was in the ICO, we faced a lot of scammers
- For new token buyers coming into the scene we have to build up an environment, that is acting and behaving professional and not only playing it. Savedroid is back again on their heroic way to change the world on the back of their own Investors.
And isn't it interesting that he always says "we", even when talking about times before he joined Savedroid?
Also interesting, about the voting:
"Just two thoughts about the Community Voting for the exchange. The voting result is fine for me, because it represents our Community directly. We have discussed the process within the Team and we think that this way it is the most democratic, to get a fair result out of the voting. Also, this way, we’re accepting the personal interests of every token buyer at the same time. One vote for one SVD is also fair in my opinion. Small token buyers are there to max their purchase and that’s why they want to be in the exchange ASAP. Token buyers with a bigger ticket are typically interested in a good start at the exchange and hence, a portfolio of 5 big exchanges is more appealing to them. Giving 1 SVD = 1 vote, we got our result and we will now execute this Community Voting result!" No concerns about the zero-transparent-approach?
No concerns about the fact that pre-sale-Investors were encouraged to vote
after the voting was closed?
Don't take it personal Tobias, but if you wrote that text alone you clearly fit in. ;-)
Edit: A reaction on reddit:
"Another clueless one, trying to justify the PR GAG, I am speechless. The PR Gag was something like a self-destruction.
The Voting was not transparent and manipulated, becouse you asked investors for there opinion after the Voting was over.
Locked Tokens and no Exchanges: Every one how gave you money for tokens, can do with the token what ever he like. But your company locked down the token and take the money from the investors, this is a crime my friend. (this will harm the project again). ....and so on, and so on...." https://www.reddit.com/r/savedroid_ico/comments/8ohc8f/meet_tobias_savedroids_new_community_manager/They really don't learn...