Haha see how that escalated quickly. When opening the telegram channel with over 40k member all you can see is people asking "when exchange". There is more negativity than any positivity. I have invested in 9 ICOs from January to March this year and every single one of them except Savedroid is listed on an exchange. Most if them doing very good.
Funny thing is that Savedroid admins are now giving us the fault of not getting listed so fast. "You voted for option 1, investors wanted to wait for top5". Do an open and legit survey again and I bet that the mood has shifted. My theory is still that Savedroid was rejected by the top5 exchange (imo thanks to the worst PR exit scam campaign) and now is delaying the listing on purpose to find another top5 that is why this is taking so long.
Yep, I also don't believe their story about the top5 and why it's delayed. There are several things I see as contradictions:
1) They constantly complain about the high prices to get a good listing but they also claim that they
secured a listing on a top 5 already during the ICO without having to pay for it.
2) While they said that listing would be secured back then, they say now: Due to an update of listing policies the certain exchange delays the listing. But why does the update has an effect on Savedroid if there already was an agreement? And if the update has influence on Savedroid, how can they still say it's safe that they'll meet the new requirements and get the listing (and without having to pay for it)?
3) Some days ago I've checked all Twitter accounts of the top 5 exchanges and I saw no difference. They all are listing new projects constantly.
4) The way Yassir talks about the listing also slightly shifts from "save" and "soon" to "we have no influence on that".
5) The voting was weird. While there is no proof that they've totally fabricated the result (I wouldn't even exclude that) they have admitted that they've contacted Pre-Sales Investors after the voting was closed - what seems to me as if they didn't like the result previously.
The only scenario that would make all that possible without lies would be:
They had a listing agreement with a top5 exchange already during the ICO, and while other projects have to pay Millions that exchange did not want money from Savedroid. Now the exchange says:
"We have to change our listing policies and until that is done we will not list Savedroid - but others - and while we list not Savedroid but others, it's still save that we'll list Savedroid after the changes are done".
Doesn't make much sense to me. I also believe it should be known by now if one of the big exchanges needs several weeks to update their listing-policies. Also that is hard to believe - this exchange needs weeks to update the listing-requirements? And Savedroid shouldn't be the only project that is affected by this, but if that is the case (that Savedroid but no other projects are affected) it's hard to understand why the team still claims that listing would be save and for free.
My impression is that the story shifts a little bit from week to week into vagueness. Once they come up with the name of the top 5 it will be possible to see if the given reason (the exchange updates their policies and delays the listing) was true or not. I know how I would place my bet.