Pages:
Author

Topic: [ANN][ICO] SPECTIV: VIRTUAL REALITY + DECENTRALIZED ADS - 10,000 ETH ICO! - page 16. (Read 64447 times)

newbie
Activity: 121
Merit: 0


Clarification on the relationship between the Signal Token Protocol and Spectiv VR

https://twitter.com/spectivvr/status/1032743954473803777?s=19
full member
Activity: 214
Merit: 100
It is just the market, we listed on TopBTC which is a high volume exchange but not enough people trade sig there for it to show on CMC. The most important part is the project being built, the sig protocal being rolled out and signed up content creators for specitvvr - exchanges are charging a lot less to add coins, I believe we will see that in the future esp when decentralized exchanges become much more dominate in this space


Hopefully once the official Spectiv platform is launched in the third quarter of the year it might create some demand for the token and by that time the crypto market might be in better shape.

Yes, you are right every coin price is based on the developments they do after the crowd sale. I hear in some cases the team is performing AMA calls for the community what they are doing in the back ground. So we have to wait for the third quarter.

Nope. Every coin price depends on market sentiment. 90% of traders and investors have left crypto, thinking its done. Some will come back when the market is cheap enough.

Traders and investors buy a coin because they believe they can sell at a higher price and they based there decisions on the progress of the coin development.

That's why prices fluctuate even when the development has been consistent and continuing.


Agreed. All alts are super cheap right now even reputable ones, it's just a matter of time before traders and investors decide they're cheap enough to consider filling their bags.

All the same, flagship in this process is bitcoin. While he will not show constant growth - alts will not actively buy. It seems that the restoration of the price of altas we will see no earlier than in the fourth quarter.
legendary
Activity: 1288
Merit: 1002
It is just the market, we listed on TopBTC which is a high volume exchange but not enough people trade sig there for it to show on CMC. The most important part is the project being built, the sig protocal being rolled out and signed up content creators for specitvvr - exchanges are charging a lot less to add coins, I believe we will see that in the future esp when decentralized exchanges become much more dominate in this space


Hopefully once the official Spectiv platform is launched in the third quarter of the year it might create some demand for the token and by that time the crypto market might be in better shape.

Yes, you are right every coin price is based on the developments they do after the crowd sale. I hear in some cases the team is performing AMA calls for the community what they are doing in the back ground. So we have to wait for the third quarter.

Nope. Every coin price depends on market sentiment. 90% of traders and investors have left crypto, thinking its done. Some will come back when the market is cheap enough.

Traders and investors buy a coin because they believe they can sell at a higher price and they based there decisions on the progress of the coin development.

That's why prices fluctuate even when the development has been consistent and continuing.


Agreed. All alts are super cheap right now even reputable ones, it's just a matter of time before traders and investors decide they're cheap enough to consider filling their bags.
sr. member
Activity: 924
Merit: 260
It is just the market, we listed on TopBTC which is a high volume exchange but not enough people trade sig there for it to show on CMC. The most important part is the project being built, the sig protocal being rolled out and signed up content creators for specitvvr - exchanges are charging a lot less to add coins, I believe we will see that in the future esp when decentralized exchanges become much more dominate in this space


Hopefully once the official Spectiv platform is launched in the third quarter of the year it might create some demand for the token and by that time the crypto market might be in better shape.

Yes, you are right every coin price is based on the developments they do after the crowd sale. I hear in some cases the team is performing AMA calls for the community what they are doing in the back ground. So we have to wait for the third quarter.

Nope. Every coin price depends on market sentiment. 90% of traders and investors have left crypto, thinking its done. Some will come back when the market is cheap enough.

Traders and investors buy a coin because they believe they can sell at a higher price and they based there decisions on the progress of the coin development.

That's why prices fluctuate even when the development has been consistent and continuing.
full member
Activity: 1134
Merit: 103
It is just the market, we listed on TopBTC which is a high volume exchange but not enough people trade sig there for it to show on CMC. The most important part is the project being built, the sig protocal being rolled out and signed up content creators for specitvvr - exchanges are charging a lot less to add coins, I believe we will see that in the future esp when decentralized exchanges become much more dominate in this space


Hopefully once the official Spectiv platform is launched in the third quarter of the year it might create some demand for the token and by that time the crypto market might be in better shape.

Yes, you are right every coin price is based on the developments they do after the crowd sale. I hear in some cases the team is performing AMA calls for the community what they are doing in the back ground. So we have to wait for the third quarter.
newbie
Activity: 121
Merit: 0
hero member
Activity: 1162
Merit: 752
Rollbit - Crypto Futures
It is just the market, we listed on TopBTC which is a high volume exchange but not enough people trade sig there for it to show on CMC. The most important part is the project being built, the sig protocal being rolled out and signed up content creators for specitvvr - exchanges are charging a lot less to add coins, I believe we will see that in the future esp when decentralized exchanges become much more dominate in this space


Hopefully once the official Spectiv platform is launched in the third quarter of the year it might create some demand for the token and by that time the crypto market might be in better shape.
many who have been waiting for this project can compete in the market. when the community still believes in the team, this project still has the opportunity to be even better. can't wait to see this project become fantastic later
legendary
Activity: 1288
Merit: 1002
It is just the market, we listed on TopBTC which is a high volume exchange but not enough people trade sig there for it to show on CMC. The most important part is the project being built, the sig protocal being rolled out and signed up content creators for specitvvr - exchanges are charging a lot less to add coins, I believe we will see that in the future esp when decentralized exchanges become much more dominate in this space


Hopefully once the official Spectiv platform is launched in the third quarter of the year it might create some demand for the token and by that time the crypto market might be in better shape.
newbie
Activity: 147
Merit: 0
It is just the market, we listed on TopBTC which is a high volume exchange but not enough people trade sig there for it to show on CMC. The most important part is the project being built, the sig protocal being rolled out and signed up content creators for specitvvr - exchanges are charging a lot less to add coins, I believe we will see that in the future esp when decentralized exchanges become much more dominate in this space
full member
Activity: 214
Merit: 100
Quote
A prevalent issue with many token projects is scalability, particularly as it relates to microtransactions. High gas fees make these small transactions uneconomical. This is not an issue for sales-based rewards on the Signal Marketplace, but it is an issue for view-based rewards. Our current workaround for this is transaction batching, where reward transactions are only executed when they’ve reached a minimum required “batch” count, such that the gas fees do not exceed the rewards themselves. For general intents and purposes, this works just fine. However, because it requires us to manage the batch data, it is not fully decentralized. To address this, we will be exploring some blockchain alternatives (i.e. EOS) while also keeping a close eye on scalability developments in the Ethereum world (Sharding, etc.).

Don't limit yourselves to blockchain-based consensus, there are the DAG solutions and hashgraph. Maybe one of your team members should experiment building upon these platforms.
I do think with that statement they don't really limit theirselves or the team on it. From what i understand they were seeking solution for scalability issues which is one of the advantages of other new blockchains now blockchain 3.0 and 4.0. Their path of exploring what would actually fits to spectivr is much better idea for me.

I agree with you.It is serious development they are looking for best solution
spectiv platform and his advertising token is going to stay for long
So better is to find best way instead of releasing in hurry
Just some patience until the end of that we will know more

I understand that it takes time for the best solution, but these searches can last indefinitely. Already half a year has been spent without result.
newbie
Activity: 121
Merit: 0
One of the biggest values of cryptocurrencies and Blockchain technology is that we are decentralizing all of these processess

https://twitter.com/spectivvr/status/1030252838260236291?s=19
sr. member
Activity: 924
Merit: 260
Quote
A prevalent issue with many token projects is scalability, particularly as it relates to microtransactions. High gas fees make these small transactions uneconomical. This is not an issue for sales-based rewards on the Signal Marketplace, but it is an issue for view-based rewards. Our current workaround for this is transaction batching, where reward transactions are only executed when they’ve reached a minimum required “batch” count, such that the gas fees do not exceed the rewards themselves. For general intents and purposes, this works just fine. However, because it requires us to manage the batch data, it is not fully decentralized. To address this, we will be exploring some blockchain alternatives (i.e. EOS) while also keeping a close eye on scalability developments in the Ethereum world (Sharding, etc.).

Don't limit yourselves to blockchain-based consensus, there are the DAG solutions and hashgraph. Maybe one of your team members should experiment building upon these platforms.
I do think with that statement they don't really limit theirselves or the team on it. From what i understand they were seeking solution for scalability issues which is one of the advantages of other new blockchains now blockchain 3.0 and 4.0. Their path of exploring what would actually fits to spectivr is much better idea for me.

I agree with you.It is serious development they are looking for best solution
spectiv platform and his advertising token is going to stay for long
So better is to find best way instead of releasing in hurry
Just some patience until the end of that we will know more

It's gonna be a long wait. I hope the Spectiv dev team recruits some talented blockchain developers who are in touch with the brightest minds in blockchain research - the spirit of open source and sharing.
Pab
legendary
Activity: 1862
Merit: 1012
Quote
A prevalent issue with many token projects is scalability, particularly as it relates to microtransactions. High gas fees make these small transactions uneconomical. This is not an issue for sales-based rewards on the Signal Marketplace, but it is an issue for view-based rewards. Our current workaround for this is transaction batching, where reward transactions are only executed when they’ve reached a minimum required “batch” count, such that the gas fees do not exceed the rewards themselves. For general intents and purposes, this works just fine. However, because it requires us to manage the batch data, it is not fully decentralized. To address this, we will be exploring some blockchain alternatives (i.e. EOS) while also keeping a close eye on scalability developments in the Ethereum world (Sharding, etc.).

Don't limit yourselves to blockchain-based consensus, there are the DAG solutions and hashgraph. Maybe one of your team members should experiment building upon these platforms.
I do think with that statement they don't really limit theirselves or the team on it. From what i understand they were seeking solution for scalability issues which is one of the advantages of other new blockchains now blockchain 3.0 and 4.0. Their path of exploring what would actually fits to spectivr is much better idea for me.

I agree with you.It is serious development they are looking for best solution
spectiv platform and his advertising token is going to stay for long
So better is to find best way instead of releasing in hurry
Just some patience until the end of that we will know more
hero member
Activity: 1820
Merit: 537
Quote
A prevalent issue with many token projects is scalability, particularly as it relates to microtransactions. High gas fees make these small transactions uneconomical. This is not an issue for sales-based rewards on the Signal Marketplace, but it is an issue for view-based rewards. Our current workaround for this is transaction batching, where reward transactions are only executed when they’ve reached a minimum required “batch” count, such that the gas fees do not exceed the rewards themselves. For general intents and purposes, this works just fine. However, because it requires us to manage the batch data, it is not fully decentralized. To address this, we will be exploring some blockchain alternatives (i.e. EOS) while also keeping a close eye on scalability developments in the Ethereum world (Sharding, etc.).

Don't limit yourselves to blockchain-based consensus, there are the DAG solutions and hashgraph. Maybe one of your team members should experiment building upon these platforms.
I do think with that statement they don't really limit theirselves or the team on it. From what i understand they were seeking solution for scalability issues which is one of the advantages of other new blockchains now blockchain 3.0 and 4.0. Their path of exploring what would actually fits to spectivr is much better idea for me.

Supporting such an open discussion of the project's prospects in social networks, bitcointalk, Medium, etc. - SPECTIV can not only gather the necessary information for analysis and further development, but also to return the community's favor to itself.
Yes, you're right and as long as the correct information was been delivered the projects makes more sense and its quality was being nown than to have unanswered or unclear information was given.
newbie
Activity: 121
Merit: 0
Entrepreneur mindset and how the crypto community surprises us with their engagement

https://twitter.com/spectivvr/status/1029379811469414401?s=19
full member
Activity: 378
Merit: 100
https://topbtc.com/home/Market/index/market/BTC/coin/SIG.html Don't forget to use TopBTC if you want to buy/sell sigs - we need some volume there to get it listed on CMC for us  Wink but the volume is very small  Sad


The spread is terrible there and I don't think trading on that exchange would help in any way for SIGs get listed on better exchanges.

yes I know that but I only received news on the telegram spectiv  Wink and this news update  Please take a minute to check these out here: https://medium.com/spectiv-vr/july-2018-spectiv-progress-and-updates-1690a9d0f5f7
full member
Activity: 214
Merit: 100
Quote
A prevalent issue with many token projects is scalability, particularly as it relates to microtransactions. High gas fees make these small transactions uneconomical. This is not an issue for sales-based rewards on the Signal Marketplace, but it is an issue for view-based rewards. Our current workaround for this is transaction batching, where reward transactions are only executed when they’ve reached a minimum required “batch” count, such that the gas fees do not exceed the rewards themselves. For general intents and purposes, this works just fine. However, because it requires us to manage the batch data, it is not fully decentralized. To address this, we will be exploring some blockchain alternatives (i.e. EOS) while also keeping a close eye on scalability developments in the Ethereum world (Sharding, etc.).

Don't limit yourselves to blockchain-based consensus, there are the DAG solutions and hashgraph. Maybe one of your team members should experiment building upon these platforms.
I do think with that statement they don't really limit theirselves or the team on it. From what i understand they were seeking solution for scalability issues which is one of the advantages of other new blockchains now blockchain 3.0 and 4.0. Their path of exploring what would actually fits to spectivr is much better idea for me.

Supporting such an open discussion of the project's prospects in social networks, bitcointalk, Medium, etc. - SPECTIV can not only gather the necessary information for analysis and further development, but also to return the community's favor to itself.
sr. member
Activity: 728
Merit: 253
This Scam project.
Proof: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.32049329

Dylan and his team are scammers. And SPECTIV raised only 460-480 ETH.
legendary
Activity: 1288
Merit: 1002
https://topbtc.com/home/Market/index/market/BTC/coin/SIG.html Don't forget to use TopBTC if you want to buy/sell sigs - we need some volume there to get it listed on CMC for us  Wink but the volume is very small  Sad


The spread is terrible there and I don't think trading on that exchange would help in any way for SIGs get listed on better exchanges.
full member
Activity: 378
Merit: 100
https://topbtc.com/home/Market/index/market/BTC/coin/SIG.html Don't forget to use TopBTC if you want to buy/sell sigs - we need some volume there to get it listed on CMC for us  Wink but the volume is very small  Sad
Pages:
Jump to: