No disrespect, but it was pretty much stated from the jump that EDelta tokens were no good. Even if a placehodler token is made, there will always be some work around that scammers will try to make to sell the rights to that and people will lose their shirts that way. Eth tokens weren't the problem, its the mentality of scammers and swindlers that is the problem, and as long as they can think up elaborate schemes people will get got. It just so happens it was via EDelta this time.
No disrespect but i invested in Tezo and Exscudo and they all have placeholders and i don't see the scam involved if you buy someone's acct and they sign over the email associated to that acct to you. You will not lose the Tezo and Exscudo that you bought.
However, utilizing ETH token and blaming individuals that decide to sell their token early on a decentralized exchange( which they facilitated by using ETH token) and then blaming the buyer who might not have known about any prior statement is utter bullshit. And why the fuck wasn't the token locked if that was the issue.
Also, am not sure how selling a token you paid for during ICO on a decentralized exchange ( b/c it was made available for you to sell) makes you a scammer/swindler.
I think it makes you a scammer if you sold tokens because anyone who was in the ico was told lots of times that you should not buy or sell the tokens as they won't be swapped for wan coins later on. Unfortunately people who weren't in the ico and who bought them on ED may not have known this, so yes you are right, the tokens should have been locked to avoid any confusion.
I understand your position but they have always been very open about their approach so this should usually minimize the drama tbh!
If this drama is true it should have been avoided. Letting people purchase anything worthless on EhterD. is a very bad move. If they want to rescue the project they should present a rescue plan.
Tokens should have been locked really. Some ICO's do that, it would have avoided any confusion.