Pages:
Author

Topic: [ANN][ICO]CREDITS - New Blockchain for financial industry [HARDCAP REACHED!] - page 10. (Read 37742 times)

hero member
Activity: 2926
Merit: 567
Okay. I think it is enough. I've been supporting the CREDITS project from the moment they appeared at Bitcointalk, and dispite my support I do not mind at all when critical questions are asked or doubts are raised. I would actually encourage it. A professional project can usually answer such questions and take away doubts. But the discussion should consist of content, not of personal attacks, mud throwing at each other, false linking, etc. This thread is being totally spoiled by a bunch of weazles who's only goal is exactly to spoil the thread.

I have a suggestion to cheus, the starter of this thread.

1. Open a new CREDITS ANN thread (or let the present Bitcointalk community manager do that) but make it this time self-moderated. This will enable the topic starter to remove unwanted content.
2. Put a reference to the new thread in the opening post and in a last post. And then close and lock this thread.

The weazles then can open their own spam thread for their poisoneous posts. And the proper CREDITS ANN thread can be reserved for proper announcements and interesting, decent discussions.



I hope Cheus will  do that or anyone with good rank can do that all he has to do is to copy paste the announcement page, invite all those Credits supporters to post there and post all updates about Credits, that who should do that is active in Credits community on telegram reddit and other official channel.
jr. member
Activity: 182
Merit: 8
I'm not blind to the red flags that were raised, and I sincerely appreciate the flag raisers, but I'm also not blind to the green flags, which are definately present also. To focus on one side or the other, BillionDollarMan, is a matter of perspective.

My perspective is that every person, or company, is innocent untill the contrary has been proven. And CREDITS is not a proven scam, so I think it is not fair to label them as such at this stage.

I think it is perfectly fine to raise the red flags when newcomers are visiting the thread by positing counter arguments in dialogue discussions. Then the ins and outs of the red and green flags can be discussed and the newcomer can make up his / her own mind. That is different from copy-pasting monologues. The forum was not meant for that. That goes for shillers also whose content doesn't reach beyond 'buybuybuy' monologues.

I feel you two have some grudge against CREDITS. Perhaps you were unfairly banned from Telegram or perhaps you missed out on CS due to the sudden hardcap. If that is the case then I invite you to talk about that. But at least keep it a dialogue, a discussion, both sides, instead of blind copy-pasting. 

Your solution to flag raisers was to open a self-moderated thread so the topic starter can remove any unwanted content.
As i previously said. No wonder why you have a negative Trust.


Okay. I think it is enough. I've been supporting the CREDITS project from the moment they appeared at Bitcointalk, and dispite my support I do not mind at all when critical questions are asked or doubts are raised. I would actually encourage it. A professional project can usually answer such questions and take away doubts. But the discussion should consist of content, not of personal attacks, mud throwing at each other, false linking, etc. This thread is being totally spoiled by a bunch of weazles who's only goal is exactly to spoil the thread.

I have a suggestion to cheus, the starter of this thread.

1. Open a new CREDITS ANN thread (or let the present Bitcointalk community manager do that) but make it this time self-moderated. This will enable the topic starter to remove unwanted content.
2. Put a reference to the new thread in the opening post and in a last post. And then close and lock this thread.

The weazles then can open their own spam thread for their poisoneous posts. And the proper CREDITS ANN thread can be reserved for proper announcements and interesting, decent discussions.

jr. member
Activity: 182
Merit: 8
You are preaching to deaf ears, just let the boat sink! These guys will never learn the easy way till they get burned.

Thats true too but im not trying to warn the guys that are here praising credits.
These guys are greedy investors that know already whats going on so who cares?!
But newcomers that are thinking to invest have to see all the facts and they will hopefully learn to investigate properly before investing.
There is a point that we learn only when we get burned by ourselves but at least its better they know all the facts first.


I agree, it's very important for new comers to be aware of what they are getting into. Few more bitconnect level scams and whole market falls victim to US SEC regulations.

Exactly. After all we all invested in this industry and we want a healthy environment for our investment and no scams everywhere cheating everyone.
full member
Activity: 742
Merit: 102
I'm not blind to the red flags that were raised, and I sincerely appreciate the flag raisers, but I'm also not blind to the green flags, which are definately present also. To focus on one side or the other, BillionDollarMan, is a matter of perspective.

My perspective is that every person, or company, is innocent untill the contrary has been proven. And CREDITS is not a proven scam, so I think it is not fair to label them as such at this stage.

I think it is perfectly fine to raise the red flags when newcomers are visiting the thread by positing counter arguments in dialogue discussions. Then the ins and outs of the red and green flags can be discussed and the newcomer can make up his / her own mind. That is different from copy-pasting monologues. The forum was not meant for that. That goes for shillers also whose content doesn't reach beyond 'buybuybuy' monologues.

I feel you two have some grudge against CREDITS. Perhaps you were unfairly banned from Telegram or perhaps you missed out on CS due to the sudden hardcap. If that is the case then I invite you to talk about that. But at least keep it a dialogue, a discussion, both sides, instead of blind copy-pasting.  
member
Activity: 210
Merit: 10
You are preaching to deaf ears, just let the boat sink! These guys will never learn the easy way till they get burned.

Thats true too but im not trying to warn the guys that are here praising credits.
These guys are greedy investors that know already whats going on so who cares?!
But newcomers that are thinking to invest have to see all the facts and they will hopefully learn to investigate properly before investing.
There is a point that we learn only when we get burned by ourselves but at least its better they know all the facts first.



I agree, it's very important for new comers to be aware of what they are getting into. Few more bitconnect level scams and whole market falls victim to US SEC regulations.
jr. member
Activity: 182
Merit: 8
You are preaching to deaf ears, just let the boat sink! These guys will never learn the easy way till they get burned.

Thats true too but im not trying to warn the guys that are here praising credits.
These guys are greedy investors that know already whats going on so who cares?!
But newcomers that are thinking to invest have to see all the facts and they will hopefully learn to investigate properly before investing.
There is a point that we learn only when we get burned by ourselves but at least its better they know all the facts first.

jr. member
Activity: 182
Merit: 8
[*snip*]

To be honest sebastian. I would not at all have minded the content of your post and the (seemingly one-sided) research you did. However when you post that same text over and over again it becomes spam and that does not invite visitors to engage in normal discussion. You made your point. You think CREDITS is scamming. Others think differently. What import does it have to you, or anybody, to keep copy-pasting the same thing over and over again?

To inform newcomers that are checking for credits.
For as long as you praise scammers i will be here warning newcomers. Period.
member
Activity: 210
Merit: 10
[*snip*]

To be honest sebastian. I would not at all have minded the content of your post and the (seemingly one-sided) research you did. However when you post that same text over and over again it becomes spam and that does not invite visitors to engage in normal discussion. You made your point. You think CREDITS is scamming. Others think differently. What import does it have to you, or anybody, to keep copy-pasting the same thing over and over again?

This isn't matter of perspective. Credits is a scam irrespective of shillers and bagholders crying it out loud.
sr. member
Activity: 1918
Merit: 268
Vave.com - Crypto Casino
I bought this little in my wallet, hoping the price is also better after I collect it, I see the price ethereum and bitcoin also have started up, I think need to add the trading site also to increase the volume on the Credits
hero member
Activity: 1358
Merit: 635
[*snip*]

To be honest sebastian. I would not at all have minded the content of your post and the (seemingly one-sided) research you did. However when you post that same text over and over again it becomes spam and that does not invite visitors to engage in normal discussion. You made your point. You think CREDITS is scamming. Others think differently. What import does it have to you, or anybody, to keep copy-pasting the same thing over and over again?

sebastian was coming on too strong. Give it time, sebastian, give it time and it'll make you proud, if not, we'll beat ourselves up something fierce.
newbie
Activity: 38
Merit: 0
You are preaching to deaf ears, just let the boat sink! These guys will never learn the easy way till they get burned.
full member
Activity: 742
Merit: 102
[*snip*]

To be honest sebastian. I would not at all have minded the content of your post and the (seemingly one-sided) research you did. However when you post that same text over and over again it becomes spam and that does not invite visitors to engage in normal discussion. You made your point. You think CREDITS is scamming. Others think differently. What import does it have to you, or anybody, to keep copy-pasting the same thing over and over again?
jr. member
Activity: 182
Merit: 8
Why the price of tokens CREDITS falls sharply. After all, the entire cryptocurrency market began to grow. What is the reason?

Do you call this a sharp fall?



And don't think cryptocurrencies always follow perfectly parrallel lines.

He is on your side dont worry.
He just didnt refresh the page properly i guess.
jr. member
Activity: 182
Merit: 8
Okay. I think it is enough. I've been supporting the CREDITS project from the moment they appeared at Bitcointalk, and dispite my support I do not mind at all when critical questions are asked or doubts are raised. I would actually encourage it. A professional project can usually answer such questions and take away doubts. But the discussion should consist of content, not of personal attacks, mud throwing at each other, false linking, etc. This thread is being totally spoiled by a bunch of weazles who's only goal is exactly to spoil the thread.

I have a suggestion to cheus, the starter of this thread.

1. Open a new CREDITS ANN thread (or let the present Bitcointalk community manager do that) but make it this time self-moderated. This will enable the topic starter to remove unwanted content.
2. Put a reference to the new thread in the opening post and in a last post. And then close and lock this thread.

The weazles then can open their own spam thread for their poisoneous posts. And the proper CREDITS ANN thread can be reserved for proper announcements and interesting, decent discussions.



Thats the next step of how scam's react when facts are on board.
First they banned on telegram,twitter, facebook, anyone that was asking for proofs for their claims, deleting posts on medium and reddit as they were presenting facts and exposing their code, and now you want a self-moderated threat so you can ban anyone that is warning newcomers for your scam ico.
No wonder why you have a negative trust.

full member
Activity: 742
Merit: 102
Why the price of tokens CREDITS falls sharply. After all, the entire cryptocurrency market began to grow. What is the reason?

Do you call this a sharp fall?



And don't think cryptocurrencies always follow perfectly parrallel lines.
full member
Activity: 742
Merit: 102
Okay. I think it is enough. I've been supporting the CREDITS project from the moment they appeared at Bitcointalk, and dispite my support I do not mind at all when critical questions are asked or doubts are raised. I would actually encourage it. A professional project can usually answer such questions and take away doubts. But the discussion should consist of content, not of personal attacks, mud throwing at each other, false linking, etc. This thread is being totally spoiled by a bunch of weazles who's only goal is exactly to spoil the thread.

I have a suggestion to cheus, the starter of this thread.

1. Open a new CREDITS ANN thread (or let the present Bitcointalk community manager do that) but make it this time self-moderated. This will enable the topic starter to remove unwanted content.
2. Put a reference to the new thread in the opening post and in a last post. And then close and lock this thread.

The weazles then can open their own spam thread for their poisoneous posts. And the proper CREDITS ANN thread can be reserved for proper announcements and interesting, decent discussions.

member
Activity: 280
Merit: 10
https://www.soar.earth/
Why the price of tokens CREDITS falls sharply. After all, the entire cryptocurrency market began to grow. What is the reason?
jr. member
Activity: 182
Merit: 8
2nd Global Fintech & Blockchain China Summit 2018. Best of luck to Credits
https://www.instagram.com/credits_com/

So, according to their roadmap, they already had MVP back in august 2017. Another portion of bullshit I guess, since what they had was not even a proof of concept, but rather wireframes. No wonder there are just two people listening.
- new blockchain
- new consensus

Guys, seriously. If you are waiting for a patent, that means you already lodged the application. That in turn means that you can safely disclose at least some details of your incredible innovation without a risk of being incompetitive. At lest post a link to the lodged patent application, so that everyone can at least see the proof of innovative idea.

You are confusing their thought process. To hard for them to analyze facts or to press the button of critical thinking.
sr. member
Activity: 713
Merit: 252
CREDITS at Hey! Blockchain Conference, Blockchain Conference in Hanoi, Vietnam on April 22.
https://credits.com/en/Home/New_Ins/4382

Hey, that's good they are everywhere and very visible if this is a runaway company they will not expose themselves nor will attend to any events it seems they are very serious to promote Credits as one of the go-to coins in the market, let's see.

It is positive to see them spread the word at conferences I agree, but Centra did pull off a huge scam despite being public. It's always good to be careful.
pno
newbie
Activity: 20
Merit: 0
2nd Global Fintech & Blockchain China Summit 2018. Best of luck to Credits
https://www.instagram.com/credits_com/

So, according to their roadmap, they already had MVP back in august 2017. Another portion of bullshit I guess, since what they had was not even a proof of concept, but rather wireframes. No wonder there are just two people listening.
- new blockchain
- new consensus

Guys, seriously. If you are waiting for a patent, that means you already lodged the application. That in turn means that you can safely disclose at least some details of your incredible innovation without a risk of being incompetitive. At lest post a link to the lodged patent application, so that everyone can at least see the proof of innovative idea.
Pages:
Jump to: