Topic: [ANN][INCNT] Incent Loyalty | Waves Token | Traded on Bittrex - page 105. (Read 491316 times)

It represents an invitation to come have a coffee in Sydney, Australia at the Incent Headquarters.   

Same here !! Its a joke

If the issue is code related, that means any asset on the waves platform will not be expected to be listed on any centralised exchange any time soon. The time is taking Incent to be listed on exchange is giving me concern, if it is 3BTC the team raised more than 1000BTC and should not be issue to the team to pay

Dev said: "We were on holidays for around 10 days and have picked up work again a week ago"
So.. for 10 days no one should ask anything, because it willn't get a response 

Happy holidays guys!

I still not receive my incent
How long?

The big problem is to be the asset of vawes the big exchanges don't have full code of waves to get review and make further decision to get listed this token. But I'm optimistic soon it will make the way to the exchange till than hold them tight.

so much going on here. what seem top take long for the token to get listed on exchange. if the team wants it to get listed, they could really be listing it with bittrex with 3btc.  btc value had gone up already so they should have gained a lot by now.

No: we've been as open as we can be. The above quote contains plenty of information about our approach. We have always been clear about rollout in Q1 2017.

Quite apart from this, what interests could exchanges be protecting by not listing Incent? The accusation that we are covering for them doesn't make sense.

I don't care about all the above story, what I care about it attainable goals, how many weeks do these exchanges need to verified the new platform. i think maybe these centralised exchanges are trying to protect their interest too and you guys are not telling us, since there is no need for me to help my competitor to promote his/her product/services. We need specific date and this is getting common now after collecting investors fund the developers will withdrawal to their shell and leave people wondering what is really happening with the project

Thanks for sharing 

Those not on Slack might be interested in this conversation:

blackpete [8:13 AM]
btw Rob, any water-level report regarding exchanges? Seems to have gotten a lot tougher to get listed these days. (edited)

pyneer [8:13 AM]
joined #general

blackpete [8:15 AM]
or are there any considerations to list INCNT on Waves DEX first? Make it some sort of exclusive?

rob [8:19 AM]
I can tell you that the relationship between Waves and Incent is very tight and that we shall defo be making the market for Incent with them. I had made overtures to Bittrex and, to a lesser extent, Poloniex, but ultimately this proved a mildly distasteful business.

[8:21] 
We are a Waves token. This is where I have pitched our tent and it's a decision I am very comfortable with.

blackpete [8:23 AM]
thank you for clarifying and your open words. Market making on Waves is a very good idea in my opinion. This is a marathon and not a sprint.

[8:24] 
Both Waves and Incent can profit massively of the first successfull CAT on the Waves platform.

marousi [8:25 AM]
bingo

rob [8:29 AM]
So I should be clear that we are (jointly) thinking way bigger than this. Allow me to explain...

[8:29] 
Within the next week we shall be launching this site http://icotech.me

[8:30] 
...as a side project.

[8:30] 
Incent will be baked in. Allowing us to support market price, in advance of core product launch.

[8:31] 
Sasha sees its potential to bring business to Waves and will support with marketing horsepower from the get go.

[8:32] 
My team will also swing back into action on marketing.

[8:32] 
We are in the process of negotiating our first big ICO.

[8:33] 
The result will be a Waves token that resides on both Waves and Ethereum blockchains.

[8:34] 
More generally, this will keep Incent at the cutting edge in the building of the Waves CAT community, with us in the centre of those relationships, and our stack ready to white-label to projects as they come on line...

[8:35] 
...all with Incent baked in.

marousi [8:35 AM]
very very good @rob

rob [8:36 AM]
I want to stress that none of this detracts from our core dev roadmap. Instead it complements and leverages it, to the benefit of our backers.

marousi [8:36 AM]
even better

rob [8:37 AM]
This is exactly where I wanted us to be at the start of 2017. The team are, as you can imagine, stoked, and we are ready to press hard.

blackpete [8:37 AM]
Rob, you are a free-thinker and very creative entrepreneurial mind. However, please don't get carried away and focus on incent's core product. This was your pitch and that is what your investors lined up for. Now, please tell me, how the same team that works on incent now has a side-project and that this side-project does not take away any ressources

[8:39] 
besides that, I totally support the idea behind icotech.me. Its a missing link

[8:39] 
and I have been playing around with a similiar idea myself

rob [8:39 AM]
Good question. So the core ICO Tech is built and basically deplorable on a key. What my devs now need to focus on is the core stack. The rest of us can market this while they do that.

[8:40] 
Remember, an ICO and other client that wishes to tokenise their business is no different from a merchant client where Incent is concerned. The better they do the more Incent is sold and the greater the sport for the price of Incent on the secondary market.

[8:41] 
This is a way for us to stimulate demand quicker than we had originally thought possible.

[8:42] 
And if it pays for itself we will hire against it.

[8:43] 
It is - I want to stress - completely synergous with our core mission.

[8:43] 
It simply leverages tech and expertise we have to support Incent and Waves.

blackpete [8:44 AM]
probably a good decision business-wise. You know your ressources better than anyone and I trust you in that regard. An ICO is primarily not about a promise anyway...its about investing in a team (edited)

rob [8:44 AM]
Pete, trust me, things are lining up nicely.

[8:45] 
In the meantime I'll publish a roadmap shortly. I need to bring you guys into the tent on this so you can keep us honest.

Incent Was Born!!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U7vuMmpJyhU&feature=youtu.be

Nice to see

Sure  We are still offering our ICO technology to upcoming Waves projects aside from it being active already in the Tokes ICO. We hope to be able to release news here soon.

No new partnerships as of now. We were on holidays for around 10 days and have picked up work again a week ago. Currently, our main focus is on getting the initial Incent app up and running as soon as possible. Our goal here is within Q1 2017.

so many posts about exchanges and payouts but what about news on incent developments?

@KarlKarlsson_ maybe you can share some information with us on how developments are going, any new partnerships or etc? During ICO time there were pretty much different information regarding that, now (maybe because of holidays?) haven't seen anything interesting what could support interest of Incent even on OpenLedger or P2P trading.

Btw incentCoffee tokkens, are only for visit purpose or you have any additional ideas for that? 

Exchange will add incent for their own benefit because they will get fees from trading volume.I don't think dev need to pay for listing.

why only bittrex listing campaign? shouldn't the campaign include other exchanges like Polo etc? i guess much depend on devs for Incent project to get it listed on major exchanges. prices on OpenLedger are a joke. i will never send my tokens there.

I think so, INCENT is potentially coin. Dev doesn't listed incnt into another market that is less interest (eg: nova, coingather, coinexchange, etc)
If dev want, it's very easy to do. But he chose to be patient and negotiates with Great exchangers 

I have seen many shitcoin on these exchanges.Incent is far better coin.Anyway as a devs you guys better know what is good for incent.

It's firstly not that easy anymore today since exchanges are a lot more about quality > quantity and furthermore we are not built on a clone. This means a considerable amount of developer resources are required to implement us on any exchange.

Yes, thanks. I shared it too on Twitter. Let's get this party started!