Topic: [ANN]Joincoin (J) ToR Anonymous All Algorithm mining! *1.3 WALLET UPDATE!* - page 39. (Read 118639 times)

same

Is mining supposed to be working already ?

We compiled the source but cannot get x11, x13, x15 or even nist5 working - no blocks are found.

SHA works though

post what

i think i know let me guess you compiled a block explorer

So ..

No I cannot post this... This will be considered FUD again

I'll just wait ^^

(Sorry for being unprofessional)

When will there be third party verifications ?

I understand and respectfully agree to your comment. But I will to continue to express my hatred anger (not on this thread) for suprnova because of this incident until he post a public apology to YOU and to C-CEX exchange for his statement.

Everyone please consider just enjoying Joincoin, the purpose is to bring everyone together by eliminating the need to go elsewhere for algo changes.

Pools please PM us with your info once you have one compiled, this period is a good time to get accustom to the code and allow solo miners some time until the larger block rewards come in to fruition.

For the record: I bought into the IPO and am quite happy with it so far.

Your point about 3rd party verification is a valid one, maybe that can be done for future CCex IPOs. On the other hand, I think CCex knows the risk to their reputation by doing the verification themselves, so I'm pretty sure they were careful. Either way, I think your list of accusations was over the top; this seems like a well-done IPO so far.

Awesome topic already!

lol you telling me you never invested blindly. when a dev says we are launching this boom price goes up. when XC dev said we have unique anon at 10k sat everyone laughed now where is he. many take the gamble and you even know yourself the price of 1800 was a nice price to get in. it is even now. with the right plan your looking multiples of where we are. tor is implemented so where headed in right direction. ofcourse it is great to get it verified from multiple parties but to say c-cex is not credible is mad. again c-cex has access to btc why would he ruin his exchange for Joincoin. im just proving you wrong the way i did you on LXC lol. i just see it as fud. ocminer checked the code he has not found anything bad lol.

we also careless if your butthurt but chatting crap about the coin just because your say your not buthurt but you actually are is not cool. i will fight your fud AGAIN

This isn't about me or you. This about about integrity.

So much hate, anger, greed and distrust in this "world" will lead us right to bankers again who will welcome us with high interest and slavery shackles...

What's your problem here? CCex is a small but growing exchange and I'm pretty sure they have done their best to ensure that they know the dev and that the IPO was legit and without any of the usual scams (premine, etc).

As for you calling CCex a scam exchange, that's just plan wrong. Yes, they've had their share of scam coins but so has every other exchange. Hell, Cryptsy listed DRKC 1 or 2 days after the initial scam was exposed. Bittrex has had their shares of scam coins as has every other exchange. I agree that scam coins are a problem which needs to be dealt with, but calling CCex a scam exchange is just not fair. Hell, they listed BOOST and SDC before bittrex and those are certainly legit coins which have done well on the larger exchanges.

If the IPO was sold out in 15 min rather than the planned 15 days, that just means that it was underpriced and that the IPO sum was low (which it was). So people saw an opportunity and bought. As of right now, the current market price @ CCex shows that they made a good decision which sort of debunks your point of it being a scam. Sure, it may look different 2 weeks from now, but that is the case with most coins these days, even when they're not a scam.

All of your points have already been rebutted by others, so I see no reasons to re-do this. But it seems that CCex has taken every effort to prevent a scam and launch a legitimate ICO. You should give them credit for that because that's more than a lot of other exchanges have done in the past.

Damage and reputation has already been done.

I'm glad that you finally stepped up to the podium and apologize. It doesn't matter if you do it as a hobby or if it is your business, but the people behind the keyboards are real, and so are the exchanges. I used to own a business in the past, so what you've said might have hurt their reputation. You don't know the ripple effect of what you said?

People in Cloak's thread went beserk because of a statement from one of Bittrex's employee and forced Richie to take actions, even though it was a discussion from the start.

I'm saying you shouldn't just blindly throw money at something just because c-cex said it was safe. No I don't know cryptoasian but that's besides the point since he's not the one offering ICO's. The point is he's a third party. Then again, it doesn't have to be cryptoasian, there's also coinsource. The point is there are third party verification services out there and there is no excuse for a coin not to go through them. I could care less how people see me as "butthurt". It just goes to show their lack of experience. I will leave it that. Good day.

So this is IntialDat vs. ocminer Thread now ? :-)

Again, and only for you:

I'm sorry for you that i'm a pool op who actually looks at the coin he hosts, this is not my primary job, i'm doing this just for fun - so i can leave some coins out that don't feel right. This coin ACTUALLY looks good, but has/had lots of red flags on start - i'm checking the code currently and a block explorer will also be up soon, so SOME of those will be gone soon - but YOU should stop FUDing against me dude, I have/had my points, i've stated them and we are or we can get them out of the way in a constructive way without b*shit

What is irc channel?

His lack of apology and failing to recognize what he said showed enough of his character. Completely unacceptable from a business standpoint.