Author

Topic: [ANN][KMD][dPoW] Komodo - An Open, Composable Smart Chain Platform, Secured by B - page 363. (Read 1192381 times)

hero member
Activity: 1022
Merit: 504
GoMeat - Digitalizing Meat Stores - ICO
Having read komodo features above makes me smile from ear to ear .  Roll Eyes 2 - 5 years time KMD will evolve into a crypto asset force to reckon with.
full member
Activity: 196
Merit: 100
I'm stuck trying to sent lousy 2 and a something KMD to the exchange. Mined some time for them, and now I can't sent them from Agama basilisk mode, and the native took ages and didn't show them.

Quote
Processing transaction...
Note: it may take a few minutes to complete the transaction.

Left it for like hours. Updated Agama, same problem.
full member
Activity: 476
Merit: 133
legendary
Activity: 2254
Merit: 1043
Just grabbed another 11k KMD on Bittrex to add to my mini whale stash.

KMD price will only be going one way mid to long term

sr. member
Activity: 784
Merit: 253
Set Your Ideas Free
hero member
Activity: 910
Merit: 1000
Wouldn't turn my back on waves either. Seems to be progressing nicely.

From your statement it does not pertain any information about this thread that is Komodo. Please  concentrate on KMD and just for the sake of comparison, include statements with KMD so no bias. How can a newbie all these stuff unless it is an alternate account Wink
Apologizes, thought it was relevant given the shared ancestry of kmd and waves and, I'd wager, there's more than just me on this thread who have been holding both since the respective ipos. I'm a 'newbie' because for the most part i don't post every time an opinion pops into my mind and I probably am lacking an understanding of proper etiquette. At any rate, it wasn't meant as a trolling comment by any means and enough said on the matter.

Great explanation . I just want to emphasize that komodo is a different beast and comparing apple with orange doesn't seem to be in same playing field. As though komodo is much more superior.
sr. member
Activity: 1078
Merit: 310
AKA RJF - Member since '13
Wouldn't turn my back on waves either. Seems to be progressing nicely.

From your statement it does not pertain any information about this thread that is Komodo. Please  concentrate on KMD and just for the sake of comparison, include statements with KMD so no bias. How can a newbie all these stuff unless it is an alternate account Wink
Apologizes, thought it was relevant given the shared ancestry of kmd and waves and, I'd wager, there's more than just me on this thread who have been holding both since the respective ipos. I'm a 'newbie' because for the most part i don't post every time an opinion pops into my mind and I probably am lacking an understanding of proper etiquette. At any rate, it wasn't meant as a trolling comment by any means and enough said on the matter.

No harm done, thanks for explaining your comment and, your input.

newbie
Activity: 19
Merit: 0
Wouldn't turn my back on waves either. Seems to be progressing nicely.

From your statement it does not pertain any information about this thread that is Komodo. Please  concentrate on KMD and just for the sake of comparison, include statements with KMD so no bias. How can a newbie all these stuff unless it is an alternate account Wink
Apologizes, thought it was relevant given the shared ancestry of kmd and waves and, I'd wager, there's more than just me on this thread who have been holding both since the respective ipos. I'm a 'newbie' because for the most part i don't post every time an opinion pops into my mind and I probably am lacking an understanding of proper etiquette. At any rate, it wasn't meant as a trolling comment by any means and enough said on the matter.
hero member
Activity: 910
Merit: 1000
Wouldn't turn my back on waves either. Seems to be progressing nicely.

From your statement it does not pertain any information about this thread that is Komodo. Please  concentrate on KMD and just for the sake of comparison, include statements with KMD so no bias. How can a newbie all these stuff unless it is an alternate account Wink
newbie
Activity: 19
Merit: 0
Things are progressing well.

I think a few months down the line people will be kicking themselves that they didnt horde KMD at the current price point.



Huge undertaking getting close to coming together.  Cannot wait to see what this becomes......


.....a contender for Ethereum's crown that actually works as designed perhaps?


I think this would have to be looked at seriously by many big companies, but it certainly is a possibility.  I always thought BTCD and DASH were the two that would give BTC a run if they were completed and adopted.  Never saw ETH coming, but I think that KMD is combining what DASH is doing in essence with what BTCD started with and now what ETH can do.  So, basically a complete working system here combines them all when it comes together.

Most certainly, there is a lot of potential here.  Cannot see where this would not be a major player if it all works well down the road.

Wouldn't turn my back on waves either. Seems to be progressing nicely.
legendary
Activity: 966
Merit: 1000
Things are progressing well.

I think a few months down the line people will be kicking themselves that they didnt horde KMD at the current price point.



Huge undertaking getting close to coming together.  Cannot wait to see what this becomes......


.....a contender for Ethereum's crown that actually works as designed perhaps?


I think this would have to be looked at seriously by many big companies, but it certainly is a possibility.  I always thought BTCD and DASH were the two that would give BTC a run if they were completed and adopted.  Never saw ETH coming, but I think that KMD is combining what DASH is doing in essence with what BTCD started with and now what ETH can do.  So, basically a complete working system here combines them all when it comes together.

Most certainly, there is a lot of potential here.  Cannot see where this would not be a major player if it all works well down the road.
sr. member
Activity: 1078
Merit: 310
AKA RJF - Member since '13
Things are progressing well.

I think a few months down the line people will be kicking themselves that they didnt horde KMD at the current price point.



Huge undertaking getting close to coming together.  Cannot wait to see what this becomes......


.....a contender for Ethereum's crown that actually works as designed perhaps?
legendary
Activity: 966
Merit: 1000
Things are progressing well.

I think a few months down the line people will be kicking themselves that they didnt horde KMD at the current price point.



Huge undertaking getting close to coming together.  Cannot wait to see what this becomes......
sr. member
Activity: 399
Merit: 251

-snip-


I'm trying to understand everything, but it's a but too technical for me... can you do a tl;dr for me and other n00bs? Cheers. Smiley
barterDEX is nearing full functionality. On unix and osx, nodes can post orders and fill orders. this is only command line, please dont ask "when gui?"

I estimate another week or two to identify all the edge cases and fixing them shouldnt take long. We have a very active group doing very good testing now.



Thank you for the fast reply!!
sr. member
Activity: 466
Merit: 253
Imagine a world without banks.......
I made my first Atomic Swap today on Komodo Platform's Barter DEX !!!

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
SWAP completed! 1785385111-428187355 {"requestid":1785385111,"quoteid":428187355,"txs":[],"sentflags":["alicespend", "bobpayment", "alicepayment", "bobdeposit", "myfee", "bobreclaim"],"values":[99.99989901, 0, 99.99999901, 1.00019899, 112.49998638, 0, 0.00128712, 0, 99.99999901, 0, 0],"result":"success","status":"finished","paymentspent":"1ebabfadf2d899ee8aa52d9caf3ca4ec08727ace299aad351c073b0b0dadcc8f","Apaymentspent":"0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000","depositspent":"0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000"}
second call.({"requestid":1785385111,"quoteid":428187355,"txs":[],"sentflags":["alicespend", "bobpayment", "alicepayment", "bobdeposit", "myfee", "bobreclaim"],"values":[99.99989901, 0, 99.99999901, 1.00019899, 112.49998638, 0, 0.00128712, 0, 99.99999901, 0, 0],"result":"success","status":"finished","paymentspent":"1ebabfadf2d899ee8aa52d9caf3ca4ec08727ace299aad351c073b0b0dadcc8f","Apaymentspent":"0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000","depositspent":"0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000"})
legendary
Activity: 2254
Merit: 1043
Things are progressing well.

I think a few months down the line people will be kicking themselves that they didnt horde KMD at the current price point.

full member
Activity: 476
Merit: 133

-snip-


I'm trying to understand everything, but it's a but too technical for me... can you do a tl;dr for me and other n00bs? Cheers. Smiley
barterDEX is nearing full functionality. On unix and osx, nodes can post orders and fill orders. this is only command line, please dont ask "when gui?"

I estimate another week or two to identify all the edge cases and fixing them shouldnt take long. We have a very active group doing very good testing now.

sr. member
Activity: 399
Merit: 251

-snip-


I'm trying to understand everything, but it's a but too technical for me... can you do a tl;dr for me and other n00bs? Cheers. Smiley
full member
Activity: 476
Merit: 133
barterDEX testing found connectivity issues between nodes as the main problem. This required totally revamping the low level networking and actually totally changing how the pubkey based communications are done.

I decided to go to a broadcast method, which is theoretically more bandwidth intensive, but due to the redundancy needed to ensure the time critical packets got to the destination, it was using the bandwidth anyway. And if the design is a broadcast method, it means that we can add point to point encryption for all the pubkey based comms.

So I did.

I also streamlined the broadcast mechanism and added a broadcasting service that the LP nodes do for client nodes. This allows any client to request a broadcast of an encrypted packet to the network. Now I am tracking the number of redundant packets sent to make sure we aren't flooding the network.

PULL dup.1 (30 / 139) 21.6% encrypted.0 recv.4015931715 [7b 22] vs 43 41 U.102

About 20% redundant packets, which is not bad at all. Since the atomic swap is using pubkey based messaging, this means that the atomic swaps are done in the dark. Of course there are still indirect means that can be used to determine who did a trade at a certain time, just by looking at the blockchains, so it isnt anything like zeroknowledge level privacy, but having all the trade details under encryption certainly makes it harder for others to know what is going on.

This will of course create a bit of a problem when trying to gather stats, but I have an idea on how to do that without infringing on the privacy.

As I have discussed before nodes that cant bind ports that other nodes can connect to (virtually all home isps!) is the hardest case. Of course we want to support this case as the alternative is that anybody that wants to post an order long term would need to run a vps. The new broadcast mode is designed to work much more reliably with such nodes. And in fact was able to list some JUMBLR for sale and then fill it from another node!

This means that even now, anybody can run a barterDEX client, post orders and have it filled, without requiring the LP nodes to be involved in anything but the routing of packets (which do not have any ip address information of the client). Now if a client uses canbind: then it will need to give its ip address to the nodes it trades with, but with the trade details encrypted it is only to the counterparties to a trade. Still if you do a lot of trades maybe this is not so good, and canbind:0 is the way to go, as the ip address you give to the counterparties is the ipaddress of the LPnode that created a psock for you.

 A psock is a paired socket that the LPnodes binds on two ports. These ports are then published and exactly one node can connect to each one. This also provides a mutual exclusion functionality and with the connection address under encryption it makes any wannabe interlopers job much more difficult, even if they manage to become a man in the middle. The LP node does not even get the ip address in the request or even the pubkey of who is requesting it, it just allocates a psock and then whenever there is data available on either port just sends it from one port to the other. Of course, given wireshark level data the LP node that makes the psock for you will be able to determine your IP address, but with proper precautions you can make it so that it wont matter, ie use a vps node as your client.

Anyway, I have been busy getting barterDEX production ready and it is almost passing all the required musthave test points. We still need to do the stress testing and illegal input type of tests along with disconnection during atomic swaps, so not done yet, but the finish line is now appearing visible.

I tried doing a JUMBLR/BTC atomic swap and it actually almost worked, it seems the autofee calculation is a bit wonky, but considering this was the first BTC swap I even tried, it is not a bad result

dexfee: https://blockchain.info/tx/f827cde2f79fa67118529567f023ecaf1907cd3324dedc3f45eb01ea9d275d04 0.0001 BTC

bobdeposit: 6cefc5325c6d606362d91187b9066aca8c28f15b71daab8a8131040d25faf3c4 1.12498750 JUMBLR

alicepayment: https://blockchain.info/tx/957e3bdb555e79206c91ea7d0110826867e3780866ef5795136def0443202397 0.0044996 BTC

bobpayment: e573f7aa397d4d38580c4886f3008214fb80a4616971215fd2b2a73dd0592c30 1.00000000 JUMBLR

alicespend: 9254b848a7e0644c553605394c910d90b39405a03fca8ffa68ceec61790ee4c3 1.00000000 JUMBLR (this is a bug where the txfee was not deducted)

bobspend: 01000000019723204304ef6d139557ef660878e367688210017dea916c20795e55db3b7e9500000 000db0048304502210099723f1d7912b8ce431aa28e3a6b809aa591c5afeb789e0529fc90866b0b 960802204cf5d62f140808491ceeef21d8ccddfa6f7d1ee638a1f0b6d8b5d89c9fc645850148304 502210090696d279ac68121e9b72b35b2064947a998f0ab3b24e79e27a85cc7f05f4bba02200583 d64b4a1d6563ee65f54702ef371b121fdbbf539168b3b13ca88942f40ceb0147522102725643f29 e4139071c632c6cf0ff84108070074eec46ba11376052492e13406f210383d62d25e9ef6087dc92 a4d16c40eb21272f3407feb65f772ecd59539dc329da52aeffffffff01a8dd0600000000001976a 914efdfb7a012b73ad7a2aecfa013d231dd9b6736c088ac00000000
error due to insufficient priority trying to spend 449960 sats when input is the same

bobrefund: 01cb13f6fa9e0c2f4ddcfc0ff9642c49f13e7f2b632dfc47cbcdfc1a2b8a4611 1.12488750 JUMBLR

We seem to be down to some small issues with the error recovery code. I am using the same code for error recovery as for the mainstream swap cases to minimize the amount of code needed and maximize the code path coverage.
sr. member
Activity: 1181
Merit: 259

1) It is still a little buggy, but they are working on it. I find when I have issues, it is best to restart the wallet. - Also you can check your wallet balance in the online blockchain explorer: explorer website:
http://kmd.explorer.supernet.org/address/YOUR-ADRESS-GOES-HERE
 

2) You collect 5% interest on KMD simply by holding it in your wallet. Every once in awhile send your self .001 KMD to see that interest in your balance. More info here: https://supernet.org/en/resources/articles/receive-free-coins-quaranteed-kmd-interest

3) This just means you should keep your keys backed up in a safe place like in a local password manager.

4) Not sure

Thanks for the replies. When you say send myself KMD you mean send it from an exchange or mining pool or something to my Agama wallet?

"If you want to accumulate even more KMD you need to get your interest to earn more interest. You won't receive the new coins until you have sent the coins, so the more often they are sent, the more KMD you receive."

Still a little confused.

I mean send it from your Agama wallet to your Agama wallet. Your send and receive addresses are the same. You need to get it off and keep it off the exchange to earn interest.
Jump to: